Democrats cheathing?

[Freewill]

The resident spammer I am sure will soon be posting her spam. BTW, anyone heard of this on the MSM?

Dem Who Pled Guilty to Illegal Fundraising for D.C. Mayor Also Contributed to Hillary; Nets Ignore

A prominent Democrat who illegally funneled $660,000 into the mayoral campaign of Vincent Gray in 2010 also contributed to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, according to the Washington Times. All three networks on Monday night and Tuesday morning ignored the story. Prosecutors claimed that Mayor Gray had knowledge of the illegal "shadow" campaign run by Jeffrey Thompson.

Times writer Dave Boyer explained the connection to other high-profile Democrats: "Despite Hillary Rodham Clinton’s promise that she had scrubbed illegal cash contributions from her 2008 presidential campaign, prosecutors revealed Monday that the mastermind of Mayor Vincent C. Gray’s 'shadow campaign' also funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars to aid Mrs. Clinton’s bid for the White House."


Read more: Dem Who Pled Guilty to Illegal Fundraising for D.C. Mayor Also Contributed to Hillary; Nets Ignore | NewsBusters

 

[Indeependent]

I gave you the benefit of the doubt...I Googled "Cheathing"; couldn't find it.
So exacting what IS cheathing?

 

[Freewill]

I gave you the benefit of the doubt...I Googled "Cheathing"; couldn't find it.
So exacting what IS cheathing?

Well then, had you done so, you would have come up with this story of more dems cheat(h)ing:

GREENWOOD VILLAGE, Colo.—On the first day of early voting in Colorado, Democrats were caught attempting to bribe voters with free t-shirts and pizza at the CSU Fort Collins early voting location. The operatives also posted campaign signs in and near the polling place.

“Our democratic process hinges upon the integrity of our elections,” Colorado Republican Party Chairman Ryan Call said. “The Democrats’ clear disregard for the rules governing Colorado’s electoral process is a severe oversight that needs to be addressed.”

Democrats caught cheating at CSU polling location | Colorado GOPColorado GOP

Actually I would imagine just typing in dems would reveal stories of cheating.

 

[Truthmatters]

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

 

[Truthmatters]

the republican party has a record of cheating in elections that spans decades and goes straight to the top of the party

 

[Freewill]

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

Thank you once again of showing us that the RNC obeys decrees. That since 1981 they have stopped the practice. Thank you for pointing out very clearly that Republicans play by the rules. Interesting that you would do so in a thread about Democrat cheating. I guess you just want to make sure everyone knows it is truly the democrats that cheat.

 

[peach174]

This would never had happened if Blacks and Latinos had taken their responsibly in the first place.

If you are a registered voter and you move or change your name, you must notify the registrar of voters by changing your address and name properly. You can avoid missing registration deadlines and other important elections by changing your information as soon as possible

Why is it that so many did not do this?

The blame goes to the registered voters.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

How does one cheath?

 

[bodecea]

I gave you the benefit of the doubt...I Googled "Cheathing"; couldn't find it.
So exacting what IS cheathing?

Exactly the question I have.

 

[Freewill]

How does one cheath?

the old make a joke about a typing error, always good for a laugh like fart jokes.

but to answer your question, all you need do is ask your wife, or special other.

 

[bripat9643]

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

Quit spamming the forum with our voter disenfranchisement crap.

 

[kaz]

the republican party has a record of cheating in elections that spans decades and goes straight to the top of the party

You know that you're the cheaters, which is why you oppose checking voter IDs. Anyone who belongs voting has an ID.

 

[kaz]

How does one cheath?

It's when one only pretends to put away their sword...

 

[deltex1]

"Cheathing" is when your gay husband blows your brother.

 

[buckeye45_73]

"Cheathing" is when your gay husband blows your brother.

thats what swallow does to me, its not gay ifyour getting blown right?

 

[hjmick]

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

the republican party has a record of cheating in elections that spans decades and goes straight to the top of the party

You fucking moron, you are completely incapable of addressing the topic of the thread.

We've all read your drivel, repeatedly.

We've all told you the Democrats do it, repeatedly.

You've denied the Democrats do it, repeatedly.

You've been shown examples of their cheating, repeatedly.


You are a hypocrite. You are a liar. You are a racist. You are a fool.

Do us all a favor, go away and never return.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

Quit spamming the forum with our voter disenfranchisement crap.

she has to get her post count up.....be the first to 100,000 .....why?.....who the fuck knows....

 

[depotoo]

Minnesota Leads the Nation in Voter Fraud Convictions -- ST. PAUL, Minn., Oct. 13, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ --
Election watchdog hands FL 173 cases of alleged voter fraud « Watchdog.org
Former Dallas County JP Carlos Medrano convicted in illegal voting case | Dallas Morning News
Second Medrano convicted in vote fraud scandal | wfaa.com Dallas - Fort Worth
Officials found guilty in Obama, Clinton ballot petition fraud | Fox News
Illegal alien arrested, charged with voter fraud
Democrat Elections Official Melowese Richardson Convicted Of Voter Fraud In Ohio!! | Libertarian
Charlie White: Former Secretary of State guilty of voter fraud | Fox 59 News ? fox59.com
Illegal voting investigation grows dramatically - NBC-2.com WBBH News for Fort Myers, Cape Coral & Naples, Florida
Ohioan gets 5-year prison term for illegal voting

the republican party has a record of cheating in elections that spans decades and goes straight to the top of the party

 

[FJO]

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

Having seen several thousand of Truthmatters's posts, it is a safe and sure bet that THIS post of hers was plagiarized, unless she learned punctuation, proper capitalization, spelling and grammar since yesterday. Which she obviously forgot almost immediately, as it is conclusively illustrated by her very next post.

In other words, Truthmatters has cheated.

 

[hjmick]

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

Link to source, you lying, cheating plagiarist...