Conservatives control DC, yet cannot repeal Obamacare

[CrusaderFrank]

For seven years all we heard from Conservatives was that they were going to "repeal and replace" Obamacare with someone so wonderful, they had to vote 60+ times in order to do it. Now that they have control of DC for the first time since 2003, their "replacement plan" is nowhere to be found. What the hell have they been doing for seven years? Where's this wonderful replacement plan? And furthermore, where are all their economic and jobs plans they said were so wonderful? It's been 8 years folks...if they don't have something by now, they never will.

You're confusing Conservative and Republican; there's a difference

tomato tohmahto

Progressive, Communist, etc

May as well. You've been broad brushing us for years. Expect the same in return.

Whatever, Komrade

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Politicians lie

Well, some lie more than others. Seven years of lies is what the GOP has to account for now. It's inexcusable that the GOP had no replacement plan ready to go. The fact they didn't proves they were posturing on ACA repeal. And you fell for it, hook, line and sinker.

I did? That's news to me

 

[Zoom-boing]

View attachment 124368

False. Prior to 2010, private and gov't run health insurance plans were required to cover those with p/e's. The only place it wasn't required was in the individual market and even then, it affected a small number of people.

Those with p/e's should pay more than those without p/e's. Enough to bankrupt them? Of course not. But certainly more. Why? Because they're a higher risk to insure. It's retarded that these people get to pay a substantially lower amount because they're getting subsidized out the wahzoo ... by people who do not have a p/e.

 

[blackhawk]

A little history lesson when Obama was sworn in 2009 the Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress as well it took them a year to get Obamacare passed Trump and this Republican controlled Congress have been at it just over a 100 days.

 

[Zoom-boing]

A little history lesson when Obama was sworn in 2009 the Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress as well it took them a year to get Obamacare passed Trump and this Republican controlled Congress have been at it just over a 100 days.

The Rs have run for 7 years that the have the plan(s) and voted how many times to repeal? Well, they voted to repeal when they knew damn well there was no chance in hell that anything would happen. Safe to vote repeal then, now? not so much.

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[The Derp]

Those with p/e's should pay more than those without p/e's. Enough to bankrupt them? Of course not. But certainly more. Why? Because they're a higher risk to insure. It's retarded that these people get to pay a substantially lower amount because they're getting subsidized out the wahzoo ... by people who do not have a p/e.

Higher risk to whom? Insurance companies. And risk to what? Their profits. The only reason you think they should pay more is to protect the profit of insurance companies. That's what Conservatives always try to talk around. Fact is, with a well-funded single-payer system, this wouldn't even be an issue.

 

[The Derp]

A little history lesson when Obama was sworn in 2009 the Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress as well it took them a year to get Obamacare passed Trump and this Republican controlled Congress have been at it just over a 100 days.

The difference is that the Conservatives have no idea what health insurance is, refuse to have their plans scored by the CBO, and are passing it without knowing what's in it, literally.

 

[blackhawk]

A little history lesson when Obama was sworn in 2009 the Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress as well it took them a year to get Obamacare passed Trump and this Republican controlled Congress have been at it just over a 100 days.

The difference is that the Conservatives have no idea what health insurance is, refuse to have their plans scored by the CBO, and are passing it without knowing what's in it, literally.

We have to pass the bill to find out what's in it from then House leader Nancy Pelosi on Obamacare bill.

 

[The Derp]

We have to pass the bill to find out what's in it from then House leader Nancy Pelosi on Obamacare bill.

Actually, what Pelosi really said was this:

“We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.”

That "fog" was sewn by Conservative who lied about the bill and continue to lie about it. You even lied about what Pelosi said in order to make a lying bullshit point. This is why I say everything Conservatives say are lies. Because they are.

But Conservatives quite literally do not know what is in the health care bill they sloppily and hastily vomited up after 7 years of doing no preparation.

 

[Synthaholic]

We have to pass the bill to find out what's in it from then House leader Nancy Pelosi on Obamacare bill.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Those with p/e's should pay more than those without p/e's. Enough to bankrupt them? Of course not. But certainly more. Why? Because they're a higher risk to insure. It's retarded that these people get to pay a substantially lower amount because they're getting subsidized out the wahzoo ... by people who do not have a p/e.

Higher risk to whom? Insurance companies. And risk to what? Their profits. The only reason you think they should pay more is to protect the profit of insurance companies. That's what Conservatives always try to talk around. Fact is, with a well-funded single-payer system, this wouldn't even be an issue.

So you'd have no problem with newly licensed drivers paying the same rate for car insurance as someone driving 20 years with clean record? Cause, you know, who cares about risk factor. You don't get the gist of insurance, do you? Poor thing. The reason they should pay more is because they cost more to insure ... because their p/e makes it so. Dipshit.

Oh keep your panties on, we'll have single payer for everyone by 2030, 2025 if the shithead Dems have their way. It'll be run like shit, just like the VA.

 

[Zoom-boing]

We have to pass the bill to find out what's in it from then House leader Nancy Pelosi on Obamacare bill.

Actually, what Pelosi really said was this:

“We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.”

That "fog" was sewn by Conservative who lied about the bill and continue to lie about it. You even lied about what Pelosi said in order to make a lying bullshit point. This is why I say everything Conservatives say are lies. Because they are.

But Conservatives quite literally do not know what is in the health care bill they sloppily and hastily vomited up after 7 years of doing no preparation.

The unaca is imploding on itself but you still think conservatives lied about it. You are a fucking idiot.