Does a liberal have the IQ to understand how Republican capitalist health care.....

Ed, I agree with your support of federal regulation here over states rights even if it is a liberal reading of the constitution.

too stupid by 100% as usual. Republicans support free trade and so did the commerce clause of the Constitution.

See why we say a liberal will be slow??
 
Ed, I agree with your support of federal regulation here over states rights even if it is a liberal reading of the constitution.

too stupid by 100% as usual. Republicans support free trade and so did the commerce clause of the Constitution.

See why we say a liberal will be slow??

So you sau the states do not have the right to set their own regulations on healthcare? How about emissions? Fire safety? Marriage? Slavery? Abortion?

Watch it with them slow remarks Mr confused by 3 questions ;)
 
So you sau the states do not have the right to set their own regulations on healthcare? How about emissions? Fire safety? Marriage? Slavery? Abortion?

dear, your use of English is so sloppy you have no ability to communicate and so are slow, very slow. States obviously do regulate health care so does that mean, to your way of thinking, they have the right or merely exercise the right despite not technically having the right? And, those options are different from whether they should exercise the right. Do you have any idea what question you really want to ask and what you would do with the answer once you got it. I'm 100% sure you have no idea so your debates, as always, cant possibly lead anywhere.
 
Last edited:

I of course am devastated to find that liberal authorities have conclusively demonstrated that conservatives are stupid. Before I commit suicide over a lifetime wasted promulgating stupid conservative ideas I wonder if you would be kind enough to present the most substantive example of a conservative/libertarian stupid idea.

My life is on your hands, and I expect to survive the experience without effort. You on the other hand won't be able to present an example and will survive too but in body only because as a liberal you lack the IQ to comprehend your intellectual death.
 
Last edited:
Ed, I agree with your support of federal regulation here over states rights even if it is a liberal reading of the constitution.

too stupid by 100% as usual. Republicans support free trade and so did the commerce clause of the Constitution.

See why we say a liberal will be slow??

So you sau the states do not have the right to set their own regulations on healthcare? How about emissions? Fire safety? Marriage? Slavery? Abortion?

Watch it with them slow remarks Mr confused by 3 questions ;)

You honestly are confused by that and go around calling ppl slow all day?

So you think the states just should not regulate healthcare?

Do you think the states should have the power to regulate abortion?

How about emissions? Should liberal republican california govenors have the power to force cars not to burn leaded gas?

What about fire safety regulations? It is a pain to have to make things California compliant.

What about gun laws? Do you want states to regulate what a well regulated militia means?
 
So you think the states just should not regulate healthcare?

Republicans since Jefferson have favored free trade among the states. Liberalisn as regards trade was a major shortcoming of the Articles. You may be the only person in the world not to know that
 
too stupid by 100% as usual. Republicans support free trade and so did the commerce clause of the Constitution.

See why we say a liberal will be slow??

So you sau the states do not have the right to set their own regulations on healthcare? How about emissions? Fire safety? Marriage? Slavery? Abortion?

Watch it with them slow remarks Mr confused by 3 questions ;)

You honestly are confused by that and go around calling ppl slow all day?

So you think the states just should not regulate healthcare?

Do you think the states should have the power to regulate abortion?

How about emissions? Should liberal republican california govenors have the power to force cars not to burn leaded gas?

What about fire safety regulations? It is a pain to have to make things California compliant.

What about gun laws? Do you want states to regulate what a well regulated militia means?

dear, we have a federalist system where power is shared between fed and states on 1000 issues. Do you know why you are asking about how it should be shared as regards 1000 different issues??? NOtice how you must evade every question that is asked of you. That must tell you something about your IQ?
 
Last edited:
So you sau the states do not have the right to set their own regulations on healthcare? How about emissions? Fire safety? Marriage? Slavery? Abortion?

Watch it with them slow remarks Mr confused by 3 questions ;)

You honestly are confused by that and go around calling ppl slow all day?

So you think the states just should not regulate healthcare?

Do you think the states should have the power to regulate abortion?

How about emissions? Should liberal republican california govenors have the power to force cars not to burn leaded gas?

What about fire safety regulations? It is a pain to have to make things California compliant.

What about gun laws? Do you want states to regulate what a well regulated militia means?

dear, we have a federalist system where power is shared between fed and states on 1000 issues. Do you know why you are asking about how it should be shared as regards 1000 different issues??? NOtice how you must evade every question that is asked of you. That must tell you something about your IQ?

Ed, I have an answer to each of those questions....if you do not I suppose that is ok.

So your opinion on healthcare is states DO have the right to regulate it but SHOULD NOT? as a system of fifty seperate regulatory systems is inefficient. Interesting.

How about abortion? 50 different laws or just one nationwide law?
 

I of course am devastated to find that liberal authorities have conclusively demonstrated that conservatives are stupid. Before I commit suicide over a lifetime wasted promulgating stupid conservative ideas I wonder if you would be kind enough to present the most substantive example of a conservative/libertarian stupid idea.

My life is on your hands, and I expect to survive the experience without effort. You on the other hand won't be able to present an example and will survive too but in body only because as a liberal you lack the IQ to comprehend your intellectual death.

95% of your posts. Do I need to copy them for you, or can you just go back and read them?
 

I of course am devastated to find that liberal authorities have conclusively demonstrated that conservatives are stupid. Before I commit suicide over a lifetime wasted promulgating stupid conservative ideas I wonder if you would be kind enough to present the most substantive example of a conservative/libertarian stupid idea.

My life is on your hands, and I expect to survive the experience without effort. You on the other hand won't be able to present an example and will survive too but in body only because as a liberal you lack the IQ to comprehend your intellectual death.

95% of your posts. Do I need to copy them for you, or can you just go back and read them?

you say conservatism is mistaken but you are afraid to present your most substantive example. What does your fear tell you about the liberal IQ and character??
 
295677_589077147780821_1739212255_n.jpg
 
Go for it. Give the state control over your health care.

Dumbasses.
 
Go for it. Give the state control over your health care.

Dumbasses.

well, the state had control of everything in China; then they switched to capitalism and now they are getting rich as opposed to starving to death in the millions!!

A simple lesson that escapes the liberal mind. For the liberal science does not matter one bit, they are anti-rational true believers.
 
Last edited:
Go for it. Give the state control over your health care.

Dumbasses.

well, the state had control of everything in China; then they switched to capitalism and now they are getting rich as opposed to starving to death in the millions!!

A simple lesson that escapes the liberal mind. For the liberal science does not matter one bit, they are anti-rational true believers.

China is becoming very like the US - the rich get richer and poor get homeless because the rich forced them out of their homes so they could use the land to build vast empty cities.

EDUCATE YOURSELF.
 
China is becoming very like the US -

this is true, not only is starvation down to almost nothing
from 5 million a year or so under liberalism, but they are buying as many cars now as we do in America.

In fact, since the Republicans introduced capitalism there in 1980 world poverty has been cut in half!!

Liberals are anti scieince and anti-rational so have no guilt about the millions who starved to death under their policies.
 
In a sad way I was introduced to a capitalistic healthcare system. The mother in law's rat terrier was not eating. Vet visit and bill one a month ago. No real diagnosis but better food and some stool softener.

It did not get better. After letting another paycheck roll through she takes the yappie thing back in. They wanna do x-rays. She requests and actually gets an estimate and takes the dog home no x-rays. Well after a night of puking she takes the dog back in and pays for x-rays.

TUMOR! and a decent size one blocking some intestines.

Now when my old man had cancer chemo lengthened his life by a bit under the old Eisenhower era socialist system. But with this dog on the open market the mother in law had to think about tests and biopsies then treatment costs.

Well, it PROBABLY was not going to work and this yappie dog was 9 years old so she drug.her feet a few nights to analyze the cost vs chances of success.

Then last week had the pup creamated. It WAS the responsible thing to do financially after all according to the capitalist death panel ;)
 
In a sad way I was introduced to a capitalistic healthcare system. The mother in law's rat terrier was not eating. Vet visit and bill one a month ago. No real diagnosis but better food and some stool softener.

It did not get better. After letting another paycheck roll through she takes the yappie thing back in. They wanna do x-rays. She requests and actually gets an estimate and takes the dog home no x-rays. Well after a night of puking she takes the dog back in and pays for x-rays.

TUMOR! and a decent size one blocking some intestines.

Now when my old man had cancer chemo lengthened his life by a bit under the old Eisenhower era socialist system. But with this dog on the open market the mother in law had to think about tests and biopsies then treatment costs.

Well, it PROBABLY was not going to work and this yappie dog was 9 years old so she drug.her feet a few nights to analyze the cost vs chances of success.

Then last week had the pup creamated. It WAS the responsible thing to do financially after all according to the capitalist death panel ;)

can you say what your point is????
 
In a sad way I was introduced to a capitalistic healthcare system. The mother in law's rat terrier was not eating. Vet visit and bill one a month ago. No real diagnosis but better food and some stool softener.

It did not get better. After letting another paycheck roll through she takes the yappie thing back in. They wanna do x-rays. She requests and actually gets an estimate and takes the dog home no x-rays. Well after a night of puking she takes the dog back in and pays for x-rays.

TUMOR! and a decent size one blocking some intestines.

Now when my old man had cancer chemo lengthened his life by a bit under the old Eisenhower era socialist system. But with this dog on the open market the mother in law had to think about tests and biopsies then treatment costs.

Well, it PROBABLY was not going to work and this yappie dog was 9 years old so she drug.her feet a few nights to analyze the cost vs chances of success.

Then last week had the pup creamated. It WAS the responsible thing to do financially after all according to the capitalist death panel ;)

The vet has every right to expect to be paid but the other side of that coin is that the degree of care and treatment is often dependent on how much money we have in our checking account.

Our current socialist system, EMTALA is only slightly better than nothing and, in spite of romney's lies to the contrary, a lot of people die for lack of health care.

ACA will require most of us to pay for our own health care insurance. IMO, that's the way it should be.
 

Forum List

Back
Top