Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #41
Also, gays can marry and adopt in every state in the nation. You don't like that fact, but tough shit.
Which is exactly why homo marriage should not be a legal construct.
Family structure depletion has been at the core of social demise -- especially among blacks, post 1960's -- and homo marriage adoption only contributes to that problem.
Wow, someone edited my post for me. That's a first at USMB.
What I said was that gay marriage upon its face is a banishment of any children implicity involved from either a mother or father for life. Which is a violation if the Infancy Doctrine and contracts with children re: necessities.
So, any court that finds in favor of Dumont lesbians has to have in its judicially-legislated Opinion, language that says "fathers and mothers are no longer psychological necessities for boys and girls". Which flies in the face of a mountain of evidence to the contrary.
So, will 300 million Americans sit back and watch a tiny panel of unelected lawyers in Michigan or eventually 5 unelected lawyers in DC legislate fathers and mothers into irrelevance? I'm 85% sure they won't. Follow this link to the poll here at USMB that sampled evenly across the entire political spectrum in favor of fathers and mothers being important: The Gay Marriage vs Children's Rights Impending Legal-Collision Looms Closer
Specifically: Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?
Last edited: