Dershowitz: ‘You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction for Exercising His Constitutional Power’

This is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:


Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.

“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”




FOX & FRIENDS REALLY-:badgrin:--That is a Sean Hannity sponsored program on FOX & Sean Hannity is Trump's physco babble interpretor and political adviser. This is how they reported 3 Federal Grand Jury indictments and one guilty plea.



Furthermore they have established INTENT--I know you've heard that word before. Trump in one of his tweeter storms over the weekend admitted that he knew Flynn had lied to the FBI when he pressured Comey to drop the investigation. That is INTENT to commit Obstruction of Justice.
Analysis | Did Trump’s tweet about Michael Flynn’s guilty plea just admit something it shouldn’t have?

Trump is tweeting himself to death.
trump-twitter-poop%2BDaryl%2BCagle.png


Trump's attorney's are in full panic mode. Mueller is required to hand over all evidence--sworn testimony, basically everything he is receiving in order for Trump's lawyers to mount a defense.

They've had a good look at Mueller's evidence and now realise they don't have a defense. So they're only option is to attack the Articles of Impeachment that are listed in the Constitution. Actually stating that Trump is the supreme law enforcement officer in this country and cannot be charged with Obstruction of Justice. (Well they might want to talk to Richard Nixon about that one)--:badgrin:
Analysis | Trump’s lawyer says a president can’t technically obstruct justice. Experts say that’s fanciful.

Just last week, Republican Senators stated that Trump had pressured them over this last summer about the Russian investigation, (while he was under investigation) which included the Senate Republican intelligence committee chairman on the Russian investigation, and including Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell.
Trump Pressed Top Republicans to End Senate Russia Inquiry

But only Trump is STUPID enough to get on National T.V. and admit to Obstruction of Justice, during an NBC interview with Lester Holt.



A good movie to watch right now is "All of the Presidents men."
 
Last edited:
The president can be charged with obstruction of Justice.
Not for firing an appointee.

The president can be charged with obstruction of Justice for firing an appointee if he did so to obstruct justice.

Shit. You people really don't have any respect for the legal foundations that make this nation great.

Thankfully, you are not the fucking majority.
 
This is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:


Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.

“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”

Dershowitz is a conservative, far right winger. He is about as believable as Don the Con. Stay tuned dumb ass and see what happens. Bigly! Covfefe!!!
Forgive bripat He's getting his info from Hanitty

You get yours from Bozo the Clown.
 
This is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:


Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.

“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”

Dershowitz is a conservative, far right winger. He is about as believable as Don the Con. Stay tuned dumb ass and see what happens. Bigly! Covfefe!!!

Anyone who disputes snowflake rationalizations for impeaching Trump is labeled a "rightwinger" by the snowflakes. Only a certifiable idiot would believe such a claim.
 
This is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:


Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.

“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”

Dershowitz is a conservative, far right winger. He is about as believable as Don the Con. Stay tuned dumb ass and see what happens. Bigly! Covfefe!!!
Forgive bripat He's getting his info from Hanitty

You get yours from Bozo the Clown.
IF true my info is more factual
 
This is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:


Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.

“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”


He can charge Trump with obstruction of justice. Dershowitz is wrong.
. Nope, because the original charge and/or the investigation that sought to find the act of cullusion, and all in order for Trump himself to be found guilty of cullusion with the Russians ummmm wasn't found. No cullusion, then the whole case dies, and nothing else matters because it was all a bogus political hit job on Trump and his team by some super corrupt individuals in which had gathered together in order to try and fix an election, but when that failed "the Russians did it, the Russians did it", and that mean ole nasty Trump must have helped them, yes he must have helped them, I mean he had to have helped them right, it's got to be true, it's just got to be, waaaah waahhhh whaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaahhh booooo hoooooooo, boooo hoooooooo snucker snucker goes Madonna, and that NASTY Woman Ashley Judd, Joy Behar, Morning Joe coffee hangover , Miley Cyrus, and well all the rest of the crying good time gang... LOL.

It doesn't seem this is the case. If the investigation was for collusion and the investigation had not been closed and was ongoing, then anything that is designed to stop that investigation is obstruction of justice and a crime. So the case does not die. Instead a count of obstruction is now added to the case.
. What case ??? No cullusion, no case.. Period.

Well that doesn't seem to be the reality happening. Seems that we are seeing a case.

A case for what, contagious mental retardation among snowflakes?
 
Clinton was impeached for obstructing justice, so now why all of a sudden can't Trump be charged with it?
Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.

Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.
No it isn't Trump can fire an appointee for ANY reason. ANY reason means just that and no Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anyone so don't try that lie.

But Nixon was. And Trump cannot impede an investigation.

Look fool, you can do all the bellowing you want, but this investigation s is continuing and apparently Mueller has evidence that shows him he can continue. You don't have that information therefore you really have nothing to say.

Actiually, he can impede an investigation conducted by his own justice department. That's one of his functions as the country's chief law enforcement officer
 
He can charge Trump with obstruction of justice. Dershowitz is wrong.
. Nope, because the original charge and/or the investigation that sought to find the act of cullusion, and all in order for Trump himself to be found guilty of cullusion with the Russians ummmm wasn't found. No cullusion, then the whole case dies, and nothing else matters because it was all a bogus political hit job on Trump and his team by some super corrupt individuals in which had gathered together in order to try and fix an election, but when that failed "the Russians did it, the Russians did it", and that mean ole nasty Trump must have helped them, yes he must have helped them, I mean he had to have helped them right, it's got to be true, it's just got to be, waaaah waahhhh whaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaahhh booooo hoooooooo, boooo hoooooooo snucker snucker goes Madonna, and that NASTY Woman Ashley Judd, Joy Behar, Morning Joe coffee hangover , Miley Cyrus, and well all the rest of the crying good time gang... LOL.

It doesn't seem this is the case. If the investigation was for collusion and the investigation had not been closed and was ongoing, then anything that is designed to stop that investigation is obstruction of justice and a crime. So the case does not die. Instead a count of obstruction is now added to the case.
. What case ??? No cullusion, no case.. Period.

Well that doesn't seem to be the reality happening. Seems that we are seeing a case.

A case for what, contagious mental retardation among snowflakes?
Bri please ,,before mentioning the word mental take a long look at the very sick very dangerous ah in our wh
 
In fact a counter investigation should start immediately to determine who orchastrated this lie of cullusion, and a hot pursuit of these people should take place for what this ruse has since cost the tax payers.

Oh give me a break. If you want to blame someone for the rumors of collusion, look no further than Donald J Trump. His bizarre behavior and that of his associates brought this all up on him.
 
. Nope, because the original charge and/or the investigation that sought to find the act of cullusion, and all in order for Trump himself to be found guilty of cullusion with the Russians ummmm wasn't found. No cullusion, then the whole case dies, and nothing else matters because it was all a bogus political hit job on Trump and his team by some super corrupt individuals in which had gathered together in order to try and fix an election, but when that failed "the Russians did it, the Russians did it", and that mean ole nasty Trump must have helped them, yes he must have helped them, I mean he had to have helped them right, it's got to be true, it's just got to be, waaaah waahhhh whaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaahhh booooo hoooooooo, boooo hoooooooo snucker snucker goes Madonna, and that NASTY Woman Ashley Judd, Joy Behar, Morning Joe coffee hangover , Miley Cyrus, and well all the rest of the crying good time gang... LOL.

It doesn't seem this is the case. If the investigation was for collusion and the investigation had not been closed and was ongoing, then anything that is designed to stop that investigation is obstruction of justice and a crime. So the case does not die. Instead a count of obstruction is now added to the case.
. What case ??? No cullusion, no case.. Period.

Well that doesn't seem to be the reality happening. Seems that we are seeing a case.

A case for what, contagious mental retardation among snowflakes?
Bri please ,,before mentioning the word mental take a long look at the very sick very dangerous ah in our wh

Trump is far saner than any of the snowflakes who blubber incessantly about him.
 
In fact a counter investigation should start immediately to determine who orchastrated this lie of cullusion, and a hot pursuit of these people should take place for what this ruse has since cost the tax payers.

Oh give me a break. If you want to blame someone for the rumors of collusion, look no further than Donald J Trump. His bizarre behavior and that of his associates brought this all up on him.
19 different high up Russians have been contacted by trumps people ,,,and you ah's believe trumps hands are clean??? Are you all brainless
 
In fact a counter investigation should start immediately to determine who orchastrated this lie of cullusion, and a hot pursuit of these people should take place for what this ruse has since cost the tax payers.

Oh give me a break. If you want to blame someone for the rumors of collusion, look no further than Donald J Trump. His bizarre behavior and that of his associates brought this all up on him.

That's pure horseshit.
 
It doesn't seem this is the case. If the investigation was for collusion and the investigation had not been closed and was ongoing, then anything that is designed to stop that investigation is obstruction of justice and a crime. So the case does not die. Instead a count of obstruction is now added to the case.
. What case ??? No cullusion, no case.. Period.

Well that doesn't seem to be the reality happening. Seems that we are seeing a case.

A case for what, contagious mental retardation among snowflakes?
Bri please ,,before mentioning the word mental take a long look at the very sick very dangerous ah in our wh

Trump is far saner than any of the snowflakes who blubber incessantly about him.
As you might really believe trump is not an AH I can't argue the point anymore Stay tuned for the morons latest tweet
 
In fact a counter investigation should start immediately to determine who orchastrated this lie of cullusion, and a hot pursuit of these people should take place for what this ruse has since cost the tax payers.

Oh give me a break. If you want to blame someone for the rumors of collusion, look no further than Donald J Trump. His bizarre behavior and that of his associates brought this all up on him.

That's pure horseshit.
How come more bad words for people in his own party than for putin?? and no sanctions though rec'ed by his own party and signed by the AH himself?
 
In fact a counter investigation should start immediately to determine who orchastrated this lie of cullusion, and a hot pursuit of these people should take place for what this ruse has since cost the tax payers.

Oh give me a break. If you want to blame someone for the rumors of collusion, look no further than Donald J Trump. His bizarre behavior and that of his associates brought this all up on him.

That's pure horseshit.

Nope, it's absolutely true. And Trump firing Comey pointed the investigation right at Trump.
 
In fact a counter investigation should start immediately to determine who orchastrated this lie of cullusion, and a hot pursuit of these people should take place for what this ruse has since cost the tax payers.

Oh give me a break. If you want to blame someone for the rumors of collusion, look no further than Donald J Trump. His bizarre behavior and that of his associates brought this all up on him.

That's pure horseshit.

Nope, it's absolutely true. And Trump firing Comey pointed the investigation right at Trump.
If the moron didn't fire Comey there might not be a Mueller....
 

Forum List

Back
Top