- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,369
- 142,477
- 2,615
which is just one piece of evidence here that proves it was impossible for oswald to have done it
I can't believe you morons are still selling that magic bullet shit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
which is just one piece of evidence here that proves it was impossible for oswald to have done it
which is just one piece of evidence here that proves it was impossible for oswald to have done it
I can't believe you morons are still selling that magic bullet shit
which is just one piece of evidence here that proves it was impossible for oswald to have done it
I can't believe you morons are still selling that magic bullet shit
Whoa, hold on thar Hoss, check please.
My posting the video was a joke!
Who done itHis motive? The 1976 investigation concluded that it probably was a conspiracy.Oswald heard that JFK would be driving by his place of work so he brought his gun, fired three shots and blew the Presidents brains out
United States House Select Committee on Assassinations - Wikipedia
There is way more to Kennedy's death that Oswald. An Oswald I think was the biggest patsy in history.
To many people saw things that day and I'd bet most of what they saw was ignored by the Warren Commission who wanted the whole incident wrapped up in a nice bow.
How and why?
Some documents just released
The JFK assassination files: Live updates - CNNPolitics
OMG Oswald is a patsy!
Who done itHis motive? The 1976 investigation concluded that it probably was a conspiracy.Oswald heard that JFK would be driving by his place of work so he brought his gun, fired three shots and blew the Presidents brains out
United States House Select Committee on Assassinations - Wikipedia
There is way more to Kennedy's death that Oswald. An Oswald I think was the biggest patsy in history.
To many people saw things that day and I'd bet most of what they saw was ignored by the Warren Commission who wanted the whole incident wrapped up in a nice bow.
How and why?
That's the question everyone wants the answers to.
If you believe the Warren Report then good for you. You obviously see nothing wrong with it.
Carry on.
I hope once and for all the release of these files answers the question, as to why detectives made Oswald wear this tiny hat when they arrested him.
3Px19IMQ9CQgwPCoMTzg_
We see on this thread that FF Indiana asks badger2 about reading Posner's book. The first ten minutes looking at it already reveals Posner's lack of mentioning de Mohrenschildt's doctor. No document seems to exist that this doctor had a license to practice medicine, though the doctor had to sign somewhere. The doctor's name is mentioned in Ultimate Sacrifice, if we are not mistaken. A further irony is about Posner's fascination with Mengele: Klages also studied handwriting analysis at Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.
We see on this thread that FF Indiana asks badger2 about reading Posner's book. The first ten minutes looking at it already reveals Posner's lack of mentioning de Mohrenschildt's doctor. No document seems to exist that this doctor had a license to practice medicine, though the doctor had to sign somewhere. The doctor's name is mentioned in Ultimate Sacrifice, if we are not mistaken. A further irony is about Posner's fascination with Mengele: Klages also studied handwriting analysis at Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.
ever notice that these shills Indiana,DD,shillian,and WRONGwinger in their desperate attempts at trying to convince us the warren commission is facual they always get desperate and grasp at straws by always talking about Posners book Case Closed?
THEN everytime I mention the obvious that they have obviously never read the works of one of the early pioneers critical of the warren commission Harold Weisbergs book Case "OPEN" how that book debunks Posners book point by point,they always do this- everytime
since they know Weisbergs book proves in spades what a pathological liar he is and withholds key facts with many ommissions? am i the only one here that has noticed the obvious about them, that they have never read Weisbergs book Case OPEN?
Posners book is cleverly written,I will give him that much.If you are someone just starting out and dnot know the real facts of the case,it is easy to believe and get fooled on.He had ME going for the first 50 pages or so thinking-wow maybe oswald WAS the lone assassin?
but after the first 50 pages or so he just starts telling outright lies that never happened and lying about what witnesses said and what other reseachers have said in the past,things they never said in as much as i wanted to believe that Posners book was the all ending truth to the whole thing,after he exposed himself for the liar he was,I knew we were back to square one again.
We see on this thread that FF Indiana asks badger2 about reading Posner's book. The first ten minutes looking at it already reveals Posner's lack of mentioning de Mohrenschildt's doctor. No document seems to exist that this doctor had a license to practice medicine, though the doctor had to sign somewhere. The doctor's name is mentioned in Ultimate Sacrifice, if we are not mistaken. A further irony is about Posner's fascination with Mengele: Klages also studied handwriting analysis at Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.
ever notice that these shills Indiana,DD,shillian,and WRONGwinger in their desperate attempts at trying to convince us the warren commission is factual they always get desperate and grasp at straws by always talking about Posners book Case Closed?
THEN everytime I mention the obvious that they have obviously never read the works of one of the early pioneers critical of the warren commission Harold Weisbergs book Case "OPEN" how that book debunks Posners book point by point,they always do this- everytime
since they know Weisbergs book proves in spades what a pathological liar Posner is and withholds key facts with many ommissions.
Am i the only one here that has noticed the obvious about them, that they have never read Weisbergs book Case OPEN?
Posners book is cleverly written,I will give him that much.If you are someone just starting out and dnot know the real facts of the case,it is easy to believe and get fooled on.He had ME going for the first 50 pages or so thinking-wow maybe oswald WAS the lone assassin.
but after the first 50 pages or so he just starts telling outright lies that never happened and lying about what witnesses said and what other reseachers have said in the past,things they never said in as much as i wanted to believe that Posners book was the all ending truth to the whole thing,after he exposed himself for the liar he was,I knew we were back to square one again.
We see on this thread that FF Indiana asks badger2 about reading Posner's book. The first ten minutes looking at it already reveals Posner's lack of mentioning de Mohrenschildt's doctor. No document seems to exist that this doctor had a license to practice medicine, though the doctor had to sign somewhere. The doctor's name is mentioned in Ultimate Sacrifice, if we are not mistaken. A further irony is about Posner's fascination with Mengele: Klages also studied handwriting analysis at Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.
ever notice that these shills Indiana,DD,shillian,and WRONGwinger in their desperate attempts at trying to convince us the warren commission is facual they always get desperate and grasp at straws by always talking about Posners book Case Closed?
THEN everytime I mention the obvious that they have obviously never read the works of one of the early pioneers critical of the warren commission Harold Weisbergs book Case "OPEN" how that book debunks Posners book point by point,they always do this- everytime
since they know Weisbergs book proves in spades what a pathological liar he is and withholds key facts with many ommissions? am i the only one here that has noticed the obvious about them, that they have never read Weisbergs book Case OPEN?
Posners book is cleverly written,I will give him that much.If you are someone just starting out and dnot know the real facts of the case,it is easy to believe and get fooled on.He had ME going for the first 50 pages or so thinking-wow maybe oswald WAS the lone assassin?
but after the first 50 pages or so he just starts telling outright lies that never happened and lying about what witnesses said and what other reseachers have said in the past,things they never said in as much as i wanted to believe that Posners book was the all ending truth to the whole thing,after he exposed himself for the liar he was,I knew we were back to square one again.
Like clockwork,,our resident troll WRONGwinger always post smileys in defeat on factual posts like this cause these magic bullet theorists can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are.