Does a 3-day waiting period violate your rights?

[JohnA]

are you stupid or just cant read . this is what the law says

South Dakota Governor Signs Tough Abortion Bill Into Law
Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard signed a bill requiring women seeking an abortion to wait three days after meeting with a doctor and *receive counseling *before undergoing the procedure, news agencies reported.

RECEIVE COUNSELING not voluntary mandated means to bully her into changing her mind

read before you post .......

Speaking of reading before posting...

Seperate issue. The question here is the waiting period itself

Did you want to address the previous points related to same that you chose to skip over?

christ almighty how dense are you.
i am addressing the waiting period the *waiting period where the *govt todies * are giving the right to council the mother who has already made a discision as to whether she wants the baby or not .
why would they have a mandate to council her when she has already made HER DECISION she has not asked for councelling its being forced on her

in the case of gun *waiting period *no councelling is required or asked for or mandated .

how else shall i address the waiting period
is it to long ? YES AND UNNESSASARY
in both cases it should be no waiting period at all

in abortion the doctor has already approved the measure who the fuck is the state to interfere in the relationship between a doctor and his /her patient ? .

in the case of guns the application has been approved by the govt no need to wait .

 

[rdean]

South Dakota Governor Signs Tough Abortion Bill Into Law
Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard signed a bill requiring women seeking an abortion to wait three days after meeting with a doctor and receive counseling before undergoing the procedure, news agencies reported.

South Dakota Governor Signs Tough Abortion Bill Into Law

Up to this point, liberals have regularly said no.
What say ye now?

Counseling from ignorant right wingers, NOT professionals. Pathetic and insulting. Those guys would live in our bedrooms with score cards if given the chance. What ever happened to "small government"? Guess it was just another in a long, long string of lies.

 

[M14 Shooter]

South Dakota Governor Signs Tough Abortion Bill Into Law
Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard signed a bill requiring women seeking an abortion to wait three days after meeting with a doctor and receive counseling before undergoing the procedure, news agencies reported.

South Dakota Governor Signs Tough Abortion Bill Into Law

Up to this point, liberals have regularly said no.
What say ye now?

Counseling from ignorant right wingers, NOT professionals. Pathetic and insulting. Those guys would live in our bedrooms with score cards if given the chance. What ever happened to "small government"? Guess it was just another in a long, long string of lies.

You didn't answer the question:
Does a 3 day waiting period violate your rights?

 

[JohnA]

South Dakota Governor Signs Tough Abortion Bill Into Law

Up to this point, liberals have regularly said no.
What say ye now?

Counseling from ignorant right wingers, NOT professionals. Pathetic and insulting. Those guys would live in our bedrooms with score cards if given the chance. What ever happened to "small government"? Guess it was just another in a long, long string of lies.

You didn't answer the question:
Does a 3 day waiting period violate your rights?

YES it violates your rights in both instances .

any more questions ???

 

[Bernard]

No, not unreasonable considering you are talking about a future human being.

 

[shintao]

Looks like a good opportunity to sue the state for damages and win. I am trying to imagine the circumstances going through the supporters minds. Do they think mothers just arbitrarily make the decision to end their future babies life without consideration? How about the frustrated mother wait three days after delivery and throw the baby out the window, or into a trash can.

 

[M14 Shooter]

are you stupid or just cant read . this is what the law says


RECEIVE COUNSELING not voluntary mandated means to bully her into changing her mind

read before you post .......

Speaking of reading before posting...

Seperate issue. The question here is the waiting period itself

Did you want to address the previous points related to same that you chose to skip over?

christ almighty how dense are you.

Says the guy that continues to harp on an issue not under consideration.

i am addressing the waiting period the *waiting period where the *govt todies * are giving the right to council the mother who has already made a discision as to whether she wants the baby or not . why would they have a mandate to council her when she has already made HER DECISION she has not asked for councelling its being forced on her

No... You are addressing the counselling.
That's not the issue.

how else shall i address the waiting period
is it to long ? YES AND UNNESSASARY
in both cases it should be no waiting period at all

You could have said that quite a while ago.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Counseling from ignorant right wingers, NOT professionals. Pathetic and insulting. Those guys would live in our bedrooms with score cards if given the chance. What ever happened to "small government"? Guess it was just another in a long, long string of lies.

You didn't answer the question:
Does a 3 day waiting period violate your rights?

YES it violates your rights in both instances .
any more questions ???

Yes... who are you to respond for rdean?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Looks like a good opportunity to sue the state for damages and win. I am trying to imagine the circumstances going through the supporters minds. Do they think mothers just arbitrarily make the decision to end their future babies life without consideration? How about the frustrated mother wait three days after delivery and throw the baby out the window, or into a trash can.

You didn't answer the question.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You agree then, that a waiting period on abortion does not violate your rights.
Good boy.

Since that is the opposite of what I said, enjoy the neg reps for lying about my position.

Really.
Explain then how a 3-day wait for an abortion violates your rights.
Be sure to compare and contrast this argument to your position that a 3-day wat for a gun does NOT violate your rights.

Hello darkness, my old friend...

 

[Charles_Main]

South Dakota Governor Signs Tough Abortion Bill Into Law
Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard signed a bill requiring women seeking an abortion to wait three days after meeting with a doctor and receive counseling before undergoing the procedure, news agencies reported.

South Dakota Governor Signs Tough Abortion Bill Into Law

Up to this point, liberals have regularly said no.
What say ye now?

No more than a waiting period to buy a gun.

 

[Charles_Main]

Looks like a good opportunity to sue the state for damages and win. I am trying to imagine the circumstances going through the supporters minds. Do they think mothers just arbitrarily make the decision to end their future babies life without consideration? How about the frustrated mother wait three days after delivery and throw the baby out the window, or into a trash can.

I have personally witnessed a young lady do just that. Get pregnant and immediately decide to have an abortion.

This was my sister in law. She drove 140 Miles to the nearest clinic the day after she found out she was pregnant. Had second thoughts and came home only to go back a week later and do it.

I see nothing wrong with a 3 Day wait.

 

[M14 Shooter]

So you agree that in the 2nd/3rd trimester, where the state DOES have a compelling interest, a 3-day wait does not violate your rights.
Good boy.

You're catching on, slowly.

No, I was actually here long before I started the topic - it just took you this long to muster the honesty necessry to admit I was right.
I was betting 8-5 against that, BTW.

Now, recalling -everything- you've argued thus far:
Cite the compelling state interest in a 3-day wait to take delivery of a gun.

Interesting that there's been no response.
Predictable, as well.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Probably not. Waiting Periods have been deemed Constitutional in the past. No one is taking the right to kill a baby away from a woman. She can still kill her baby if she wants to. All Big Government Goose Steppers (Socialists/Progressives & Neocons) should be applauding this Law. This is exactly what Big Government is all about.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You're catching on, slowly.

No, I was actually here long before I started the topic - it just took you this long to muster the honesty necessry to admit I was right.
I was betting 8-5 against that, BTW.

Now, recalling -everything- you've argued thus far:
Cite the compelling state interest in a 3-day wait to take delivery of a gun.

Interesting that there's been no response.
Predictable, as well.

STLL no response.
:shrug:

 

[auditor0007]

Who does this 'counseling' and what guidelines do they use?

Three days of religious propaganda and an opportunity to pile on more guilt? Leave it to the 'Religious' Right to come up with this crap!

I have no problem with a three day waiting period or with counseling. But I am afraid that you are correct and that this counseling would be nothing more than the badgering of the woman trying to get her to change her mind.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Who does this 'counseling' and what guidelines do they use?

Three days of religious propaganda and an opportunity to pile on more guilt? Leave it to the 'Religious' Right to come up with this crap!

I have no problem with a three day waiting period or with counseling. But I am afraid that you are correct and that this counseling would be nothing more than the badgering of the woman trying to get her to change her mind.

Supprt this assertion.