zaangalewa
Gold Member
- Jan 24, 2015
- 21,294
- 2,153
- 140
Slavs are a linguistic community. Slavs by origin are only those who descended from the Huns: ...
Your "concept" of history is really a torture.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Slavs are a linguistic community. Slavs by origin are only those who descended from the Huns: ...
There's only one problem. There are peoples that are destroyed as a unity, there are peoples that are completely destroyed physically, there are peoples that are being destroyed by the imperialists right now, before our eyes, such as the Uighurs in China. The people have their own spirit, their own body, killing a people is no less a crime than killing a person.the other side of the problem
Stalin for example displaced and murdered how many million Russians and others with what kind of methods?Hatred of enemies and conquerors is normal, but it is now "not accepted"
It's just your ignorance.
He is a good student of Bismarck,
you must be delighted with his methods.
Huns is the common name for Horsemen. The Slavic language is Old Bulgarian, there is no doubt that it was spoken by Poles, Old Bulgars, Avars and Khazars. I call them Huns. You can call them Aryans if it's more convenient for you.No. It is your absolute stupidity which is unbearable. The Huns - today called Hungarians - speak a Finno-uiguric language. The Russians speak an Indo-Germanic language. We spoke about this - but you "forget" everythgin what I said to you before it reached your ears over you eyes. You speak a lot - but nearly everything what you say about history is stupid nonsense.
Bismark? What for heavens sake has Bismark to do with this mass-murderer? The Brit Willilam II had benme a criminal - but nit so Bismark. And even the mad man William II had been harmless compared with the devilish mass-murderer Stalin.
The Slavic language is Old Bulgarian,
there is no doubt that it was spoken by Poles, Old Bulgars, Avars
and Khazars. I call them Huns.
You can call them Aryans
if it's more convenient for you.
The Hungarians come from approximately the same people as the Uighurs, they have identical ethnonyms, in Asia these peoples were called the Dzungars, as well as the Ugrs. They have nothing to do with the Finns, neither in the sense of the Venets nor in the sense of the Saami. This is a historical fake. I don't know where their language came from, but their script is runic and their heraldry is identical to the palette of the US flag, their cowboys are identical to US cowboys, and the Austro-Hungarian political order is identical to that of the USA.today called Hungarians
The orrgrin of the Slawoc language is in the Ukraine not far from Russia.
Pan-Germanists, National Socialists and Bolsheviks pursued the same imperial policy as Bismarck.
The Bolsheviks themselves essentially come from the same places as Bismarck. All the genocides of the Bolsheviks concerned mainly the steppe peoples, the Volga region, Kazakhstan, the Don region and Ukraine. These are the most fertile lands. There were no Glodomors in the northwest, in the Baltic States and in Belarus. It was not a civil war, but the conquest and destruction of peoples.
Danube region, the region of the Tisza river. Yes, it was in Ukraine too.
Ukraine itself was part of Avaria and Bulgaria. Its name comes from Ugry. Yes, Ukrainian and Polish are the closest to Avar, and they even retained the Aryan melodiousness.
Most Ukrainian folk songs do not mention the Dnieper but the Danube
Ukrainian and Polish are the most melodic languages, they are ideal for songs.
The Aryan languages were musically accented.
The Vedic language was the height of linguistic perfection, Vedic hymns, the most expressive songs of the ancient world and perhaps the most ancient songs that ever existed on earth were written.
I think there is a connection here.