Where_r_my_Keys
Gold Member
- Jan 19, 2014
- 15,272
- 1,849
- 280
- Banned
- #401
Lost yours? You're the one who started in with the define this and define that business.
Yes... and I'm the one that defined my terms, per your request, despite such being self explanatory...which you're now pretending ... didn't happen.
It also can't be avoided, except to note, that your coven-comrade has yet to define its terms... and for what are obvious reasons.
Reader, understand that what Gilligan is trying desperately NOT to say, is that it needs YOU to believe, that 'terms' can mean anything the person using them NEEDS THEM TO MEAN!
Gilligan felt that the power in my challenge, was limited to the challenge itself... and this is because Gilligan lacks the means to reason objectively, thus has no means to understand that the power of the challenge was IN THE INABILITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM THE CHALLENGED WAS LEVELED... to sustain their argument, without the implication, intrinsic to the illicit use of the word "Racist"; meaning that IF they defined the term within the scope of its etymological origins, then their position is rendered absurd and IF they define it as they NEED to define it, then their position is rendered: ABSURD.
LOL!
Poor Gilligan... its catchin' it from every direction this mornin'.