Democrats Say to Hell with Poor Kids

[Weatherman2020]

The Democratic party has lost its mind — and its soul.

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. Yet given a chance to actually support someone who is dedicated to improving education for all America’s children, especially those trapped in urban failing schools, the Dems’ said no, hell no. . . . Trump has made rookie errors, but his resolve in picking DeVos and sticking with her proves he is deadly serious about fixing what’s broken in American education. What, pray tell, are Democrats serious about?”

Money and power.

 

[Moonglow]

And to hell with poor kids that smell like bad milk...

 

[NightFox]

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. "

Uh-huh, they can claim to stand for whatever suits their purposes, however actions suggest that they like every other variety of the species politicus classicus stand for nothing but obtaining and maintaining their own power and filling their own coffers. Their subsistence depends on keeping the masses ignorant to the fact that their sole means of subsistence is the exploitation of the common citizenry, the continuance of which relies solely on subterfuge.

Politicians are no different from ancient tribal priests that made a living by convincing the rest of the tribe that they could protect them from natural disasters with magic if only the other tribe members would obey them and acquiesce to being economically exploited by the priesthood.

 

[Ozone]

Americans are bombarded with repeating messages designed to distort reality. If this was about the arts instead of politics, the Democratic party would have gone out of business years ago because no one is stupid enough to mistake a Salvador Dali as a photograph. But if the canvas is the mind and the brush is politics, what gives? Think Obamacare, or to be more realistic, the Affordable Care Act. It has nothing to do with Care. Health insurance is a bank account, not a romance novel, but don't tell that to the Democrats or they'll hate on you something awful. Thankfully, enough Americans have woken up to this kind of BS.

 

[Votto]

Imagine how much George Soros could help these children with his $24 billion.

Instead, he spends his time master minding protests at Berkeley so they can burn the place down.

 

[PoliticalChic]

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. "

Uh-huh, they can claim to stand for whatever suits their purposes, however actions suggest that they like every other variety of the species politicus classicus stand for nothing but obtaining and maintaining their own power and filling their own coffers. Their subsistence depends on keeping the masses ignorant to the fact that their sole means of subsistence is the exploitation of the common citizenry, the continuance of which relies solely on subterfuge.

Politicians are no different from ancient tribal priests that made a living by convincing the rest of the tribe that they could protect them from natural disasters with magic if only the other tribe members would obey them and acquiesce to being economically exploited by the priesthood.

I certainly like that post, and it reflects exactly what James Frazer wrote in the classic
"The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion."

But....the thesis falls apart when one sees the natives continue to vote for Obama when he failed....over and over again....to provide successful policies.


QED....Liberalism is the most dynamic of religions.


Throughout the posts on the board we see the true believers continuing to genuflect to their failed god.

 

[Votto]

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. "

Uh-huh, they can claim to stand for whatever suits their purposes, however actions suggest that they like every other variety of the species politicus classicus stand for nothing but obtaining and maintaining their own power and filling their own coffers. Their subsistence depends on keeping the masses ignorant to the fact that their sole means of subsistence is the exploitation of the common citizenry, the continuance of which relies solely on subterfuge.

Politicians are no different from ancient tribal priests that made a living by convincing the rest of the tribe that they could protect them from natural disasters with magic if only the other tribe members would obey them and acquiesce to being economically exploited by the priesthood.

I certainly like that post, and it reflects exactly what James Frazer wrote in the classic
"The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion."

But....the thesis falls apart when one sees the natives continue to vote for Obama when he failed....over and over again....to provide successful policies.


QED....Liberalism is the most dynamic of religions.

Because morality is relative. Everything is constantly changing. All that matters is power. Anything to achieve that power justifies the means to obtain it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. "

Uh-huh, they can claim to stand for whatever suits their purposes, however actions suggest that they like every other variety of the species politicus classicus stand for nothing but obtaining and maintaining their own power and filling their own coffers. Their subsistence depends on keeping the masses ignorant to the fact that their sole means of subsistence is the exploitation of the common citizenry, the continuance of which relies solely on subterfuge.

Politicians are no different from ancient tribal priests that made a living by convincing the rest of the tribe that they could protect them from natural disasters with magic if only the other tribe members would obey them and acquiesce to being economically exploited by the priesthood.

I certainly like that post, and it reflects exactly what James Frazer wrote in the classic
"The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion."

But....the thesis falls apart when one sees the natives continue to vote for Obama when he failed....over and over again....to provide successful policies.


QED....Liberalism is the most dynamic of religions.

Because morality is relative. Everything is constantly changing. All that matters is power. Anything to achieve that power justifies the means to obtain it.

"Because morality is relative."

No it isn't.

 

[Votto]

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. "

Uh-huh, they can claim to stand for whatever suits their purposes, however actions suggest that they like every other variety of the species politicus classicus stand for nothing but obtaining and maintaining their own power and filling their own coffers. Their subsistence depends on keeping the masses ignorant to the fact that their sole means of subsistence is the exploitation of the common citizenry, the continuance of which relies solely on subterfuge.

Politicians are no different from ancient tribal priests that made a living by convincing the rest of the tribe that they could protect them from natural disasters with magic if only the other tribe members would obey them and acquiesce to being economically exploited by the priesthood.

I certainly like that post, and it reflects exactly what James Frazer wrote in the classic
"The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion."

But....the thesis falls apart when one sees the natives continue to vote for Obama when he failed....over and over again....to provide successful policies.


QED....Liberalism is the most dynamic of religions.

Because morality is relative. Everything is constantly changing. All that matters is power. Anything to achieve that power justifies the means to obtain it.

"Because morality is relative."

No it isn't.

It is to Godless Dims

 

[NightFox]

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. "

Uh-huh, they can claim to stand for whatever suits their purposes, however actions suggest that they like every other variety of the species politicus classicus stand for nothing but obtaining and maintaining their own power and filling their own coffers. Their subsistence depends on keeping the masses ignorant to the fact that their sole means of subsistence is the exploitation of the common citizenry, the continuance of which relies solely on subterfuge.

Politicians are no different from ancient tribal priests that made a living by convincing the rest of the tribe that they could protect them from natural disasters with magic if only the other tribe members would obey them and acquiesce to being economically exploited by the priesthood.

I certainly like that post, and it reflects exactly what James Frazer wrote in the classic
"The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion."

But....the thesis falls apart when one sees the natives continue to vote for Obama when he failed....over and over again....to provide successful policies.


QED....Liberalism is the most dynamic of religions.


Throughout the posts on the board we see the true believers continuing to genuflect to their failed god.

They continue to vote for such people because the model works, for example
The Priest tells the tribe, give me obedience and resources and I'll work my magic to protect you from crop failures, next year the crops fail, what does the Priest do? He tells the members of the tribe that they weren't obedient enough, they didn't give him enough resources, they were sinful, thus it was THEIR fault not HIS.

Same thing happened with Obama, when his "magic" failed to materialize all the promised results, it was because the Republicans weren't obedient enough, the People didn't give him enough resources, the People didn't understand his "message", etc..,etc.., in other words they were sinful, thus it was THEIR fault not HIS.

The funny thing is that Trump stole the Democrats voodoo (populism) in 2016 and I still can't figure out if he planned it that way (if so he's A LOT smarter and craftier than people give him credit for) or if it was just him being him.

 

[The Original Tree]

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. "

Uh-huh, they can claim to stand for whatever suits their purposes, however actions suggest that they like every other variety of the species politicus classicus stand for nothing but obtaining and maintaining their own power and filling their own coffers. Their subsistence depends on keeping the masses ignorant to the fact that their sole means of subsistence is the exploitation of the common citizenry, the continuance of which relies solely on subterfuge.

Politicians are no different from ancient tribal priests that made a living by convincing the rest of the tribe that they could protect them from natural disasters with magic if only the other tribe members would obey them and acquiesce to being economically exploited by the priesthood.

I certainly like that post, and it reflects exactly what James Frazer wrote in the classic
"The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion."

But....the thesis falls apart when one sees the natives continue to vote for Obama when he failed....over and over again....to provide successful policies.


QED....Liberalism is the most dynamic of religions.

Because morality is relative. Everything is constantly changing. All that matters is power. Anything to achieve that power justifies the means to obtain it.

"Because morality is relative."

No it isn't.

Morality is relative for some people. In other words.....LIBERALS. This is why they have no issues with lying, breaking the law, committing acts of Espionage and Treason, allowing people to die and refusing to help while they craft some convenient lie to insulate themselves. Then they run for president, rig primaries, and debates, hire thugs to beat up the competition, and all the moral relativists don't even bat an eye over their candidates egregious acts, and instead double down on stupid, and whip themselves up in to foaming at the mouth frenzied fanaticism and hatred to defend their religion, and then march to the polls in solidarity to vote for their false god

The Democratic Zealots remind me of Zombies seen on The Walking Dead scurrying (in as much as a zombie can) for their next fix of living flesh and blood..

They are mindless and driven to a single purpose.........feeding time.

 

[PoliticalChic]

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. "

Uh-huh, they can claim to stand for whatever suits their purposes, however actions suggest that they like every other variety of the species politicus classicus stand for nothing but obtaining and maintaining their own power and filling their own coffers. Their subsistence depends on keeping the masses ignorant to the fact that their sole means of subsistence is the exploitation of the common citizenry, the continuance of which relies solely on subterfuge.

Politicians are no different from ancient tribal priests that made a living by convincing the rest of the tribe that they could protect them from natural disasters with magic if only the other tribe members would obey them and acquiesce to being economically exploited by the priesthood.

I certainly like that post, and it reflects exactly what James Frazer wrote in the classic
"The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion."

But....the thesis falls apart when one sees the natives continue to vote for Obama when he failed....over and over again....to provide successful policies.


QED....Liberalism is the most dynamic of religions.

Because morality is relative. Everything is constantly changing. All that matters is power. Anything to achieve that power justifies the means to obtain it.

"Because morality is relative."

No it isn't.

Morality is relative for some people. In other words.....LIBERALS. This is why they have no issues with lying, breaking the law, committing acts of Espionage and Treason, allowing people to die and refusing to help while they craft some convenient lie to insulate themselves. Then they run for president, rig primaries, and debates, and all the moral relativists don't even bat an eye over their candidates egregious acts, and instead double down on stupid, and whip themselves up in to foaming at the mouth frenzied fanaticism and hatred to defend their religion, and then march to the polls to vote for their false god.

Hillary Clinton

I believe we can trace it back before Bill's wife....


" There is no God:
This concept is an essential element of Marxism. As Lenin stated: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism."
If God exists and is in supreme command of the universe, He possesses discretionary power, and His actions cannot always be calculated accurately in advance. The whole edifice of Marxism collapses.
When Marx and the Communists deny the existence of God, they simultaneously deny the authority of the Ten Commandments, the existence of absolute standards of right and wrong, of good and evil; and man is left on the playing fields of the universe without a referee, without a book of rules. The winning side in any conflict can decide on what rules of conduct to apply. Morality is the creation of the victor." The Schwarz Report | Essays


It is no accident that the Democrat Party stands for the very same things that the Communist Party did.

 

[NightFox]

It is no accident that the Democrat Party stands for the very same things that the Communist Party did.

I disagree, IMHO they don't stand for the very same things that the Communist Party did, true Communists ultimately wanted a stateless society and thought that religion was an impediment to that end whereas the Democrats worship the state and think that religion gets in the way of making the state more powerful. They share methods, practices and the same idiotic economic theories but not the same belief system.

 

[brummelben]

The Democratic party has lost its mind — and its soul.

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. Yet given a chance to actually support someone who is dedicated to improving education for all America’s children, especially those trapped in urban failing schools, the Dems’ said no, hell no. . . . Trump has made rookie errors, but his resolve in picking DeVos and sticking with her proves he is deadly serious about fixing what’s broken in American education. What, pray tell, are Democrats serious about?”

Money and power.

DeVos was totally unqualified without an ounce of experience, just like El Presidente

 

[jc456]

And to hell with poor kids that smell like bad milk...

I hate the smell of bad milk. ewwwwwww

 

[jc456]

The Democratic party has lost its mind — and its soul.

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. Yet given a chance to actually support someone who is dedicated to improving education for all America’s children, especially those trapped in urban failing schools, the Dems’ said no, hell no. . . . Trump has made rookie errors, but his resolve in picking DeVos and sticking with her proves he is deadly serious about fixing what’s broken in American education. What, pray tell, are Democrats serious about?”

Money and power.

DeVos was totally unqualified without an ounce of experience, just like El Presidente

how you figure? you don't just get to post that without making some form of proof. what's your proof?

 

[NightFox]

The Democratic party has lost its mind — and its soul.

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. Yet given a chance to actually support someone who is dedicated to improving education for all America’s children, especially those trapped in urban failing schools, the Dems’ said no, hell no. . . . Trump has made rookie errors, but his resolve in picking DeVos and sticking with her proves he is deadly serious about fixing what’s broken in American education. What, pray tell, are Democrats serious about?”

Money and power.

DeVos was totally unqualified without an ounce of experience, just like El Presidente

Enough about Obama, he's out of office now, time to stop harping on what a completely inexperienced and unqualified executive he was.

 

[jc456]

The Democratic party has lost its mind — and its soul.

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. Yet given a chance to actually support someone who is dedicated to improving education for all America’s children, especially those trapped in urban failing schools, the Dems’ said no, hell no. . . . Trump has made rookie errors, but his resolve in picking DeVos and sticking with her proves he is deadly serious about fixing what’s broken in American education. What, pray tell, are Democrats serious about?”

Money and power.

DeVos was totally unqualified without an ounce of experience, just like El Presidente

Enough about Obama, he's out of office now, time to stop harping on what a completely inexperienced and unqualified executive he was.

eight fking years of you all complaining about bush and you think you get to write that comment?

 

[brummelben]

The Democratic party has lost its mind — and its soul.

“Democrats claim to stand for the poor, immigrants and nonwhites. Yet given a chance to actually support someone who is dedicated to improving education for all America’s children, especially those trapped in urban failing schools, the Dems’ said no, hell no. . . . Trump has made rookie errors, but his resolve in picking DeVos and sticking with her proves he is deadly serious about fixing what’s broken in American education. What, pray tell, are Democrats serious about?”

Money and power.

DeVos was totally unqualified without an ounce of experience, just like El Presidente

how you figure? you don't just get to post that without making some form of proof. what's your proof?

Simple- tell us her previous experience in the field of education. Was she a teacher, and aide, a principal, an administrator, a school board member. What does she know about public school education?

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is no accident that the Democrat Party stands for the very same things that the Communist Party did.

I disagree, IMHO they don't stand for the very same things that the Communist Party did, true Communists ultimately wanted a stateless society and thought that religion was an impediment to that end whereas the Democrats worship the state and think that religion gets in the way of making the state more powerful. They share methods, practices and the same idiotic economic theories but not the same belief system.

How about you take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.

Watch, and note the consubstantial basis of both the aims of the Communist Party and the Democrat Party:

......it is ...extraordinary.....the correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....

1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.

3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

4. . Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce



Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders?

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals



You might take a look at this one, too.
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.