Do you frequently judge people that you do not know?

[xotoxi]

And if so, how often?

 

[Si modo]

I judge what I see from them and what I hear from them, not from others about them, on a regular basis.

 

[xotoxi]

I judge what I see from them and what I hear from them, not from others about them, on a regular basis.

What if you only see what they look like?

 

[blu]

And if so, how often?

every time I read one your posts

 

[Zoom-boing]

I judge people on primarily on their actions and sometimes on looks as well. Non-smilers turn me off.

 

[zzzz]

I try to live by Matthew 7:1 "Judge not, that you be not judged. "

I take people as they are. How they live their life is their buisness and as long as they do not interfere with other peoples "pursuit of happiness" I have no objections. So I do not judge people, they judge themselves.

 

[Zoom-boing]

I try to live by Matthew 7:1 "Judge not, that you be not judged. "

I take people as they are. How they live their life is their buisness and as long as they do not interfere with other peoples "pursuit of happiness" I have no objections. So I do not judge people, they judge themselves.

By judge I was thinking he meant 'to form an opinion of'.

 

[Si modo]

I judge what I see from them and what I hear from them, not from others about them, on a regular basis.

What if you only see what they look like?

I try not to, but I would be lying if I said I did not judge some based on looks. And, sometimes I am very wrong when I do that.

 

[Jeremy]

I judge people based off of their credit score.

 

[Big Black Dog]

I judge everybody by comparing them to me. Most folks don't measure up. I'm just perfect, don't you know! Now, about that swamp land...

 

[zzzz]

I try to live by Matthew 7:1 "Judge not, that you be not judged. "

I take people as they are. How they live their life is their buisness and as long as they do not interfere with other peoples "pursuit of happiness" I have no objections. So I do not judge people, they judge themselves.

By judge I was thinking he meant 'to form an opinion of'.

If a woman is a blonde then I judge her to be an idiot? I do have opinions about issues and things but I usually do not form opinions about people. They are who they are and that is how I view them. When I see a black man I do not see him as a man of color but as a a man. I do not see a handicapped person as handicapped but as a human being and treat them with the same respect and dignity as everone else. I used to judge people but over time you see the error in it and start to realize that everone is different and they live in their own little worlds.

 

[goldcatt]

I try to live by Matthew 7:1 "Judge not, that you be not judged. "

I take people as they are. How they live their life is their buisness and as long as they do not interfere with other peoples "pursuit of happiness" I have no objections. So I do not judge people, they judge themselves.

By judge I was thinking he meant 'to form an opinion of'.

I try to keep an open mind, but it can be tough. Especially if I have to run to Wal-Mart on a Saturday evening for something.

 

[Luissa]

Depends! I like to make fun of people, but I make fun of all people, doesn't matter what their status is in life.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Sure , but they are not strong opinions .

 

[eots]

I try to live by Matthew 7:1 "Judge not, that you be not judged. "

I take people as they are. How they live their life is their buisness and as long as they do not interfere with other peoples "pursuit of happiness" I have no objections. So I do not judge people, they judge themselves.

By judge I was thinking he meant 'to form an opinion of'.

I try to keep an open mind, but it can be tough. Especially if I have to run to Wal-Mart on a Saturday evening for something.

no judgments...just the facts
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYxpHrrZK10&feature=related[/ame]

 

[Si modo]

Anyone curious about their subconscious reaction toward a group can check this out and see: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/selectatest.html

I took the skin color and Arab/Muslim ones.

You have completed the Light Skin - Dark Skin IAT.
Your Result
Your data suggest little to no automatic preference between Light Skin and Dark Skin.

Thank you for your participation. Just below is a breakdown of the scores generated by others. Most respondents find it easier to associate Dark Skin with Bad and Light Skin with Good compared to the reverse.
Skin score distribution

Many of the questions that you answered on the previous page have been addressed in research over the last 10 years. For example, the order that you performed the response pairing is influential, but procedural corrections largely eliminate that influence (see FAQ #1). Each visitor to the site completes the task in a randomized order. If you would like to learn more about the IAT, please visit the FAQs and background information section.

You are welcome to try additional demonstration tasks, and we encourage you to register (easy) for the research site where you will gain access to studies about more than 100 topics about social groups, personality, pop culture, and more.​

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Study?tid=-1

You have completed the Arab-Muslim - Other People IAT.
Your Result
Your data suggest little to no automatic preference between Other People and Arab Muslims.

Thank you for your participation. Just below is a breakdown of the scores generated by others. Most respondents find it easier to associate Arab Muslim with Bad and Other People with Good compared to the reverse.
Arab score distribution

This new test was prompted by the events of September 11, 2001. Suicide pilots, identified as Arab Muslims, crashed airplanes into the World Trade Center towers in New York City and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. killing about 4,000 people. That attack, and the military response by the United States and other countries in Afghanistan and Iraq have surely influenced conscious and unconscious beliefs and attitudes.

We constructed this test of attitude toward Arab Muslims relative to a category consisting of 'Other People' from around the world. Unfortunately, we do not have data on implicit attitudes toward Arab Muslims prior to September 11, with which the attitudes since can be compared. Nevertheless, we introduce this test because we expect that the events of September 11 and its aftermath open a new chapter in the history of the relations among world communities that differ in religious, political, and social ideology. As with other tests at this site, this one may provide insight into implicit attitudes that may not be in line with conscious attitudes or desired attitudes.

Many of the questions that you answered on the previous page have been addressed in research over the last 10 years. For example, the order that you performed the response pairing is influential, but procedural corrections largely eliminate that influence (see FAQ #1). Each visitor to the site completes the task in a randomized order. If you would like to learn more about the IAT, please visit the FAQs and background information section.

You are welcome to try additional demonstration tasks, and we encourage you to register (easy) for the research site where you will gain access to studies about more than 100 topics about social groups, personality, pop culture, and more.​

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Study?tid=-1

If anyone is interested in insight.

 

[007]

Would you have any preconceived thoughts about someone who would do this?

 

[xotoxi]

Anyone curious about their subconscious reaction toward a group can check this out and see: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/selectatest.html

I took the skin color and Arab/Muslim ones.

You have completed the Light Skin - Dark Skin IAT.
Your Result
Your data suggest little to no automatic preference between Light Skin and Dark Skin.

Thank you for your participation. Just below is a breakdown of the scores generated by others. Most respondents find it easier to associate Dark Skin with Bad and Light Skin with Good compared to the reverse.
Skin score distribution

Many of the questions that you answered on the previous page have been addressed in research over the last 10 years. For example, the order that you performed the response pairing is influential, but procedural corrections largely eliminate that influence (see FAQ #1). Each visitor to the site completes the task in a randomized order. If you would like to learn more about the IAT, please visit the FAQs and background information section.

You are welcome to try additional demonstration tasks, and we encourage you to register (easy) for the research site where you will gain access to studies about more than 100 topics about social groups, personality, pop culture, and more.​

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Study?tid=-1

You have completed the Arab-Muslim - Other People IAT.
Your Result
Your data suggest little to no automatic preference between Other People and Arab Muslims.

Thank you for your participation. Just below is a breakdown of the scores generated by others. Most respondents find it easier to associate Arab Muslim with Bad and Other People with Good compared to the reverse.
Arab score distribution

This new test was prompted by the events of September 11, 2001. Suicide pilots, identified as Arab Muslims, crashed airplanes into the World Trade Center towers in New York City and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. killing about 4,000 people. That attack, and the military response by the United States and other countries in Afghanistan and Iraq have surely influenced conscious and unconscious beliefs and attitudes.

We constructed this test of attitude toward Arab Muslims relative to a category consisting of 'Other People' from around the world. Unfortunately, we do not have data on implicit attitudes toward Arab Muslims prior to September 11, with which the attitudes since can be compared. Nevertheless, we introduce this test because we expect that the events of September 11 and its aftermath open a new chapter in the history of the relations among world communities that differ in religious, political, and social ideology. As with other tests at this site, this one may provide insight into implicit attitudes that may not be in line with conscious attitudes or desired attitudes.

Many of the questions that you answered on the previous page have been addressed in research over the last 10 years. For example, the order that you performed the response pairing is influential, but procedural corrections largely eliminate that influence (see FAQ #1). Each visitor to the site completes the task in a randomized order. If you would like to learn more about the IAT, please visit the FAQs and background information section.

You are welcome to try additional demonstration tasks, and we encourage you to register (easy) for the research site where you will gain access to studies about more than 100 topics about social groups, personality, pop culture, and more.​

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Study?tid=-1

If anyone is interested in insight.

I did the test. It showed that I have a moderate automatic preference for Straight People compared to Gay People.

Doing the test, it felt like I had a moderate loss of focus while performing a mundane task.

 

[Si modo]

My personal results in this test surprised me, but the overall results do not surprise me at all:

You have completed the Abled - Disabled IAT.
Your Result
Your data suggest a moderate automatic preference for Abled Persons compared to Disabled Persons.

Thank you for your participation. Just below is a breakdown of the scores generated by others. Most respondents find it easier to associate Disabled Persons with Bad and Abled Persons with Good compared to the reverse.
Disability score distribution

Many of the questions that you answered on the previous page have been addressed in research over the last 10 years. For example, the order that you performed the response pairing is influential, but procedural corrections largely eliminate that influence (see FAQ #1). Each visitor to the site completes the task in a randomized order. If you would like to learn more about the IAT, please visit the FAQs and background information section.

Although the disabilities we depict in this test are physical, they have the potential to function as social stigmas. This test measures a likely indicator of such stigma in the form of an implicit bias against people with physical disability. Such bias may be present in persons who do not consciously hold any negative attitude toward the disabled. As such it is important to be vigilant about its power to potentially influence behavior toward those who are disabled, compared to those who do not have a disability.

The test represents the disabled category with symbols that are familiar from their uses as public signs. We contrast these signs with other, neutral, public symbols. Because physical disability has no borders, we have used symbols that should be recognizable internationally, permitting the test to be used world wide.

You are welcome to try additional demonstration tasks, and we encourage you to register (easy) for the research site where you will gain access to studies about more than 100 topics about social groups, personality, pop culture, and more.​

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Study?tid=-1

 

[Blagger]

Anyone who tells me that when they see someone they don't know in the street and doesn't immediately assess them as someone they would or wouldn't talk to based on first impressions is talking bullshit.

So spare me the 'when I see a black man slouching his way down the street with an aggressive scowl, I accept him as an oppressed man, not a threat', or, 'when I see alternatively dressed, effeminate white man, I see a creative soul making a statement, not an attention seeking fag' nonsense because I won't be buying it.

Sorry, but that's how it is, and how it always will be. So, don't kid yourselves, and I won't kid you.

End of.