“Constitution-Free Zone’’ At US Ports Of Entry

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Intense, Jan 27, 2012.

  1. Intense
    Offline

    Intense Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    44,909
    Thanks Received:
    5,849
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +5,863
    Laptop seizures at customs cause thorny legal dispute
    January 08, 2012|By Katie Johnston

    David House took his laptop to Mexico a little over a year ago, hoping to squeeze in some work between sightseeing, fishing, and laying on the beach. All went well, vacation- and work-wise, until the former MIT researcher landed in Chicago, where federal agents seized his laptop, kept it for nearly two months, and may have shared information on his hard drive with several government agencies.

    They didn’t have a search warrant. They didn’t charge him with a crime. And there was nothing House could do about it.

    House, 24, ran into what civil liberties advocates call the “Constitution-free zone’’ at US ports of entry, where courts have carved out broad exceptions to the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. As long as they don’t use invasive techniques such as strip searches, government agents don’t need reasonable suspicion or probable cause to seize what they want - including laptops, a 2008 appeals court ruling held.

    House’s case forms the basis of one of two lawsuits the American Civil Liberties Union has filed to stop the search and seizure of laptops at US borders without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing and calls attention to a vulnerability that many people are unaware of when they travel in and out of the United States with important files on laptops, smartphones, and tablets.

    A survey last month by the Association of Corporate Travel Executives found that nearly half of the participating companies did not know customs agents could inspect, copy, or even seize travelers’ laptops.

    Laptop seizures at customs cause thorny legal dispute - Boston.com

    Just a Heads Up. ;)
     
  2. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    41,543
    Thanks Received:
    8,933
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +23,869
    Opposed by politicians fearful of appearing ‘weak of terror.’

    According to the 4th Amendment, for that matter.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Intense
    Offline

    Intense Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    44,909
    Thanks Received:
    5,849
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +5,863
    The potential for theft and abuse here is real.
     
  4. CaughtInTheMid
    Offline

    CaughtInTheMid Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Messages:
    949
    Thanks Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +80
    damn. how much more are we gonna change because we're afraid of a bunch of radicals???
     
  5. Intense
    Offline

    Intense Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    44,909
    Thanks Received:
    5,849
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +5,863
    This is where Foundation either comes into play or it doesn't. Principles don't change. We should try to not forget that, or abandon them when adapting to Circumstance. There are always going to be times where conditions compromise Liberty, but that is temporal and for the most part by general consent.

    Violating Trust is a whole different matter.
     

Share This Page