pvsi
VIP Member
- Nov 17, 2013
- 2,527
- 116
- 85
- Thread starter
- #81
Oh yea, right after it no longer mattered, not only the criticism of Ron Paul on Fox News stopped, but he was invited on programs such as Glenn beck and others on Fox news. Here is the way I see it works:I remember Fox News gave Ron Paul PLENTY of chances to explain his positionIf the media (in general) was truly fair then every, single interested party who desired to participate in the political process would be given equal and substantial air time. Then the voters could decide who to vote for. But the fact of the matter is that CNN, FOX, CBS, NBC, ABC, etc. all place a select few in from of the public eye. Every station (including FOX) gave Ron Paul a little bit of lip service but only played clips of him saying something insignificant or showed him stumbling over his words, etc. They never really gave him a chance to explain his position. He got his word out through social media and InfoWars more than any other way.
(right after he dropped out of the race)
Funny but I don't remember that.
Ron Paul was not perfect, but he was far more real than all other candidates in 2008 and the people, the viewers KNEW it. Establishment media UNDERSTANDS that without allowing people to speak the truth, the viewers will turn away in droves, and may even find a truly independent network for information, which may lead to revolution, so what they do is, when it does not matter, they ALLOW them to speak, and especially an old man like Ron Paul, who looks like a Christian lost in Somalia half the time he speaks on the news, he is safe to manipulate in the circus. If people like him were never allowed to speak on TV, then believe me, people may start paying attention to someone like me and my call to unite the nation. So they have to use people like Ron Paul as distractors and give them a voice during off season.