Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 32,384
- 21,025
- 1,845
I'm wondering if it was to protect Obama?
Yes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm wondering if it was to protect Obama?
I would live to see .. what needs to be seen ... is US AG Garland hauled before the Oversight Committee and these questions asked ....with the hearing ending like this:
'I will remind the US Attorney General tbat he is still under oath before we begin...
Attorney General Garland, why did the DOJ take no action on reports and Whistleblower testimony in 2018 against then FORMER VP / citizen Joe Biden for engaging in corruption to include Bribery and Pay-To-Play schemes?
You DO realize this constitutes election interference, do you not?
When you learned about it when you became US AG why did YOU not act on it?
On a seperate issue, US AG Garland, why has the FBI and DOJ had Hunter Biden's confirmed laptop, having been confirmed to be his laptop, for several YEARS now and taken no action?
Have you taken any action to investigate the now proven story that Sect of State - then Biden campaign manager - Blinken autjored the now infamous 'Laptop Russian Disinformation' letter and convinced 50 US Intel experts to sign it to help them candidate Biden and interfere in the 2020 election?
-- If not, WHY NOT?
You DO realize that this constitutes election interference, right?
AG Garland, it has now been proven that you and the DOJ knew about President Biden's TS/SCI - Classified information scandal PRIOR to the 2022 mid-tetm elections....
...that you knew there was a significant amount of classified documents capable of causing grave damage to the US if allowed to get into the wrong hands In multiple locations, unguarded, unsecured...
... and YOU CHOSE to hide this fact, chose not to immediayely collet and secure those documents until AFTER the mid-term elections IOT NOT harm Democrat chances during the elections, THEREBY PUTTING PARTISAN POLITICS AHEAD OF NATIONAL SECURITY.
You DO realize this was, at least, the THIRD (3rd) time YOU / THE DOJ has interfered in federal elections, do you not?
AG Garland it has been proven repeatedly that YOU & the DOJ have ignored, sat on, and hidden criminal evidence repeatedly, that you and the DOJ have REPEATEDLY interfered in US elections for tbe benefit and protection of the Democrat Party, Joe Biden, and the Bidrn family.
You have demonstrated that fair and equal Justice is beyond your ability or desire to produce, protect, and defend, as you are the epitome of a partisanly weaponized federal govt official...
..And this is the readon I am revommending and immediately initiating your Impeachment.'
I did not know 2023 was an election year ... neither was 2018 a Presidential election year...
Yeah, reminds me of the Democrats' 1st FAILED Impeachment attempt, when Democrats had ZERO crime, evidence, or witnesses.
Oh, they had a lot of 2nd and 3rd hand 'i / He heard rumors, was told...blah, blah, blah.
In other words, in Joe and Hunter's defense, Democrats are producing a lot of 2nd and 3rd hand bullshit but no actual evidence again.
There was plenty of evidence that Trump was pressuring a foreign leader to launch a phony investigation of a political rival. It was more than rumors.
The faux Impeachnents wete proven to be UnConstitutional and criminal.
Pelosi promised not to allow Impeachment to proceed unless 2 things existed: 1) Bipartisanship & 2) Undeniable evidence. She had NEITHER.
When pushed on this she literally argued that no crime is needed for Impeachment.
During both Impeachments Democrats proved they had ZERO crime, evidence, or witnesses..
...which was made obvious by the fact that in both faux Impeachments Democrats were caught illegally altering transcripts (which they again were caught doing during the J6 Committee hearings), illegally manufacturing evidence, and creating / claiming to have non-existent whistleblowers...ALL IN AN ATTEMPT TO OVERTHROW THE US GOVT BY TRYING TO ILLEGALLY REMOVE A SITTING PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE.
Both failed, faux Impeachments were exposed as embarrassing, criminal clusterfucks that blew up in the Democrats' faces ... which will be recorded in history.
View attachment 783528
Biden is tanking in the polls ! we know that more than likely nothing will happen to a crooked democrat that actually is guilty of everything and even more than what the left accused Trump of .... lol ! But watch your guys poll numbers drop even lower when the voters see the curtain pulled on the Biden pay to play scheme's .
Trump is tanking in the polls even more. Biden will beat Trump again if that is what it comes to.
Absolutely false you fucking retard.
Take your troll ass someplace else.
Absolutely true. We know Trump supporters are the retards.
You are the one trolling. Try getting your ass out of here.
Ignorantly?
You aretghe one who continues to claim Un-Constitutional, proven criminal Impeachments conducted in an attempt to overthrow the US govt based on no crime, no evidence, no witnesses, and proven Democrat illegally altered and manufactured evidence are actual Impeachents.
Those Impeschments are as legitimate as Hillary's 'Russian Collusion' or Biden's / Blinken's 'Russian Disinformation' letter.
they were failed as they went nowhere, the trails exonerated himYeah, ignorantly.
Trump was impeached twice a and you said they were failed impeachments.
All your other right wing screed is irrelevant.
Man up and own your fail.
Yeah right, 2018 the fake Russian Collusion investigation was in full swing under Mueller. Try again. Fail.DOJ reported to Trump in 2018
Was Trump covering for Biden?
Trump started that investigation when he fired ComeyYeah right, 2018 the fake Russian Collusion investigation was in full swing under Mueller. Try again. Fail.
The DOJ has been in the pocket of the Democratic Party for years. Nothing will happen to Hunter or the head of the crime family Big Guy Joe. You can count on that.
Yeah right, 2018 the fake Russian Collusion investigation was in full swing under Mueller. Try again. Fail.
Because I have a keen grasp of the obvious.Why is it that every time one of your conspiracy theories are debunked because the Democrats control EVERYTHING!!
Because I have a keen grasp of the obvious.
Always angry, always wrong. Merrick Garland is the head of the DOJ and he is a 100% stooge for the Democratic Party. Does that help you understand?You call your dick “the obvious”.
Oh. Fellow scumbags cleared their scumbag leader after a full “investigation.”Except Congress investigated this in 2020 and cleared Biden.
Republican Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden (Published 2020)
The report delivered on Wednesday appeared to be little more than a rehashing of unproven allegations that echoed a Russian disinformation campaign.www.nytimes.com
WASHINGTON — An election-year investigation by Senate Republicans into corruption allegations against Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son, Hunter, involving Ukraine found no evidence of improper influence or wrongdoing by the former vice president, closing out an inquiry its leaders had hoped would tarnish the Democratic presidential nominee.
The investigation found that Hunter Biden had “cashed in” on his father’s name to close lucrative business deals around the world. It also concluded that his work for Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company then mired in a corruption scandal, while the former vice president was directing American policy toward Kyiv had given the appearance of a conflict of interest and alarmed some State Department officials.
But an 87-page report summing up the findings, released jointly on Wednesday by the Senate Homeland Security and Finance Committees, contained no evidence that the elder Mr. Biden improperly manipulated American policy toward Ukraine or committed any other misdeed. In fact, investigators heard witness testimony that rebutted those charges.