Again, you're just painfully, wincingly, stupid.
My apologies again I must have missed it in the article, what experiment did he conduct or scientific evidence did he examine to come to his new conclusion?
What scientific evidence did you examine? What experiment did you conduct?
Again. Wince.
I'm not a scientist, I rely on the scientific efforts of said scientists.
So there was no scientific evidence or experiments that caused him to come to a new conclusion, correct? Just book reading from a preacher right?