Elections: Spiders vs. Flies

[PoliticalChic]

Upon regularly reviewing the failures of Obama, to this day, I cannot reconcile the election results with the record of ineptitude of the mistake in the White House....
Now, a careful inspection of behind the scenes machinations, a spider-web of global events, suggests an explanation.


1. Obama, 65,899,660 951.1 %)....Romney, 60,932,152 (47.2 %) Election Results
Hard to believe that our nation contains almost 66 million hideously ignorant folks....






2. "SCYTL (Innovating Democracy) is the global leader in secure electronic voting and election modernization software solutions.
Scytl empowers public administrations to tackle precisely the challenges they face with the organization of elections through powerful and specialized electronic voting and electoral modernization software solutions."
Scytl Secure Electronic Voting | LinkedIn

3. 'In January 2012, Scytl acquired U.S.-based SOE Software. SOE writes “election management” programs that assist officials with everything from “Internet voting to election night reporting and online poll worker training.”.... While SOE boasts of a presence “with 900 jurisdictions as customers in 26 states,” there is no single contract that the federal government has entered into, or could, with Scytl to count the 2012 presidential election votes.....

a. Scytl does have a contract with the feds to use its technology to help overseas and military voters participate in elections. In 2009, the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act mandated that U.S. jurisdictions allow uniformed and overseas citizens to receive and track their ballots electronically. Scytl’s online ballot program was used in 14 states during the 2010 midterms.

b. The security risks of e-voting are still a legitimate concern. University of California at Berkeley computer science professor David Wagner wrote a critical report for the Pentagon about the privacy and accuracy shortcomings of Scytl’s military voting program in 2004 — which prompted the feds to cancel the initial program, according to PBS..... A group of University of Michigan students successfully hacked into the system, commandeered passwords, doctored ballots and programmed audio of the school’s fight song to play whenever an e-ballot was submitted.' Scytl: Voter fraud facts and fiction | Human Events





4. "In a major step towards global centralization of election processes, the world's dominant Internet voting company has purchased the USA's dominant election results reporting company... in over 525 US jurisdictions you are actually redirected to a private corporate site controlled by SOE software, which operates under the name ClarityElections.com.... redirects results reporting to a centralized privately held server which is not just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global.... With SCYTL internet voting, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of custody. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, chain of custody, or the count."
FOREIGN COMPANY BUYS U.S. ELECTION RESULTS REPORTING FIRM





5. "Also interesting to note, one of the organizations on “Scytl Partners” tab is Oracle, a major supporter to all-things-Democrat. And another Scytl Partner is a spooky “global governance” organization called Gov2u.org. "
WHAT is Scytl & WHY Should You Be VERY, VERY Concerned? - Patriot UpdatePatriot Update

a. "Scytl acquires Gov2U´s software division expanding its eDemocracy solutions portfolio."
Scytl acquires Gov2U´s software division expanding its eDemocracy solutions portfolio





6. "SCYTL, an internationally headquartered company that recently purchased the leading U.S. electronic voting firm, has just announced the acquisition of the software division of a non-profit election organization tied to George Soros’ Open Society Institute.... Gov4U is currently partnered with Soros’ Open Society to support and develop a group called theDeclaration on Parliamentary Openness.... Gov4U, meanwhile, has eight partners of its own listed on its website, including the Soros-funded and partnered National Democratic Institute, or NDI..... Aside from receiving financial support for Soros, the NDI has co-hosted scores of events along with Soros’ Open Society. The two groups work closely together..... The NDI previously stated it was founded to draw on the traditions of the U.S. Democratic Party..... NDI is also listed as the only U.S. associated organization of Socialists International, the world’s largest socialist umbrella group."
Foreign vote-count firm expands U.S. reach through Soros. Buying software division of group linked to billionaire activist « Klein Online




On the bright side, it would make me feel better about the intelligence of the electorate......

On the darkside....there is no bright side.

 

[jwoodie]

The same mentality that justified burning heretics in the Middle Ages pervades modern "liberalism." When one is combating evil (i.e., conservatives), any means (e.g., voting fraud) is justified.

 

[g5000]

This needs to be placed in the Conspiracy Theory whackjob forum.

No one has ever provided a shred of evidence of the army of fraudsters it would take to swing a national election. This is the identical delusion under which the Left suffered when Bush won. "We wuz robbed! It HAD to be fixed!"

You people are the definition of sore losers.

An army of fraudsters rigged the voting machines and not one of them ever got caught or broke their silence? Really? You have got to be the dumbest pack of fools ever to walk the earth.

 

[g5000]

Electronic voting machines are overseen and operated by septua- and octogenarians who don't even know how to program their DVD players. They receive little to no training on modern electoral technology.

Errors are not due to some vast web of conspirators sneaking about in the night rigging voting machines across the nation. It is due to simple incompetence. Operator error.

And, gee, color me surprised entire neighborhoods of black people voted for the black guy! What a shocker. How come they aren't voting for the party which so clearly hates them? It's a real mystery. Those damned food stamp grabbing, Obamaphone demanding, welfare cheating, no Voter ID negroes should love us! What is WRONG with them?


As for the double number of ballots in Florida, each page of a multipage ballot was counted as one ballot cast. Operator error strikes again! This has been known for some time, and yet the CT whackjobs cover their eyes and ears to avoid this fact.

Better luck next time. You idiots crack me up. You are still butt sore over how badly you deluded yourselves about the election. All that premature crowing! How could we have been so wrong? It must have been a conspiracy! It just HAD to be!

 

[jwoodie]

..and yet you oppose any verification of voter identity or eligibility...

 

[g5000]

..and yet you oppose any verification of voter identity or eligibility...

No one has ever proven Voter ID would do a better job of preventing in person voter fraud than the current layers of government bureacracy. No one has ever proven a need for Voter ID. Voter ID is a solution looking for a problem.

Dead people voting? That is fixed by proper management of the voter registration rolls.

If the govermnment is doing a shitty job with the current bureaucratic methods, what makes you think MORE bureaucracy is a good thing?

It is funny how the alleged "right wingers" love more government if it will keep the darkies from voting.

How come not one bloviating "right winger" whined about military veterans being prevented from voting for not having Voter ID?

Papers! Papers please!

 

[BreezeWood]

... a thumb print is suffice to confirm "verification of voter identity" when necessary, "when voting".


* maybe she is confused with Venezuela ?

 

[g5000]

So you jump through the hoops to register to vote. During this process, you prove your residency and citizenship and eligibility to vote. This is all done ahead of time.

Then come Election Day, you go in to vote. But lo! Someone else has voted in your name because they did not have to produce an ID.

How often have any of you heard of this happening? Almost never. Precisely because it would be caught, and because it would take thousands and thousands and thousands of people to do this kind of fraud to swing an election.

So Voter ID is not needed to "solve" this nearly non-existent problem.

I would also like it noted that no opponent of Voter ID is saying fraud does not exist. It does. but Voter ID would have no impact on the kind of fraud that does occur.

Every once in a while, some dumbshit posts a story about someone who voted twice using absentee ballots. As if this was PROOF we needed Voter ID. It never occurs to them that Voter ID would not prevent that kind of fraud. What, we going to show our ID to the mailman? And how is one extra vote responsible for Obama's election? People who commit voter fraud are stupid.


A little critical thinking goes a long way.

 

[jwoodie]

..and yet you oppose any verification of voter identity or eligibility...

No one has ever proven Voter ID would do a better job of preventing in person voter fraud than the current layers of government bureacracy. No one has ever proven a need for Voter ID. Voter ID is a solution looking for a problem.

Dead people voting? That is fixed by proper management of the voter registration rolls.

If the govermnment is doing a shitty job with the current bureaucratic methods, what makes you think MORE bureaucracy is a good thing?

It is funny how the alleged "right wingers" love more government if it will keep the darkies from voting.

Yeah, those Canadians are a bunch of racists...

 

[g5000]

..and yet you oppose any verification of voter identity or eligibility...

No one has ever proven Voter ID would do a better job of preventing in person voter fraud than the current layers of government bureacracy. No one has ever proven a need for Voter ID. Voter ID is a solution looking for a problem.

Dead people voting? That is fixed by proper management of the voter registration rolls.

If the govermnment is doing a shitty job with the current bureaucratic methods, what makes you think MORE bureaucracy is a good thing?

It is funny how the alleged "right wingers" love more government if it will keep the darkies from voting.

Yeah, those Canadians are a bunch of racists...

This is about Canada, suddenly?

And let me get this straight. A "right winger" is arguing we should be more like big government Canada?

 

[PoliticalChic]

..and yet you oppose any verification of voter identity or eligibility...

No one has ever proven Voter ID would do a better job of preventing in person voter fraud than the current layers of government bureacracy. No one has ever proven a need for Voter ID. Voter ID is a solution looking for a problem.

Dead people voting? That is fixed by proper management of the voter registration rolls.

If the govermnment is doing a shitty job with the current bureaucratic methods, what makes you think MORE bureaucracy is a good thing?

It is funny how the alleged "right wingers" love more government if it will keep the darkies from voting.

How come not one bloviating "right winger" whined about military veterans being prevented from voting for not having Voter ID?

Papers! Papers please!

Hard to believe how lucky you are!

Here we are in what most agree are difficult times, times of high unemployment....

....and, while many have to settle for being jerks part time...

....you manage to hold a full time position in that endeavor.

Lucky you.

 

[g5000]

..and yet you oppose any verification of voter identity or eligibility...

No one has ever proven Voter ID would do a better job of preventing in person voter fraud than the current layers of government bureacracy. No one has ever proven a need for Voter ID. Voter ID is a solution looking for a problem.

Dead people voting? That is fixed by proper management of the voter registration rolls.

If the govermnment is doing a shitty job with the current bureaucratic methods, what makes you think MORE bureaucracy is a good thing?

It is funny how the alleged "right wingers" love more government if it will keep the darkies from voting.

How come not one bloviating "right winger" whined about military veterans being prevented from voting for not having Voter ID?

Papers! Papers please!

Hard to believe how lucky you are!

Here we are in what most agree are difficult times, times of high unemployment....

....and, while many have to settle for being jerks part time...

....you manage to hold a full time position in that endeavor.

Lucky you.

I am sorry the truth comes across as offensive to you. That's sad.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No one has ever proven Voter ID would do a better job of preventing in person voter fraud than the current layers of government bureacracy. No one has ever proven a need for Voter ID. Voter ID is a solution looking for a problem.

Dead people voting? That is fixed by proper management of the voter registration rolls.

If the govermnment is doing a shitty job with the current bureaucratic methods, what makes you think MORE bureaucracy is a good thing?

It is funny how the alleged "right wingers" love more government if it will keep the darkies from voting.

How come not one bloviating "right winger" whined about military veterans being prevented from voting for not having Voter ID?

Papers! Papers please!

Hard to believe how lucky you are!

Here we are in what most agree are difficult times, times of high unemployment....

....and, while many have to settle for being jerks part time...

....you manage to hold a full time position in that endeavor.

Lucky you.

I am sorry the truth comes across as offensive to you. That's sad.

Well, then...perhaps we can examine what you mistakenly refer to as "the current layers of government bureacracy (sic)."


As is usual with your posts, they are based on imagination and ignorance.
Enforcement via "the current layers of government bureacracy (sic)" does not exist.


If reading ever becomes an option for you, I recommend that you pick up a copy of
"Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department"
by J. Christian Adams

He states:
I testified under oath that pervasive and open hostility exists within the Justice Department towards race-neutral enforcement of voting rights laws….the Justice Department’s unwillingness to enforce voting laws equally and in a racially fair way.

1. It is within the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division that the far-left racialist mindset most afflicts American political life. Christian Adams offers the insight of his years in the Voting Section, which already employed a number of leftist zealots, quickly descended during the Obama administration into outright racial demagoguery.

2. The Voting Section has enormous power over the systems of government adopted by states, counties and cities. Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act requires the federal government to approve every law affecting voting in nine states and parts of seven others. Even statewide laws that affect those other seven states are subject to approval or rejection by the federal government. The Constitution gives the states the power to run their own elections, Section 5 is at the very limits of legality.

a. Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 requires a covered jurisdiction to obtain either judicial or administrative preclearance before enforcing any new "voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or standard, practice, or procedure with respect to voting."


3. Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act gives the Civil Rights Division the right to sue a state or any sovereign body that has power over voting.

4. The Voting Section also is charged with enforcing the Ntional Voter Registration Act of 1993, the “Motor Voter” Act, and the “Help America Vote Act “ (replace punchcard and lever-based voting systems), which mandates the purging of voter lists of dead, duplicate and ineligible voters.

a. Under Democrat Attorney-General Eric Holder, the DOJ has undertaken absolutely no enforcement activity to remove dead and ineligible voters.

b. But, Holder has shown a keen interest in Section 7 of Motor Voter, which requires states to turn welfare agencies into voter registration offices and requires state officials to urge welfare recipients to register.




Based on this witness testimony alone, there is no expectation of honest elections.

Therefore, credence should be given to the OP.....

....except, of course, by inveterate, and confirmed, jerks.
Raise your paw.

 

[g5000]

The OP surmises exactly the same thing the libbies claimed when Bush won. To wit, a vast army of conspirators nationwide, rigging voting machines.

There was no evidence of such then, just as there is no evidence of such now.

This is the truth which dimwits find so painful.


If you want to divert to the entirely different matter of the Voting Rights Act, I am more than willing to discuss those parts I would like to see expire.

If you would like to address the proper way to purge voter registration rolls of the dead and felons, I am more than happy to talk about that. My reference to the disenfranchised vets was directed at this very thing. Florida completely botched their purging of voters, disenfranchising eligible voters, including vets. And yet not one bloviating Voter ID proponent or flag pin wearing pundit complained. Not a whisper. Another painful truth is that it was a Republican who led the charge to stop the purging of voter registration rolls in Florida. And he did so because Florida was fucking it up.

If you are going to do something, do it right. Don't be an idiot and add yet another layer of government between us and our constitutional rights. You whine like your tits are in a wringer when that happens to your second amendment rights. Be consistent, for chrissakes. You are all about registration and verification of ID when it comes to voting but not to purchasing guns? Hypocrites!

 

[PoliticalChic]

The OP surmises exactly the same thing the libbies claimed when Bush won. To wit, a vast army of conspirators nationwide, rigging voting machines.

There was no evidence of such then, just as there is no evidence of such now.

This is the truth which dimwits find so painful.


If you want to divert to the entirely different matter of the Voting Rights Act, I am more than willing to discuss those parts I would like to see expire.

If you would like to address the proper way to purge voter registration rolls of the dead and felons, I am more than happy to talk about that. My reference to the disenfranchised vets was directed at this very thing. Florida completely botched their purging of voters, disenfranchising eligible voters, including vets. And yet not one bloviating Voter ID proponent or flag pin wearing pundit complained. Not a whisper. Another painful truth is that it was a Republican who led the charge to stop the purging of voter registration rolls in Florida. And he did so because Florida was fucking it up.

If you are going to do something, do it right. Don't be an idiot and add yet another layer of government between us and our constitutional rights. You whine like your tits are in a wringer when that happens to your second amendment rights. Be consistent, for chrissakes. You are all about registration and verification of ID when it comes to voting but not to purchasing guns? Hypocrites!

You miss the point...as is your usual modus operani...

Imagine if the highest law enforcement office in the nation was corrupt....

Oh!....wait!

It is.


It seems hardly a leap of any magnitude to imagine the power and wealth of the socialist movement, represented prominently by George Soros, subverting the mechanism of electronic voting.


But it is obvious that your limitations in the areas of logic and of experience would prevent you from connecting those dots.


So, continue to respond with your default position, "is not, is not," and be satisfied with your one and only gift, that is being able to talk to plants on their own level.