Danish Academic: 'Climate Change' May Require Militarized World Police

Not just irrelevant foreign news -- it's not even news, just speculation. By a foreigner. This is how low "news" has sunk. Breaking news: Somebody in a far-away cold country just said something stupid. [Sigh]
 
Not just irrelevant foreign news -- it's not even news, just speculation. By a foreigner. This is how low "news" has sunk. Breaking news: Somebody in a far-away cold country just said something stupid. [Sigh]

Hey, there are a few conservatives on here who will post articles about Islamic extremism, or someone got shot in another country, and point to that as being something that will happen in this country. Not really that much different.
 
Militarizing the effort is carbon-intensive ... not to mention all the extra cesium-135 ... maybe we should think again about a position in Lockheed-Martin ...

The video looks completely credible to me ... those are beer steins in the background ...
 
Of course, because the Goal of Climate Change is not trying to fight fictional Climate Change. It is to promote and carry out Globalist Governance.

Which means to get control over the United States. Control of us by...……...Denmark? Dream on.
 
Remember to say "global warming" not climate change, as they shifted to because everyone laughs at them whenever there's another snowstorm. If you want to. I take care not to use the Left's forced vocabulary, which is propaganda in itself. I say global warming, homosexual not gay, transvestite not transgender, which is impossible --- like that.
 
Of course, because the Goal of Climate Change is not trying to fight fictional Climate Change. It is to promote and carry out Globalist Governance.


While it has nothing to do with Climate change, the fact that we have global commerce means that we need global governance.

Regulating commerce is one of the essential functions of government....like putting tariffs on foreign made goods.
 
The proposals, the effectiveness thereof, and the logic or philosophy which proposals like this are founded upon to begin with, are not substantiated merely by the conclusion that "human activity affects the climate".

It's just people dishonestly or stupidly conflating political and ethical philosophy and postulation of untested ideas with "science", or being ignorant of the scope of science (and Francis Bacon's particular method of science in particular) to begin with.
 
Of course, because the Goal of Climate Change is not trying to fight fictional Climate Change. It is to promote and carry out Globalist Governance.


While it has nothing to do with Climate change, the fact that we have global commerce means that we need global governance.

Regulating commerce is one of the essential functions of government....like putting tariffs on foreign made goods.

Interesting point -- and we HAVE governance of global commerce: the IMF, the WTO, the various central banks, many, many trade treaties. So in that sense, I'd agree with you, but would argue that we've got the government of trade that we need already.
 
Global Warming is the new religion of the Left. They Believe on the basis of faith, not evidence.
 
The proposals, the effectiveness thereof, and the logic or philosophy which proposals like this are founded upon to begin with, are not substantiated merely by the conclusion that "human activity affects the climate".

It's just people dishonestly or stupidly conflating political and ethical philosophy and postulation of untested ideas with "science", or being ignorant of the scope of science (and Francis Bacon's particular method of science in particular) to begin with.

So you don't believe that air which has a considerable amount of carbon will have a different rate of heat dissipation as compared to air that has no carbon?

It seems that it's conservatives that have 'dishonestly or stupidly conflating political and ethical philosophy' in denying science.
 
Of course, because the Goal of Climate Change is not trying to fight fictional Climate Change. It is to promote and carry out Globalist Governance.


While it has nothing to do with Climate change, the fact that we have global commerce means that we need global governance.

Regulating commerce is one of the essential functions of government....like putting tariffs on foreign made goods.

Interesting point -- and we HAVE governance of global commerce: the IMF, the WTO, the various central banks, many, many trade treaties. So in that sense, I'd agree with you, but would argue that we've got the government of trade that we need already.


We have very limited and mostly ineffective global governance. We do not have control over the international arms trade, human trafficking, drug trades or tax havens for example. We have ad hoc treaties and trade agreements, but no real global governance.
 
So you don't believe that air which has a considerable amount of carbon will have a different rate of heat dissipation as compared to air that has no carbon?
That's a non-sequitur, and has no bearing on postulations or proposals in regards to what should actually be done via legislation in regards to these predictions, many of which proposals are founded on philosophical or belief systems which are separate from actual science or data itself. The conclusions are merely being ignorantly or even dishonestly conflated with the information they are predicated on.

It seems that it's conservatives that have 'dishonestly or stupidly conflating political and ethical philosophy' in denying science.
Science isn't a deity to be appeased as a superstitious folk might imagine, nor will it smite one who "denies" it as Yahweh might have, it's just a Western methodology or institution founded by Francis Bacon, and only one of many potential methodologies, arguably never being a "pure science" to begin with in the sense that mathematics is, given that it is constructed from it.
 
Sorry professor, we have already effected climate change through our militarization as the worlds police to liberate and free some of the worlds oil supply. Did I say Oil. I meant Spice....ops no, got it backwards again, Oil.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top