AntiParty
Tea is the new Kool-Aid
- Mar 12, 2014
- 4,054
- 362
- 85
- Thread starter
- #21
Did America Turn Into Communism After Citizens United?
Nope. Long before.
They've been turning toward communism (actually socialism, not much significant difference at this stage) since at least the 1930s.
Citizens United decision, if anything, backtracked a little as the Supreme Court decided that people had the right to see their political spending protected as political speech (the main purpose of that part of the 1st amendment), and so forbade government from regulating as much as they had been. Whether the people were acting individually or in groups.
Citizens United basically stated "Corporations are People" and gave them the same voting rights as people without notating that not everyone in one industry is in the same party and not a "people". It's directly against the Constitution to force someone to vote a specific way, we do we allow this? Not everyone in "GE" is in one party.
You trying to say Citizens United is a step in the (R)ight direction doesn't surprise me
Forced to vote a specific way, really? You're losing it, no one is forced to vote or invest in a corporation.
A corporation is not a Corporate owner. This is your flaw. Christie Walton is not Wal-Mart, correct? Yet if Christie Walton decides to give to a politician she can do so under Wal-Mart. The topic isn't hard to comprehend. Not everyone who works for Wal-Mart, invests in the stocks at Wal-Mart wants to vote the same way. This is just one Corp of the many.
Just taking a VERY basic example to try to wake your brain up.