Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lets try a little exercise:
Hitler: Evil
Stalin: Evil
Pol Pot: Evil
Obama: Wrong, not Evil
Bill Clinton: Long Island "3" chasing hordog, not evil
Nancy Pelosi: Typical leftist idiot, not evil.
Bush II: Big government Republican, not evil
Romney: Quasi-Rhino, not evil
Ron Paul: Isolationist libertarian nutter: not evil
Dennis Kucinich: Far left socialist idiot, not evil
Evil Knevel: Not really evil
Dr. Evil: Working on sharks with "lasers"
Cheney was/is as evil as they come these days.
Not even close to evil. Really, if you need to make up people who differ politically from you as evil, I suggest you step away from political debate, or at least look at your own viewpoints again.
People can be wrong without being evil.
Lets try a little exercise:
Hitler: Evil
Stalin: Evil
Pol Pot: Evil
Obama: Wrong, not Evil
Bill Clinton: Long Island "3" chasing hordog, not evil
Nancy Pelosi: Typical leftist idiot, not evil.
Bush II: Big government Republican, not evil
Romney: Quasi-Rhino, not evil
Ron Paul: Isolationist libertarian nutter: not evil
Dennis Kucinich: Far left socialist idiot, not evil
Evil Knevel: Not really evil
Dr. Evil: Working on sharks with "lasers"
Exercising all by yourself with your own opinions, your own scale, and your own set of rules.
That isn't exercising, it's masturbation.
and defining down evil makes the term meaningless. If you equate differing political opinions being done through non violent government action as evil, then what do you call real evil?
Obama is not evil. Romney is not evil. They have no evil capes, or secret lair, or massive death machine apparatus to slaughter us all.
Get a grip please.
Cheney was/is as evil as they come these days.
Not even close to evil. Really, if you need to make up people who differ politically from you as evil, I suggest you step away from political debate, or at least look at your own viewpoints again.
People can be wrong without being evil.
If you don't put war profiteers in the evil column then you set a pretty high bar.
The title of this thread has the word "evil" in it. Also, I have heard the term "voting for the lesser of two evils" batted around here a lot. I have used it myself. You want to use another word? How about "corrupt"?
All votes for politicians are votes for the least corrupt among them.
Better?
Yes. I agree. However taking power takes much longer than removing it. Many of the problems we have is because of what you describe. Which candidates were working to remove government power? Which ones were trying to circumvent it?I disagree. Well... Kind of.All votes are for the lesser of evils. Some people running for office are just less evil than others. Government is evil and the reason for that is because the politicians who make it up are evil. There are no good politicians, there are only evil and less evil.
All votes are for the common good. Some people running for office are just less about the common good than others. Government is for the common good and the reason for that is because the politicians who make it up are for the common good. There are bad politicians, there are only more for the common good and less for the common good.
Both say the same thing, except the first one suggests that it's not possible to have a government worthy of being proud of. I don't believe that should ever be the case, although I'm not feeling a whole lot of pride now. I am working to change it to something that I can be.
Government is inherently evil. The founding fathers knew this and designed a government with checks. Over the two centuries the politicians have worked to declaw the rules and bypass the checks. You cannot design a governmnet where the men who aspire to run it can not become corrupted by it's power.
No choice. Either it will be done the politically correct way, or there will be war. Politically correct should always be tried first.I admire your optimism though.
Not even close to evil. Really, if you need to make up people who differ politically from you as evil, I suggest you step away from political debate, or at least look at your own viewpoints again.
People can be wrong without being evil.
If you don't put war profiteers in the evil column then you set a pretty high bar.
Give me a specific example of a war profiteer.
Grow up Drama Queens. Neither Guy is Evil.
"Evil" spelled backwards is "live."
Ever think of that?
Grow up Drama Queens. Neither Guy is Evil.
Grow up Drama Queens. Neither Guy is Evil.
No but some of their owner's are.
Like, Kochs, Adelson, Bush's Brain, Norquist.
They do not have our best interests at heart and they DO own Rmoney, LyinRyan and the GObP/pubpots.
Make no mistake, what the one percenters care about is money and we are their servant bitches.
"Evil" spelled backwards is "live."
Ever think of that?
oooh... scawy...
"Evil" spelled backwards is "live."
Ever think of that?
oooh... scawy...
I know, eh?
And "oooh" spelled backwards is "hooo." Some people might think that is a coincidence.
Lets try a little exercise:
Hitler: Evil
Stalin: Evil
Pol Pot: Evil
Obama: Wrong, not Evil
Bill Clinton: Long Island "3" chasing hordog, not evil
Nancy Pelosi: Typical leftist idiot, not evil.
Bush II: Big government Republican, not evil
Romney: Quasi-Rhino, not evil
Ron Paul: Isolationist libertarian nutter: not evil
Dennis Kucinich: Far left socialist idiot, not evil
Evil Knevel: Not really evil
Dr. Evil: Working on sharks with "lasers"
Exercising all by yourself with your own opinions, your own scale, and your own set of rules.
That isn't exercising, it's masturbation.
and defining down evil makes the term meaningless. If you equate differing political opinions being done through non violent government action as evil, then what do you call real evil?
Obama is not evil. Romney is not evil. They have no evil capes, or secret lair, or massive death machine apparatus to slaughter us all.
Get a grip please.
Well, ain't you just a big ol' bucket of retard.
Yeah. Anyone who looks favorably on Chavez is an America-hating douchebag.
You say this then jump on someone else because you hate Obama...I see no difference...try thinking for yourself instead of hating who the MSM and government tells you to hate...
Uh oh -- Noam Chumpsky will disagree with you on the second two.Lets try a little exercise:
Hitler: Evil
Stalin: Evil
Pol Pot: Evil
Obama: Wrong, not Evil
Bill Clinton: Long Island "3" chasing hordog, not evil
Nancy Pelosi: Typical leftist idiot, not evil.
Bush II: Big government Republican, not evil
Romney: Quasi-Rhino, not evil
Ron Paul: Isolationist libertarian nutter: not evil
Dennis Kucinich: Far left socialist idiot, not evil
Evil Knevel: Not really evil
Dr. Evil: Working on sharks with "lasers"
Like "racist", "torture", and "liar", leftists are working hard to make the word "evil" utterly meaningless.Lets try a little exercise:
Hitler: Evil
Stalin: Evil
Pol Pot: Evil
Obama: Wrong, not Evil
Bill Clinton: Long Island "3" chasing hordog, not evil
Nancy Pelosi: Typical leftist idiot, not evil.
Bush II: Big government Republican, not evil
Romney: Quasi-Rhino, not evil
Ron Paul: Isolationist libertarian nutter: not evil
Dennis Kucinich: Far left socialist idiot, not evil
Evil Knevel: Not really evil
Dr. Evil: Working on sharks with "lasers"
Cheney was/is as evil as they come these days.
How many times have you personally used the phrase "This has legs! Bush is TOAST!!"Cheney was/is as evil as they come these days.
Not even close to evil. Really, if you need to make up people who differ politically from you as evil, I suggest you step away from political debate, or at least look at your own viewpoints again.
People can be wrong without being evil.
If you don't put war profiteers in the evil column then you set a pretty high bar.