Democrat Incitement: Nancy Pelosi - There Will Be 'Collateral Damage To Those Who Disagree With Us'

Dschrute3

Gold Member
Dec 10, 2016
15,572
1,871
290
More dangerous incitement rhetoric from a Democrat leader. Why is this being allowed to continue?


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told a gathering at the 92nd Street Y in New York on Sunday that there may have to be “collateral damage” to those Americans who do not agree with the Democratic Party agenda.

Pelosi was being interviewed onstage by Paul Krugman, the left-wing New York Times columnist and Nobel economic laureate who predicted, the day Donald Trump won the presidency, that Trump would trigger “a global recession, with no end in sight.”

In a long, rambling monologue, during which she stumbled on her words and appeared to lose her train of thought, Pelosi said:

"If there’s some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it."...

Nancy Pelosi: There Will Be 'Collateral Damage' to Those Who Disagree with Us | Breitbart
 
Yes!! Please keep showing everyone how un-American and Anti-America is the modern democrat Party!!!

Thank you, Nancy & Paul!
 
Yes!! Please keep showing everyone how un-American and Anti-America is the modern democrat Party!!!

Thank you, Nancy & Paul!

Yeah, Democrats really have created a very dangerous environment with their 24/7 incitement. Hopefully the American People stand up to them and give em the boot in upcoming elections.
 
She is REALLY unhinged in that video.

UNHINGED: Nancy Pelosi Endorses “Collateral Damage” Against Americans Who Don’t Share Her Views

At one point she outright lies to the audience, like she is on TV or something. She wants to pass an overwhelmingly number of "jobs?" What does that even mean? It is obvious she meant LAWS. She wants to pass a massive amount of new regulations. Her "select committee on the environment" that she envisions would obviously only have democrats and republicans that are friendly to the idea of AGW.

There will be no compromise it seems.

What makes her think it would ever get through the Senate?

Or that it would have enough support to over-ride a veto?

I'm not sure she is entirely sane.

And after this guy Krugman has been shown to be a witch doctor/snake oil salesman she wants to be seen with him?

:eusa_snooty:
 
Heads will roll, and roll they will....oh wait, there'll be blood in the streets. Yeah that's the one, there'll be blood in the streets.

Geeeze, what is going on with the democrats these days?

They've lost it. Power-Mad.
 
More dangerous incitement rhetoric from a Democrat leader. Why is this being allowed to continue?


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told a gathering at the 92nd Street Y in New York on Sunday that there may have to be “collateral damage” to those Americans who do not agree with the Democratic Party agenda.

Pelosi was being interviewed onstage by Paul Krugman, the left-wing New York Times columnist and Nobel economic laureate who predicted, the day Donald Trump won the presidency, that Trump would trigger “a global recession, with no end in sight.”

In a long, rambling monologue, during which she stumbled on her words and appeared to lose her train of thought, Pelosi said:

"If there’s some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it."...

Nancy Pelosi: There Will Be 'Collateral Damage' to Those Who Disagree with Us | Breitbart
She is going to send the Red Army, also known as the ANTIFA to fight us next.
 
She is REALLY unhinged in that video.

UNHINGED: Nancy Pelosi Endorses “Collateral Damage” Against Americans Who Don’t Share Her Views

At one point she outright lies to the audience, like she is on TV or something. She wants to pass an overwhelmingly number of "jobs?" What does that even mean? It is obvious she meant LAWS. She wants to pass a massive amount of new regulations. Her "select committee on the environment" that she envisions would obviously only have democrats and republicans that are friendly to the idea of AGW.

There will be no compromise it seems.

What makes her think it would ever get through the Senate?

Or that it would have enough support to over-ride a veto?

I'm not sure she is entirely sane.

And after this guy Krugman has been shown to be a witch doctor/snake oil salesman she wants to be seen with him?

:eusa_snooty:
More dangerous incitement rhetoric from a Democrat leader. Why is this being allowed to continue?


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told a gathering at the 92nd Street Y in New York on Sunday that there may have to be “collateral damage” to those Americans who do not agree with the Democratic Party agenda.

Pelosi was being interviewed onstage by Paul Krugman, the left-wing New York Times columnist and Nobel economic laureate who predicted, the day Donald Trump won the presidency, that Trump would trigger “a global recession, with no end in sight.”

In a long, rambling monologue, during which she stumbled on her words and appeared to lose her train of thought, Pelosi said:

"If there’s some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it."...

Nancy Pelosi: There Will Be 'Collateral Damage' to Those Who Disagree with Us | Breitbart


What is the Democratic party agenda does anyone know, does she even know???
 
She is REALLY unhinged in that video.

UNHINGED: Nancy Pelosi Endorses “Collateral Damage” Against Americans Who Don’t Share Her Views

At one point she outright lies to the audience, like she is on TV or something. She wants to pass an overwhelmingly number of "jobs?" What does that even mean? It is obvious she meant LAWS. She wants to pass a massive amount of new regulations. Her "select committee on the environment" that she envisions would obviously only have democrats and republicans that are friendly to the idea of AGW.

There will be no compromise it seems.

What makes her think it would ever get through the Senate?

Or that it would have enough support to over-ride a veto?

I'm not sure she is entirely sane.

And after this guy Krugman has been shown to be a witch doctor/snake oil salesman she wants to be seen with him?

:eusa_snooty:
More dangerous incitement rhetoric from a Democrat leader. Why is this being allowed to continue?


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told a gathering at the 92nd Street Y in New York on Sunday that there may have to be “collateral damage” to those Americans who do not agree with the Democratic Party agenda.

Pelosi was being interviewed onstage by Paul Krugman, the left-wing New York Times columnist and Nobel economic laureate who predicted, the day Donald Trump won the presidency, that Trump would trigger “a global recession, with no end in sight.”

In a long, rambling monologue, during which she stumbled on her words and appeared to lose her train of thought, Pelosi said:

"If there’s some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it."...

Nancy Pelosi: There Will Be 'Collateral Damage' to Those Who Disagree with Us | Breitbart


What is the Democratic party agenda does anyone know, does she even know???
Open Borders and mass immigration as has been the case for decades.......until they have a new batch of voters who almost all vote for them. Then ram their liberal policies down the country.............Create disasters and blame others for it.........and then promise the Gov't will take care of you.

Pretty much sums it up.
 
More dangerous incitement rhetoric from a Democrat leader. Why is this being allowed to continue?


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told a gathering at the 92nd Street Y in New York on Sunday that there may have to be “collateral damage” to those Americans who do not agree with the Democratic Party agenda.

Pelosi was being interviewed onstage by Paul Krugman, the left-wing New York Times columnist and Nobel economic laureate who predicted, the day Donald Trump won the presidency, that Trump would trigger “a global recession, with no end in sight.”

In a long, rambling monologue, during which she stumbled on her words and appeared to lose her train of thought, Pelosi said:

"If there’s some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it."...

Nancy Pelosi: There Will Be 'Collateral Damage' to Those Who Disagree with Us | Breitbart
She is going to send the Red Army, also known as the ANTIFA to fight us next.


....and her flying monkeys....


 
Didn’t she say Donald Trump will never be president in a very condescending way?

So why does anyone take any stock in what she says?
 
She is REALLY unhinged in that video.

UNHINGED: Nancy Pelosi Endorses “Collateral Damage” Against Americans Who Don’t Share Her Views

At one point she outright lies to the audience, like she is on TV or something. She wants to pass an overwhelmingly number of "jobs?" What does that even mean? It is obvious she meant LAWS. She wants to pass a massive amount of new regulations. Her "select committee on the environment" that she envisions would obviously only have democrats and republicans that are friendly to the idea of AGW.

There will be no compromise it seems.

What makes her think it would ever get through the Senate?

Or that it would have enough support to over-ride a veto?

I'm not sure she is entirely sane.

And after this guy Krugman has been shown to be a witch doctor/snake oil salesman she wants to be seen with him?

:eusa_snooty:
More dangerous incitement rhetoric from a Democrat leader. Why is this being allowed to continue?


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told a gathering at the 92nd Street Y in New York on Sunday that there may have to be “collateral damage” to those Americans who do not agree with the Democratic Party agenda.

Pelosi was being interviewed onstage by Paul Krugman, the left-wing New York Times columnist and Nobel economic laureate who predicted, the day Donald Trump won the presidency, that Trump would trigger “a global recession, with no end in sight.”

In a long, rambling monologue, during which she stumbled on her words and appeared to lose her train of thought, Pelosi said:

"If there’s some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it."...

Nancy Pelosi: There Will Be 'Collateral Damage' to Those Who Disagree with Us | Breitbart


What is the Democratic party agenda does anyone know, does she even know???

YES.

Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development .:. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform
 
She is REALLY unhinged in that video.

UNHINGED: Nancy Pelosi Endorses “Collateral Damage” Against Americans Who Don’t Share Her Views

At one point she outright lies to the audience, like she is on TV or something. She wants to pass an overwhelmingly number of "jobs?" What does that even mean? It is obvious she meant LAWS. She wants to pass a massive amount of new regulations. Her "select committee on the environment" that she envisions would obviously only have democrats and republicans that are friendly to the idea of AGW.

There will be no compromise it seems.

What makes her think it would ever get through the Senate?

Or that it would have enough support to over-ride a veto?

I'm not sure she is entirely sane.

And after this guy Krugman has been shown to be a witch doctor/snake oil salesman she wants to be seen with him?

:eusa_snooty:
More dangerous incitement rhetoric from a Democrat leader. Why is this being allowed to continue?


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told a gathering at the 92nd Street Y in New York on Sunday that there may have to be “collateral damage” to those Americans who do not agree with the Democratic Party agenda.

Pelosi was being interviewed onstage by Paul Krugman, the left-wing New York Times columnist and Nobel economic laureate who predicted, the day Donald Trump won the presidency, that Trump would trigger “a global recession, with no end in sight.”

In a long, rambling monologue, during which she stumbled on her words and appeared to lose her train of thought, Pelosi said:

"If there’s some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it."...

Nancy Pelosi: There Will Be 'Collateral Damage' to Those Who Disagree with Us | Breitbart


What is the Democratic party agenda does anyone know, does she even know???
Open Borders and mass immigration as has been the case for decades.......until they have a new batch of voters who almost all vote for them. Then ram their liberal policies down the country.............Create disasters and blame others for it.........and then promise the Gov't will take care of you.

Pretty much sums it up.

You will notice when she refers to what they have done, she mistakenly says we passed, and then has to correct herself and states it was the courts.

In fact, they have done nothing to accomplish their goals other than get their agenda before friendly administrative judges and support their goals through friendly propagandists.
 
She is REALLY unhinged in that video.

UNHINGED: Nancy Pelosi Endorses “Collateral Damage” Against Americans Who Don’t Share Her Views

At one point she outright lies to the audience, like she is on TV or something. She wants to pass an overwhelmingly number of "jobs?" What does that even mean? It is obvious she meant LAWS. She wants to pass a massive amount of new regulations. Her "select committee on the environment" that she envisions would obviously only have democrats and republicans that are friendly to the idea of AGW.

There will be no compromise it seems.

What makes her think it would ever get through the Senate?

Or that it would have enough support to over-ride a veto?

I'm not sure she is entirely sane.

And after this guy Krugman has been shown to be a witch doctor/snake oil salesman she wants to be seen with him?

:eusa_snooty:
More dangerous incitement rhetoric from a Democrat leader. Why is this being allowed to continue?


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told a gathering at the 92nd Street Y in New York on Sunday that there may have to be “collateral damage” to those Americans who do not agree with the Democratic Party agenda.

Pelosi was being interviewed onstage by Paul Krugman, the left-wing New York Times columnist and Nobel economic laureate who predicted, the day Donald Trump won the presidency, that Trump would trigger “a global recession, with no end in sight.”

In a long, rambling monologue, during which she stumbled on her words and appeared to lose her train of thought, Pelosi said:

"If there’s some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it."...

Nancy Pelosi: There Will Be 'Collateral Damage' to Those Who Disagree with Us | Breitbart


What is the Democratic party agenda does anyone know, does she even know???
Open Borders and mass immigration as has been the case for decades.......until they have a new batch of voters who almost all vote for them. Then ram their liberal policies down the country.............Create disasters and blame others for it.........and then promise the Gov't will take care of you.

Pretty much sums it up.

You will notice when she refers to what they have done, she mistakenly says we passed, and then has to correct herself and states it was the courts.

In fact, they have done nothing to accomplish their goals other than get their agenda before friendly administrative judges and support their goals through friendly propagandists.


Coulter:


1. If liberals could trust the voters, they wouldn’t need the Court to invent ludicrous ‘constitutional rights’ for them in the first place.

2. The only limit on liberal insanity in this country is how many issues liberals can get before a court…A lot is at stake for liberals with the court. If they lose a liberal vote, they will be forced t fight political battles through a messy little system know as ‘democracy.’

3. When conservative judges strike down laws, it’s because of what’s in the Constitution. When liberal judges strike down laws (or impose new laws, such as tax increases), it’s because of what’s in the New York Times.
 
She is REALLY unhinged in that video.

UNHINGED: Nancy Pelosi Endorses “Collateral Damage” Against Americans Who Don’t Share Her Views

At one point she outright lies to the audience, like she is on TV or something. She wants to pass an overwhelmingly number of "jobs?" What does that even mean? It is obvious she meant LAWS. She wants to pass a massive amount of new regulations. Her "select committee on the environment" that she envisions would obviously only have democrats and republicans that are friendly to the idea of AGW.

There will be no compromise it seems.

What makes her think it would ever get through the Senate?

Or that it would have enough support to over-ride a veto?

I'm not sure she is entirely sane.

And after this guy Krugman has been shown to be a witch doctor/snake oil salesman she wants to be seen with him?

:eusa_snooty:
More dangerous incitement rhetoric from a Democrat leader. Why is this being allowed to continue?


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told a gathering at the 92nd Street Y in New York on Sunday that there may have to be “collateral damage” to those Americans who do not agree with the Democratic Party agenda.

Pelosi was being interviewed onstage by Paul Krugman, the left-wing New York Times columnist and Nobel economic laureate who predicted, the day Donald Trump won the presidency, that Trump would trigger “a global recession, with no end in sight.”

In a long, rambling monologue, during which she stumbled on her words and appeared to lose her train of thought, Pelosi said:

"If there’s some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it."...

Nancy Pelosi: There Will Be 'Collateral Damage' to Those Who Disagree with Us | Breitbart


What is the Democratic party agenda does anyone know, does she even know???
Open Borders and mass immigration as has been the case for decades.......until they have a new batch of voters who almost all vote for them. Then ram their liberal policies down the country.............Create disasters and blame others for it.........and then promise the Gov't will take care of you.

Pretty much sums it up.

I've met second gen Mexican citizens.

Due to having worked hard and their Catholic culture, once they are here, not all, but like the general populace, depending on where they live, they tend toward conservatism.

They went through the process, why shouldn't the new arrivals?
 

Forum List

Back
Top