Democrats Never Met A Communist....

[AvgGuyIA]

The Democrat party of old is dead and gone. they should just come out and call themselves what they are:

The Socialist/communist party of the United States

and people better wake up to it

The Communist Party of the USA endorsed Obama's candidacy.

 

[NYcarbineer]

DEMOCRAT Harry Truman spent some 36,000 American lives keeping the Communist North Koreans out of South Korea.

If you support that Democratic President's actions, you have an odd way of showing it.

99.9% of all national Democrats are communist! The last REAL DemocRAT left when Zell shut the door on them!

That's retarded.

NO, the retarded part is that SOME, such as yourself, don't REALIZE it! the NATIONAL dummycRATS are indeed communists.... the Gov't takeover of almost everything in the citizens life...want to start with GOV'T healthcare?

Socialism is what keeps Communism at bay. You should learn to appreciate it. Communist revolutions don't spring from socialist countries;

they happen most often in nations where the tyranny of the rich has oppressed the poor to unbearable levels.

Democratic socialism alleviates that oppression.

The ONCE head Communist in the world, just smacked you down from his grave...

Where's the Soviet Union now?

 

[eagle1462010]

Add in the communist spin-offs in China, Cambodia, Cuba, Viet Nam, etc., and the number goes well beyond 100 million mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, lives counted as less important than the victory of communism.
And this is the hallmark of every totalist view, communism, Nazism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....the life of the individual may never be considered, only the collective, the state, the "general will" is paramount.

DEMOCRAT Harry Truman spent some 36,000 American lives keeping the Communist North Koreans out of South Korea.

If you support that Democratic President's actions, you have an odd way of showing it.

But did he destroy the North Koreans or did he back down to a stalemate with them? He should have annihilated North Korea when the chance was had but Communist China grabbed him by the balls and he backed off like a good Liberal Socialist.

Another Politician who refused to finish the War............And not quit until ultimate Victory is achieved............leaving the world the current problems associated with North Korea who are a pain in the World's ass........................

Refusing to give our military the ability to cut the Chinese supply lines in China..............Refusing to allow our military to blow up bridges that were supplying the enemy.................allowing Chinese jets to escape after conducting combat missions in Korea by not allowing them to shot down over Chinese air space...............

Truman was good at one thing...............using PC to LOSE A WAR..................

 

[Vigilante]

99.9% of all national Democrats are communist! The last REAL DemocRAT left when Zell shut the door on them!

That's retarded.

NO, the retarded part is that SOME, such as yourself, don't REALIZE it! the NATIONAL dummycRATS are indeed communists.... the Gov't takeover of almost everything in the citizens life...want to start with GOV'T healthcare?

Socialism is what keeps Communism at bay. You should learn to appreciate it. Communist revolutions don't spring from socialist countries;

they happen most often in nations where the tyranny of the rich has oppressed the poor to unbearable levels.

Democratic socialism alleviates that oppression.

The ONCE head Communist in the world, just smacked you down from his grave...

Where's the Soviet Union now?

THANK YOU REPUBLICAN EXTREMIST...PRESIDENT RONALDO MAGMUS!

My GOD, you really are this stupid...a TRUE communist trait!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Skulls of victims of the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia.

How did the Khmer Rouge seize power in Cambodia?
"The relationship between the massive carpet bombing of Cambodia by the United States and the growth of the Khmer Rouge, in terms of recruitment and popular support, has been a matter of interest to historians.

"Some historians have cited the U.S. intervention and bombing campaign (spanning 1965–1973) as a significant factor leading to increased support of the Khmer Rouge among the Cambodian peasantry.[41]

"However, Pol Pot biographer David P. Chandler argues that the bombing 'had the effect the Americans wanted – it broke the Communist encirclement of Phnom Penh'.[42][43]

"Peter Rodman and Michael Lind claimed that the US intervention saved Cambodia from collapse in 1970 and 1973.[44][45]

"Craig Etcheson agreed that it was 'untenable' to assert that US intervention caused the Khmer Rouge victory while acknowledging that it may have played a small role in boosting recruitment for the insurgents.[46]

"William Shawcross, however, wrote that the US bombing and ground incursion plunged Cambodia into the chaos that Sihanouk had worked for years to avoid."
The same way IS took control of Mosul??
Khmer Rouge - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1. In the movie “The Killing Fields,” the first half leaves one with the impression that the United States was ultimately to blame for the fate that befell Cambodia by bringing Cambodia into the Indochina war, destroying its neutrality, and bombing to the extent that it drove the Khmer Rouge to the horrors that developed. The actuality is that it was North Vietnam that widened the war, not the United States. It was before 1965 that Hanoi created the Khmer Rouge (as early as WWII) and the Pathet Lao (mid ‘50’s) with the goal of conquering all of Indochina for communism.
   1. In “Sideshow,” William Shawcross claims that the 1970 bombings caused the coup in which Prince Sihanouk was by Lon Nol. But this adumbrates the issues, as Sihanouk attempted to be too clever, allowing the Vietnamese to invade his country, and then telling Kissinger he could bomb them.
   2. The North Vietnamese were getting support from the Soviet Union and China, determined to support wars of “national liberation.”

Now for your error re: Shawcross-

c. In 1994, Shawcross acknowledged his error: “Those of us who opposed the American war in Indochina should be extremely humble in the face of the appalling aftermath: a form of genocide in Cambodia and horrific tyranny in both Vietnam and Laos. Looking back on my own coverage for The Sunday Times...,I think I concentrated too easily on the corruption and incompetence of the South Vietnamese and their American allies, was too ignorant of the inhuman Hanoi regime, and far too willing to believe that a victory by the Communists would provide a better future. But after the Communist victory came the refugees to Thailand and the floods of boat people desperately seeking to escape the Cambodian killing fields and the Vietnamese gulags. Their eloquent testimony should have put paid to all illusions.”
Wiliam Shaw Cross I m William Cross

 

[NYcarbineer]

That's retarded.

NO, the retarded part is that SOME, such as yourself, don't REALIZE it! the NATIONAL dummycRATS are indeed communists.... the Gov't takeover of almost everything in the citizens life...want to start with GOV'T healthcare?

Socialism is what keeps Communism at bay. You should learn to appreciate it. Communist revolutions don't spring from socialist countries;

they happen most often in nations where the tyranny of the rich has oppressed the poor to unbearable levels.

Democratic socialism alleviates that oppression.

The ONCE head Communist in the world, just smacked you down from his grave...

Where's the Soviet Union now?

THANK YOU REPUBLICAN EXTREMIST...PRESIDENT RONALDO MAGMUS!

My GOD, you really are this stupid...a TRUE communist trait!

Reagan had nothing to do with it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

99.9% of all national Democrats are communist! The last REAL DemocRAT left when Zell shut the door on them!

That's retarded.

NO, the retarded part is that SOME, such as yourself, don't REALIZE it! the NATIONAL dummycRATS are indeed communists.... the Gov't takeover of almost everything in the citizens life...want to start with GOV'T healthcare?

Socialism is what keeps Communism at bay. You should learn to appreciate it. Communist revolutions don't spring from socialist countries;

they happen most often in nations where the tyranny of the rich has oppressed the poor to unbearable levels.

Democratic socialism alleviates that oppression.

The ONCE head Communist in the world, just smacked you down from his grave...

Where's the Soviet Union now?

"Where's the Soviet Union now?"
What does that tell you about the philosophy you support?
Foot in your mouth again?

 

[PoliticalChic]

NO, the retarded part is that SOME, such as yourself, don't REALIZE it! the NATIONAL dummycRATS are indeed communists.... the Gov't takeover of almost everything in the citizens life...want to start with GOV'T healthcare?

Socialism is what keeps Communism at bay. You should learn to appreciate it. Communist revolutions don't spring from socialist countries;

they happen most often in nations where the tyranny of the rich has oppressed the poor to unbearable levels.

Democratic socialism alleviates that oppression.

The ONCE head Communist in the world, just smacked you down from his grave...

Where's the Soviet Union now?

THANK YOU REPUBLICAN EXTREMIST...PRESIDENT RONALDO MAGMUS!

My GOD, you really are this stupid...a TRUE communist trait!

Reagan had nothing to do with it.

I love consistency!

Good to see you living up to your name, NYLiar.

 

[Vigilante]

NO, the retarded part is that SOME, such as yourself, don't REALIZE it! the NATIONAL dummycRATS are indeed communists.... the Gov't takeover of almost everything in the citizens life...want to start with GOV'T healthcare?

Socialism is what keeps Communism at bay. You should learn to appreciate it. Communist revolutions don't spring from socialist countries;

they happen most often in nations where the tyranny of the rich has oppressed the poor to unbearable levels.

Democratic socialism alleviates that oppression.

The ONCE head Communist in the world, just smacked you down from his grave...

Where's the Soviet Union now?

THANK YOU REPUBLICAN EXTREMIST...PRESIDENT RONALDO MAGMUS!

My GOD, you really are this stupid...a TRUE communist trait!

Reagan had nothing to do with it.

And NOW the LIES!

 

[NYcarbineer]

Skulls of victims of the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia.

How did the Khmer Rouge seize power in Cambodia?
"The relationship between the massive carpet bombing of Cambodia by the United States and the growth of the Khmer Rouge, in terms of recruitment and popular support, has been a matter of interest to historians.

"Some historians have cited the U.S. intervention and bombing campaign (spanning 1965–1973) as a significant factor leading to increased support of the Khmer Rouge among the Cambodian peasantry.[41]

"However, Pol Pot biographer David P. Chandler argues that the bombing 'had the effect the Americans wanted – it broke the Communist encirclement of Phnom Penh'.[42][43]

"Peter Rodman and Michael Lind claimed that the US intervention saved Cambodia from collapse in 1970 and 1973.[44][45]

"Craig Etcheson agreed that it was 'untenable' to assert that US intervention caused the Khmer Rouge victory while acknowledging that it may have played a small role in boosting recruitment for the insurgents.[46]

"William Shawcross, however, wrote that the US bombing and ground incursion plunged Cambodia into the chaos that Sihanouk had worked for years to avoid."
The same way IS took control of Mosul??
Khmer Rouge - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1. In the movie “The Killing Fields,” the first half leaves one with the impression that the United States was ultimately to blame for the fate that befell Cambodia by bringing Cambodia into the Indochina war, destroying its neutrality, and bombing to the extent that it drove the Khmer Rouge to the horrors that developed. The actuality is that it was North Vietnam that widened the war, not the United States. It was before 1965 that Hanoi created the Khmer Rouge (as early as WWII) and the Pathet Lao (mid ‘50’s) with the goal of conquering all of Indochina for communism.
   1. In “Sideshow,” William Shawcross claims that the 1970 bombings caused the coup in which Prince Sihanouk was by Lon Nol. But this adumbrates the issues, as Sihanouk attempted to be too clever, allowing the Vietnamese to invade his country, and then telling Kissinger he could bomb them.
   2. The North Vietnamese were getting support from the Soviet Union and China, determined to support wars of “national liberation.”

Now for your error re: Shawcross-

c. In 1994, Shawcross acknowledged his error: “Those of us who opposed the American war in Indochina should be extremely humble in the face of the appalling aftermath: a form of genocide in Cambodia and horrific tyranny in both Vietnam and Laos. Looking back on my own coverage for The Sunday Times...,I think I concentrated too easily on the corruption and incompetence of the South Vietnamese and their American allies, was too ignorant of the inhuman Hanoi regime, and far too willing to believe that a victory by the Communists would provide a better future. But after the Communist victory came the refugees to Thailand and the floods of boat people desperately seeking to escape the Cambodian killing fields and the Vietnamese gulags. Their eloquent testimony should have put paid to all illusions.”
Wiliam Shaw Cross I m William Cross

So how many more American lives would you have been willing to see spent in Southeast Asia fighting over issues that had nothing to do with our national security or vital interests?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Socialism is what keeps Communism at bay. You should learn to appreciate it. Communist revolutions don't spring from socialist countries;

they happen most often in nations where the tyranny of the rich has oppressed the poor to unbearable levels.

Democratic socialism alleviates that oppression.

The ONCE head Communist in the world, just smacked you down from his grave...

Where's the Soviet Union now?

THANK YOU REPUBLICAN EXTREMIST...PRESIDENT RONALDO MAGMUS!

My GOD, you really are this stupid...a TRUE communist trait!

Reagan had nothing to do with it.

And NOW the LIES!

The Soviet Union collapsed because totalitarian Communism is fatally flawed.

 

[Vigilante]

NO, the retarded part is that SOME, such as yourself, don't REALIZE it! the NATIONAL dummycRATS are indeed communists.... the Gov't takeover of almost everything in the citizens life...want to start with GOV'T healthcare?

Socialism is what keeps Communism at bay. You should learn to appreciate it. Communist revolutions don't spring from socialist countries;

they happen most often in nations where the tyranny of the rich has oppressed the poor to unbearable levels.

Democratic socialism alleviates that oppression.

The ONCE head Communist in the world, just smacked you down from his grave...

Where's the Soviet Union now?

THANK YOU REPUBLICAN EXTREMIST...PRESIDENT RONALDO MAGMUS!

My GOD, you really are this stupid...a TRUE communist trait!

Reagan had nothing to do with it.

It appears that even learned economists recognize the fact REAGAN KILLED RUSSIAN COMMUNISM!

 

[Toro]

DEMOCRAT Harry Truman spent some 36,000 American lives keeping the Communist North Koreans out of South Korea.

If you support that Democratic President's actions, you have an odd way of showing it.

99.9% of all national Democrats are communist! The last REAL DemocRAT left when Zell shut the door on them!

That's retarded.

NO, the retarded part is that SOME, such as yourself, don't REALIZE it! the NATIONAL dummycRATS are indeed communists.... the Gov't takeover of almost everything in the citizens life...want to start with GOV'T healthcare?

You might want to travel outside your county more.

Why, because the concentration camps aren't operating yet, you scum already are trying to do away with FREE SPEECH, and gun ownership.... pure communist goals!

Also, you might want to try this

Education

 

[eagle1462010]

Skulls of victims of the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia.

How did the Khmer Rouge seize power in Cambodia?
"The relationship between the massive carpet bombing of Cambodia by the United States and the growth of the Khmer Rouge, in terms of recruitment and popular support, has been a matter of interest to historians.

"Some historians have cited the U.S. intervention and bombing campaign (spanning 1965–1973) as a significant factor leading to increased support of the Khmer Rouge among the Cambodian peasantry.[41]

"However, Pol Pot biographer David P. Chandler argues that the bombing 'had the effect the Americans wanted – it broke the Communist encirclement of Phnom Penh'.[42][43]

"Peter Rodman and Michael Lind claimed that the US intervention saved Cambodia from collapse in 1970 and 1973.[44][45]

"Craig Etcheson agreed that it was 'untenable' to assert that US intervention caused the Khmer Rouge victory while acknowledging that it may have played a small role in boosting recruitment for the insurgents.[46]

"William Shawcross, however, wrote that the US bombing and ground incursion plunged Cambodia into the chaos that Sihanouk had worked for years to avoid."
The same way IS took control of Mosul??
Khmer Rouge - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Again we were at WAR..............the Cambodians were supplying the enemy with weapons, food and more.............

In a WAR a KEY MILITARY STRATEGY is to hit the enemies supply lines......................The supply lines were there..................So we hit them.....................

Even with this, we again failed to fight it as a War..................had we driven our armies in MASS into North Vietnam they couldn't have stopped us..................instead we fought THEIR WAR and not ours...................

While the outcome due to Ideology may not have changed, all of VIETNAM would have fallen to our forces and the supply lines cut to ribbons................

At best, the North only had half the numbers we had there...........TET was MILITARILY A FAILURE as the North lost a lot of troops................

They sacrificed their men in a hopeless endeavor for POLITICAL REASONS............to get the American public to DEMAND that we leave.................and it WORKED................as the PC CULTURE refused to fight it as a WAR.....................

Another example of how politicians lose WARS..............

Same as the 1st Gulf WAR when we didn't finish Saddam off when we had a half a million forces at his doorstep.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Socialism is what keeps Communism at bay. You should learn to appreciate it. Communist revolutions don't spring from socialist countries;

they happen most often in nations where the tyranny of the rich has oppressed the poor to unbearable levels.

Democratic socialism alleviates that oppression.

Well we finally got them admitting they're socialist lovers and not capitalists.

 

[Vigilante]

99.9% of all national Democrats are communist! The last REAL DemocRAT left when Zell shut the door on them!

That's retarded.

NO, the retarded part is that SOME, such as yourself, don't REALIZE it! the NATIONAL dummycRATS are indeed communists.... the Gov't takeover of almost everything in the citizens life...want to start with GOV'T healthcare?

You might want to travel outside your county more.

Why, because the concentration camps aren't operating yet, you scum already are trying to do away with FREE SPEECH, and gun ownership.... pure communist goals!

Also, you might want to try this

Education

And you might TRY not being a communist backer! We all see what you people are!

 

[NYcarbineer]

Skulls of victims of the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia.

How did the Khmer Rouge seize power in Cambodia?
"The relationship between the massive carpet bombing of Cambodia by the United States and the growth of the Khmer Rouge, in terms of recruitment and popular support, has been a matter of interest to historians.

"Some historians have cited the U.S. intervention and bombing campaign (spanning 1965–1973) as a significant factor leading to increased support of the Khmer Rouge among the Cambodian peasantry.[41]

"However, Pol Pot biographer David P. Chandler argues that the bombing 'had the effect the Americans wanted – it broke the Communist encirclement of Phnom Penh'.[42][43]

"Peter Rodman and Michael Lind claimed that the US intervention saved Cambodia from collapse in 1970 and 1973.[44][45]

"Craig Etcheson agreed that it was 'untenable' to assert that US intervention caused the Khmer Rouge victory while acknowledging that it may have played a small role in boosting recruitment for the insurgents.[46]

"William Shawcross, however, wrote that the US bombing and ground incursion plunged Cambodia into the chaos that Sihanouk had worked for years to avoid."
The same way IS took control of Mosul??
Khmer Rouge - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Again we were at WAR..............the Cambodians were supplying the enemy with weapons, food and more.............

In a WAR a KEY MILITARY STRATEGY is to hit the enemies supply lines......................The supply lines were there..................So we hit them.....................

Even with this, we again failed to fight it as a War..................had we driven our armies in MASS into North Vietnam they couldn't have stopped us..................instead we fought THEIR WAR and not ours...................

While the outcome due to Ideology may not have changed, all of VIETNAM would have fallen to our forces and the supply lines cut to ribbons................

At best, the North only had half the numbers we had there...........TET was MILITARILY A FAILURE as the North lost a lot of troops................

They sacrificed their men in a hopeless endeavor for POLITICAL REASONS............to get the American public to DEMAND that we leave.................and it WORKED................as the PC CULTURE refused to fight it as a WAR.....................

Another example of how politicians lose WARS..............

Same as the 1st Gulf WAR when we didn't finish Saddam off when we had a half a million forces at his doorstep.

And what was the point of our being in Vietnam in the first place?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Skulls of victims of the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia.

How did the Khmer Rouge seize power in Cambodia?
"The relationship between the massive carpet bombing of Cambodia by the United States and the growth of the Khmer Rouge, in terms of recruitment and popular support, has been a matter of interest to historians.

"Some historians have cited the U.S. intervention and bombing campaign (spanning 1965–1973) as a significant factor leading to increased support of the Khmer Rouge among the Cambodian peasantry.[41]

"However, Pol Pot biographer David P. Chandler argues that the bombing 'had the effect the Americans wanted – it broke the Communist encirclement of Phnom Penh'.[42][43]

"Peter Rodman and Michael Lind claimed that the US intervention saved Cambodia from collapse in 1970 and 1973.[44][45]

"Craig Etcheson agreed that it was 'untenable' to assert that US intervention caused the Khmer Rouge victory while acknowledging that it may have played a small role in boosting recruitment for the insurgents.[46]

"William Shawcross, however, wrote that the US bombing and ground incursion plunged Cambodia into the chaos that Sihanouk had worked for years to avoid."
The same way IS took control of Mosul??
Khmer Rouge - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1. In the movie “The Killing Fields,” the first half leaves one with the impression that the United States was ultimately to blame for the fate that befell Cambodia by bringing Cambodia into the Indochina war, destroying its neutrality, and bombing to the extent that it drove the Khmer Rouge to the horrors that developed. The actuality is that it was North Vietnam that widened the war, not the United States. It was before 1965 that Hanoi created the Khmer Rouge (as early as WWII) and the Pathet Lao (mid ‘50’s) with the goal of conquering all of Indochina for communism.
   1. In “Sideshow,” William Shawcross claims that the 1970 bombings caused the coup in which Prince Sihanouk was by Lon Nol. But this adumbrates the issues, as Sihanouk attempted to be too clever, allowing the Vietnamese to invade his country, and then telling Kissinger he could bomb them.
   2. The North Vietnamese were getting support from the Soviet Union and China, determined to support wars of “national liberation.”

Now for your error re: Shawcross-

c. In 1994, Shawcross acknowledged his error: “Those of us who opposed the American war in Indochina should be extremely humble in the face of the appalling aftermath: a form of genocide in Cambodia and horrific tyranny in both Vietnam and Laos. Looking back on my own coverage for The Sunday Times...,I think I concentrated too easily on the corruption and incompetence of the South Vietnamese and their American allies, was too ignorant of the inhuman Hanoi regime, and far too willing to believe that a victory by the Communists would provide a better future. But after the Communist victory came the refugees to Thailand and the floods of boat people desperately seeking to escape the Cambodian killing fields and the Vietnamese gulags. Their eloquent testimony should have put paid to all illusions.”
Wiliam Shaw Cross I m William Cross

So how many more American lives would you have been willing to see spent in Southeast Asia fighting over issues that had nothing to do with our national security or vital interests?

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:
"So how many more American lives would you have been willing to see spent in Southeast Asia fighting over issues that had nothing to do with our national security or vital interests?"

 

[NYcarbineer]

Socialism is what keeps Communism at bay. You should learn to appreciate it. Communist revolutions don't spring from socialist countries;

they happen most often in nations where the tyranny of the rich has oppressed the poor to unbearable levels.

Democratic socialism alleviates that oppression.

Well we finally got them admitting they're socialist lovers and not capitalists.

Do you think that's a big gotcha? I support Democratic socialism as a check to rampant exploitative capitalism.

Most sane people do.

 

[Vigilante]

He was WAY AHEAD of the curve...