Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How about you just vote for the person you like the most and not play political games?
This isn't a popularity contest--go back to high school if you want that. The opt is right we non-Romney's need to get behind ONE single candidate to make this work.
The ONLY candidate that has a track record of cutting the size of the Federal Government is Newt Gingrich. The rest are already on their way out. Rick Santorum has some major issues going on right now--with videos all over the place on his earmarks and his big spending days. Ron Paul never had a shot in hell anyway--and his racist newsletters and attacks on Abe Lincoln last week when he tweeted on his home page that Lincoln is responsible for killing 500,000 in the civil war--and whom Ron Paul has already admitted that he won't win the White House. Rick Perry--(I personally like) but won't vote for him--because Obama would kick his butt in any debate and make him look stupid.
So that leaves Newt Gingrich who is the only viable candidate of winning the nomination and then the Presidency.
The below is the ad on Rick Santorum and unfortunately it's TRUE--let alone that he is way to socially conservative to have a snowballs chance in hell of winning.
Game Show - YouTube
Santorum has next to no chance- he's a social conservative in an election cycle that will elect a Fiscal conservative. He has not had his turn in the barrel (that starts now) and once the media starts ripping him apart it will be tough for Rick. He'll go the same way that Bachman, Perry, Cain, and Newt have....
Romney will win New Hampshire easily. Then he'll finish in the top tier in South Carolina. After he wins Florida.....it's all over but the crying. If there is anyone we need to rally around- it's Mitt Romney!
You better hope your wrong, cause if your right then the conservatives of the Republican Party will demand Ron Paul runs third party.
Consider it a hostage situation. No more compromise.
The conservatives of the Republican party arent voting for Ron Paul for the nomination, they aren't going to be demanding a third party run if one of the people they do support wins.
Are you some kind of fucking idiot? Ron Paul is the only one the conservatives support.
Are you some kind of fucking idiot? Ron Paul is the only one the conservatives support.
No. He's the one the libertarians are supporting.
Are you some kind of fucking idiot? Ron Paul is the only one the conservatives support.
No. He's the one the libertarians are supporting.
Alright fuckface. Who do the conservatives support?
no. He's the one the libertarians are supporting.
alright fuckface. Who do the conservatives support?
conservatives are actually split between most candidates.
alright fuckface. Who do the conservatives support?
conservatives are actually split between most candidates.
conservative=small government dipshit. Not one candidate other then ron paul is small government. Now do you understand you poor uneducated fool. Stop posting, you make everyone fucking dumber just by your presence.
conservatives are actually split between most candidates.
conservative=small government dipshit. Not one candidate other then ron paul is small government. Now do you understand you poor uneducated fool. Stop posting, you make everyone fucking dumber just by your presence.
Actually, all of them, except maybe Hunstman have been running a small government campaign. And I except Hunstman mostly because I know about his policies the least.
You think Perry's part time Congress ideas are big government?
Mitt, Newt, and Santorum have all succeeded in cutting government spending at times.
and on the reverse, Paul has attached earmarks to bills. That's not very principled to me. Nor is it small government.
And you know what the best part is? The non-Paul candidates don't have a death wish by encouraging Twelvers to seek Nuclear weapons.
Would conservatives prefer a not-Romney to lose to Obama, or see Romney beat Obama?
If John Huntsman really wants to be President he can learn from this experience and make a far better candidate in 4 years. More likely he'll just say screw it- and enjoy his life. Why go through the hell that a presidential run entails? You have to REALLY want it, I don't think Huntsman does. He gave it a shot, on his own terms, and he fell short. I think he's done with politics.Huntsman actually has a very conservative track record as governor of Utah- unfortunately he ran a very bad campaign.
At the risk of actually posing a straight question and having someone consider it, and answer it without profanity, I'll offer this....
Do you think that Huntsman can be this year's Romney insofar as learning how not to campaign; rather to be more precise....how NOT to run a campaign and be better for it in the next election if Obama holds office?
What I like about him is that he is a straight shooter; I think he may be incapable of the types of bullshit you see from Gingrich and, in my view Santorum (does anyone really believe that a 7 year old Rick Santorum actually thought, 'Those hands dug freedom for me')?
Anyway, if the question is worthy of your consideration, I'd like to hear what you think. In the morning. Good night.
Santorum sucks harder than anyone on the list, A social conservative? The teaparty must truly be dead to even consider a Theocrat over a Neocon, he's even further away from libertarian values of non-interference than Romney.
Would conservatives prefer a not-Romney to lose to Obama, or see Romney beat Obama?
WASHINGTON (AP) Prominent conservative leaders want their rank and file to quickly get behind a single presidential candidate, fearful that persistent splits will help Mitt Romney win the Republican nomination.
The former Massachusetts governor narrowly won the Iowa caucuses when conservative voters divided their support among several challengers, and the worry is that the same thing will happen in South Carolina, Florida and beyond if Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry all stay in the race.
"Conservatives are still divided among a number of different candidates, but the field is winnowing," said former Republican presidential candidate Gary Bauer. And, he said: "I certainly think that Sen. Santorum is in a good position to inherit a lot of that support."
[/INDENT]
I am still wondering what effect the two debates will have this weekend. The damage was done to Gingrich in Iowa from Romney but are those ads being played in NH and South Carolina? Gingrich is so effective in those debates, will there be a comeback when he starts comparing himself with Romney on issues?
Romney has a great fiscal background but it doesn't get him out of the 20's and I don't think he's going to take attacks well in the debates. These next debates may be crucial.
