Death Knell For The Democrat Party???

[Bassman007]

The proverbial nail in the coffin will be if Democrats are stupid enough to run 2-time-loser criminal Clinton again, as she will no doubt be screaming once again, "It's STILL my turn".

Bwuhahahahaha....

They will coronate Chelsea and run her. Slow learners those people.

Hillary will try to do that, but Chelsea is as qualified to be President as Mr. Ed, of which she does a great impression.

 

[The Professor]

Meh...

A judge throws out a challenge to how unions spend teachers' money

Thanks for the link.

This is a major case. I'm not sure how the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will rule if the judgment of the lower court is appealed. In the cited case, bargaining unit employees are not required to join the union; however, they are required to financially support the union. Historically, SCOTUS has ruled that compulsory dues cannot be used for political activities when the non-members object to such use.

“In a line of decisions, the Supreme Court has addressed this issue and has
concluded that compulsory union dues of non-members may not be used for political
and ideological activities that are outside the scope of the unions’ collective
bargaining and labor-management duties when non-members object to such use.
Seven Supreme Court decisions have held that union dues exacted from dissenting
non-members may not to be used for political and ideological purposes and must be
expeditiously refunded to dissenting non-members according to proper procedural
safeguards..”

The Use of Labor Union Dues for Political Purposes: A Legal Analysis

 

[PoliticalChic]

The proverbial nail in the coffin will be if Democrats are stupid enough to run 2-time-loser criminal Clinton again, as she will no doubt be screaming once again, "It's STILL my turn".

Bwuhahahahaha....

The Dems are not allowing Clinton to run again, one by one they are blaming Trumps Presidency on her which is actually the truth.

So will Clinton have Biden murdered?

The dems will off Clinton themselves soon enough

Will Clinton put a hit on Biden? Of course not. I do suspect that Fuhrer Soros has commanded the brown shirts to murder the president, though. One brown shirt attacked Republican congressmen already. IF or when the Nazi democrats take a shot at Trump, then it's war and I start shooting democrats. At that point it is an open civil war.

Dude, you just committed a crime, and I assure you that your name, address, and complete ID is in the hands of the secret service and NSA at least..................................

I don't know it that post registered as a crime, but I admit that I shuddered when I read it.

You must admit the basis of same, as contemporary Liberals/Democrats have shown a propensity for violence...

"This List Of Attacks Against Conservatives Is Mind Blowing"
This List Of Attacks Against Conservatives Is Mind Blowing


...and.....
.....every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.

Saying that you are going to start shooting people is a terroristic threat, it's a crime. There is no need to pull the trigger or even own a gun.

You dodged three-quarters of the post, the explanation as to why his fear of assassination is reality-based.




As for the 'threat,' the Supreme Court has allowed, as free speech, anything outside of this:

Brandenburg test
Standard established in Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 US 444 (1969), to determine when inflammatory speech intending to advocate illegal action can be restricted. The standard developed determined that speech advocating the use of force or crime could only be proscribed where two conditions were satisfied:
(1) the advocacy is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,” and (2) the advocacy is also “likely to incite or produce such action.”
Brandenburg test

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just one more effort to make American workers poorer.

There's ALWAYS going to be stupid people that are going to do the menial labor and make low wages... ALWAYS, because not everyone is either smart enough or has enough ambition to climb the ladder and make decent money, and no union is going to elevate the lazy and stupid people into high enough wages to buy a house, a nice car, toys, etc. They're going to live in a shitty apartment, drive a POS car that's financed, always be broke and sit around farting and burping while drinking Old Milwaukee lite beer and bitch about not having any money. That's just the way it is.

. The union did bring many good things to American workers way back in the days right ? They were responsible for the 8 hour a day, 40 hour work week weren't they ?? They were responsible for getting overtime pay for workers weren't they ? I mean they were responsible for many things that labor has today weren't they ??

And this happened:
“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Lord Acton

 

[Wry Catcher]

Point of information:

Bernie Sanders is a communist.
I would strongly recommend that everyone review how communists functions, and the result of their regimes.

The book you presented explains why communists rejected communism when they understood what it did and what it was.

Why would you support my thesis, other than to pretend you've read any books????


Gads, you're a fool!!!!!!


For those who vote Communist/Democrat....here's an excellent opus:

“The Anti-Communist Manifestos,” by John V. Fleming

1. The book is about the political struggle known as the Cold War, and the role played by four unusually influential books.
2. For historical purposes, our starting point is that the concept of Marxist Communism is inextricably linked with the Bolshevik coup d'état of 1917 and with the USSR.
3. From its inception, the Soviet State was the object of geat and often sympathetic interest in the West. Many early visitors to the USSR are aptly called ‘pilgrims,’ as opposed to travelers. Pilgrims always know in advance what he is to see, he knows and desires it, and even as he views it he is planning how he will tell the folks back home. In short…objectivity is hardly in play.
   1. Dante could have had this individual in mind, when he told of the of being transported, in the “Divine Comedy,” from time to eternity, from the human to the divine, “from Florence to a people just and sane…And as a pilgrim who delighteth him In gazing round the temple of his vow, And hopes some day to retell how it was,…” The Divine Comedy : Paradiso : Canto XXXI by Alighieri Dante @ Classic Reader
   2. What better description of Sidney and Beatrice Webb, pioneering British Socialists, founders of the Fabians. Their enthusiasm for collectivism apparently blinded to its actual practice in the Soviet Union of the 1930’s.
4. But not all were so benighted. It is one of the striking features of anti-Communist literature that its great writers are all former Communists. This feature is compounded when one realizes how few other “antis-“ such as anti-Semites, anti-racists, anti-vivisectionists, or anti-Americans are former Semites, racists, vivisectionists or Americans. What did they learn than turned them 180 degrees?
5. All four of these anti-Communist authors we Communist renegades.
   1. Arthur Koestler
   2. Jan Valtin (Richard Krebs)
   3. Victor Kravchenko
   4. Whittaker Chambers

The God that Failed - Wikipedia

You didn't read the book, you fool....you didn't even read what Wikipedia says.

This:
"The God That Failed is a 1949 book[1] which collects together six essays with the testimonies of a number of famous ex-communists, who were writers and journalists. The common theme of the essays is the authors' disillusionment with and abandonment of communism."


Exactly what I said.



Sooooo....how many times have I caught you lying in this thread alone???
Burnishes your Liberal credentials, huh?

Communism is a boogie man under your bed.

Communism is used by the Right Wing as a pejorative, and when one looks at nations which have been named People's Republic's, one sees oppression and the same 14 points of fascism practiced.

That these same 14 points can be seen practiced by Trump&Co since day one of his administration, is something PC and other Authoritarians deny. Totalitarianism and despotic rule smells the same, no matter what they choose to be called or labeled.

What is the difference between the power elite in a Communist, National Socialist or Plutocratic system? None.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The proverbial nail in the coffin will be if Democrats are stupid enough to run 2-time-loser criminal Clinton again, as she will no doubt be screaming once again, "It's STILL my turn".

Bwuhahahahaha....

The Dems are not allowing Clinton to run again, one by one they are blaming Trumps Presidency on her which is actually the truth.

So will Clinton have Biden murdered?

The dems will off Clinton themselves soon enough

Will Clinton put a hit on Biden? Of course not. I do suspect that Fuhrer Soros has commanded the brown shirts to murder the president, though. One brown shirt attacked Republican congressmen already. IF or when the Nazi democrats take a shot at Trump, then it's war and I start shooting democrats. At that point it is an open civil war.

Dude, you just committed a crime, and I assure you that your name, address, and complete ID is in the hands of the secret service and NSA at least..................................

I don't know it that post registered as a crime, but I admit that I shuddered when I read it.

You must admit the basis of same, as contemporary Liberals/Democrats have shown a propensity for violence...

"This List Of Attacks Against Conservatives Is Mind Blowing"
This List Of Attacks Against Conservatives Is Mind Blowing


...and.....
.....every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.

Saying that you are going to start shooting people is a terroristic threat, it's a crime. There is no need to pull the trigger or even own a gun.

Yep, for the record:

California Code, Penal Code - PEN § 422 | FindLaw

 

[Wry Catcher]

Janus.....a union worker who doesn't agree with the Leftist policies and candidates that his union uses the dues it collects, sues to block forcing him to pay dues!

This sort of thing is what he objects to:
" Andy Stern of the SEIU:
We spent a fortune to elect Barack Obama — $60.7 million to be exact — and we’re proud of it." LaborPains.org | The Price of An Election

Union support is the life's blood of the Democrat Party.
Where did the union get that money, and who decided how it is to be spent?



1. "On June 6, the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation asked the Supreme Court to hear Janus v. AFSCME, a case involving plaintiff Mark Janus...is compelled to send part of his paycheck to the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, even though he says that the union does not “represent his interests.”

2. Right-to-work proponents are optimistic that the Court will hear the case and that Neil Gorsuch, Scalia’s replacement, will come down as the fifth vote on the side of employee freedom and overturn the 40-year-old precedent established in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, in which the Supreme Court held that states may force public-sector workers to pay union dues, ....

3. The Economic Policy Institute, an organization with strong ties to organized labor, claims that prohibiting fair-share payments could “profoundly affect the ability of millions of public-sector workers to improve their wages and working conditions....


4. [But former] research fellow in labor economics at the Heritage Foundation James Sherk explains that “studies that control for differences in costs of living find workers in states with voluntary dues have no lower—and possibly slightly higher—real wages than workers in states with compulsory dues.”





Here come the predictions of the end of the Democrat Party:

5. Even if the Court decides to hear the case, a decision in Janus is most likely a year off. But the unions are planning for the worst-case scenario. California Teachers Association Executive Director Joe Nuñez wrote in January that the CTA should be prepared for a 30 percent to 40 percent membership drop, ....


6. But whatever the membership drop might be, it will be damaging to the unions and could have widespread ramifications. And perhaps no group will be more affected than the Democratic Party. Naomi Walker, an assistant to AFSCME president Lee Saunders and a former Obama administration appointee, said that Janus “could undermine political operations that assist the Democratic Party.”
She added, “The progressive infrastructure in this country, from think tanks to advocacy organizations—which depends on the resources and engagement of workers and their unions—will crumble. We need the entire labor and progressive movements to stand with us and fight for us.
We may not survive without it—and nor, we fear, will they.”


['tis a consummation devoutly to be wished'....The Bard]


7. "The loss of these unions’ political clout certainly was a factor in giving Donald Trump narrow victories in both states. Should the Court decide for Janus in Janus, neither the apocalypse nor utopia will be upon us, but much will change.


8. Most notably, many government workers will have much freedom than they have now, and the Democratic Party won’t have the same bundles of cash flowing from union piggy banks." Janus and Worker Freedom





In full disclosure....the future of the Supreme Court, and of this nation, was my #1 reason for voting for President Trump.
The Democrats see exactly why.

i'd like to hear stories from people, past and present, if and how they were "persuaded" to vote.
and who employs the two million seiu members.

good one PC.

The SEIU is employed by the Marxists to overturn American society. And that's about it. The poor members of the union pay dues to pay thugs who travel around the country instigating riots.
Unions gave Democrats 420 million dollars between 2012 and 2016 (for all the good it did them). Robbing working people and handing it over to millionaire Democrats.


420 million dollars...what a strike fund that would make...if they really cared.

total bullshit ^^^ and an amazing lack of historical knowledge.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The book you presented explains why communists rejected communism when they understood what it did and what it was.

Why would you support my thesis, other than to pretend you've read any books????


Gads, you're a fool!!!!!!


For those who vote Communist/Democrat....here's an excellent opus:

“The Anti-Communist Manifestos,” by John V. Fleming

1. The book is about the political struggle known as the Cold War, and the role played by four unusually influential books.
2. For historical purposes, our starting point is that the concept of Marxist Communism is inextricably linked with the Bolshevik coup d'état of 1917 and with the USSR.
3. From its inception, the Soviet State was the object of geat and often sympathetic interest in the West. Many early visitors to the USSR are aptly called ‘pilgrims,’ as opposed to travelers. Pilgrims always know in advance what he is to see, he knows and desires it, and even as he views it he is planning how he will tell the folks back home. In short…objectivity is hardly in play.
   1. Dante could have had this individual in mind, when he told of the of being transported, in the “Divine Comedy,” from time to eternity, from the human to the divine, “from Florence to a people just and sane…And as a pilgrim who delighteth him In gazing round the temple of his vow, And hopes some day to retell how it was,…” The Divine Comedy : Paradiso : Canto XXXI by Alighieri Dante @ Classic Reader
   2. What better description of Sidney and Beatrice Webb, pioneering British Socialists, founders of the Fabians. Their enthusiasm for collectivism apparently blinded to its actual practice in the Soviet Union of the 1930’s.
4. But not all were so benighted. It is one of the striking features of anti-Communist literature that its great writers are all former Communists. This feature is compounded when one realizes how few other “antis-“ such as anti-Semites, anti-racists, anti-vivisectionists, or anti-Americans are former Semites, racists, vivisectionists or Americans. What did they learn than turned them 180 degrees?
5. All four of these anti-Communist authors we Communist renegades.
   1. Arthur Koestler
   2. Jan Valtin (Richard Krebs)
   3. Victor Kravchenko
   4. Whittaker Chambers

The God that Failed - Wikipedia

You didn't read the book, you fool....you didn't even read what Wikipedia says.

This:
"The God That Failed is a 1949 book[1] which collects together six essays with the testimonies of a number of famous ex-communists, who were writers and journalists. The common theme of the essays is the authors' disillusionment with and abandonment of communism."


Exactly what I said.



Sooooo....how many times have I caught you lying in this thread alone???
Burnishes your Liberal credentials, huh?

Communism is a boogie man under your bed.

Communism is used by the Right Wing as a pejorative, and when one looks at nations which have been named People's Republic's, one sees oppression and the same 14 points of fascism practiced.

That these same 14 points can be seen practiced by Trump&Co since day one of his administration, is something PC and other Authoritarians deny. Totalitarianism and despotic rule smells the same, no matter what they choose to be called or labeled.

What is the difference between the power elite in a Communist, National Socialist or Plutocratic system? None.

"Communism is used by the Right Wing as a pejorative,"



If there was even one human being on the planet....nay...in the universe.....who wasn't totally convinced that you are an intellect the rival of garden tools....

...this one post would certainly convince them.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Janus.....a union worker who doesn't agree with the Leftist policies and candidates that his union uses the dues it collects, sues to block forcing him to pay dues!

This sort of thing is what he objects to:
" Andy Stern of the SEIU:
We spent a fortune to elect Barack Obama — $60.7 million to be exact — and we’re proud of it." LaborPains.org | The Price of An Election

Union support is the life's blood of the Democrat Party.
Where did the union get that money, and who decided how it is to be spent?



1. "On June 6, the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation asked the Supreme Court to hear Janus v. AFSCME, a case involving plaintiff Mark Janus...is compelled to send part of his paycheck to the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, even though he says that the union does not “represent his interests.”

2. Right-to-work proponents are optimistic that the Court will hear the case and that Neil Gorsuch, Scalia’s replacement, will come down as the fifth vote on the side of employee freedom and overturn the 40-year-old precedent established in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, in which the Supreme Court held that states may force public-sector workers to pay union dues, ....

3. The Economic Policy Institute, an organization with strong ties to organized labor, claims that prohibiting fair-share payments could “profoundly affect the ability of millions of public-sector workers to improve their wages and working conditions....


4. [But former] research fellow in labor economics at the Heritage Foundation James Sherk explains that “studies that control for differences in costs of living find workers in states with voluntary dues have no lower—and possibly slightly higher—real wages than workers in states with compulsory dues.”





Here come the predictions of the end of the Democrat Party:

5. Even if the Court decides to hear the case, a decision in Janus is most likely a year off. But the unions are planning for the worst-case scenario. California Teachers Association Executive Director Joe Nuñez wrote in January that the CTA should be prepared for a 30 percent to 40 percent membership drop, ....


6. But whatever the membership drop might be, it will be damaging to the unions and could have widespread ramifications. And perhaps no group will be more affected than the Democratic Party. Naomi Walker, an assistant to AFSCME president Lee Saunders and a former Obama administration appointee, said that Janus “could undermine political operations that assist the Democratic Party.”
She added, “The progressive infrastructure in this country, from think tanks to advocacy organizations—which depends on the resources and engagement of workers and their unions—will crumble. We need the entire labor and progressive movements to stand with us and fight for us.
We may not survive without it—and nor, we fear, will they.”


['tis a consummation devoutly to be wished'....The Bard]


7. "The loss of these unions’ political clout certainly was a factor in giving Donald Trump narrow victories in both states. Should the Court decide for Janus in Janus, neither the apocalypse nor utopia will be upon us, but much will change.


8. Most notably, many government workers will have much freedom than they have now, and the Democratic Party won’t have the same bundles of cash flowing from union piggy banks." Janus and Worker Freedom





In full disclosure....the future of the Supreme Court, and of this nation, was my #1 reason for voting for President Trump.
The Democrats see exactly why.

i'd like to hear stories from people, past and present, if and how they were "persuaded" to vote.
and who employs the two million seiu members.

good one PC.

The SEIU is employed by the Marxists to overturn American society. And that's about it. The poor members of the union pay dues to pay thugs who travel around the country instigating riots.
Unions gave Democrats 420 million dollars between 2012 and 2016 (for all the good it did them). Robbing working people and handing it over to millionaire Democrats.


420 million dollars...what a strike fund that would make...if they really cared.

total bullshit ^^^ and an amazing lack of historical knowledge.

'Knowledge' is far from your forte.....

You have been well trained, like a seal, to scream 'is not, issss noootttttt1' at the first sign of criticism of your socialist/Democrat/Liberal/Marxist doctrines or elites.


But....I must admit, the last time I saw a face like yours, I threw it a fish.




"SEIU Confirms Democrat-Socialist Marxist Connection"
SEIU Confirms Democrat-Socialist Marxist Connection - Breitbart

 

[Pete7469]

Make "right to work" national, and eliminate the illegal vote, and dems won't win another presidential election for a hundred years. The party will become obsolete.

They already are obsolete.

Once they finally drop the charade they will merge with the CPUSA and declare their intention to bankrupt the country and convert it into a soviet hell hole.

Oh wait, they've already declared their intentions.

Cloward–Piven strategy - Wikipedia

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by leftist sociopaths and traitors Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty". [1][2]

 

[Uncensored2008]

Janus.....a union worker who doesn't agree with the Leftist policies and candidates that his union uses the dues it collects, sues to block forcing him to pay dues!

This sort of thing is what he objects to:
" Andy Stern of the SEIU:
We spent a fortune to elect Barack Obama — $60.7 million to be exact — and we’re proud of it." LaborPains.org | The Price of An Election

Union support is the life's blood of the Democrat Party.
Where did the union get that money, and who decided how it is to be spent?



1. "On June 6, the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation asked the Supreme Court to hear Janus v. AFSCME, a case involving plaintiff Mark Janus...is compelled to send part of his paycheck to the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, even though he says that the union does not “represent his interests.”

2. Right-to-work proponents are optimistic that the Court will hear the case and that Neil Gorsuch, Scalia’s replacement, will come down as the fifth vote on the side of employee freedom and overturn the 40-year-old precedent established in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, in which the Supreme Court held that states may force public-sector workers to pay union dues, ....




3. The Economic Policy Institute, an organization with strong ties to organized labor, claims that prohibiting fair-share payments could “profoundly affect the ability of millions of public-sector workers to improve their wages and working conditions....


4. [But former] research fellow in labor economics at the Heritage Foundation James Sherk explains that “studies that control for differences in costs of living find workers in states with voluntary dues have no lower—and possibly slightly higher—real wages than workers in states with compulsory dues.”





Here come the predictions of the end of the Democrat Party:

5. Even if the Court decides to hear the case, a decision in Janus is most likely a year off. But the unions are planning for the worst-case scenario. California Teachers Association Executive Director Joe Nuñez wrote in January that the CTA should be prepared for a 30 percent to 40 percent membership drop, ....


6. But whatever the membership drop might be, it will be damaging to the unions and could have widespread ramifications. And perhaps no group will be more affected than the Democratic Party. Naomi Walker, an assistant to AFSCME president Lee Saunders and a former Obama administration appointee, said that Janus “could undermine political operations that assist the Democratic Party.”
She added, “The progressive infrastructure in this country, from think tanks to advocacy organizations—which depends on the resources and engagement of workers and their unions—will crumble. We need the entire labor and progressive movements to stand with us and fight for us.
We may not survive without it—and nor, we fear, will they.”


['tis a consummation devoutly to be wished'....The Bard]


7. "The loss of these unions’ political clout certainly was a factor in giving Donald Trump narrow victories in both states. Should the Court decide for Janus in Janus, neither the apocalypse nor utopia will be upon us, but much will change.


8. Most notably, many government workers will have much freedom than they have now, and the Democratic Party won’t have the same bundles of cash flowing from union piggy banks." Janus and Worker Freedom





In full disclosure....the future of the Supreme Court, and of this nation, was my #1 reason for voting for President Trump.
The Democrats see exactly why.

Yep, this Democrat knows why; you are a neo fascist and a wannabe authoritarian. You are much like Trump, a narcissist and a hater of all people who question your rants, rants liberally (lol) spread throughout in the effort to control the future ("Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past" Orwell, 1984). Exactly what the current iteration of conservatives seek to do.

If she were a neo-fascist, she would be you, Nazi boi.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Janus.....a union worker who doesn't agree with the Leftist policies and candidates that his union uses the dues it collects, sues to block forcing him to pay dues!

This sort of thing is what he objects to:
" Andy Stern of the SEIU:
We spent a fortune to elect Barack Obama — $60.7 million to be exact — and we’re proud of it." LaborPains.org | The Price of An Election

Union support is the life's blood of the Democrat Party.
Where did the union get that money, and who decided how it is to be spent?



1. "On June 6, the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation asked the Supreme Court to hear Janus v. AFSCME, a case involving plaintiff Mark Janus...is compelled to send part of his paycheck to the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, even though he says that the union does not “represent his interests.”

2. Right-to-work proponents are optimistic that the Court will hear the case and that Neil Gorsuch, Scalia’s replacement, will come down as the fifth vote on the side of employee freedom and overturn the 40-year-old precedent established in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, in which the Supreme Court held that states may force public-sector workers to pay union dues, ....




3. The Economic Policy Institute, an organization with strong ties to organized labor, claims that prohibiting fair-share payments could “profoundly affect the ability of millions of public-sector workers to improve their wages and working conditions....


4. [But former] research fellow in labor economics at the Heritage Foundation James Sherk explains that “studies that control for differences in costs of living find workers in states with voluntary dues have no lower—and possibly slightly higher—real wages than workers in states with compulsory dues.”





Here come the predictions of the end of the Democrat Party:

5. Even if the Court decides to hear the case, a decision in Janus is most likely a year off. But the unions are planning for the worst-case scenario. California Teachers Association Executive Director Joe Nuñez wrote in January that the CTA should be prepared for a 30 percent to 40 percent membership drop, ....


6. But whatever the membership drop might be, it will be damaging to the unions and could have widespread ramifications. And perhaps no group will be more affected than the Democratic Party. Naomi Walker, an assistant to AFSCME president Lee Saunders and a former Obama administration appointee, said that Janus “could undermine political operations that assist the Democratic Party.”
She added, “The progressive infrastructure in this country, from think tanks to advocacy organizations—which depends on the resources and engagement of workers and their unions—will crumble. We need the entire labor and progressive movements to stand with us and fight for us.
We may not survive without it—and nor, we fear, will they.”


['tis a consummation devoutly to be wished'....The Bard]


7. "The loss of these unions’ political clout certainly was a factor in giving Donald Trump narrow victories in both states. Should the Court decide for Janus in Janus, neither the apocalypse nor utopia will be upon us, but much will change.


8. Most notably, many government workers will have much freedom than they have now, and the Democratic Party won’t have the same bundles of cash flowing from union piggy banks." Janus and Worker Freedom





In full disclosure....the future of the Supreme Court, and of this nation, was my #1 reason for voting for President Trump.
The Democrats see exactly why.

Yep, this Democrat knows why; you are a neo fascist and a wannabe authoritarian. You are much like Trump, a narcissist and a hater of all people who question your rants, rants liberally (lol) spread throughout in the effort to control the future ("Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past" Orwell, 1984). Exactly what the current iteration of conservatives seek to do.

If she were a neo-fascist, she would be you, Nazi boi.

Idiot-Gram ^^^

But for the moment I'll give you the opportunity to judge me by a standard:

Now, point by point explain what I've ever posted which include these statements,

Time to pull out again: The 14 Points of Fascism

 

[PoliticalChic]

"More than 20,000 union members opted to leave SEIU affiliates in Washington state and Oregon, however, after an aggressive outreach involving door-to-door canvassing, targeted mailings, phone calls, and television commercials.

The Freedom Foundation’s Brian Minnich told The Daily Signal that payroll data obtained from the state of Oregon indicate 11,399 out of 28,667 home care providers no longer paid dues to the SEIU affiliate there. That’s a drop of almost 40 percent.

....the Freedom Foundation hired and trained dozens of canvassers to educate home-based health care aides about their constitutional rights, as affirmed in that year’s Supreme Court ruling Harris v. Quinn, ....

The high court ruled that unions such as SEIU, which represent “quasi-public employees,” may collect dues only when they are offered voluntarily.

...we have cost the SEIU union [in Washington state] more than $10 million."
Freedom Foundation Drains Union Membership Rolls by Promoting First Amendment



Know why that's important?
"The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) spent $61 million on political activities and lobbying [for Bill's wife].

....the $61.6 million figure was $13 million higher than what was spent in 2014, but $51 million less than what the union spent during former President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign."
SEIU Forced To Cut Staff At HQ Following Massive Political Spending In 2016



Keep those numbers in mind the next time you hear some Leftist complain about "Citizen's United."


It's morning in America.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Janus.....a union worker who doesn't agree with the Leftist policies and candidates that his union uses the dues it collects, sues to block forcing him to pay dues!

This sort of thing is what he objects to:
" Andy Stern of the SEIU:
We spent a fortune to elect Barack Obama — $60.7 million to be exact — and we’re proud of it." LaborPains.org | The Price of An Election

Union support is the life's blood of the Democrat Party.
Where did the union get that money, and who decided how it is to be spent?



1. "On June 6, the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation asked the Supreme Court to hear Janus v. AFSCME, a case involving plaintiff Mark Janus...is compelled to send part of his paycheck to the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, even though he says that the union does not “represent his interests.”

2. Right-to-work proponents are optimistic that the Court will hear the case and that Neil Gorsuch, Scalia’s replacement, will come down as the fifth vote on the side of employee freedom and overturn the 40-year-old precedent established in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, in which the Supreme Court held that states may force public-sector workers to pay union dues, ....




3. The Economic Policy Institute, an organization with strong ties to organized labor, claims that prohibiting fair-share payments could “profoundly affect the ability of millions of public-sector workers to improve their wages and working conditions....


4. [But former] research fellow in labor economics at the Heritage Foundation James Sherk explains that “studies that control for differences in costs of living find workers in states with voluntary dues have no lower—and possibly slightly higher—real wages than workers in states with compulsory dues.”





Here come the predictions of the end of the Democrat Party:

5. Even if the Court decides to hear the case, a decision in Janus is most likely a year off. But the unions are planning for the worst-case scenario. California Teachers Association Executive Director Joe Nuñez wrote in January that the CTA should be prepared for a 30 percent to 40 percent membership drop, ....


6. But whatever the membership drop might be, it will be damaging to the unions and could have widespread ramifications. And perhaps no group will be more affected than the Democratic Party. Naomi Walker, an assistant to AFSCME president Lee Saunders and a former Obama administration appointee, said that Janus “could undermine political operations that assist the Democratic Party.”
She added, “The progressive infrastructure in this country, from think tanks to advocacy organizations—which depends on the resources and engagement of workers and their unions—will crumble. We need the entire labor and progressive movements to stand with us and fight for us.
We may not survive without it—and nor, we fear, will they.”


['tis a consummation devoutly to be wished'....The Bard]


7. "The loss of these unions’ political clout certainly was a factor in giving Donald Trump narrow victories in both states. Should the Court decide for Janus in Janus, neither the apocalypse nor utopia will be upon us, but much will change.


8. Most notably, many government workers will have much freedom than they have now, and the Democratic Party won’t have the same bundles of cash flowing from union piggy banks." Janus and Worker Freedom





In full disclosure....the future of the Supreme Court, and of this nation, was my #1 reason for voting for President Trump.
The Democrats see exactly why.

Yep, this Democrat knows why; you are a neo fascist and a wannabe authoritarian. You are much like Trump, a narcissist and a hater of all people who question your rants, rants liberally (lol) spread throughout in the effort to control the future ("Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past" Orwell, 1984). Exactly what the current iteration of conservatives seek to do.

If she were a neo-fascist, she would be you, Nazi boi.

Idiot-Gram ^^^

But for the moment I'll give you the opportunity to judge me by a standard:

Now, point by point explain what I've ever posted which include these statements,

Time to pull out again: The 14 Points of Fascism

Only one point matters: collectivism/statism.
That's Fascism as well as Liberalism.