Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
Just tell them that all that FREE STUFF isnt really going to happen, and you will turn off 90% of the liberal voters, because they have an IQ of 70.You can't suppress the vote of Republicans. Voting is too important to us. Democrats? Just tell them they need to get an ID to vote or that they need to vote on one day, and that's enough to turn those people off.
Republican voter suppression of Democratic voters is constant and ongoing. Last year, for example, the five Republican judge majority on the U.S. Supreme Court in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute upheld an Ohio law purging from the voter rolls persons who had not voted for six years, unless they re-registered. In her dissent in Husted Justice Sotomayor explained the law was voter suppression plain and simple and cited documentation that it disproportionately disenfranchised, among others, minority voters.Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
Republican voter suppression of Democratic voters is constant and ongoing. Last year, for example, the five Republican judge majority on the U.S. Supreme Court in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute upheld an Ohio law purging from the voter rolls persons who had not voted for six years, unless they re-registered. In her dissent in Husted Justice Sotomayor explained the law was voter suppression plain and simple and cited documentation that it disproportionately disenfranchised, among others, minority voters.Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
Considering Trump hasn't done anything more about Illegal Immigration, or Abortion than Obama had.
I'm going to say, at least Democrats are for helping White Americans, and the Environment in need.
So, I support this decision, down with Republicans!
Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
There was talk about impeaching George Bush? That's news to me.
Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
There was talk about impeaching George Bush? That's news to me.
On January 16, 1991, Congressman Henry B. Gonzalez introduced H. Res. 34, to impeach President George H. W. Bush for starting the Gulf War. The resolution was referred to the Judiciary Committee, where it died.[18] Gonzalez tried again with H. Res. 86 on February 21. Both bills were referred to the Subcommittee on Economic and Commercial Law March 18, 1992, where the efforts also died.
Impeachment investigations of United States federal officials - Wikipedia
Sotomayor demonstrated how that is voter supression.Republican voter suppression of Democratic voters is constant and ongoing. Last year, for example, the five Republican judge majority on the U.S. Supreme Court in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute upheld an Ohio law purging from the voter rolls persons who had not voted for six years, unless they re-registered. In her dissent in Husted Justice Sotomayor explained the law was voter suppression plain and simple and cited documentation that it disproportionately disenfranchised, among others, minority voters.Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
The state made three attempts to contact absent voters. They provided a return addressed envelope and phone number. If the person contacted didn't respond after all three attempts, they took them off the voter rolls for obvious reasons such as death, illness that prevented them from voting, moving to another part of the state or out of the state altogether.
There is no other way to purge voters from the rolls.
Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
Sotomayor demonstrated how that is voter supression.Republican voter suppression of Democratic voters is constant and ongoing. Last year, for example, the five Republican judge majority on the U.S. Supreme Court in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute upheld an Ohio law purging from the voter rolls persons who had not voted for six years, unless they re-registered. In her dissent in Husted Justice Sotomayor explained the law was voter suppression plain and simple and cited documentation that it disproportionately disenfranchised, among others, minority voters.Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
The state made three attempts to contact absent voters. They provided a return addressed envelope and phone number. If the person contacted didn't respond after all three attempts, they took them off the voter rolls for obvious reasons such as death, illness that prevented them from voting, moving to another part of the state or out of the state altogether.
There is no other way to purge voters from the rolls.
2020 might be decided by voter suppression.
not Impeaching is more risky than impeaching, considering this suppression, along with russian influence in 2020
There is more, a whole smorgasbord of suppression, as detailed here.Sotomayor demonstrated how that is voter supression.Republican voter suppression of Democratic voters is constant and ongoing. Last year, for example, the five Republican judge majority on the U.S. Supreme Court in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute upheld an Ohio law purging from the voter rolls persons who had not voted for six years, unless they re-registered. In her dissent in Husted Justice Sotomayor explained the law was voter suppression plain and simple and cited documentation that it disproportionately disenfranchised, among others, minority voters.Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
The state made three attempts to contact absent voters. They provided a return addressed envelope and phone number. If the person contacted didn't respond after all three attempts, they took them off the voter rolls for obvious reasons such as death, illness that prevented them from voting, moving to another part of the state or out of the state altogether.
There is no other way to purge voters from the rolls.
2020 might be decided by voter suppression.
not Impeaching is more risky than impeaching, considering this suppression, along with russian influence in 2020
Well this article didn't say anything of the sorts. It was a leftist piece on how Republicans are cheating again, so thanks for wasting my time.
How is it voter suppression when people who haven't voted in six years probably didn't bother for the seventh if they were alive and still in the state? You mean after receiving several notices, ignoring every one of them, now they all of a sudden decided to start voting again?
Your article was pure partisan unproven speculation. Democrats simply want to keep as many options open for people who are willing to fraudulently vote.
[... upheld an Ohio law purging from the voter rolls persons who had not voted for six years, unless they re-registered. In her dissent in Husted Justice Sotomayor explained the law was voter suppression plain and simple and cited documentation that it disproportionately disenfranchised, among others, minority voters.
There is more, a whole smorgasbord of suppression, as detailed here.Sotomayor demonstrated how that is voter supression.Republican voter suppression of Democratic voters is constant and ongoing. Last year, for example, the five Republican judge majority on the U.S. Supreme Court in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute upheld an Ohio law purging from the voter rolls persons who had not voted for six years, unless they re-registered. In her dissent in Husted Justice Sotomayor explained the law was voter suppression plain and simple and cited documentation that it disproportionately disenfranchised, among others, minority voters.Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
The state made three attempts to contact absent voters. They provided a return addressed envelope and phone number. If the person contacted didn't respond after all three attempts, they took them off the voter rolls for obvious reasons such as death, illness that prevented them from voting, moving to another part of the state or out of the state altogether.
There is no other way to purge voters from the rolls.
2020 might be decided by voter suppression.
not Impeaching is more risky than impeaching, considering this suppression, along with russian influence in 2020
Well this article didn't say anything of the sorts. It was a leftist piece on how Republicans are cheating again, so thanks for wasting my time.
How is it voter suppression when people who haven't voted in six years probably didn't bother for the seventh if they were alive and still in the state? You mean after receiving several notices, ignoring every one of them, now they all of a sudden decided to start voting again?
Your article was pure partisan unproven speculation. Democrats simply want to keep as many options open for people who are willing to fraudulently vote.
but,
Even with voter suppression, Democrats have the potential to blow Republicans out of the water, if they can just get their potential voters to the polls.
The Republicans' demographic is shrinking, not growing. Even with working class Trump voters, they're already at their ceiling. Meanwhile, kids are turning 18 every day, and the majority are showing that they're more liberal than their parents.
Beto won 71% of voters aged 18-29 in Texas, for example. 71%!
They are gonna piss Sanders off and he will go independent. That will give Trump the election.Next year the Democrats will say that they will impeach President Trump if he is reelected. They will be trying to suppress Trump supporter turn-out to win the election. They did the same thing to President George H.W. Bush in 1991 and they beat him.
