Dork Democrat Says During Hearing That Hearsay Is Better Than Direct Evidence

[BlindBoo]

Biden stopped the investigation of corruption regarding Ukraine.

The investigation into the corruption involved the original owner before Biden's son was offered a job by the new management. One of the reason everybody wanted Shokin out was he stopped that investigation.


"Western diplomats saw Shokin, who still sometimes wore his old Soviet-style uniform, as a relic of a stultified system and a “pay-to-play” prosecutor. Shokin, who declined to be interviewed for this story, blames his ouster on an illegal foreign intervention in Ukraine’s domestic affairs.

“My actions as General Prosecutor did not suit the interests of the U.S. Vice President Biden and the persons connected to him,” Shokin said in an affidavit filed Sept. 4 in an Austrian court on a separate case. He said Biden was motivated by his son’s connection to Burisma but offered no evidence.

Ukrainian officials say the inquiry into alleged improprieties at Burisma has never been completely closed.

“The Burisma case is still there; it’s up and down,” a senior Ukrainian official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. “But the Burisma case and a Hunter Biden case are totally different things, and the latter simply does not exist.”

On Friday, Ukraine’s current prosecutor general, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, said his office would revisit about 15 legal cases that were closed or had gone dormant in recent years, including several involving Burisma and the oligarch who controls it, Mykola Zlochevsky. Ryaboshapka said he would consider reopening any case that ended prematurely or improperly."

Here is what Joe Biden actually did in Ukraine

 

[jc456]

What is the specific crime that Trump committed?

The "Guns for Dirt" plot was an extortion plot involving US aid and soliciting foreign aid in generating dirt to use against domestic political rivals.

Is that crime serious enough to justify impeachment?

Yes.

You have no evidence of extortion, nobody that says they heard extortion, a transcript that proves no extortion, and the alleged victim says it didn't happen. Other than that you've got a good case.

Fascist Democrats can impeach Trump for kicking Hillary's ass to the curb. And you can cheer the Fascists on.

right? If they'd just fking admit they're butthurt from the 2016 election loss and trying to overturn that election, they'd have so much credibility.

 

[BlindBoo]

What is the specific crime that Trump committed?

The "Guns for Dirt" plot was an extortion plot involving US aid and soliciting foreign aid in generating dirt to use against domestic political rivals.

Is that crime serious enough to justify impeachment?

Yes.

You have no evidence of extortion, nobody that says they heard extortion, a transcript that proves no extortion, and the alleged victim says it didn't happen. Other than that you've got a good case.

Fascist Democrats can impeach Trump for kicking Hillary's ass to the curb. And you can cheer the Fascists on.

What is the WH hiding by preventing WH officials from answering Congresses
subpoena's? Where are the witnesses that can exonerate President Shakedown?

 

[jc456]

What is the specific crime that Trump committed?

The "Guns for Dirt" plot was an extortion plot involving US aid and soliciting foreign aid in generating dirt to use against domestic political rivals.

Is that crime serious enough to justify impeachment?

Yes.

You have no evidence of extortion, nobody that says they heard extortion, a transcript that proves no extortion, and the alleged victim says it didn't happen. Other than that you've got a good case.

Fascist Democrats can impeach Trump for kicking Hillary's ass to the curb. And you can cheer the Fascists on.

What is the WH hiding by preventing WH officials from answering Congresses
subpoena's? Where are the witnesses that can exonerate President Shakedown?

testifying about what? name something to come in and testify about?

you Still got your hypocrite hat on.

 

[iceberg]

What is the specific crime that Trump committed?

The "Guns for Dirt" plot was an extortion plot involving US aid and soliciting foreign aid in generating dirt to use against domestic political rivals.

Is that crime serious enough to justify impeachment?

Yes.

You have no evidence of extortion, nobody that says they heard extortion, a transcript that proves no extortion, and the alleged victim says it didn't happen. Other than that you've got a good case.

Fascist Democrats can impeach Trump for kicking Hillary's ass to the curb. And you can cheer the Fascists on.

What is the WH hiding by preventing WH officials from answering Congresses
subpoena's? Where are the witnesses that can exonerate President Shakedown?

what was hillary hiding by deleting 33k mails?
what were bill and loretta hiding by meeting in secret on a tarmac?
where were these questions when YOUR SIDE was doing some sneaky ass shit?

seems you love to give the benefit of doubt when your side requires it but will have none of that when it's the other side.

 

[iceberg]

Biden stopped the investigation of corruption regarding Ukraine.

The investigation into the corruption involved the original owner before Biden's son was offered a job by the new management. One of the reason everybody wanted Shokin out was he stopped that investigation.


"Western diplomats saw Shokin, who still sometimes wore his old Soviet-style uniform, as a relic of a stultified system and a “pay-to-play” prosecutor. Shokin, who declined to be interviewed for this story, blames his ouster on an illegal foreign intervention in Ukraine’s domestic affairs.

“My actions as General Prosecutor did not suit the interests of the U.S. Vice President Biden and the persons connected to him,” Shokin said in an affidavit filed Sept. 4 in an Austrian court on a separate case. He said Biden was motivated by his son’s connection to Burisma but offered no evidence.

Ukrainian officials say the inquiry into alleged improprieties at Burisma has never been completely closed.

“The Burisma case is still there; it’s up and down,” a senior Ukrainian official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. “But the Burisma case and a Hunter Biden case are totally different things, and the latter simply does not exist.”

On Friday, Ukraine’s current prosecutor general, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, said his office would revisit about 15 legal cases that were closed or had gone dormant in recent years, including several involving Burisma and the oligarch who controls it, Mykola Zlochevsky. Ryaboshapka said he would consider reopening any case that ended prematurely or improperly."

Here is what Joe Biden actually did in Ukraine

from your story:

It’s common in Eastern Europe, and much of the world, to hire a celebrity or relative of a senior official to burnish a company’s image, and to help shield it from official or unofficial shakedowns.
----------
so they were hiring hunter as a channel to the government, yet joe didn't talk to his son about this business *at all*.

how...convenient.

 

[mudwhistle]

What is the specific crime that Trump committed?

The "Guns for Dirt" plot was an extortion plot involving US aid and soliciting foreign aid in generating dirt to use against domestic political rivals.

Is that crime serious enough to justify impeachment?

Yes.

You have no evidence of extortion, nobody that says they heard extortion, a transcript that proves no extortion, and the alleged victim says it didn't happen. Other than that you've got a good case.

Fascist Democrats can impeach Trump for kicking Hillary's ass to the curb. And you can cheer the Fascists on.

What is the WH hiding by preventing WH officials from answering Congresses
subpoena's? Where are the witnesses that can exonerate President Shakedown?

They aren't hiding anything.
They see this for what it is.....nothing but harassment before the election.
Democrats forget the separation of powers inherent in the Constitution. They're abusing their authority. They are comitting fraud. They are lying to the public. Even Democrat voters are getting wise to it.

 

[jillian]

These asshole Democrats are showing us how insane they are every day.

Democrat During Impeachment Hearing: ‘Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct’
Democrat During Impeachment Hearing: ‘Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct’

Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley (IL) faced intense backlash on Wednesday afternoon after claiming during Democrats’ impeachment inquiry hearing that “hearsay” can be “much better evidence than direct” evidence.

In a rambling statement, Quigley said, “And, if gets to closed primer on hearsay, I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created, needed exceptions to hearsay.”

Quigley continued, “Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct … and it’s certainly valid in this instance.”

Donald Trump Jr. immediately turned his sights on Quigley, hammering the congressman in a series of tweeted.

“Can you believe this insanity? ‘Heresay can be much better evidence than DIRECT EVIDENCE’ according to Democrat Mike Quigley,” Trump tweeted. “Are you fricken kidding me? 3rd and 4th party info better than hearing it yourself?”​

​

You should stop posting garbage you vile little psycho

you would do better to focus on your orange criminal in the White House

 

[iceberg]

These asshole Democrats are showing us how insane they are every day.

Democrat During Impeachment Hearing: ‘Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct’
Democrat During Impeachment Hearing: ‘Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct’

Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley (IL) faced intense backlash on Wednesday afternoon after claiming during Democrats’ impeachment inquiry hearing that “hearsay” can be “much better evidence than direct” evidence.

In a rambling statement, Quigley said, “And, if gets to closed primer on hearsay, I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created, needed exceptions to hearsay.”

Quigley continued, “Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct … and it’s certainly valid in this instance.”

Donald Trump Jr. immediately turned his sights on Quigley, hammering the congressman in a series of tweeted.

“Can you believe this insanity? ‘Heresay can be much better evidence than DIRECT EVIDENCE’ according to Democrat Mike Quigley,” Trump tweeted. “Are you fricken kidding me? 3rd and 4th party info better than hearing it yourself?”​

​

You should stop posting garbage you vile little psycho

you would do better to focus on your orange criminal in the White House

 

[BlindBoo]

What is the specific crime that Trump committed?

The "Guns for Dirt" plot was an extortion plot involving US aid and soliciting foreign aid in generating dirt to use against domestic political rivals.

Is that crime serious enough to justify impeachment?

Yes.

You have no evidence of extortion, nobody that says they heard extortion, a transcript that proves no extortion, and the alleged victim says it didn't happen. Other than that you've got a good case.

Fascist Democrats can impeach Trump for kicking Hillary's ass to the curb. And you can cheer the Fascists on.

What is the WH hiding by preventing WH officials from answering Congresses
subpoena's? Where are the witnesses that can exonerate President Shakedown?

what was hillary hiding by deleting 33k mails?
what were bill and loretta hiding by meeting in secret on a tarmac?
where were these questions when YOUR SIDE was doing some sneaky ass shit?

seems you love to give the benefit of doubt when your side requires it but will have none of that when it's the other side.

Was Hillary afraid to face the Republican inquiry?

 

[BlindBoo]

Biden stopped the investigation of corruption regarding Ukraine.

The investigation into the corruption involved the original owner before Biden's son was offered a job by the new management. One of the reason everybody wanted Shokin out was he stopped that investigation.


"Western diplomats saw Shokin, who still sometimes wore his old Soviet-style uniform, as a relic of a stultified system and a “pay-to-play” prosecutor. Shokin, who declined to be interviewed for this story, blames his ouster on an illegal foreign intervention in Ukraine’s domestic affairs.

“My actions as General Prosecutor did not suit the interests of the U.S. Vice President Biden and the persons connected to him,” Shokin said in an affidavit filed Sept. 4 in an Austrian court on a separate case. He said Biden was motivated by his son’s connection to Burisma but offered no evidence.

Ukrainian officials say the inquiry into alleged improprieties at Burisma has never been completely closed.

“The Burisma case is still there; it’s up and down,” a senior Ukrainian official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. “But the Burisma case and a Hunter Biden case are totally different things, and the latter simply does not exist.”

On Friday, Ukraine’s current prosecutor general, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, said his office would revisit about 15 legal cases that were closed or had gone dormant in recent years, including several involving Burisma and the oligarch who controls it, Mykola Zlochevsky. Ryaboshapka said he would consider reopening any case that ended prematurely or improperly."

Here is what Joe Biden actually did in Ukraine

from your story:

It’s common in Eastern Europe, and much of the world, to hire a celebrity or relative of a senior official to burnish a company’s image, and to help shield it from official or unofficial shakedowns.
----------
so they were hiring hunter as a channel to the government, yet joe didn't talk to his son about this business *at all*.

how...convenient.

The prosecutor whom we demanded the Ukraine fire before that aid was sent was protecting the corrupt former owner of Burisma and had shut down the investigation. Did Burisma break any Ukraine law by hiring Bidens son? Did Hunter violate any US law when he accepted the job from Burisma?

 

[iceberg]

What is the specific crime that Trump committed?

The "Guns for Dirt" plot was an extortion plot involving US aid and soliciting foreign aid in generating dirt to use against domestic political rivals.

Is that crime serious enough to justify impeachment?

Yes.

You have no evidence of extortion, nobody that says they heard extortion, a transcript that proves no extortion, and the alleged victim says it didn't happen. Other than that you've got a good case.

Fascist Democrats can impeach Trump for kicking Hillary's ass to the curb. And you can cheer the Fascists on.

What is the WH hiding by preventing WH officials from answering Congresses
subpoena's? Where are the witnesses that can exonerate President Shakedown?

what was hillary hiding by deleting 33k mails?
what were bill and loretta hiding by meeting in secret on a tarmac?
where were these questions when YOUR SIDE was doing some sneaky ass shit?

seems you love to give the benefit of doubt when your side requires it but will have none of that when it's the other side.

Was Hillary afraid to face the Republican inquiry?

dunno. was she? she damn sure:

1. looked to alter header information
2. deleted 33k e-mails and called them "personal"
3. bleachbit the hard drive so nothing could be pulled back from it

if you're not afraid, what's all that about? ALSO - if trump did ANY OF THAT i would be furious. yet here we are, you excuse all this then get your dick all bent when trump says "look into this, could you"?

 

[BlindBoo]

What is the specific crime that Trump committed?

The "Guns for Dirt" plot was an extortion plot involving US aid and soliciting foreign aid in generating dirt to use against domestic political rivals.

Is that crime serious enough to justify impeachment?

Yes.

You have no evidence of extortion, nobody that says they heard extortion, a transcript that proves no extortion, and the alleged victim says it didn't happen. Other than that you've got a good case.

Fascist Democrats can impeach Trump for kicking Hillary's ass to the curb. And you can cheer the Fascists on.

What is the WH hiding by preventing WH officials from answering Congresses
subpoena's? Where are the witnesses that can exonerate President Shakedown?

They aren't hiding anything.
They see this for what it is.....nothing but harassment before the election.
Democrats forget the separation of powers inherent in the Constitution. They're abusing their authority. They are comitting fraud. They are lying to the public. Even Democrat voters are getting wise to it.

Every subpoena the WH ignores is another potential count of obstruction of justice. The Republicans were not interested in the separation of powers when they issued subpoena after subpoena when chasing the ghost of Benghazi for the 4, 5 ....ect times.

Lets make a deal, I'll give you Hunter, you give me Ghouliani!

 

[BlindBoo]

dunno. was she? she damn sure:

...was willing to testified on her own behalf for 11 hours.

 

[iceberg]

dunno. was she? she damn sure:

...was willing to testified on her own behalf for 11 hours.

After only sending in paper copies first
After trying to alter header info
After deleting 33k mails
After destroying the hard drive

You leave out a lot

 

[mudwhistle]

These asshole Democrats are showing us how insane they are every day.

Democrat During Impeachment Hearing: ‘Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct’
Democrat During Impeachment Hearing: ‘Hearsay Can Be Much Better Evidence Than Direct’

Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley (IL) faced intense backlash on Wednesday afternoon after claiming during Democrats’ impeachment inquiry hearing that “hearsay” can be “much better evidence than direct” evidence.

In a rambling statement, Quigley said, “And, if gets to closed primer on hearsay, I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created, needed exceptions to hearsay.”

Quigley continued, “Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct … and it’s certainly valid in this instance.”

Donald Trump Jr. immediately turned his sights on Quigley, hammering the congressman in a series of tweeted.

“Can you believe this insanity? ‘Heresay can be much better evidence than DIRECT EVIDENCE’ according to Democrat Mike Quigley,” Trump tweeted. “Are you fricken kidding me? 3rd and 4th party info better than hearing it yourself?”​

​

You should stop posting garbage you vile little psycho

you would do better to focus on your orange criminal in the White House

Why should I???

We've got you retards to do that 24/7!!!

 

[Maxdeath]

Whether we need it or not, we've got plenty.

great. do you really want a law of the land that passes out judgements on heresay?

well outside of it pertaining to trump cause that's where it will certainly go.

They want anything that will help them tarnish or get rid of Trump. The thought is not how things will play out further down the line. It is all about the current moment.

The fact is that use hearsay now. Next year it will be use it to get rid of someone else. Then it will be used again and again until no one can stay in office.

You guys need a room?

Also, you're ignoring a few facts.

But that's pretty much how you kids rationalize shit.

Funny how Dems keep saying that Republicans are willing to overlook the rule of law but Dems are the ones that always seem to be the ones who are more then willing to over look it.