DNC email shows nomination was rigged for Hillary

Clementine

Platinum Member
Dec 18, 2011
12,919
4,823
350
I'm not a Bernie Sanders fan, but his supporters have a legitimate grievance against the DNC. Hillary has no business getting votes from Super Delegates because they don't exist for the DNC to play favorites. If you take away those votes, where would Hillary stand? Also, there was a coordinated effort between the DNC and the liberal media to stump for Hillary. I think Hillary is one of the most dishonest politicians we've ever had. She's already cheated to get the nod so what are the odds she'll cheat to win the election?

"Bernie Sanders is still in the 2016 race.

Not really sure why since he has no chance of winning but apparently he wants people to look back years from now and talk about him as the guy who made socialism cool again. Or something.

Bernie might be a terrible candidate with backwards ideas but you have to feel for the guy in the sense that the DNC absolutely rigged the game against him from the jump.

They didn’t put up any serious candidates to run against Hillary.

They limited the number of debates and buried the ones they did hold on nights when nobody was watching.

The super delegate system is an absolute joke.

And that’s just the beginning.

A recently leaked DNC email basically proves that the Democrat establishment was actively coordinating with the media in order to push a pro Hillary Clinton narrative for at least the past year.

Bernie’s supporters tend to complain about the unfairness of the Super Delegate system, nearly all of which have pledged to Hillary Clinton. It’s practically insurance for the Democrat establishment to nominate the candidate of their choosing. But when it comes to the Democrat establishment securing the nomination for Hillary – that’s just the tip off the iceberg.

Zero Hedge reports:

While Bernie Sanders’ supporters and independent media outlets have exhaustively pointed out that corporate media’s fatuous prattling over Hillary Clinton likely tipped the elections in her favor, we now have solid proofleaked emails show the DNC colluded with mainstream outlets to heavily favor Clinton.

As the mainstream largely directed attention to the hack of the Democratic National Committee’s strategy to oppose Donald Trump, this collusion to steer the narrative in Hillary’s favor appears to have gone unnoticed, as US Uncut reported. But this series of leaked emails show a meticulously plotted coordination between DNC narratives touting Clinton, rather than Sanders, as if she had been the presumptive nominee from the outset — precisely as activists and fair elections advocates had suspected."


http://www.youngcons.com/leaked-dnc-emails-prove-that-nomination-was-rigged-for-hillary-a-year-ago/
 
Last edited:
In Iowa, Sanders won the popular vote, and Hillary won the Caucus, and then the DNC refused to release the vote total.

The cheating in California was apparently even worse, where the absentee ballots were simply not counted because they were overwhelmingly for Sanders.

Debbie W-S is a classic Zionist Traitor who just wants another treasonous and sold out "US" President to cover up 911 and other things like the fraudulent Global Warming...
 
In Iowa, Sanders won the popular vote, and Hillary won the Caucus, and then the DNC refused to release the vote total.

The cheating in California was apparently even worse, where the absentee ballots were simply not counted because they were overwhelmingly for Sanders.

Debbie W-S is a classic Zionist Traitor who just wants another treasonous and sold out "US" President to cover up 911 and other things like the fraudulent Global Warming...


That's where those super delegates come in handy. They put her ahead when she would otherwise lose the fair way.
 
Last edited:
In Iowa, Sanders won the popular vote, and Hillary won the Caucus, and then the DNC refused to release the vote total.

The cheating in California was apparently even worse, where the absentee ballots were simply not counted because they were overwhelmingly for Sanders.

Debbie W-S is a classic Zionist Traitor who just wants another treasonous and sold out "US" President to cover up 911 and other things like the fraudulent Global Warming...


That's where those super delegates come in handy. They put her ahead when she would otherwise lose.

She's ahead in both pledge delegates and the popular vote. So, no, she would not have lost if not for Super Delegates.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
They did nothing different in this primary vs the primary in 2008, when the DNC/Media proclaimed Obama to be the nominee on June 3rd when he had enough Super Delegates, to give him the total win.... he did not have enough pledged delegates to win before the convention...it was the super delegate count that GAVE him the presumptive nominee position..... 4 days later, June 7th, Hillary conceded.... they were less than 1% apart, a virtual tie.


Although Obama led Clinton in delegates won through state contests, Clinton led in the popular vote as she had more actual votes from the state contests.[2] However, this calculation could not include many states that had held caucuses, which Obama had dominated, and it did include Florida, which neither Clinton nor Obama contested, nor Michigan, where Obama withdraw from the ballot yet Clinton did not, due to the Democratic National Committee's penalizing of those two states for violating party rules. Final vote tallies from organizations including RealClearPolitics did include estimates from caucus states.[3] Regardless of how votes were counted, the candidates' totals were within less than one percent of each other.[4]


Obama received enough superdelegate endorsements on June 3 to claim that he had secured the simple majority of delegates necessary to win the nomination, and Clinton conceded the nomination four days later.[5][6] Obama was nominated on the first ballot, at the August convention. He went on to win the general election, and became the 44th President of the United States on January 20, 2009. Clinton went on to serve as Obama's Secretary of State for his first term.

Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2008 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Berners, remember that a vote for Hillary in the general just makes it that much harder for the next Bernie to make any headway. Send a message.
 
I'm not a Bernie Sanders fan, but his supporters have a legitimate grievance against the DNC. Hillary has no business getting votes from Super Delegates because they don't exist for the DNC to play favorites. If you take away those votes, where would Hillary stand?
If you took away the superdelegates, Hillary still wins.

If you changed the allocation of superdelegates to a winner-take-all scheme for every state, Hillary still wins. In fact, she wins even bigger.

This "rigged" meme is bullshit.
 
I'm not a Bernie Sanders fan, but his supporters have a legitimate grievance against the DNC. Hillary has no business getting votes from Super Delegates because they don't exist for the DNC to play favorites. If you take away those votes, where would Hillary stand?
If you took away the superdelegates, Hillary still wins.

If you changed the allocation of superdelegates to a winner-take-all scheme for every state, Hillary still wins. In fact, she wins even bigger.

This "rigged" meme is bullshit.

And yet still she has to cheat and lie. She just can't help herself. It's pathological...
 
I'm not a Bernie Sanders fan, but his supporters have a legitimate grievance against the DNC. Hillary has no business getting votes from Super Delegates because they don't exist for the DNC to play favorites. If you take away those votes, where would Hillary stand?
If you took away the superdelegates, Hillary still wins.

If you changed the allocation of superdelegates to a winner-take-all scheme for every state, Hillary still wins. In fact, she wins even bigger.

This "rigged" meme is bullshit.

And yet still she has to cheat and lie. She just can't help herself. It's pathological...


And how did she do that, again?
 

Forum List

Back
Top