Durham Comes Up Empty

Status
Not open for further replies.
The trial was about showing the evidence to the public. It was in DC and no one ever expected the sleaze to be convicted of something he CLEARLY did. He is documented to have lied and a jury nullified his punishment. You cheer for that but you'd squeal like a stuck pig if it happened for a member of Trump's circle on 1/6 issues. Hypocrite...
 
The trial was about showing the evidence to the public. It was in DC and no one ever expected the sleaze to be convicted of something he CLEARLY did. He is documented to have lied and a jury nullified his punishment. You cheer for that but you'd squeal like a stuck pig if it happened for a member of Trump's circle on 1/6 issues. Hypocrite...
So for all of Durham's nonsense...all he came up with was what you tards used to call a "process crime" and even there...NOT GUILTY
 
Last edited:
He exposed the crooked Clinton campaign and the crooked FBI....
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz

Years of bogus "investigations" and ....nothing

Durham should be investigated...for wasting taxpayer money.
From your link:

He has brought three cases so far though the one against Sussmann is the only to have reached trial. A former FBI lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith, was given probation after pleading guilty in 2020 to altering an email related to the surveillance of an ex-Trump campaign aide, and a Russian analyst who contributed to a dossier of Democratic-funded research into ties between Russia and Trump awaits trial on charges of lying to the FBI about his sources of information.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top