If every American sat down for a few minutes and wrote out what they feel is wrong with the federal government, I think they would realize that all of the harm coming to fruition today originated with the Democrat partys totalitarian agenda.
Im not suggesting write it out so they can post it on the Internet. I believe that each individual should work it out to their own satisfaction. In so doing they will conclude that establishment Republicans were very much willing collaborators in everything Democrats did. The one and only time Republicans balked was the Affordable Care Act. I assumed that socialized medicine was a bridge too far even for establishment Republicans. Im not so sure the bridge analogy applies when it comes to keeping the ACA. House votes to repeal aside, John Boehner all but threw in the towel:
Conservatives have problems with Karl Roves Republicans to be sure, but there is another problem conservatives are powerless against. No amount of understanding is going change the people who repeatedly support, cheer, work for, and vote for Democrat fanatics:
Pelosi is a stupid, vicious, woman, yet she's been reelected time after time since 1987. Harry Reid is her male counterpart over in the Senate. They are worse than Barack Taqiyya because theyve been there longer with no end in sight while Taqiyya the Liar will be gone in January 2017.
Rank & file Democrats who have a vested interest in the welfare state will always vote for the Democrat even if they are worse than Pelosi and Reid, but concerned Americans must come to see that conservative candidates taking control of the Republican party is truly the last hope for individual liberties as they once were. That makes nominating conservatives in the midterms far more important than the presidential nominee this far out.
The one question never asked is why Karl Roves Republicans have to prove their conservatism? Tea Party favorites do not have to prove anything, while guys like Mitch McConnell need all of the help they can get:
Considering the growth of government with a lot of help from establishment Republicans the establishments definition of conservatism is clearly at fault. This excerpt is more to the point:
Finally, this years midterms represent round one in a title fight. Round two comes in 2016. That bout is the last chance for conservatives to score a knockout or end up in Palookaville. Watch the clip and think of Karl Rove as Charlie and conservatives as Terry. Note that John McCain and Mitt Romney got a shot at the title:
Im not suggesting write it out so they can post it on the Internet. I believe that each individual should work it out to their own satisfaction. In so doing they will conclude that establishment Republicans were very much willing collaborators in everything Democrats did. The one and only time Republicans balked was the Affordable Care Act. I assumed that socialized medicine was a bridge too far even for establishment Republicans. Im not so sure the bridge analogy applies when it comes to keeping the ACA. House votes to repeal aside, John Boehner all but threw in the towel:
SAWYER: A couple of other questions about the agenda now. You have said next year that you would repeal the healthcare vote. That's still your mission?
BOEHNER: Well, I think the election changes that. It's pretty clear that the president was reelected, Obamacare is the law of the land. I think there are parts of the healthcare law that are gonna be very difficult to implement. And very expensive. And as the time when we're tryin' to find a way to create a path toward a balanced budget everything has to be on the table.
SAWYER: But you won't be spending the time next year trying to repeal Obamacare?
BOEHNER: There certainly may be parts of it that we believe-- need to be changed. We may do that. No decisions at this point.
The speaker's pronouncement, if nothing else, signifies a pivot away from Republicans' efforts to showcase for conservatives their doggedness in looking to repeal "Obamacare."
It's also a recognition that the 2009-2010 health care law that came to define Obama's first term in office -- and propel Republicans to a majority in the House -- is here to stay.
Conservatives have problems with Karl Roves Republicans to be sure, but there is another problem conservatives are powerless against. No amount of understanding is going change the people who repeatedly support, cheer, work for, and vote for Democrat fanatics:
Whether shes telling you that you have to pass it to find out whats in it, joblessness is actually freedom from job lock, or unemployment stimulates the economy, Nancy Pelosi can be counted on for her epic pearls of non-wisdom. If her mouth is moving, you can bet shes going to say something ridiculous.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a0IkupfEKQ&feature=player_embedded]Nancy Pelosi: Anonymous Republican Said GOP Doesn't Care About Starving Children - YouTube[/ame]
Yep, thats right. Nancy Pelosi thinks youre dumb enough to believe all of the following three things:
A: She has a Republican friend.
B: Republicans dont care about starving children, but they keep that a closely-guarded secret.
C: Her Republican friend was dumb enough to reveal this dark truth to one of the most powerful Democrats in the country.
Uh-huh. Sure thing Nancy. Were 100% positive youre telling the truth.
Nancy Pelosi has a Republican friend who told her the GOP doesnt care about starving children
By Robert Laurie Tuesday, March 11, 2014
Nancy Pelosi has a ?Republican friend? who told her the GOP doesn?t care about starving children
Pelosi is a stupid, vicious, woman, yet she's been reelected time after time since 1987. Harry Reid is her male counterpart over in the Senate. They are worse than Barack Taqiyya because theyve been there longer with no end in sight while Taqiyya the Liar will be gone in January 2017.
Rank & file Democrats who have a vested interest in the welfare state will always vote for the Democrat even if they are worse than Pelosi and Reid, but concerned Americans must come to see that conservative candidates taking control of the Republican party is truly the last hope for individual liberties as they once were. That makes nominating conservatives in the midterms far more important than the presidential nominee this far out.
The one question never asked is why Karl Roves Republicans have to prove their conservatism? Tea Party favorites do not have to prove anything, while guys like Mitch McConnell need all of the help they can get:
There are things that McConnell has done that I disagree with strongly, but he is definitely NOT a RINO thats just unfair. The American Conservative Union routinely ranks him near the top but, if thats too swishy for you, the Heritage Action for America scorecard gives him an 80 percent, . . .
Considering the growth of government with a lot of help from establishment Republicans the establishments definition of conservatism is clearly at fault. This excerpt is more to the point:
McConnell tells my friends over at Truth Revolt that he is not attacking the Tea Party at all. Rather he feels that the Senate Conservatives Fund is a fake, pretending to support conservatism while undermining it. Heres the quote:
Ive always been and continue to be a big supporter of the Tea Party and the conservative change its bringing to Washington. One of the biggest obstacles to that change, however, is the Senate Conservatives Fund, a rogue political operation that has co-opted the Liberty movement for its own enrichment to the detriment of the conservative cause. This is a point that I have been making repeatedly and energetically over the past several months, because in my view this group has deceived a lot of good people. They claim to share our goals but undermine them at every turn. I think they should be stopped, and I dont mind saying so.
McConnell Gives His Side of the Story
by Andrew Klavan
March 10th, 2014 - 3:16 pm
Klavan On The Culture » McConnell Gives His Side of the Story
Finally, this years midterms represent round one in a title fight. Round two comes in 2016. That bout is the last chance for conservatives to score a knockout or end up in Palookaville. Watch the clip and think of Karl Rove as Charlie and conservatives as Terry. Note that John McCain and Mitt Romney got a shot at the title:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=3QsNXd57Ppw]On The Waterfront "I could have been a contender" - YouTube[/ame]