Democrats War on 1.3 million babies a year

Discussion in 'Politics' started by healthmyths, Sep 27, 2012.

  1. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,245
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,856
    Most rationale understanding people agree that in those cases of rape, incest or mothers' health the nearly 50,000 babies killed is terrible.. but with all things considered and not happy understandable!

    But what about those majority of the 1.250 MILLION babies killed simply because the mother didn't want to be bothered!
    "inconvenience pregnancies"... "career obstacles", "promiscuous behavior" killings?

    Now I'm not advocating changing the laws.
    What I am advocating EDUCATION of everyone with the same evangelic fervor that especially liberals have for global warming" should be in teaching personal responsibility for NOT having casual sex that triggers pregnancies.

    With MORE money spent on global warming education, why not the grossest direct loss of human life then ANY pollution causes, the killing of babies!
    I mean it is so dumb that we spend millions on trying save endangered species then on endangered babies!
    Every year in the USA 1.25 million future wage earners murdered. Amongst those babies are future Steve Jobs, future Einsteins, future problem solvers - murdered!

    Most of these tragic murders simply because of casual sex, irresponsible behavior, and the insistence that "it's my body" mentality!

    Well I'm totally surprised especially at liberals who want the government to run our lives from womb to tomb.. EXCEPT when it comes to education of the dangers of
    promiscuous sex! With schools systems providing condoms.. is that truly the message that well casual sex is ok and oh please use a condom ...WrONG!
    That same money could be spent teaching self restraint! Responsible sex!
     
  2. Black_Label
    Offline

    Black_Label Registered Democrat

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,306
    Thanks Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +514
    :cuckoo:
     
  3. Warrior102
    Offline

    Warrior102 Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    16,554
    Thanks Received:
    4,019
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Ratings:
    +4,029
    Thanks for turning your rep back on dickless.

    Appreciate it.
     
  4. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,245
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,856
    So where was I wrong?
    1.25 million potential workers per year murdered by mostly Democrats!
    1.25 million potential taxpayers a year.
    1.25 million spending $30,000 a year in GDP or $38 billion destroyed!
    A potential founder of an another $1 trillion valued company like Apple!

    It doesn't seem to make any sense to murder 1.25 million a year potential Democrat voters..
    but they are doing it!!!
     
  5. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    If each and every one of those births resulted in an improvished indivdual that had to go on the dole..you'd be singing a different tune.

    Well not really..you'd just want them to die quickly after they were born.
     
  6. catzmeow
    Offline

    catzmeow BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    24,064
    Thanks Received:
    2,922
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Gunshine State
    Ratings:
    +2,974
    Making it easier for women to access the morning after pill would ensure that most abortions occurred in the first 6 weeks of pregnancy, before the fetus is as large as a fingernail.

    I don't consider a 6-week-old fetus to be a baby. But, thanks for sharing your views.
     
  7. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,245
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,856
    So you have more concern for the live of a snail darter then a human being even though the human fetus is smaller?

    WHY make taking a life i.e. easier to have a pill that KILLS a fetus, then educating people on personal responsibility? I mean we are obviously failing as parents to teach our children that in spite of the lax and easy attitude about sex that it is JUST as easy to kill!

    Yet you are ok with that right? Instead of teaching people to have personal responsibility it is the government responsibility to give pills to people to kill a fetus!

    What a progressive civilization!
     

Share This Page