Court denies ACLU contempt motion against Kentucky Clerk

Odium could not tell the truth if he had a cattle rod up his ass.

Here is the rreal story, and it is not about contempt of court, only about her removing her name: "The same judge who ordered Kentucky clerk Kim Davis to jail for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples [which was contempt of court] has now rejected a motion filed by the ACLU that would have forced her to issue the licenses with her name and title on them."
 
Good. Davis doesn't have her name on the licenses anymore and gays can marry in Rowan Co. without her interference. It's time we move onto more pressing matters like half-time shows at the Super Bowl. lol
 
Odium could not tell the truth if he had a cattle rod up his ass.

Here is the rreal story, and it is not about contempt of court, only about her removing her name: "The same judge who ordered Kentucky clerk Kim Davis to jail for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples [which was contempt of court] has now rejected a motion filed by the ACLU that would have forced her to issue the licenses with her name and title on them."
What is it about White Supremists and constant lying. Makes me embarrassed to be of the same race.

Honest to god! Not all white people lie like Odium does.
 
Doesn't the ACLU (American civil liberties union) represent all the people and not just militant lesbians? Wouldn't you think an entity that calls itself "civil liberties" would represent Ms. Davis's 1st Amendment freedom of religion instead of attacking her?
 
Doesn't the ACLU (American civil liberties union) represent all the people and not just militant lesbians? Wouldn't you think an entity that calls itself "civil liberties" would represent Ms. Davis's 1st Amendment freedom of religion instead of attacking her?
Did she ask them to represent her? Yes or No.
 
Doesn't the ACLU (American civil liberties union) represent all the people and not just militant lesbians? Wouldn't you think an entity that calls itself "civil liberties" would represent Ms. Davis's 1st Amendment freedom of religion instead of attacking her?
Ms Davis attacked the civil liberties of those wanted to marry. She had no civil liberty in HER OFFICIAL SECULAR POSITION to deny them.
 
The form was changed and no longer has her name or title. Does the ACLU want the form changed, or just force Davis to scribble her name someplace on the form just cause they want it.
 
Shame on you for ACLU bashing.

Like your rights, thank the ACLU !
 
The form was changed and no longer has her name or title. Does the ACLU want the form changed, or just force Davis to scribble her name someplace on the form just cause they want it.
On that you are right. The judge, however, says she does not have to, which has nothing to with contempt of court in the OP.
 
Doesn't the ACLU (American civil liberties union) represent all the people and not just militant lesbians? Wouldn't you think an entity that calls itself "civil liberties" would represent Ms. Davis's 1st Amendment freedom of religion instead of attacking her?
since her first amendment rights were not infringed upon what would they have done for her?
 
The form was changed and no longer has her name or title. Does the ACLU want the form changed, or just force Davis to scribble her name someplace on the form just cause they want it.
the concern was over those issued prior to the executive order allowing davis to remove her name but after she had already done so
 
Doesn't the ACLU (American civil liberties union) represent all the people and not just militant lesbians? Wouldn't you think an entity that calls itself "civil liberties" would represent Ms. Davis's 1st Amendment freedom of religion instead of attacking her?
Did she ask them to represent her? Yes or No.
The ACLU attorneys operate on the 'parachute' method. Meaning, they seek out and find issues which support their political ideology then make inquiries as to whether or not the person or group wishes their legal representation.
 

Forum List

Back
Top