I came into this thread hoping for things to be different than the usual Gay Marriage thread at USMB. As usual however, I was disappointed.
Lifes tough, Dog
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I came into this thread hoping for things to be different than the usual Gay Marriage thread at USMB. As usual however, I was disappointed.
I came into this thread hoping for things to be different than the usual Gay Marriage thread at USMB. As usual however, I was disappointed.
Lifes tough, Dog
Lifes tough, Dog
Sure is. But there is obviously a solution that both sides should logically be able to agree on. However, the arguing goes on.
I've solved it several times but nobody listens to me.
I have a feeling many hetero men would love the same behavior if it were heterosexuals doing it.I voted "yes" in the sense that it is a phenomenon known to have occured.
As Terry Pratchett says, "Just because they exist is no call to go around believing in them. It only encourages them."
In LA, they have, or had a Gay Pride Parade every year. I gotta tell you that gives gays a bad name. I have no issues with gays overall, but the parade could have tried to have a little class to promote itself, and not come across the way it did. It was so in your face that it came across as disgusting.
I have a feeling many hetero men would love the same behavior if it were heterosexuals doing it.As Terry Pratchett says, "Just because they exist is no call to go around believing in them. It only encourages them."
In LA, they have, or had a Gay Pride Parade every year. I gotta tell you that gives gays a bad name. I have no issues with gays overall, but the parade could have tried to have a little class to promote itself, and not come across the way it did. It was so in your face that it came across as disgusting.
I have a feeling many hetero men would love the same behavior if it were heterosexuals doing it.As Terry Pratchett says, "Just because they exist is no call to go around believing in them. It only encourages them."
In LA, they have, or had a Gay Pride Parade every year. I gotta tell you that gives gays a bad name. I have no issues with gays overall, but the parade could have tried to have a little class to promote itself, and not come across the way it did. It was so in your face that it came across as disgusting.
I have a feeling many hetero men would love the same behavior if it were heterosexuals doing it.As Terry Pratchett says, "Just because they exist is no call to go around believing in them. It only encourages them."
In LA, they have, or had a Gay Pride Parade every year. I gotta tell you that gives gays a bad name. I have no issues with gays overall, but the parade could have tried to have a little class to promote itself, and not come across the way it did. It was so in your face that it came across as disgusting.
I voted "yes" in the sense that it is a phenomenon known to have occured.
As Terry Pratchett says, "Just because they exist is no call to go around believing in them. It only encourages them."
In LA, they have, or had a Gay Pride Parade every year. I gotta tell you that gives gays a bad name. I have no issues with gays overall, but the parade could have tried to have a little class to promote itself, and not come across the way it did. It was so in your face that it came across as disgusting.
I have a feeling many hetero men would love the same behavior if it were heterosexuals doing it.As Terry Pratchett says, "Just because they exist is no call to go around believing in them. It only encourages them."
In LA, they have, or had a Gay Pride Parade every year. I gotta tell you that gives gays a bad name. I have no issues with gays overall, but the parade could have tried to have a little class to promote itself, and not come across the way it did. It was so in your face that it came across as disgusting.
I have a feeling many hetero men would love the same behavior if it were heterosexuals doing it.In LA, they have, or had a Gay Pride Parade every year. I gotta tell you that gives gays a bad name. I have no issues with gays overall, but the parade could have tried to have a little class to promote itself, and not come across the way it did. It was so in your face that it came across as disgusting.
I doubt it. Ever been to the Folsom Street Fair? They have heterosexuals engaging in essentially the same behavior, and it's about as distasteful to the average middle-class American.
The truth is that most people just don't want to be made an unwilling participant in someone else's sex life. It's called a "private life" for a reason, so keep it that way!
I voted "yes" in the sense that it is a phenomenon known to have occured.
As Terry Pratchett says, "Just because they exist is no call to go around believing in them. It only encourages them."
In LA, they have, or had a Gay Pride Parade every year. I gotta tell you that gives gays a bad name. I have no issues with gays overall, but the parade could have tried to have a little class to promote itself, and not come across the way it did. It was so in your face that it came across as disgusting.
Oh fiddlesticks. The "marriage" they're talking about requires a re-definition of the term, and the desire to make it legal isn't so they can obtain rights (there are civil contracts BESIDES the marriage contract that can secure property rights between couples of any gender). Legalizing marriage in the legal system is just code for getting a foot into those churches who currently don't perform marriages between gay folk.
And you're right...the government has absolutely no place in the churches. So no, the state has no right to force the hand of the church.
you can't possibly be serious.
Sad to say, but Alliebaabaa is perfectly serious. I wonder if she can provide us with the churches that have been forced to perform interracial marriages since Loving v Virginia. But then again, she probably won't.
I go with my stock answer.
I believe gays should be able to experience the same pain and suffering that heteros suffer from with a long drawn out and inopportune marriage.
The only difference is they can't be force into shot-gun weddings.
That's not the question.I voted "yes" in the sense that it is a phenomenon known to have occured.
This is not a question with a wide choice of possible solutions. It is a yes/no question. There is no middle ground or third choice that might be suitable to both sides.Lifes tough, Dog
Sure is. But there is obviously a solution that both sides should logically be able to agree on. However, the arguing goes on.