usmbguest5318
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #21
I find it amusing that you use the phrase "brevity of your remarks" to (I'm guessing here) try to discount eflatminor's post, when your post, framing the topic, is no less brief. A broad topic calls for a broad response, IMHO.Society, no. The market, yes.
- Do you think society should reward you in accordance with your value and merit? Yes or no?
- Should the same approach you think society should use to reward you be used to reward everyone else? Yes or no? Why or why not?
And it's not a matter of what you think you should be rewarded nor what you think of your value or merit. It's how free people making voluntary decisions value you. It's the market that will determine your reward. What you think is irrelevant.
Is this not obvious? What am I missing?What am I missing?
Given the scope of the matter, the brevity of your remarks makes it quite difficult to with certainty say.
Readers were supposed to find my comment amusing. I'm glad the jocular irony came through; that's not an easy thing to convey. So, thank you.
My reply to eflatminor entreats for a more thorough explanation from her/him so one (I, seeing as I replied to it) can tell whether one agrees with his/her analysis , thus whether indeed one finds the member has missed something.