During GOP Debate, when RP asked about sick young man audience yells "Let him DIE!".

[bigrebnc1775]

During the Republican Debate, Ron Paul was asked about a hypothetical young man without insurance who gets sick. Ron Paul said you have to live by your choices.

When the moderator asked, "So we should let him die?" and then the audience started wildly cheering, "Yea, let him die!".

And how many of those people in the audience were old and fat? Well, from what they were showing, most of them. How many have Medicare and Social Security? And they were cheering, "Let him die?" because he had no insurance?

I thought it was bad enough when they cheered when Rick Santorum talked about ending "Medicare".

These people are insane. What other explanation could there be?

This was one of the most shocking things I have ever seen in American politics.

The Republican Party is truely evil.

Has the person who said it been identified?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

See why they love FDR and his Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments

Frank, I'm curious. Why do you never mention that those experiments were started under Hoover?

No answer. How surprising.

Hoover didn't lock American citizens up in intermcamps FDR did.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Audience's reaction was shameful.

more accurately the 3 people shouting outs action's were shameful. The rest of the audience wasn't cheering on the comments at all.

Its almost like they were either non-representative outliers or plants.

 

[dblack]

Audience's reaction was shameful.

more accurately the 3 people shouting outs action's were shameful. The rest of the audience wasn't cheering on the comments at all.

Its almost like they were either non-representative outliers or plants.

More likely just enthusiastic college students without much sense.

 

[rightwinger]

Frank, I'm curious. Why do you never mention that those experiments were started under Hoover?

No answer. How surprising.

Hoover didn't lock American citizens up in intermcamps FDR did.

That is true

How many Republicans at that time protested this gross violation of the rights of US citizens? Where were the Republican cries of outrage?

There were none, because republicans were urging FDR to lock them up for the good of the country

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Audience's reaction was shameful.

more accurately the 3 people shouting outs action's were shameful. The rest of the audience wasn't cheering on the comments at all.

Its almost like they were either non-representative outliers or plants.

More likely just enthusiastic college students without much sense.

Could be that too....could be a couple of teapartiers whom, IMO, were being idiots....we really don't know.

Either way to disparage the whole crowd based on the actions of less than 1% of the participants in the crowd is dishonest.

 

[Conservative]

That's the point. What's being questioned is a law against killing unborn sea turtles but no law against killing unborn humans.

So the egg of an unborn animal out weighs the egg of an unborn human? Liberal minds are sick

Sea turtles are a higher form of life.

Of course they are... and they are also how 'Captian' Jack Sparrow got off the island his mutinous crew left him on...

 

[rightwinger]

Audience's reaction was shameful.

more accurately the 3 people shouting outs action's were shameful. The rest of the audience wasn't cheering on the comments at all.

Its almost like they were either non-representative outliers or plants.

Why do we always get this same excuse every time Tea Baggers misbehave? What ever happened to personal accountability? That used to be a cornerstone of the republican party

 

[CrusaderFrank]

See why they love FDR and his Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments

Frank, I'm curious. Why do you never mention that those experiments were started under Hoover?

They weren't. They were FDR's experiments

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No answer. How surprising.

Hoover didn't lock American citizens up in intermcamps FDR did.

That is true

How many Republicans at that time protested this gross violation of the rights of US citizens? Where were the Republican cries of outrage?

There were none, because republicans were urging FDR to lock them up for the good of the country

How many democrats protested this?

 

[rightwinger]

Hoover didn't lock American citizens up in intermcamps FDR did.

That is true

How many Republicans at that time protested this gross violation of the rights of US citizens? Where were the Republican cries of outrage?

There were none, because republicans were urging FDR to lock them up for the good of the country

How many democrats protested this?

Almost nobody protested. The internment of Japanese citizens was for the most part accepted as necessary for national security and was supported by both parties

There were not many people willing to stand up for the rights of Japanese Americans at that time

Most importantly, our courts who have an obligation to stand up for the rights of the individual.....did nothing

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

more accurately the 3 people shouting outs action's were shameful. The rest of the audience wasn't cheering on the comments at all.

Its almost like they were either non-representative outliers or plants.

More likely just enthusiastic college students without much sense.

Could be that too....could be a couple of teapartiers whom, IMO, were being idiots....we really don't know.

Either way to disparage the whole crowd based on the actions of less than 1% of the participants in the crowd is dishonest.

Audience's reaction was shameful.

more accurately the 3 people shouting outs action's were shameful. The rest of the audience wasn't cheering on the comments at all.

Its almost like they were either non-representative outliers or plants.

Why do we always get this same excuse every time Tea Baggers misbehave? What ever happened to personal accountability? That used to be a cornerstone of the republican party

I think you missed a post by me.

Like i said even if it was 3 teapartiers who were doing the yelling it was 3 morons and less than 1% of the crowd.

To portray the entire crowd as being represented by the under 1% that yelled out stupid comments is dishonest.

 

[rightwinger]

More likely just enthusiastic college students without much sense.

Could be that too....could be a couple of teapartiers whom, IMO, were being idiots....we really don't know.

Either way to disparage the whole crowd based on the actions of less than 1% of the participants in the crowd is dishonest.

more accurately the 3 people shouting outs action's were shameful. The rest of the audience wasn't cheering on the comments at all.

Its almost like they were either non-representative outliers or plants.

Why do we always get this same excuse every time Tea Baggers misbehave? What ever happened to personal accountability? That used to be a cornerstone of the republican party

I think you missed a post by me.

Like i said even if it was 3 teapartiers who were doing the yelling it was 3 morons and less than 1% of the crowd.

To portray the entire crowd as being represented by the under 1% that yelled out stupid comments is dishonest.

Let's not give the Tea Party crowd too much credit. While only a couple actually said "let him die" the crowd as a whole applauded when Paul was initially asked about the hypothetical case and replied .....He made his choice let him face the consequences

What are the consequences to someone in a coma who does not receive medical care?

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Could be that too....could be a couple of teapartiers whom, IMO, were being idiots....we really don't know.

Either way to disparage the whole crowd based on the actions of less than 1% of the participants in the crowd is dishonest.

Why do we always get this same excuse every time Tea Baggers misbehave? What ever happened to personal accountability? That used to be a cornerstone of the republican party

I think you missed a post by me.

Like i said even if it was 3 teapartiers who were doing the yelling it was 3 morons and less than 1% of the crowd.

To portray the entire crowd as being represented by the under 1% that yelled out stupid comments is dishonest.

Let's not give the Tea Party crowd too much credit. While only a couple actually said "let him die" the crowd as a whole applauded when Paul was initially asked about the hypothetical case and replied .....He made his choice let him face the consequences

What are the consequences to someone in a coma who does not receive medical care?

Yes, if you choose not to get health care then you will end up having to go into debt to pay for your medical expenses.

What is wrong with being personally responsible for taking a gamble with your own personal health by choosing not to buy health care?

Then again I live in a state where, before romneycare, the state paid for things such as the situation you described. Now we all pay more for insurance, wait longer for appointments, and have trouble seeing specialists but we all have coverage (or pay a fine to the gov)

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

During the Republican Debate, Ron Paul was asked about a hypothetical young man without insurance who gets sick. Ron Paul said you have to live by your choices.

When the moderator asked, "So we should let him die?" and then the audience started wildly cheering, "Yea, let him die!".

And how many of those people in the audience were old and fat? Well, from what they were showing, most of them. How many have Medicare and Social Security? And they were cheering, "Let him die?" because he had no insurance?

I thought it was bad enough when they cheered when Rick Santorum talked about ending "Medicare".

These people are insane. What other explanation could there be?

The Tea Party reminds me of Vlad III the Impaler. He once invited all of his sick and poor subjects to his place for dinner one night. He sat them all at a large banquet table, lit the room on fire, and closed and locked the doors. That was his solution to the problem of the sick and poor. Its very similar to the Tea Party's.

I gotta wonder though, who did the rich get to plow their fields after he killed all the poor?

 

[signelect]

It is going to be a fun election season or a sad one depending on your mentality. This board will lead the way in both.

 

[rightwinger]

During the Republican Debate, Ron Paul was asked about a hypothetical young man without insurance who gets sick. Ron Paul said you have to live by your choices.

When the moderator asked, "So we should let him die?" and then the audience started wildly cheering, "Yea, let him die!".

And how many of those people in the audience were old and fat? Well, from what they were showing, most of them. How many have Medicare and Social Security? And they were cheering, "Let him die?" because he had no insurance?

I thought it was bad enough when they cheered when Rick Santorum talked about ending "Medicare".

These people are insane. What other explanation could there be?

The Tea Party reminds me of Vlad III the Impaler. He once invited all of his sick and poor subjects to his place for dinner one night. He sat them all at a large banquet table, lit the room on fire, and closed and locked the doors. That was his solution to the problem of the sick and poor. Its very similar to the Tea Party's.

I gotta wonder though, who did the rich get to plow their fields after he killed all the poor?

Any physical resemblance of Ron Paul and Vlad the impaler is strictly a coincidence

 

[Full-Auto]

During the Republican Debate, Ron Paul was asked about a hypothetical young man without insurance who gets sick. Ron Paul said you have to live by your choices.

When the moderator asked, "So we should let him die?" and then the audience started wildly cheering, "Yea, let him die!".

And how many of those people in the audience were old and fat? Well, from what they were showing, most of them. How many have Medicare and Social Security? And they were cheering, "Let him die?" because he had no insurance?

I thought it was bad enough when they cheered when Rick Santorum talked about ending "Medicare".

These people are insane. What other explanation could there be?

The Tea Party reminds me of Vlad III the Impaler. He once invited all of his sick and poor subjects to his place for dinner one night. He sat them all at a large banquet table, lit the room on fire, and closed and locked the doors. That was his solution to the problem of the sick and poor. Its very similar to the Tea Party's.

I gotta wonder though, who did the rich get to plow their fields after he killed all the poor?

Your post puts you in the room next to this guy.

 

[OODA_Loop]

For political gain we must make sure to include and confuse those who choose to go to naked with those who can afford no clothes.

 

[Ravi]

See why they love FDR and his Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments

Frank, I'm curious. Why do you never mention that those experiments were started under Hoover?

They weren't. They were FDR's experiments

Nope. They were started in 1932 when Hoover was president.