Donald Trump Calls For 'Complete Shutdown' Of Muslim Immigration To U.S.

[jc456]

It can be done:

View attachment 63317

Yes, if the court rules that it is constitutional. I suspect that Trump would not ban all Muslims but rather ban entries for persons holding passports from certain countries, who just happen to be 99% Muslim.

Does the US have any responsibility to allow millions of basically illiterate muslims to come to the country. No skills. No education. No fucking interest in anything remotely considered 'assimilation'. By their own admittance a percentage of them being radical islamofascists intent on destroying America?
Add these fucking violent welfare bums to the millions of illegal mexicans already in the country sucking off the welfare teat.
What will America look like in decade?
Ever been to France? Ever attempt to walk down a city street trying to avoid fucking scum muslim 'youth' from spitting on you? Or trying to not step in a pile of shit some muslim 'youth' had left in the doorway of a business the muslim 'youth' decided was not muslim?
Try walking in downtown Dearborn. This is the future of America if we don't stop the descent to hell which is Islam.
The hilarious irony is should the islamofascists ever control America the FIRST people they would iniilate are the fucking LIBs.

Your rather bigoted claims and anecdotal evidence is not backed by real statistics. The 2007 Pew survey found that Muslim Americans generally mirror the U.S. public in education and income levels, with immigrant Muslims slightly more affluent and better educated than native-born Muslims. Twenty-four percent of all Muslims and 29 percent of immigrant Muslims have college degrees, compared to 25 percent for the U.S. general population. Forty-one percent of all Muslim Americans and 45 percent of immigrant Muslims report annual household income levels of $50,000 or higher. This compares to the national average of 44 percent. Immigrant Muslims are well represented among higher-income earners, with 19 percent claiming annual household incomes of $100,000 or higher (compared to 16 percent for the Muslim population as a whole and 17 percent for the U.S. average). This is likely due to the strong concentration of Muslims in professional, managerial, and technical fields, especially in information technology, education, medicine, law, and the corporate world. There is some evidence of a decline in the wages of Muslim and Arab men since 2001, although more recent data suggest the trend might be reversing.

Muslims in America – A Statistical Portrait | Baghdad, Iraq - Embassy of the United States

Too funny. Consensus cannot corroborate the count of Muslims in the US. So how can someone have statistics to make any kind of statement. Hahahaha

Almost all the statistics quoted are from the Pew Research Study in the link. Pew Research is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, non-advocacy research organization that is widely quoted by conservatives, liberal, and nonpartisan media.

About Pew Research Center

So what? If you have no accurate count all figures are invalid

 

[dannyboys]

It can be done:

View attachment 63317

Yes, if the court rules that it is constitutional. I suspect that Trump would not ban all Muslims but rather ban entries for persons holding passports from certain countries, who just happen to be 99% Muslim.

Does the US have any responsibility to allow millions of basically illiterate muslims to come to the country. No skills. No education. No fucking interest in anything remotely considered 'assimilation'. By their own admittance a percentage of them being radical islamofascists intent on destroying America?
Add these fucking violent welfare bums to the millions of illegal mexicans already in the country sucking off the welfare teat.
What will America look like in decade?
Ever been to France? Ever attempt to walk down a city street trying to avoid fucking scum muslim 'youth' from spitting on you? Or trying to not step in a pile of shit some muslim 'youth' had left in the doorway of a business the muslim 'youth' decided was not muslim?
Try walking in downtown Dearborn. This is the future of America if we don't stop the descent to hell which is Islam.
The hilarious irony is should the islamofascists ever control America the FIRST people they would iniilate are the fucking LIBs.

Your rather bigoted claims and anecdotal evidence is not backed by real statistics. The 2007 Pew survey found that Muslim Americans generally mirror the U.S. public in education and income levels, with immigrant Muslims slightly more affluent and better educated than native-born Muslims. Twenty-four percent of all Muslims and 29 percent of immigrant Muslims have college degrees, compared to 25 percent for the U.S. general population. Forty-one percent of all Muslim Americans and 45 percent of immigrant Muslims report annual household income levels of $50,000 or higher. This compares to the national average of 44 percent. Immigrant Muslims are well represented among higher-income earners, with 19 percent claiming annual household incomes of $100,000 or higher (compared to 16 percent for the Muslim population as a whole and 17 percent for the U.S. average). This is likely due to the strong concentration of Muslims in professional, managerial, and technical fields, especially in information technology, education, medicine, law, and the corporate world. There is some evidence of a decline in the wages of Muslim and Arab men since 2001, although more recent data suggest the trend might be reversing.

Muslims in America – A Statistical Portrait | Baghdad, Iraq - Embassy of the United States

Dear God you are so fucking ignorant!
You are using information nine fucking years old!
Nine years ago the US was carefully vetting EVERY applicant, muslim or not, who wanted to immigrate to the US.
The US government was ONLY allowing in EDUCATED!!!!!!!! immigrants!!!!!! There were very few muslim applications based on 'humanitarian' emergency based on number of overall applications. Most applicants were well educated and frankly mentally smart enough to be happily willing to assimilate and 'get rich' in America.
That is why you fucking jerk the Stats point to the FACT that ALL immigrants were at least as well educated as American born citizens.
You're dumb enough to then falsely extrapolate/claim that these stats mean All muslims are highly educated and most are even smarter than the average American born citizen. Goes to show how stats can be twisted to make them appear to prove something they don't.
The flood of muslims wanting come to the US now has ZERO to do with what was happening 9 years ago.
I bet not 1 in a 100 Syrian muslim 'young men of fighting age' who are trying to come to the US can write their fucking name.

 

[dannyboys]

It can be done:

View attachment 63317

Yes, if the court rules that it is constitutional. I suspect that Trump would not ban all Muslims but rather ban entries for persons holding passports from certain countries, who just happen to be 99% Muslim.

Does the US have any responsibility to allow millions of basically illiterate muslims to come to the country. No skills. No education. No fucking interest in anything remotely considered 'assimilation'. By their own admittance a percentage of them being radical islamofascists intent on destroying America?
Add these fucking violent welfare bums to the millions of illegal mexicans already in the country sucking off the welfare teat.
What will America look like in decade?
Ever been to France? Ever attempt to walk down a city street trying to avoid fucking scum muslim 'youth' from spitting on you? Or trying to not step in a pile of shit some muslim 'youth' had left in the doorway of a business the muslim 'youth' decided was not muslim?
Try walking in downtown Dearborn. This is the future of America if we don't stop the descent to hell which is Islam.
The hilarious irony is should the islamofascists ever control America the FIRST people they would iniilate are the fucking LIBs.

Your rather bigoted claims and anecdotal evidence is not backed by real statistics. The 2007 Pew survey found that Muslim Americans generally mirror the U.S. public in education and income levels, with immigrant Muslims slightly more affluent and better educated than native-born Muslims. Twenty-four percent of all Muslims and 29 percent of immigrant Muslims have college degrees, compared to 25 percent for the U.S. general population. Forty-one percent of all Muslim Americans and 45 percent of immigrant Muslims report annual household income levels of $50,000 or higher. This compares to the national average of 44 percent. Immigrant Muslims are well represented among higher-income earners, with 19 percent claiming annual household incomes of $100,000 or higher (compared to 16 percent for the Muslim population as a whole and 17 percent for the U.S. average). This is likely due to the strong concentration of Muslims in professional, managerial, and technical fields, especially in information technology, education, medicine, law, and the corporate world. There is some evidence of a decline in the wages of Muslim and Arab men since 2001, although more recent data suggest the trend might be reversing.

Muslims in America – A Statistical Portrait | Baghdad, Iraq - Embassy of the United States

Too funny. Consensus cannot corroborate the count of Muslims in the US. So how can someone have statistics to make any kind of statement. Hahahaha

Almost all the statistics quoted are from the Pew Research Study in the link. Pew Research is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, non-advocacy research organization that is widely quoted by conservatives, liberal, and nonpartisan media.

About Pew Research Center

Stats from 9 years ago are as useful today as one of 'Pocahontas's used 'Cotton Ponies'.

 

[JimBowie1958]

 

[Flopper]

When Muslim men demand the forced removal of the clitoris, and wearing burkas, and females treated like second class citizens, that tends to be a major sticking point.

How man Muslim men do you know that actually do this?

Really? I didn't personally know Hitler, for that mater. Did you? Maybe Nazis are misunderstood, yes?Just look at the bloody facts, is that too hard?

Oh, I've see them in Islamaphobia web sites, staged ISIS videos, and radical christian web sites all seeking a worldwide jihad, nation against, nation and neighbor against neighbor. Keep it up and the Armageddon or jihad you seek may be just around the corner.

 

[Flopper]

It can be done:

View attachment 63317

Yes, if the court rules that it is constitutional. I suspect that Trump would not ban all Muslims but rather ban entries for persons holding passports from certain countries, who just happen to be 99% Muslim.

Does the US have any responsibility to allow millions of basically illiterate muslims to come to the country. No skills. No education. No fucking interest in anything remotely considered 'assimilation'. By their own admittance a percentage of them being radical islamofascists intent on destroying America?
Add these fucking violent welfare bums to the millions of illegal mexicans already in the country sucking off the welfare teat.
What will America look like in decade?
Ever been to France? Ever attempt to walk down a city street trying to avoid fucking scum muslim 'youth' from spitting on you? Or trying to not step in a pile of shit some muslim 'youth' had left in the doorway of a business the muslim 'youth' decided was not muslim?
Try walking in downtown Dearborn. This is the future of America if we don't stop the descent to hell which is Islam.
The hilarious irony is should the islamofascists ever control America the FIRST people they would iniilate are the fucking LIBs.

Your rather bigoted claims and anecdotal evidence is not backed by real statistics. The 2007 Pew survey found that Muslim Americans generally mirror the U.S. public in education and income levels, with immigrant Muslims slightly more affluent and better educated than native-born Muslims. Twenty-four percent of all Muslims and 29 percent of immigrant Muslims have college degrees, compared to 25 percent for the U.S. general population. Forty-one percent of all Muslim Americans and 45 percent of immigrant Muslims report annual household income levels of $50,000 or higher. This compares to the national average of 44 percent. Immigrant Muslims are well represented among higher-income earners, with 19 percent claiming annual household incomes of $100,000 or higher (compared to 16 percent for the Muslim population as a whole and 17 percent for the U.S. average). This is likely due to the strong concentration of Muslims in professional, managerial, and technical fields, especially in information technology, education, medicine, law, and the corporate world. There is some evidence of a decline in the wages of Muslim and Arab men since 2001, although more recent data suggest the trend might be reversing.

Muslims in America – A Statistical Portrait | Baghdad, Iraq - Embassy of the United States

Dear God you are so fucking ignorant!
You are using information nine fucking years old!
Nine years ago the US was carefully vetting EVERY applicant, muslim or not, who wanted to immigrate to the US.
The US government was ONLY allowing in EDUCATED!!!!!!!! immigrants!!!!!! There were very few muslim applications based on 'humanitarian' emergency based on number of overall applications. Most applicants were well educated and frankly mentally smart enough to be happily willing to assimilate and 'get rich' in America.
That is why you fucking jerk the Stats point to the FACT that ALL immigrants were at least as well educated as American born citizens.
You're dumb enough to then falsely extrapolate/claim that these stats mean All muslims are highly educated and most are even smarter than the average American born citizen. Goes to show how stats can be twisted to make them appear to prove something they don't.
The flood of muslims wanting come to the US now has ZERO to do with what was happening 9 years ago.
I bet not 1 in a 100 Syrian muslim 'young men of fighting age' who are trying to come to the US can write their fucking name.

So you think there has been a radical change in immigrant demographics in US over last 9 years. That's ridiculous. I offer you a sound unbiased study that directly contradicts your claims and you offer insults and bullshit. Education in itself is not and has not been a criteria for immigration. And for your information the vetting process is security screening, not educational screening.

The facts are we getting far better educated immigrants today than ever before. The number of student visa's issued to college students from almost all countries have significant increased over the last 10 years and student visa issued to students in middle eastern countries have dramatically increased.

 

[the_human_being]

 

[the_human_being]

 

[MikeK]

Perfect

Perfect? What's perfect about it? Does it also apply to Christian immigration into the U.S.?

Christians are not repeatedly carrying out terrorist attacks on innocent American citizens. Muslims are. And if the only way to eliminate or minimize the occurrence of these attacks is to preclude entry of this category of immigrants, why should we not do that?

Of course this action will affect many peaceful, law-abiding Muslims but it is expedient and necessary for the protection of our native population. In fact, under the existing circumstances it would be foolish not to implement such a restrictive policy.

 

[SeniorChief_Polock]

Great news.

 

[SeniorChief_Polock]

Trump is still trying to fearmonger his way into the White House.

I hope he begins rounding up and questioning socialists too - just like the 1950s.

 

[Flopper]

Perfect

Perfect? What's perfect about it? Does it also apply to Christian immigration into the U.S.?

Christians are not repeatedly carrying out terrorist attacks on innocent American citizens. Muslims are. And if the only way to eliminate or minimize the occurrence of these attacks is to preclude entry of this category of immigrants, why should we not do that?

Of course this action will affect many peaceful, law-abiding Muslims but it is expedient and necessary for the protection of our native population. In fact, under the existing circumstances it would be foolish not to implement such a restrictive policy.

Expedient - being convenient and practical despite the possibly of being improper or immoral. In this country, we pride ourselves on treating people as individuals not Muslims, Jews, or Christians. It is just plain wrong and cowardly to turn away a thousand or million people because we fear one may do us harm. Yes, it's expeditious, but that does not make it right.

 

[dannyboys]

It can be done:

View attachment 63317

Yes, if the court rules that it is constitutional. I suspect that Trump would not ban all Muslims but rather ban entries for persons holding passports from certain countries, who just happen to be 99% Muslim.

Naturally... there's more than one approach, for the desired result, and the one you've outlined is the most obvious and most likely effective.

Yep, but it's also likely to result in some retaliation by those countries which could be anything from severing relations with the US, denying entry of persons holding US passports, breaking trade, terrorism information sharing, maritime, and flyover agreements, etc. It might even inspire more homegrown terrorism in the US.

So now you're going to name one 'muslim country' that will "sever relations" etc. with the US right?
WRONG!
Every 'muslim' country on the planet is basically surviving by having a trade relationship, tourism, military aid/protection, trade deals, etc, with the US. Many muslim country leaders are fucking delighted to see how fucking stupid Obama is in allowing muslim radicals and criminals to enter the US then disappear.
Same with the corrupt leaders in Mexico.
Obama: "Bring us your fucking mentally ill. Your hardened criminals. You extremist muslim terrorists, your illiterates! I'm sure some of them will end up voting DEM in the future. In the meantime it's up to all you White working class REPs to take care of them".

 

[the_human_being]

 

[SeniorChief_Polock]

View attachment 63683

Why are you exploiting children, pervert ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Flopper]

It can be done:

View attachment 63317

Yes, if the court rules that it is constitutional. I suspect that Trump would not ban all Muslims but rather ban entries for persons holding passports from certain countries, who just happen to be 99% Muslim.

Naturally... there's more than one approach, for the desired result, and the one you've outlined is the most obvious and most likely effective.

Yep, but it's also likely to result in some retaliation by those countries which could be anything from severing relations with the US, denying entry of persons holding US passports, breaking trade, terrorism information sharing, maritime, and flyover agreements, etc. It might even inspire more homegrown terrorism in the US.

So now you're going to name one 'muslim country' that will "sever relations" etc. with the US right?
WRONG!
Every 'muslim' country on the planet is basically surviving by having a trade relationship, tourism, military aid/protection, trade deals, etc, with the US. Many muslim country leaders are fucking delighted to see how fucking stupid Obama is in allowing muslim radicals and criminals to enter the US then disappear.
Same with the corrupt leaders in Mexico.
Obama: "Bring us your fucking mentally ill. Your hardened criminals. You extremist muslim terrorists, your illiterates! I'm sure some of them will end up voting DEM in the future. In the meantime it's up to all you White working class REPs to take care of them".

The governments of these countries would have to retaliate, not necessary severing relations. If the head of state does not, he looses creditably with his supporters. In most of these middle eastern countries US tourism and trade is not critical. Arab oil is sold on the world market and their major trading partners are in the region or Europe not the US.

Suspending information sharing with homeland security, flyover and maritime privileges, and support for US military base would be devastating to US military in the middle east and anti-terrorism efforts worldwide. Outside of the middle east, Pakistan could make US efforts in Afghanistan very difficult. Then there are other countries with huge Muslim populations that are long term allies of the US and are major trading partners with large US investments such as India and Indonesia.

 

[the_human_being]

Trump is still trying to fearmonger his way into the White House.

I hope he begins rounding up and questioning socialists too - just like the 1950s.

I would prefer having a season on Liberals like they do for deer hunting. Maybe a bag limit of six a day?

 

[MaryL]

When Muslim men demand the forced removal of the clitoris, and wearing burkas, and females treated like second class citizens, that tends to be a major sticking point.

How man Muslim men do you know that actually do this?

Really? I didn't personally know Hitler, for that mater. Did you? Maybe Nazis are misunderstood, yes?Just look at the bloody facts, is that too hard?

Oh, I've see them in Islamaphobia web sites, staged ISIS videos, and radical christian web sites all seeking a worldwide jihad, nation against, nation and neighbor against neighbor. Keep it up and the Armageddon or jihad you seek may be just around the corner.

Islamaphobia sites? I avoid the propaganda, just observe the overall. Who is kidding who here? IF Christians were pulling these same stunts on the same scale, nobody would be letting that slide under the ruse of Multiculturalism. Please, no Christmas trees on Starbucks coffee cups anymore, crèches in public places. Can't have that. I am agnostic, what do I care? When people that can't have prayer in schools defend Islam. Are you people schizophrenic or what? After 9/11 even? Get a shrink. Do us a favor already.

 

[LastProphet]

Where Trump comes from: naming illuminati icon in trumperminator role
"Trump's popularity rising after calling for murder for simply being family and Clinton's victories, although 98% can't stand her:
manufactured by the same illuminazi writer of the rest of the script, including the name Trump.
Actor playing billionaire named after Tramp, Trumpet (Last) and Truman (Show).
Blog
Simulated Reality, the world as we know it: Where Trump comes from: naming illuminati icon in trumperminator role

Waterloo basic facts is all you need to get the "Truman show":
Reminder of Last Prophet's words from Jun 2005, on the 190th anniversary of Waterloo:

Battle of Waterloo sets three illuminati milestones: last two still stand
1789: illuminati use the cover of the French Revolution to first introduce a weapon for mass sacrifices, the guillotine.
25 years later, at Waterloo, illuminati set another milestone in mass human sacrifices and beyond.

Battle of Waterloo 1815: first two milestones, two sides of the same coin, set the same day:
Never before:
1. - were as many people and as much young blood sacrificed under the cover of a fake war.
Sunday, 18 June 1815: at the end of the day, "more than 26,000 French were killed or wounded and another 9,000 captured at Waterloo; allied casualties totaled 22,000. ".
2. - did the illuminati go to such lengths to divert from a previous defeat, more precisely Napoleon's army defeat two years earlier in Russia.

At the end of the day in the History of End Times: what happened to the two first Waterloo milestones
Both continued to stand high above until the illuminati shot the first bullet of End Times, June 28, 1914, at Sarajevo
The first milestone was immediately after surpassed, accordingly to the original illuminati end times script.
The same script had the second milestone unchallenged for "the next 1000 years".
The script was secured 1917, as the October revolution in Russia came to the scripted end.
But the script had to be modified in 1924. This caused the second milestone to be approached in 1944 and 1945, Yet it was indeed never surpassed.

First milestone immediately surpassed again and again, in World War I
The first milestone was not only rapidly surpassed but also many times, both in the numbers of sacrificed lives as well as of episodes. Keyword: battle of Verdun.

October revolution in Russia: implications for first two Waterloo milestones
With agent Lenin as leader of the Soviet Union illuminati had finally, for the first time ever, control of all of Europe and the United States.
What this implied for the two first Waterloo milestones:
1. from then on and until the end of the "war to end all wars", all battles on european soil would be of the same type as Waterloo.
2. the second Waterloo milestone would never again be even approached, not to mention surpassed.
Context note, see "World War III: original script" for details:
World War I went exactly as scripted, and the script included the two previously mentioned implications for the Waterloo milestones.
In other words, all this was already scripted before the illuminati murdered archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo, June 1914:
- October Revolution in Russia, Versailles treaty to interrupt the World War and stage "Germany's defeat",
- the show terminated by having the illuminazi Messiah proclaim global slavery after WW2, a fake war that would start around 1930 and would be over within two years.

Second milestone unsurpassed, yet against the script and the odds, approached in World War II
Against all odds, the second milestone was indeed approached years later. First major episode on european soil: D-Day 1944.
The climax: the US and UK bombings of civilians and of churches in Germany, early 1945 (Keyword: Dresden).
Yet none of these "Truman show" type of reenactements, staged as Hitler's last Luftwaffe commander was about to become US president Truman, did indeed surpass Waterloo's coreography.

Third Waterloo milestone: same coin as the other two, and that beyond the battle
Now let's put the two previous milestones, set on the same day, on the same side of the coiin.
Now we can press the third milestone on the other side: not only does it relate to Waterloo but it also has the same roots as the two first milestones on the other side of the coin: a fake war.
Same as the first Waterloo milestone, the third one also fulfills an illuminati's religion commandment and same as the second one, it still stands.
This one is not about offering human blood to satan but rather to have human cattle robotically repeat "black is white".
The third milestone emerged only years later and reflects how convincingly the illuminati staged Waterloo.
In other words, how high the illuminati set the two first milestones: "Waterloo added a phrase to the vernacular: "Waterloo" has come to mean decisive and complete defeat."

Waterloo's fourth milestone, the only official one, isn't real
The only milestine in History books, is in fact is part of the "Truman show", not of real History.
Waterloo meant the end of the Napoleonic Wars: this is a fact.
Yet "The Allied victory over Napoleon Bonaparte" setting the milestome "the end to French domination of Europe, the end of France's legacy of greatness (never regained)" is false.
The milestone had already been set 25 years earlier.
Since then the illuminati TOTALLY control France, except while Charles De Gaulle was president.

Back to the guillotine to get why the fourth milestone is a fake
I don't mean what's coming now, global genocide also in malls, and also by the guillotine, fulfilling illuminati's religion commandment for parallel scripts.
I mean the first line of the article: it's also the key to get why the fourth Waterloo milestone was in fact already set months after the 1789 french revolution.
The "Napoleonic Wars" was an illuminati script part of the mission of illuminati agent Napoleon, whose ultimate role was suicide bomber.
The same role as "Lenin", Roosevelt and Churchill in the orginal script for World War II and fake Putin now.

French Revolution 1789: Slaughtering mobs part of the same show as the mobs used in the Waterloo re-enactments in the Truman show
In the world as the human cattle knows it, Waterloo stands for the "Biggest ever battle re-enactment", staged June 14, 2015.
In the real Truman show however, the Waterloo re-enactments are much bigger and impressive.
Participants include:
- french and german soldiers dying in the Verdun trenches (as explained by the first Waterloo milestone)
- civilians bombed in Feb 1945 in Dresden (as explained by the second Waterloo milestone)
- allied US and UK soldiers dying on D-Day (as explained by both the first and second Waterloo milestones).
ALL
Illuminati Milestones: Waterloo battle unsurpassed 2 out of 3 sides of same fake war coin

 

[dannyboys]

Where Trump comes from: naming illuminati icon in trumperminator role
"Trump's popularity rising after calling for murder for simply being family and Clinton's victories, although 98% can't stand her:
manufactured by the same illuminazi writer of the rest of the script, including the name Trump.
Actor playing billionaire named after Tramp, Trumpet (Last) and Truman (Show).
Blog
Simulated Reality, the world as we know it: Where Trump comes from: naming illuminati icon in trumperminator role

Waterloo basic facts is all you need to get the "Truman show":
Reminder of Last Prophet's words from Jun 2005, on the 190th anniversary of Waterloo:

Battle of Waterloo sets three illuminati milestones: last two still stand
1789: illuminati use the cover of the French Revolution to first introduce a weapon for mass sacrifices, the guillotine.
25 years later, at Waterloo, illuminati set another milestone in mass human sacrifices and beyond.

Battle of Waterloo 1815: first two milestones, two sides of the same coin, set the same day:
Never before:
1. - were as many people and as much young blood sacrificed under the cover of a fake war.
Sunday, 18 June 1815: at the end of the day, "more than 26,000 French were killed or wounded and another 9,000 captured at Waterloo; allied casualties totaled 22,000. ".
2. - did the illuminati go to such lengths to divert from a previous defeat, more precisely Napoleon's army defeat two years earlier in Russia.

At the end of the day in the History of End Times: what happened to the two first Waterloo milestones
Both continued to stand high above until the illuminati shot the first bullet of End Times, June 28, 1914, at Sarajevo
The first milestone was immediately after surpassed, accordingly to the original illuminati end times script.
The same script had the second milestone unchallenged for "the next 1000 years".
The script was secured 1917, as the October revolution in Russia came to the scripted end.
But the script had to be modified in 1924. This caused the second milestone to be approached in 1944 and 1945, Yet it was indeed never surpassed.

First milestone immediately surpassed again and again, in World War I
The first milestone was not only rapidly surpassed but also many times, both in the numbers of sacrificed lives as well as of episodes. Keyword: battle of Verdun.

October revolution in Russia: implications for first two Waterloo milestones
With agent Lenin as leader of the Soviet Union illuminati had finally, for the first time ever, control of all of Europe and the United States.
What this implied for the two first Waterloo milestones:
1. from then on and until the end of the "war to end all wars", all battles on european soil would be of the same type as Waterloo.
2. the second Waterloo milestone would never again be even approached, not to mention surpassed.
Context note, see "World War III: original script" for details:
World War I went exactly as scripted, and the script included the two previously mentioned implications for the Waterloo milestones.
In other words, all this was already scripted before the illuminati murdered archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo, June 1914:
- October Revolution in Russia, Versailles treaty to interrupt the World War and stage "Germany's defeat",
- the show terminated by having the illuminazi Messiah proclaim global slavery after WW2, a fake war that would start around 1930 and would be over within two years.

Second milestone unsurpassed, yet against the script and the odds, approached in World War II
Against all odds, the second milestone was indeed approached years later. First major episode on european soil: D-Day 1944.
The climax: the US and UK bombings of civilians and of churches in Germany, early 1945 (Keyword: Dresden).
Yet none of these "Truman show" type of reenactements, staged as Hitler's last Luftwaffe commander was about to become US president Truman, did indeed surpass Waterloo's coreography.

Third Waterloo milestone: same coin as the other two, and that beyond the battle
Now let's put the two previous milestones, set on the same day, on the same side of the coiin.
Now we can press the third milestone on the other side: not only does it relate to Waterloo but it also has the same roots as the two first milestones on the other side of the coin: a fake war.
Same as the first Waterloo milestone, the third one also fulfills an illuminati's religion commandment and same as the second one, it still stands.
This one is not about offering human blood to satan but rather to have human cattle robotically repeat "black is white".
The third milestone emerged only years later and reflects how convincingly the illuminati staged Waterloo.
In other words, how high the illuminati set the two first milestones: "Waterloo added a phrase to the vernacular: "Waterloo" has come to mean decisive and complete defeat."

Waterloo's fourth milestone, the only official one, isn't real
The only milestine in History books, is in fact is part of the "Truman show", not of real History.
Waterloo meant the end of the Napoleonic Wars: this is a fact.
Yet "The Allied victory over Napoleon Bonaparte" setting the milestome "the end to French domination of Europe, the end of France's legacy of greatness (never regained)" is false.
The milestone had already been set 25 years earlier.
Since then the illuminati TOTALLY control France, except while Charles De Gaulle was president.

Back to the guillotine to get why the fourth milestone is a fake
I don't mean what's coming now, global genocide also in malls, and also by the guillotine, fulfilling illuminati's religion commandment for parallel scripts.
I mean the first line of the article: it's also the key to get why the fourth Waterloo milestone was in fact already set months after the 1789 french revolution.
The "Napoleonic Wars" was an illuminati script part of the mission of illuminati agent Napoleon, whose ultimate role was suicide bomber.
The same role as "Lenin", Roosevelt and Churchill in the orginal script for World War II and fake Putin now.

French Revolution 1789: Slaughtering mobs part of the same show as the mobs used in the Waterloo re-enactments in the Truman show
In the world as the human cattle knows it, Waterloo stands for the "Biggest ever battle re-enactment", staged June 14, 2015.
In the real Truman show however, the Waterloo re-enactments are much bigger and impressive.
Participants include:
- french and german soldiers dying in the Verdun trenches (as explained by the first Waterloo milestone)
- civilians bombed in Feb 1945 in Dresden (as explained by the second Waterloo milestone)
- allied US and UK soldiers dying on D-Day (as explained by both the first and second Waterloo milestones).
ALL
Illuminati Milestones: Waterloo battle unsurpassed 2 out of 3 sides of same fake war coin

You are mentally ill.
Permanent Ignore