Democrats Trying to Outlaw Right To Work Laws

[meaner gene]

Or if somebody claims his religion says that his home is his house of worship (church), and thus exempt from property tax.

 

[struth]

That's double edged sword. It allows a David Koresh to claim that machine guns are a tenet of his religion, and thus protected from government action.

not really, he can have that belief. But as SCOtUS said the Govt can still ban them

he however is still free to have that belief

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Move to Russia now.

Should we bring any "reset" buttons?

Should we be more flexible? DURR.......

 

[dblack]

Or if somebody claims his religion says that his home is his house of worship (church), and thus exempt from property tax.

Nope. Only state-approved churches get the break. And then only if they stay out of politics.

 

[daveman]

For-Cause criteria for unemployment compensation in an at-will employment State creates poverty.

Are you saying bad employees shouldn't be fired?

 

[daveman]

You're a liar. The QOP cheats with every breath it takes. Voter suppression, anti-Constitutional obstructionism in Congress, constant lying to their uneducated gullible dimwitted dumbshit base (= you), collusion with the Russian enemy, collusion with corporate neo-feudalists, and treasonous words, behavior and actions.

Move to Russia now.

Good Gaea, you're gullible.

 

[daveman]

If an employer cannot remain in business without paying Spartan wages, he deserves to go out of business

And then his employees are unemployed, making no money instead of some.

Why do Democrats think that's a win? Oh, right -- Democrats want more and more people dependent on government.

 

[daveman]

Who are unions to demand such special treatment?

Should employers be required to act as agents to collect for utility companies, mortgage holders and shylocks that their employers might owe money to as well?

You are asking a lot from employers.

Unions are money-making schemes for the Democratic Party. Democrats don't give a shit about workers.

 

[Correll]

You show complete ignorance in economics.

When there is a labor shortage, the employee has the advantage over the employer. Able to demand higher wages, more benefits, and additional compensations.

When there is an excess in employment, that's when people would join unions, since that's when the employer has the advantage over the employee, and can demand lower wages, fewer benefits, and lay off employees at will.

That makes no sense. When the employees have leverage, that should make unionizing EASIER, as replacing or threatening workers is harder, and the employer is already struggling to fill slots.

AND it is worth noting, the decline in unions has occurred over a period of labor excess, with women entering the workforce and high levels of immigration.

 

[danielpalos]

Are you saying bad employees shouldn't be fired?

I am saying "bad" employees would have probably quit before being fired if there were equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation. Employers could be saving a lot of money through less litigation with equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in any at-will employment State.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Employers could be saving a lot of money through less litigation

How is spending money on bum checks going to save employers money?

 

[danielpalos]

How is spending money on bum checks going to save employers money?

Less litigation from wrongful termination suits.

Employment lawsuits and claims are the biggest and most time-consuming losses that a corporation will face. The average employment lawsuit will cost a company $200,000; this is made up of $80,000 for the employer’s attorneys’ fees, $80,000 for the employee’s attorneys’ fees, and $40,000 in settlement to the employee.

What is a typical employment lawsuit settlement?

Typically, the average employment lawsuit settlement is $40,000, but that doesn’t nearly tell the whole story. A sexual harassment lawsuit may settle for $120,000, while an unpaid wage lawsuit averages $40,000. Wrongful termination may range from $120,000 to $1 million.

nakaselawfirm.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Less litigation from wrongful termination suits.

Why would they need to spend any money on litigation, you're clearly unqualified.
Sending you weekly bum checks isn't cheaper than not hiring you.

 

[danielpalos]

Why would they need to spend any money on litigation, you're clearly unqualified.
Sending you weekly bum checks isn't cheaper than not hiring you.

It is more cost effective than our over a generation long, alleged war on poverty.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is more cost effective than our over a generation long, alleged war on poverty.

No, subsidizing sloth is never cost effective.

 

[danielpalos]

No, subsidizing sloth is never cost effective.

That is just You begging the question. Full employment of capital resources is the opposite of sloth.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That is just You begging the question. Full employment of capital resources is the opposite of sloth.

Paying out bum checks isn't "full employment of capital resources".
Bums aren't a resource.

 

[danielpalos]

Paying out bum checks isn't "full employment of capital resources".
Bums aren't a resource.

Proof, right-wingers are just plain political Parrots in natural rights threads and are clueless and Causeless regarding the whole and entire concept of economics.

 

[daveman]

I am saying "bad" employees would have probably quit before being fired if there were equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation. Employers could be saving a lot of money through less litigation with equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in any at-will employment State.

You know that doesn't make any sense at all, right?

 

[danielpalos]

You know that doesn't make any sense at all, right?

No. I only know you don't have a valid argument to substantiate your currently unsubstantiated, right-wing Opinion.