Pentagon study: Gays could serve with no harm - Yahoo! News
Can always find maturity there. (lol this doesn't go for the Retired).
Can always find maturity there. (lol this doesn't go for the Retired).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's old school. I can understand that. I have older family and what not. The older mostly seem less tollerant of "different." (not all of course) I hope I don't grow into that somehow.
He's old school. I can understand that. I have older family and what not. The older mostly seem less tollerant of "different." (not all of course) I hope I don't grow into that somehow.
I accept where Sen McCain's opinion comes from. What I don't accept is moving the goalposts on DADT repeal instead of admitting you really just don't want gays to serve openly.
I also don't think we need to be basing policy on the homophobic fears of a small minority of Republicans. Rather, we should follow the recommendations of our top military officials (both civilian and enlisted) and the opinion of an overwhelming percentage of enlisted people.
So hip hip hoofuckingray, the miltary doesn't get to decide how they run themselves!!
I tire of the military being used to score points.
When I was in we had to put on big shows for any POS pol that came down from DC.
Vets and the military have been used so long that no one notices that it's being done.
No one gives a shit about DADT. Clinton was an asshole to put that on us, for the gay vote, don't think he did it b/c he gave a damn, it was only for votes. And it's only an issue now b/c big 0 and the dims need votes, and nothing else.
So hip hip hoofuckingray, the miltary doesn't get to decide how they run themselves!!
He's old school. I can understand that. I have older family and what not. The older mostly seem less tollerant of "different." (not all of course) I hope I don't grow into that somehow.
I accept where Sen McCain's opinion comes from. What I don't accept is moving the goalposts on DADT repeal instead of admitting you really just don't want gays to serve openly.
I also don't think we need to be basing policy on the homophobic fears of a small minority of Republicans. Rather, we should follow the recommendations of our top military officials (both civilian and enlisted) and the opinion of an overwhelming percentage of enlisted people.
And the population as a whole. I think it was something like 58%.
I accept where Sen McCain's opinion comes from. What I don't accept is moving the goalposts on DADT repeal instead of admitting you really just don't want gays to serve openly.
I also don't think we need to be basing policy on the homophobic fears of a small minority of Republicans. Rather, we should follow the recommendations of our top military officials (both civilian and enlisted) and the opinion of an overwhelming percentage of enlisted people.
And the population as a whole. I think it was something like 58%.
I argue that the population, if you're referring to all citizens, should NOT have a say.
If you're not in the military where this would actually affect a mission in some way, then all you really have is an opinion on it that means jack shit to the military's overall mission.
Seriously, how is John Q. Taxpayer's opinion on DADT relevant to the military's current mission?
I accept where Sen McCain's opinion comes from. What I don't accept is moving the goalposts on DADT repeal instead of admitting you really just don't want gays to serve openly.
I also don't think we need to be basing policy on the homophobic fears of a small minority of Republicans. Rather, we should follow the recommendations of our top military officials (both civilian and enlisted) and the opinion of an overwhelming percentage of enlisted people.
And the population as a whole. I think it was something like 58%.
I argue that the population, if you're referring to all citizens, should NOT have a say.
If you're not in the military where this would actually affect a mission in some way, then all you really have is an opinion on it that means jack shit to the military's overall mission.
Seriously, how is John Q. Taxpayer's opinion on DADT relevant to the military's current mission?
So hip hip hoofuckingray, the miltary doesn't get to decide how they run themselves!!
The research of the military brass (and the opinion of those enlisted in said military) supports repealing DADT. They did their own research and reached that conclusion on their own. It was their decision.
So hip hip hoofuckingray, the miltary doesn't get to decide how they run themselves!!
The research of the military brass (and the opinion of those enlisted in said military) supports repealing DADT. They did their own research and reached that conclusion on their own. It was their decision.
The military still has no say.
The military leaders can not keep or end dadt on thier own.
But this "research" will be used to score political points, nothing more.