DACA...the "hot potato" now in congress' inept hands....

[easyt65]

The black President said he was going to do what he did because Congress didn't do it the way he wanted it done. I'm yet to see a timeline in the Constitution for when they're supposed to do anything, hot potato or not.

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

 

[Conservative65]

The black President said he was going to do what he did because Congress didn't do it the way he wanted it done. I'm yet to see a timeline in the Constitution for when they're supposed to do anything, hot potato or not.

View attachment 147663

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

 

[easyt65]

The black President said he was going to do what he did because Congress didn't do it the way he wanted it done. I'm yet to see a timeline in the Constitution for when they're supposed to do anything, hot potato or not.

View attachment 147663

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

 

[Smedley VonBuren]

As expected, Trump took the cowardly way out and instead of deciding on DACA through his "beloved" executive orders......gave the entire controversy to Congress with a timeline of 6 months to "resolve" the issue.

My guess is that equally cowardly congress will defy the 6 month timeline and try to wait out a decision AFTER the 2018 midterm elections.

Can anyone else foresee the political ads by democrats running for seats in the House next Spring??? .

You mean to tell me Crying Chuck and his 47 friends in the Senate (plus Murkowski, Collins & McShame) can't get it done in 6 months? Laughable!

 

[Conservative65]

The black President said he was going to do what he did because Congress didn't do it the way he wanted it done. I'm yet to see a timeline in the Constitution for when they're supposed to do anything, hot potato or not.

View attachment 147663

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

I fully agree and understand the concept of checks and balances. While Congress has the authority to write legislation, nothing in the Constitution requires them to do it on a timeline nor does it give the President, by default, the authority to act if it isn't done as quickly as he wants.

 

[bendog]

The black President said he was going to do what he did because Congress didn't do it the way he wanted it done. I'm yet to see a timeline in the Constitution for when they're supposed to do anything, hot potato or not.

View attachment 147663

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

I fully agree and understand the concept of checks and balances. While Congress has the authority to write legislation, nothing in the Constitution requires them to do it on a timeline nor does it give the President, by default, the authority to act if it isn't done as quickly as he wants.

Too bad its black and white for you

 

[OldLady]

I just watched Jeff Sessions get up and announce to the country that DACA was Unconstitutional.

Shrug. And no one is held accountable.

Amazing.

What do you mean? Should someone go to prison?

You tell me. What should be done?

Are they really going to lock up the nations first Black President? No, and Obama knew that well in advance and took full advantage.

When have we locked up any President for unconstitutional actions? Or legislation, for that matter? We just shut it down. Checks and balances, not prison. This is not a third world shit hole, even though the U.N. had to lecture Trump for going after the press like one.

 

[Conservative65]

The black President said he was going to do what he did because Congress didn't do it the way he wanted it done. I'm yet to see a timeline in the Constitution for when they're supposed to do anything, hot potato or not.

View attachment 147663

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

I fully agree and understand the concept of checks and balances. While Congress has the authority to write legislation, nothing in the Constitution requires them to do it on a timeline nor does it give the President, by default, the authority to act if it isn't done as quickly as he wants.

Too bad its black and white for you

It is black and white. Congress has the authority to act on such issues but not doing so in the timeframe the President or anyone else wants doesn't mean it defaults to the President to act because he doesn't like the timeframe being used.

 

[Votto]

I just watched Jeff Sessions get up and announce to the country that DACA was Unconstitutional.

Shrug. And no one is held accountable.

Amazing.

What do you mean? Should someone go to prison?

You tell me. What should be done?

Are they really going to lock up the nations first Black President? No, and Obama knew that well in advance and took full advantage.

When have we locked up any President for unconstitutional actions? Or legislation, for that matter? We just shut it down. Checks and balances, not prison. This is not a third world shit hole, even though the U.N. had to lecture Trump for going after the press like one.

Checks and balances? Where? Obama got away with it just like FDR did locking up innocent Japanese Americans

 

[Votto]

View attachment 147663

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

I fully agree and understand the concept of checks and balances. While Congress has the authority to write legislation, nothing in the Constitution requires them to do it on a timeline nor does it give the President, by default, the authority to act if it isn't done as quickly as he wants.

Too bad its black and white for you

It is black and white. Congress has the authority to act on such issues but not doing so in the timeframe the President or anyone else wants doesn't mean it defaults to the President to act because he doesn't like the timeframe being used.

If the GOP congress does not act, it will be the nail in their coffins

 

[OldLady]

The black President said he was going to do what he did because Congress didn't do it the way he wanted it done. I'm yet to see a timeline in the Constitution for when they're supposed to do anything, hot potato or not.

View attachment 147663

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

With that deadline fast approaching, a new NBC News/SurveyMonkey poll finds that nearly two-thirds of Americans support DACA, “which protects those who were brought in the United States as undocumented children from being deported”.

Survey respondents had a generally sympathetic stance toward unauthorized immigrants, with 71 per cent saying they should have a chance to pursue legal status versus the 26 per cent who favored deportation.
Majority of Americans support programme for young immigrants Trump could be on verge of closing

 

[Conservative65]

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

I fully agree and understand the concept of checks and balances. While Congress has the authority to write legislation, nothing in the Constitution requires them to do it on a timeline nor does it give the President, by default, the authority to act if it isn't done as quickly as he wants.

Too bad its black and white for you

It is black and white. Congress has the authority to act on such issues but not doing so in the timeframe the President or anyone else wants doesn't mean it defaults to the President to act because he doesn't like the timeframe being used.

If the GOP congress does not act, it will be the nail in their coffins

They need to act but that's a separate issue than whether or not Obama could do what he did.

 

[OldLady]

I just watched Jeff Sessions get up and announce to the country that DACA was Unconstitutional.

Shrug. And no one is held accountable.

Amazing.

What do you mean? Should someone go to prison?

You tell me. What should be done?

Are they really going to lock up the nations first Black President? No, and Obama knew that well in advance and took full advantage.

When have we locked up any President for unconstitutional actions? Or legislation, for that matter? We just shut it down. Checks and balances, not prison. This is not a third world shit hole, even though the U.N. had to lecture Trump for going after the press like one.

Checks and balances? Where? Obama got away with it just like FDR did locking up innocent Japanese Americans

It went to the Supreme Court and there was a 4-4 tie.

 

[Conservative65]

The black President said he was going to do what he did because Congress didn't do it the way he wanted it done. I'm yet to see a timeline in the Constitution for when they're supposed to do anything, hot potato or not.

View attachment 147663

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

With that deadline fast approaching, a new NBC News/SurveyMonkey poll finds that nearly two-thirds of Americans support DACA, “which protects those who were brought in the United States as undocumented children from being deported”.

Survey respondents had a generally sympathetic stance toward unauthorized immigrants, with 71 per cent saying they should have a chance to pursue legal status versus the 26 per cent who favored deportation.
Majority of Americans support programme for young immigrants Trump could be on verge of closing

That tells me 71% want to reward illegals for being criminals.

 

[bendog]

View attachment 147663

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

I fully agree and understand the concept of checks and balances. While Congress has the authority to write legislation, nothing in the Constitution requires them to do it on a timeline nor does it give the President, by default, the authority to act if it isn't done as quickly as he wants.

Too bad its black and white for you

It is black and white. Congress has the authority to act on such issues but not doing so in the timeframe the President or anyone else wants doesn't mean it defaults to the President to act because he doesn't like the timeframe being used.

tell that to the black president, asshole

 

[Conservative65]

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

I fully agree and understand the concept of checks and balances. While Congress has the authority to write legislation, nothing in the Constitution requires them to do it on a timeline nor does it give the President, by default, the authority to act if it isn't done as quickly as he wants.

Too bad its black and white for you

It is black and white. Congress has the authority to act on such issues but not doing so in the timeframe the President or anyone else wants doesn't mean it defaults to the President to act because he doesn't like the timeframe being used.

tell that to the black president, asshole

We didn't have a black President. One half of him was produced by a typical runaway black baby daddy and the other half was produced by a white trash mother.

 

[easyt65]

The black President said he was going to do what he did because Congress didn't do it the way he wanted it done. I'm yet to see a timeline in the Constitution for when they're supposed to do anything, hot potato or not.

View attachment 147663

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

I fully agree and understand the concept of checks and balances. While Congress has the authority to write legislation, nothing in the Constitution requires them to do it on a timeline nor does it give the President, by default, the authority to act if it isn't done as quickly as he wants.

Too bad its black and white for you

Link?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

As expected, Trump took the cowardly way out and instead of deciding on DACA through his "beloved" executive orders......gave the entire controversy to Congress with a timeline of 6 months to "resolve" the issue.

My guess is that equally cowardly congress will defy the 6 month timeline and try to wait out a decision AFTER the 2018 midterm elections.

Can anyone else foresee the political ads by democrats running for seats in the House next Spring??? .

Yeah I'm sure those protected by DACA will be fine. But saying that isn't much comfort to them with a hostile President that lacks morals in charge.

Its hostile to deport them the fuck back to their own damn country after they broke our laws?

If they were innocent children when they came here, yes.

Do you know how many have been pimped out to prostitution and drug trafficking while in Obama's detention centers? Of course you don't. By your logic we should let a billion poor kids into our country, why not throw the doors open hell they can live in your house and you can pay for their food, education, and healthcare how about that? How many can you take 6? 8?

Try learning something before you say something so utterly stupid that you can't prove, idiot.



"Undocumented immigrants pay $12 billion of taxes every single year."
— María Teresa Kumar on Sunday, October 2nd, 2016 in an interview on "Meet the Press"

"
According to the Social Security Administration, there were nearly 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States in January 2009. Factoring out kids, nonworking immigrants and those working in the underground economy and not paying taxes, the Social Security Administration estimated about 3.1 million unauthorized immigrants who worked and paid Social Security taxes in 2010.

This group and their employers generated about $13 billion in payroll taxes in 2010. The administration then subtracted about $1 billion in benefits that could’ve been received in 2010 from earnings in years when workers were unauthorized. Workers and employers contribute roughly the same amount.

In a 2014 Vice News piece, the Social Security Administration’s chief actuary Stephen C. Goss affirmed the $12 billion contribution.

Social Security Administration analysts said "a relatively small portion" of those who could draw benefits do so."""""

How much do undocumented immigrants pay in taxes?

 

[OldLady]

The black President said he was going to do what he did because Congress didn't do it the way he wanted it done. I'm yet to see a timeline in the Constitution for when they're supposed to do anything, hot potato or not.

View attachment 147663

This was an admission by Barak Obama that he violated the Constitution.
The Communist Frank Marshall Davis-tutored, Saul Alinsky-studying, Anti-American Racist Hate-Monger Pastor-Mentored Obama completely ignored the fact that 'Not passing the exact legislation I want in the time period I want it passed' is not a legitimate Constitutional Reason for an Anti-Colonialist-Sired Socialist Dictator-wannabe to create and institute a law by by-passing the Legislative Branch to push his personal agenda...

....much like how 'Congress will not agree to this Iran-benefitting Treaty, especially while Iran is already violating the terms of the treaty / mocking me and the US / practicing bombing US carriers / declaring they want the US destroyed' does not give the same POS the right to enter into a Treaty with Iran anyway.

I've looked and looked for the timeline nat seems to think is in the Constitution for Congress to do something. I'm yet to find it.

Congress has the authority to write legislation. If they choose to do so, make DACA legal / Constitutional they an do so. Congress is also supposed to be a 'Check and Balance' for the Executive Branch.

If Ryan / Congress believed Obama violated the Constitution they were BOUND by the constitution to do something about it. They did nothing.

With that deadline fast approaching, a new NBC News/SurveyMonkey poll finds that nearly two-thirds of Americans support DACA, “which protects those who were brought in the United States as undocumented children from being deported”.

Survey respondents had a generally sympathetic stance toward unauthorized immigrants, with 71 per cent saying they should have a chance to pursue legal status versus the 26 per cent who favored deportation.
Majority of Americans support programme for young immigrants Trump could be on verge of closing

That tells me 71% want to reward illegals for being criminals.

What it tells me is that, at least with the Dreamers, Congress will not boot them out.

 

[easyt65]

With that deadline fast approaching, a new NBC News/SurveyMonkey poll finds that nearly two-thirds of Americans support DACA, “which protects those who were brought in the United States as undocumented children from being deported”.

Survey respondents had a generally sympathetic stance toward unauthorized immigrants, with 71 per cent saying they should have a chance to pursue legal status versus the 26 per cent who favored deportation.
Majority of Americans support programme for young immigrants Trump could be on verge of closing

Thank you for sharing that - seriously. That being said, I put absolutely NO trust in ANY poll, no matter who posts / reports them, especially when I know nothing about the demographics, the specific questions that were asked, etc....

As part of my major I learned in college how to create polls, how to manipulate polls into providing any feedback you want.

As far as your 'bolded' part above - how 71% believe they should have a chance to pursue a legal status' - THEY ALWAYS HAD THAT, BEFORE EVER COMING / BEING BROUGHT HERE ILLEGALLY! The US Immigration system provides that opportunity / method. The problem is the tidal wave of illegals who have come into the United States CHOSE to disrespect / not to obey our laws.

I understand some of these people were brought her as kids by their illegal parents. Some of them were brought here by the US govt. Forgive me for saying so, but sucks to be them. That's life - those are the breaks.


VISA OVERSTAYS NOW BIGGER PROBLEM THAT BORDER CROSSERS
The DACA law was not created by Barry to be a temp worker program but was meant from the start to be a way to grant AMNESTY. Illegal Visa Overstays actually outnumber illegals coming across the border.

Visa overstays outnumber illegal border crossings; trend likely to continue
- Overstays have exceeded those entering illegally every year since 2007, and there have been half a million more overstays than illegal entries since 2007.

The US Govt, Congress, knows damn-well that the Department of immigrations is so back-logged and under-manned that most overstays will never be tracked down if they simply do not show back up / leave. They know it is a problem but refuse to fix it. If they thought it was a bad enough problem they would suspend issuing Visas until they came up with a plan to get it under control. Issuing Visas has become an un-official way to allow (eventual) illegals into the country.