Corroborating Court Evidence Trump Violated Campaign Finance Law

[Crepitus]

Show us your evidence parrot.

Umm, he just did. Can you not read the post?

 

[mikegriffith1]

Gosh, this is so silly. So when Obama covered-up his and Hillary's failures in the Benghazi debacle to help his reelection chances, wasn't that a violation of law that was done to help him get reelected?

When Hillary destroyed thousands of e-mails and had her server wiped, wasn't that a crime that was done to help her get the nomination?

 

[Claudette]

All of you MORONS who did nothing but avoid addressing the point of the OP up to this point about 5.5 hours after it was posted and every effort to avoid the topic because it put the target on the Orange Clown's back and is HIGHLY likely to produce the first felony charge against the Orange Fat Ass, KNOW THIS.

This is just the FIRST instance, proving with corroborating evidence from two separate decisions in two Courts on the same day, that 'Individual Number 1' has been DIRECTLY linked to violating Campaign Finance Law. Also, Edwards' issue in 2011 NOTWITHSTANDING as non-related in the particulars of the actual legal substance and matter. But if you dumb asses want to believe Faux, Brietbart, InfoWars, et al, go ahead and toast you flagon of Trump Piss!

You have proof he used campaign money to pay those extortionists? I heard he used his own money, which is not illegal.

That's what I read as well. Trump used his own money, not campaign contributions.

The money the DNC and Hitlery paid Steele for his fake dossier could be considered campaign funds as well.

 

[lantern2814]

All of you MORONS who did nothing but avoid addressing the point of the OP up to this point about 5.5 hours after it was posted and every effort to avoid the topic because it put the target on the Orange Clown's back and is HIGHLY likely to produce the first felony charge against the Orange Fat Ass, KNOW THIS.

This is just the FIRST instance, proving with corroborating evidence from two separate decisions in two Courts on the same day, that 'Individual Number 1' has been DIRECTLY linked to violating Campaign Finance Law. Also, Edwards' issue in 2011 NOTWITHSTANDING as non-related in the particulars of the actual legal substance and matter. But if you dumb asses want to believe Faux, Brietbart, InfoWars, et al, go ahead and toast you flagon of Trump Piss!

Sorry MORON, the Edwards case is the LEGAL PRECEDENT here. Along with those Congressional payoffs to women to keep them quiet that you keep conveniently forgetting about. Now take your crying, lying ass back to CNN and MS13NBC. Failure number 500,000 and counting.

Sorry MORON, the Edwards case is the LEGAL PRECEDENT here.

Well, you ignorant fuck, given Cohen was charged, plead guilty to the charge and the charge was included at sentencing as part of the punishment dished out for his violation of the law, doesn't that begin to tell you that the material facts in the Edwards case were different than those in Cohen dealing with the law? Oh, and Trump was the guy with the money being passed and noted in Cohen's case!

And if legal precedent was set with the Edwards case as you're claiming, cite exact precedent and the case which set the precedent or shut-the-fuck-up hotshot! Do you really believe all cases involving Campaign Finance Law come to Court with the same set of material facts and evidence, you fucking IDIOT!

Resorting to cursing because you just got schooled again? Poor form, even for a troll. The exact case would be the Edwards case (a literate person would have realized that). The FEDERAL DOJ found that paying money to women (in Edwards case housing, supporting, and keeping her quiet) was NOT a violation of campaign laws. In addition, this was TRUMP'S OWN MONEY, not strictly campaign cash. Since Trump and other rich men have historically done this, you have ZERO way to prove it was strictly for the election. Now you can STFU, impotent troll.

Resorting to cursing because you just got schooled again? Poor form, even for a troll. The exact case would be the Edwards case (a literate person would have realized that). The FEDERAL DOJ found that paying money to women (in Edwards case housing, supporting, and keeping her quiet) was NOT a violation of campaign laws. In addition, this was TRUMP'S OWN MONEY, not strictly campaign cash. Since Trump and other rich men have historically done this, you have ZERO way to prove it was strictly for the election. Now you can STFU, impotent troll.

I see and NOTE you can't cite either the case [such as Roe v. Wade, dummy] or the precedent [the text within the case record re: the "precedent"] regarding Edwards as you claimed existed as a show stopper allowing a bypass for the Orange Clown, you know like something another could lookup and read, but rather supply only a bullshit dodge & filler signifying nothing but a trapped lie that YOU exposed for those paying attention!

Don't like adult language returned when you insult another's intelligence with yet another redundant insulting LIE? I'll keep that in mind you fucking immature MORONIC child! BTW, what's the other handle you use on this board, fraud? Now piss off asswipe! You've got nothing of worth to "school" anyone above the age of 9!

Again, you illiterate clown, the Stevens case IS the case cited. Uh oh! A bunch of federal lawyers and FEC officials agree it is NOT a violation. Poor little baby. Need your binky? Try pulling it out of your ass. Throwing a tantrum doesn't chance the fact that this is DOA.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Cohen's sentencing today confirmed in court documents that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law to pay off the two women suing him to keep them silent to avoid negatively impacting his campaign.
~~How Michael Cohen broke campaign finance law ~~

Less than an hour after that disclosure, it was announced on the news that AMI, the holding company owning the National Inquirer that bought the rights to those stories about the same women made a non-prosecution agreement with authorities in NYC for admitting they spiked the stories with Trump's "encouragement" of avoiding negatively impacting his campaign. ( This broke on TV and no link yet!)
Edit: Here's a link now:
~~ Trump Campaign Struck Early Deal to Kill Bad Stories, AMI Admits ~~

These two 'cases' corroborate the fact that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law and is on record in court documents and sentence agreements ON THE SAME BLOODY DAY!
EDIT: replaced 'instances' with 'cases'.

No Republican in the Senate can ignore this evidence when they get Articles of Impeachment from the House next January or February!

Yes, Trump in fact violated the law – but his DOJ won’t indict and the blind partisan Republican Senate won’t convict.

Consequently, it falls to the people to vote Trump out of office in 2020 – which is appropriate given the people are ultimately responsible for the Trump disaster in the first place.

 

[Dana7360]

All of you MORONS who did nothing but avoid addressing the point of the OP up to this point about 5.5 hours after it was posted and every effort to avoid the topic because it put the target on the Orange Clown's back and is HIGHLY likely to produce the first felony charge against the Orange Fat Ass, KNOW THIS.

This is just the FIRST instance, proving with corroborating evidence from two separate decisions in two Courts on the same day, that 'Individual Number 1' has been DIRECTLY linked to violating Campaign Finance Law. Also, Edwards' issue in 2011 NOTWITHSTANDING as non-related in the particulars of the actual legal substance and matter. But if you dumb asses want to believe Faux, Brietbart, InfoWars, et al, go ahead and toast you flagon of Trump Piss!

You have proof he used campaign money to pay those extortionists? I heard he used his own money, which is not illegal.

It's a campaign contribution that violates the law. There's a limit on the amount of money a person can donate to a campaign. The amount exceeded that limit.

There's requirements by law to declare contributions. trump didn't declare the contributions.

He further broke the law by trying to hide the whole thing by using shell accounts and companies to hide it.

You seriously need to read the facts here.

trump may claim it's legal but there's AMI and others who were directly involved with have either pleaded guilty to the crime and are going to prison for it or have made a deal with prosecutors to avoid prison time.

 

[task0778]

Obama's campaign was also found guilty of violating campaign finance laws and had to pay a hefty fine, but I don't remember any talk about impeaching him.

As Politico reported back in 2013, “President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign was fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission for campaign reporting violations — one of the largest fees ever levied against a presidential campaign.” Prior to that, Bob Dole set a record for FEC fines from his 1996 presidential campaign, paying $100,000. Among many miscellaneous reporting errors, the main issue with Obama’s campaign finances was a series of missing 48-hour notices for almost 1,300 contributions totaling more than $1.8 million. The notices must be filed out for contributions of over $1,000 that are received within 20 days of election day.

Obama FINED for Campaign Violations - Paid Biggest Fees for Presidential Campaign EVER!

 

[B. Kidd]

All of you MORONS who did nothing but avoid addressing the point of the OP up to this point about 5.5 hours after it was posted and every effort to avoid the topic because it put the target on the Orange Clown's back and is HIGHLY likely to produce the first felony charge against the Orange Fat Ass, KNOW THIS.

This is just the FIRST instance, proving with corroborating evidence from two separate decisions in two Courts on the same day, that 'Individual Number 1' has been DIRECTLY linked to violating Campaign Finance Law. Also, Edwards' issue in 2011 NOTWITHSTANDING as non-related in the particulars of the actual legal substance and matter. But if you dumb asses want to believe Faux, Brietbart, InfoWars, et al, go ahead and toast you flagon of Trump Piss!

You have proof he used campaign money to pay those extortionists? I heard he used his own money, which is not illegal.

That's what I read as well. Trump used his own money, not campaign contributions.

The money the DNC and Hitlery paid Steele for his fake dossier could be considered campaign funds as well.

Obama co-opted the DOJ and deep state to swear allegiance to only one party; so the rule of law does not apply to Democraps.

 

[B. Kidd]

Cohen's sentencing today confirmed in court documents that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law to pay off the two women suing him to keep them silent to avoid negatively impacting his campaign.
~~How Michael Cohen broke campaign finance law ~~

Less than an hour after that disclosure, it was announced on the news that AMI, the holding company owning the National Inquirer that bought the rights to those stories about the same women made a non-prosecution agreement with authorities in NYC for admitting they spiked the stories with Trump's "encouragement" of avoiding negatively impacting his campaign. ( This broke on TV and no link yet!)
Edit: Here's a link now:
~~ Trump Campaign Struck Early Deal to Kill Bad Stories, AMI Admits ~~

These two 'cases' corroborate the fact that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law and is on record in court documents and sentence agreements ON THE SAME BLOODY DAY!
EDIT: replaced 'instances' with 'cases'.

No Republican in the Senate can ignore this evidence when they get Articles of Impeachment from the House next January or February!

Yes, Trump in fact violated the law – but his DOJ won’t indict and the blind partisan Republican Senate won’t convict.

Consequently, it falls to the people to vote Trump out of office in 2020 – which is appropriate given the people are ultimately responsible for the Trump disaster in the first place.

Democracy is a bitch, ain't it bedwetter?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Trump Campaign Struck Early Deal to Kill Bad Stories, AMI Admits


Under the non-prosecution agreement, the company admitted its purpose was to suppress the woman’s story and prevent it from influencing the election. The deal marks a change of allegiances for one of Trump’s biggest supporters. Pecker has been a close friend of Trump and gave positive coverage to his presidential campaign in the National Enquirer.

Pecker has been a key witness in the investigation of Cohen.

“As a part of the agreement, AMI admitted that it made the $150,000 payment in concert with a candidate’s presidential campaign, and in order to ensure that the woman did not publicize damaging allegations about the candidate before the 2016 presidential election,” the prosecutors wrote in a statement announcing the deal.

LOL

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Thet went to a concert!

 

[bripat9643]

Cohen's sentencing today confirmed in court documents that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law to pay off the two women suing him to keep them silent to avoid negatively impacting his campaign.
~~How Michael Cohen broke campaign finance law ~~

Less than an hour after that disclosure, it was announced on the news that AMI, the holding company owning the National Inquirer that bought the rights to those stories about the same women made a non-prosecution agreement with authorities in NYC for admitting they spiked the stories with Trump's "encouragement" of avoiding negatively impacting his campaign. ( This broke on TV and no link yet!)
Edit: Here's a link now:
~~ Trump Campaign Struck Early Deal to Kill Bad Stories, AMI Admits ~~

These two 'cases' corroborate the fact that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law and is on record in court documents and sentence agreements ON THE SAME BLOODY DAY!
EDIT: replaced 'instances' with 'cases'.

No Republican in the Senate can ignore this evidence when they get Articles of Impeachment from the House next January or February!

Total horseshit. The only thing a plea bargain confirms is that the defendant agreed to the charges. It "confirms" nothing about any other case. Plea bargains are not admissible evidence in other cases.

When are you fucking brain damaged retards going to get over this idea that statements compelled by threat of imprisonment are some kind of valid evidence?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Muellers got nothing but a trip to Gitmo. He made them plead to a nothing that's supposed to sound like something

 

[bripat9643]

Trump Campaign Struck Early Deal to Kill Bad Stories, AMI Admits


Under the non-prosecution agreement, the company admitted its purpose was to suppress the woman’s story and prevent it from influencing the election. The deal marks a change of allegiances for one of Trump’s biggest supporters. Pecker has been a close friend of Trump and gave positive coverage to his presidential campaign in the National Enquirer.

Pecker has been a key witness in the investigation of Cohen.

“As a part of the agreement, AMI admitted that it made the $150,000 payment in concert with a candidate’s presidential campaign, and in order to ensure that the woman did not publicize damaging allegations about the candidate before the 2016 presidential election,” the prosecutors wrote in a statement announcing the deal.

The "admission" is absolutely worthless in any case against Trump. It's not admissible as evidence.

 

[bripat9643]

Cohen's sentencing today confirmed in court documents that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law to pay off the two women suing him to keep them silent to avoid negatively impacting his campaign.
~~How Michael Cohen broke campaign finance law ~~

Less than an hour after that disclosure, it was announced on the news that AMI, the holding company owning the National Inquirer that bought the rights to those stories about the same women made a non-prosecution agreement with authorities in NYC for admitting they spiked the stories with Trump's "encouragement" of avoiding negatively impacting his campaign. ( This broke on TV and no link yet!)
Edit: Here's a link now:
~~ Trump Campaign Struck Early Deal to Kill Bad Stories, AMI Admits ~~

These two instances corroborate the fact that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law and is on record in court documents and sentence agreements ON THE SAME BLOODY DAY!

No Republican in the Senate can ignore this evidence when they get Articles of Impeachment from the House next January or February!

Ya know what's funny as hell? I don't see anyone going after the congresscritters that used tax money to pay sexual harassment and other cases to protect their political careers. Wouldn't the same contribution limits and reporting requirements apply to those two faced fucks. And stupid assed pukes like the OP think this double standard is just peachy. God Damned commies.

.

That will commence the minute they try to prosecute Trump for it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

AMI pleaded guilty to acting in concert with the Trump campaign to sodomize Bigfoot in Federally protected wetlands

 

[bripat9643]

Cohen's sentencing today confirmed in court documents that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law to pay off the two women suing him to keep them silent to avoid negatively impacting his campaign.
~~How Michael Cohen broke campaign finance law ~~

Less than an hour after that disclosure, it was announced on the news that AMI, the holding company owning the National Inquirer that bought the rights to those stories about the same women made a non-prosecution agreement with authorities in NYC for admitting they spiked the stories with Trump's "encouragement" of avoiding negatively impacting his campaign. ( This broke on TV and no link yet!)
Edit: Here's a link now:
~~ Trump Campaign Struck Early Deal to Kill Bad Stories, AMI Admits ~~

These two 'cases' corroborate the fact that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law and is on record in court documents and sentence agreements ON THE SAME BLOODY DAY!
EDIT: replaced 'instances' with 'cases'.

No Republican in the Senate can ignore this evidence when they get Articles of Impeachment from the House next January or February!

Yes, Trump in fact violated the law – but his DOJ won’t indict and the blind partisan Republican Senate won’t convict.

Consequently, it falls to the people to vote Trump out of office in 2020 – which is appropriate given the people are ultimately responsible for the Trump disaster in the first place.

No, in fact, Trump didn't violate any campaign laws.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Cohen's sentencing today confirmed in court documents that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law to pay off the two women suing him to keep them silent to avoid negatively impacting his campaign.
~~How Michael Cohen broke campaign finance law ~~

Less than an hour after that disclosure, it was announced on the news that AMI, the holding company owning the National Inquirer that bought the rights to those stories about the same women made a non-prosecution agreement with authorities in NYC for admitting they spiked the stories with Trump's "encouragement" of avoiding negatively impacting his campaign. ( This broke on TV and no link yet!)
Edit: Here's a link now:
~~ Trump Campaign Struck Early Deal to Kill Bad Stories, AMI Admits ~~

These two 'cases' corroborate the fact that Trump violated Campaign Finance Law and is on record in court documents and sentence agreements ON THE SAME BLOODY DAY!
EDIT: replaced 'instances' with 'cases'.

No Republican in the Senate can ignore this evidence when they get Articles of Impeachment from the House next January or February!

Consequently, it falls to the people to vote Trump out of office in 2020 – which is appropriate given the people are ultimately responsible for the Trump disaster in the first place.

Yes, Trump in fact violated the law – but his DOJ won’t indict and the blind partisan Republican Senate won’t convict.

The DOJ WILL follow existing DOJ policy it would appear on pain of being purged further by the Orange Bitch, until that trip wire is pulled when the mounting evidence is far too damn much for 19 or more GOP Senators to proclaim ENOUGH! There are lines that even a piss drinking ass wipe like a Lindsey Graham Trump toady keeping a finger in the air all the time!

Consequently, it falls to the people to vote Trump out of office in 2020 – which is appropriate given the people are ultimately responsible for the Trump disaster in the first place

That would be the absolutely worst case opportunity to get the Trump taint out of the Executive Branch IMHO, albeit very viable by then barring unpredictable 'Executive machinations'. Now consider Trump getting desperate as the jaws of justice are closing and getting closer to taking a chunk out of his Orange Ass.

Can that 340 pounds of wasted humanity take responsibility for his "misadventures" or will he lash out and do something dangerous and stupid to willfully harm the US in an attempt to get his fat ass out of the sling he placed it in? Frankly, I don't believe he can last until the 2020 election. Ya can't put 600 pounds of steam in a 300 pound vessel and keep it there...somethings gotta give!

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Trump Campaign Struck Early Deal to Kill Bad Stories, AMI Admits


Under the non-prosecution agreement, the company admitted its purpose was to suppress the woman’s story and prevent it from influencing the election. The deal marks a change of allegiances for one of Trump’s biggest supporters. Pecker has been a close friend of Trump and gave positive coverage to his presidential campaign in the National Enquirer.

Pecker has been a key witness in the investigation of Cohen.

“As a part of the agreement, AMI admitted that it made the $150,000 payment in concert with a candidate’s presidential campaign, and in order to ensure that the woman did not publicize damaging allegations about the candidate before the 2016 presidential election,” the prosecutors wrote in a statement announcing the deal.

oh my fucking god - go look at what obama did to journalists who didn't flatter him before or after the election.

don't even try to sell me the horseshit this is improper when one side did it and the left defends it. this is why you got trump as a president.

The Orange Virus is a problem that will sort itself out eventually. Don't you worry about it another second.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

All of you MORONS who did nothing but avoid addressing the point of the OP up to this point about 5.5 hours after it was posted and every effort to avoid the topic because it put the target on the Orange Clown's back and is HIGHLY likely to produce the first felony charge against the Orange Fat Ass, KNOW THIS.

This is just the FIRST instance, proving with corroborating evidence from two separate decisions in two Courts on the same day, that 'Individual Number 1' has been DIRECTLY linked to violating Campaign Finance Law. Also, Edwards' issue in 2011 NOTWITHSTANDING as non-related in the particulars of the actual legal substance and matter. But if you dumb asses want to believe Faux, Brietbart, InfoWars, et al, go ahead and toast you flagon of Trump Piss!

You have proof he used campaign money to pay those extortionists? I heard he used his own money, which is not illegal.

Do you have proof the Orange Virus used his own money? 'I heard' doesn't quite cut it.