Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Did they demean women in WWII? Much drag performance culture in the “gay world” actually “worships” women. For example, Judy Garland became a cult heroine to many gays, at least when I was young.
Drag also includes women impersonating men, sometimes as an act of “cool,” other times as a show of rebellion and independence, sometimes satirically. Is all that to be banned too? Who decides? Would you ban all the many comical movies that playfully highlighted drag performances?
I get that some of it may be “in very poor taste.” I don’t like that stuff either! But straight films and plays often show heterosexuals acting as killers, perverts, rapists, sadists, etc. Ban all of this too?
I found this unusual article on the history of GI DRAG SHOWS entertaining the troops during WWII … which some MAGA types — and Liberals too — should find interesting.
The author is gay, an historian, an elementary school teacher, and a prominent educator involved in Louisiana state controversies over curriculum, “CRT,” etc.
Read it and see how our nation managed to come together when sorely tested in the past. It shows how our military managed to use and even encourage “drag shows” to entertain culturally diverse — and still racially segregated — soldiers.
It was a time when gays (in an out of the military) were almost entirely still “in the closet.” At that time our nation as a whole was more culturally “conservative” yet was led by a far more united and “progressive” political leadership than in our more hysterically divided present.
GIs as Dolls: Uncovering the Hidden Histories of Drag Entertainment During Wartime | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
We do not promote killers, perverts, rapist and sadists as role models to our children.
Yes there are women who portray men. So? Men have not had to endure the battle to be treated as equals as women have. Did this even need explained?
We all see your motive. It may have worked short term, but as you can see here, the opposition is growing.
Of course not! I never accused you — or anyone on this thread — of “promoting killers, perverts, rapists and sadists as role models” … and I hope you extend to me the same simple courtesy.“We do not promote killers, perverts, rapist and sadists as role models to our children…” — HeyNorm
Of course not! I never accused you — or anyone on this thread — of “promoting killers, perverts, rapists and sadists as role models” … and I hope you extend to me the same simple courtesy.
But I think we can both accept that Hollywood and our media culture do indeed graphically portray “perversions” like sadistic murder and rape every day — though generally I hope not exactly as “role model” behavior! “Perversion” can be defined in many ways, and I hope you are not arguing that gays and lesbians are by very their existence … “perverts.”
“Stories” and portrayals of psychopathic criminals (straight or gay) seem very popular and are presented in many contexts — even sometimes in portraying otherwise “heroic” military conflict. When I was young arguments were made to restrict ALL violent or clearly sexual film portrayals because they supposedly encouraged bad behavior. Later, the worst “evil geniuses” were portrayed as mere characatures like those in James Bond movies.
In communist & authoritarian countries the government forbids almost all of this … and of course they are “the good guys” and the cops & gov’t officials always win against … criminals and “perverts.”
I don’t like “weird violence” or watching portrayals of — imo — true “perversion” of human nature — but I recognize human nature is not exactly simple or perfect, and my tastes and opinions are hardly universal. In any case, violence and sexual “perversions” like rape are very much built into primitive human nature.
We live in a “capitalist democracy,” and unfortunately these days violence and perversion often “sell.” We forbid or regulate this especially when it affects (or shows) children. I understand and agree this is necessary. I certainly wouldn’t take my grand-daughter or nieces and nephews to a drag show!
I am not, however, for the state “banning” drag shows entirely or re-imposing the old film and media “morality codes.” A “rating system” for “adult programming” that leaves it up to the consumer seems to me a much better (if imperfect) approach.
I note you and others haven’t expressed very clearly how or to what extent you think it appropriate to “ban” drag shows. The WWII military drag performances were actually government sponsored — for an exceptional cause at an exceptional time.
Advocating that all privately sponsored drag shows “be banned” today would in my view be utterly excessive, and even counterproductive. This is not at all a universally accepted “perversion.” For some it is just a way to let off steam and enjoy themselves.
The Pulse Nightclub in Orlando was the scene of a terrible massacre in 2016 — the second worst in U.S. history perpetrated by a single madman. It was certainly not my type of scene, but it was according to all accounts a fun place and central social center for the local “Gay” community, featuring classy drag impersonators, etc. We need to be careful not to encourage “vigilante justice” or government oppression … against our gay fellow citizens.
Pulse (nightclub) - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
The Pulse Nightclub in Orlando was the scene of a terrible massacre in 2016 — the second worst mass shooting in U.S. history, perpetrated by a single madman. It was certainly not my type of scene, but it was according to all accounts a fun place and central social center for the Orlando “Gay” community, featuring classy drag impersonators, etc. We need to be careful not to encourage “vigilante justice” or government oppression … against our gay fellow citizens.
Pulse (nightclub) - Wikipedia
According to your analogy, we should … “destroy gays” or any man impersonating a woman because their action automatically “demeans women”? That is just silly.You can put lipstick on a pig, it’s still a pig.
One thing has occurred to me though.
A man dressing up and acting like a woman is remarkably similar to a white man putting on black face.
We destroy white people for putting on black face, because the blacks had to fight historically for their dignity. But we throw parades for those that do the same indignity to women, who had to fight historically for theirs?
This stuff must stop. And it must stop now.
The Pulse Nightclub in Orlando was the scene of a terrible massacre in 2016 — the second worst mass shooting in U.S. history, perpetrated by a single madman. It was certainly not my type of scene, but it was according to all accounts a fun place and central social center for the Orlando “Gay” community, featuring classy drag impersonators, etc. We need to be careful not to encourage “vigilante justice” or government oppression … against our gay fellow citizens.
Pulse (nightclub) - Wikipedia
According to your analogy, we should … “destroy gays” or any man impersonating a woman because their action automatically “demeans women”? That is just silly.
You promiscuously throw around the word “pigs” — but refuse to answer my repeatedly asked concrete questions about proposals to ban drag performances.
A very pathetic response, in my opinion.
According to your analogy, we should … “destroy gays” or any man impersonating a woman because their action automatically “demeans women”? That is just silly.
You promiscuously throw around the word “pigs” — but refuse to answer my repeatedly asked concrete questions about proposals to ban drag performances.
A very pathetic response, in my opinion.
the only drag performances being banned are those involving children. No one is banning adults from putting on or attending drag shows.
I would ban them on the basis I gave you. Just as men in power have been discharged from office for being seen in black face, men demeaning women by pretending that they are one should be shamed out of the public square for doing the same.
“(Governor) Lee says there's a big difference between wearing a dress at a high school football game and drag queens wearing a dress on stage.
In my opinion, when this now powerful and privileged white Conservative denies LBQT folks their right to do the same thing he defends himself doing … he is not only acting hypocritically. His conduct resembles in kind the old typical white “Blackface” mockery and humiliation of Negroes in our collective “Gone with the Wind” past.Hella Skeleton, a drag performer in rural Middle Tennessee, says the line is not clear.
"For Bill Lee to say, 'You know, that was lighthearted when I did it,' that is absolutely absurd when a lot of drag is extremely lighthearted," Skeleton says. "Apparently when straight men dress up badly in drag, that's OK. But when gay and queer and trans people do it, that's not OK."
Go ahead, defend degrading women all you want. And you keep saying over and over and over and over “gay drag shows” as if gays are the only people who dress like women?Would you “shame out of the public square” … the Conservative Republican Governor of Tennessee?
It just came out that he appeared very publicly in drag in 1977 with two young women dressed as men, and their picture was widely circulated to minors. Should those women be “shamed” too?
Tennessee governor appears to have dressed in drag, an art form he wants to restrict
You say — seemingly without thinking — you would “ban” gay drag shows. In the next sentence you only want to “shame them.” Which is it? And how exactly does one accomplish all that?
As everyone but you apparently seems to recognize, drag performances are by no means all “demeaning” to women. Indeed, as I pointed out, the opposite is often the case, and often they are just playful. It is certainly true they are an important part of “gay culture” — and one interest often shared by straights too. But as I said before, just not my cup of tea.
I’ll give my view on questions you do not ask or answer clearly, and provide some info on the 14 new state bills and Tennessee’s new law restricting “impersonating other than one’s own” sex. Of course these bills virtually all “say” they are about “protecting children” from seeing inappropriate drag performances. Some, when passed, may indeed have this effect. But they may have other effects and intentions too.
Many of these laws, in my opinion, are aimed squarely at the gay community itself, and will be abused to close major gay clubs and deny liquor licenses to venues when a few 17-year-old minors inevitably are discovered having snuck inside with false IDs. Similarly with parades on public property — actual children MIGHT see these “terrible,” presumably “innocence-destroying” public parades — so they are to be banned as well. Even just appearing in public as a transvestite or transgender may subject some to arrest, as these laws are often open to very ambiguous readings.
The Governor of Tennessee who just signed into law the first state “anti-drag” law, whom I mentioned above, of course defended his own little public DRAG adventure as just “light-hearted H.S. tradition”! I suspect that was indeed all it was. But as NPR noted:
In my opinion, when this now powerful and privileged white Conservative denies LBQT folks their right to do the same thing he defends himself doing … he is not only acting hypocritically. His conduct resembles in kind the old typical white “Blackface” mockery and humiliation of Negroes in our collective “Gone with the Wind” past.
The legal issues will be adjudicated and re-adjudicated, mostly on a state by state basis. Maybe some workable compromise laws will be passed. Hopefully today’s hysteria will pass and the country will one day be re-unified to face far more serious national issues.
P.S.
Not that I wish to discuss them here, but here is info on the 14 present state bills being introduced around the country that would try to regulate gay drag shows, many of which also try to deal with separate even more highly controversial issues — like use of hormone blockers in children, or even transition surgery.
Here’s the Status of Anti-Drag Bills Across the U.S.
Why is it laughable? Gay men are sexually attracted, not only to other gay men, but to straight men.
In fact, not only should the military segregate gays from other gays, and from straights of the the same sex, but that should become strict public policy in places like the YMCAs and other locker rooms.
Now your response will be that the answer should be private lockers and private showers. Way to expensive and completely unnecessary. The general public should not have to absorb any expense to facilitate your kink.
Apparently HeyNorm believes that men in the armed forces who are brave enough to face the enemy in combat … are utterly helpless to resist the “sexual threat” posed by other same sex gay comrades or officers, who may have to share foxholes, command centers, or even work and live together on ships or in barracks.
Was it a similar taboo or just hated that kept black men segregated in the military in the past?
Hard to know what to say about such cowardly paranoia and lust for segregation.
There was nothing homosexual about soldiers dressing as women during WWIIApparently HeyNorm believes that men in the armed forces who are brave enough to face the enemy in combat … are utterly helpless to resist the “sexual threat” posed by other same sex gay comrades or officers, who may have to share foxholes, command centers, or even work and live together on ships or in barracks.
Was it a similar taboo or just hated that kept black men segregated in the military in the past?
Hard to know what to say about such cowardly paranoia and lust for segregation.
I never said there was. If you read the OP article you will see a somewhat deeper cultural analysis of how “drag” in both the military and civilian life still provided important “breathing space” for then mostly “illegal” and officially persecuted homosexuals … who were previously forced into the closet. This is one of the most interesting aspects of this cultural phenomenon.There was nothing homosexual about soldiers dressing as women during WWII. [my italics]
The soldiers understood that there were no women on the front lines so men had to represent women for entertainment purposes
The USO shows were not female impersonator “drag” showsI never said there was. If you read the OP article you will see a somewhat deeper cultural analysis of how “drag” in both the military and civilian life still provided important “breathing space” for then mostly “illegal” and officially persecuted homosexuals … who were previously forced into the closet. This is one of the most interesting aspects of this cultural phenomenon.
I think as usual you are missing my point entirely.The USO shows were not female impersonator “drag” shows
There were simply no women to play those parts
Liberal-progressive drag shows put on for children are entirely sexual in nature
