Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If the problem continues to get worse, it will be fixed, and people like yourself will have no say in it. When 90+% decide they have had enough of crazies with guns killing their kids, you will definately be on the short end of the stick.I love how Libs act like they could fix the problem but are blocked by the NRA and Republicans.
Thank you for confirming my point: Democrats who push "gun control" measures they know won't work, are in reality trying to enact a total ban, followed by mass confiscation.Now that is real stupid. Of course the government can do something about the shootings. Look at what the Australian government did in 1996. In the decade prior to 1996, there were 11 mass shootings in Australia. Since 1996, there has not been a single one. So that method works.At most of the mass shootings in recent memory, the laws Democrat insist will help, have already been in effect. At the Oregon community college, the campus was a gun-free zone - guns were completely banned there, except for licensed conceal carry holders who still couldn't bring them inside buildings (which this shooter wasn't). And yet that's where the shootings keep happening.
It's clear that Democrat proposals don't work. The very idea that nutcases who don't mind committing multiple murders on innocent people, might stop because some Democrat made a law forbidding them from having a gun, is ludicrous.
And yet the Democrats STILL keep reacting to such shootings, by insisting we just have to make more laws.
Democrats know their laws don't work. The only possible way to prevent (most) mass shootings, is to create a complete police state where all guns are banned from everyone, and police squads go door to door regularly checking for guns, stopping people on the street to search them, etc., to make sure ALL guns are gone.
Anything short of that, will still enable criminals to get guns - they will only disarm the law-abiding.
So when Democrats keep insisting on more laws as a solution, what could they possibly have in mind besides total confiscation and police-state enforcement? We already know (and Democrats also know) that nothing else works.
The Democrats' real agenda is becoming more and more clear, every time they call for "more laws" in the face of clear proof that nothing gets guns out of criminals' hands except total confiscation.
Your big lie. Every shooting you scream, if we had more guns out there, there would be less shootings. And each time there are more guns out there. And the shootings continue to increase. And we put more guns out there. And the time between the shootings decreases. And we put more guns out there.I'm more alluding to the saying that, if the liberal fanatics keep at it long enough, people will start believing the little lies too.I think that you're alluding to a saying that goes something like this:
People will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.
No, asshole, you are the confirmed vote for that. Because of your idiocy on sane gun laws, things will finally reach a critical mass, and we will get the Australian laws. Thanks to people like you.Thank you for confirming my point: Democrats who push "gun control" measures they know won't work, are in reality trying to enact a total ban, followed by mass confiscation.Now that is real stupid. Of course the government can do something about the shootings. Look at what the Australian government did in 1996. In the decade prior to 1996, there were 11 mass shootings in Australia. Since 1996, there has not been a single one. So that method works.At most of the mass shootings in recent memory, the laws Democrat insist will help, have already been in effect. At the Oregon community college, the campus was a gun-free zone - guns were completely banned there, except for licensed conceal carry holders who still couldn't bring them inside buildings (which this shooter wasn't). And yet that's where the shootings keep happening.
It's clear that Democrat proposals don't work. The very idea that nutcases who don't mind committing multiple murders on innocent people, might stop because some Democrat made a law forbidding them from having a gun, is ludicrous.
And yet the Democrats STILL keep reacting to such shootings, by insisting we just have to make more laws.
Democrats know their laws don't work. The only possible way to prevent (most) mass shootings, is to create a complete police state where all guns are banned from everyone, and police squads go door to door regularly checking for guns, stopping people on the street to search them, etc., to make sure ALL guns are gone.
Anything short of that, will still enable criminals to get guns - they will only disarm the law-abiding.
So when Democrats keep insisting on more laws as a solution, what could they possibly have in mind besides total confiscation and police-state enforcement? We already know (and Democrats also know) that nothing else works.
The Democrats' real agenda is becoming more and more clear, every time they call for "more laws" in the face of clear proof that nothing gets guns out of criminals' hands except total confiscation.
That's what Australia did in 1996, you know. To finally "Make it Work".
So we have one confirmed vote for a total ban and mass confiscation. Anyone else?
It's clear that Democrat proposals don't work.
Tell me, do you have water piped into your home by a utility? Electricity by the same? How about medicine? Insurance? Do you drive on roads? Then you are not this 'sovereign' citizen you blabber about. In fact, in a real survival situation, I would be willing to bet that you would not survive.He's a liberal.Note you don't list any of those "potential solutions to the problem," that's because you have none. the solution is the one thing you won't consider, let people defend themselves
Citizens can't be sovereign. They must be subservient to government.
conservative ideologues who refuse to explore in good faith potential solutions to the problem,
So why do you suppose they continue to push them?
and if they ever get the power to do it, they will.
As usual, some liberal invents something I never said, pretends I said it, and tries to bash me for it.Your big lie. Every shooting you scream, if we had more guns out there, there would be less shootings.
TRANSLATION: I want more gun laws too, even though I can't refute the fact that they won't work. Guess why I really want "more gun laws".Democrats correctly understand that the successful solution to the problem of mass shootings will be multifaceted, a blend of public and private sector contributions to the problem, where government has a role to play but neither the sole nor dominant role.
