Congress has already disqualified Trump from the ballot

[BS Filter]

Whereas Benedict Donald's party conforms to his whims and no longer believes in the US Constitution.

You're the one who said you'd support a law prohibiting negotiating at garage sales.

 

[martybegan]

The majority vote of the House was a finding of fact. The vote in the Senate was a majority. Not the 2/3rds required to convict, but more than enough to meet the requirements of Article 14/3 Read the article for god's sake.

The house vote was an Indictment, not a finding of fact.

 

[BlindBoo]

You're the one who said you'd support a law prohibiting negotiating at garage sales.

Say, that is an awesome haymaker, straight out of right field.

WTF?

 

[BS Filter]

Say, that is an awesome haymaker, straight out of right field.

WTF?

You said it. Have you changed your mind?

 

[BlindBoo]

You said it. Have you changed your mind?

You just made that up didn't you?

 

[OKTexas]

The Senate trial does not absolve him from liability in a criminal court. He is not immune from criminal prosecution.

So where's the indictment? Absolutely no one has been charged with insurrection, does the commie need a tissue?

.

 

[WEATHER53]

Fake of course but that always gets bold headlines and extra time on front page
Fanni disbarred gone in 5 minutes
Equal inaccuracy.
“When you can’t beat them, can’t defeat them,… then lie and cheat them”
Lib 101Core Course

 

[Richard-H]

An excellent opinion piece from Tristan Snell on CNN explains that in the course of Trump's second impeachment, a majority of the House and of the Senate voted that the events of January 6 were an insurrection and that Trump incited it. If the Supreme Court does not obey the clear text of our Constitution, this democracy is at an end.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions/trump-supreme-court-oral-arguments-election-snell/index.html

It isn't really a question of whether Trump should be on the ballot.

It's more of an I.Q. test for the SCOTUS justices.

I hope they pass!

 

[JustAGuy1]

Man the Left has lost their collective minds.

 

[BS Filter]

You just made that up didn't you?

Everyone saw your post.

 

[Independent thinker]

An excellent opinion piece from Tristan Snell on CNN explains that in the course of Trump's second impeachment, a majority of the House and of the Senate voted that the events of January 6 were an insurrection and that Trump incited it. If the Supreme Court does not obey the clear text of our Constitution, this democracy is at an end.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions/trump-supreme-court-oral-arguments-election-snell/index.html

Then you should put up your hands and surrender.

 

[Rawley]

An excellent opinion piece from Tristan Snell on CNN explains that in the course of Trump's second impeachment, a majority of the House and of the Senate voted that the events of January 6 were an insurrection and that Trump incited it. If the Supreme Court does not obey the clear text of our Constitution, this democracy is at an end.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions/trump-supreme-court-oral-arguments-election-snell/index.html

Good luck with that.

 

[BlindBoo]

So where's the indictment?

.

Here's one of Benedict Donald's indictments.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

4. Shortly after election day, the Defendant also pursued unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results. In so doing, the Defendant perpetrated three criminal conspiracies:

a. A conspiracy to defraud the United States by using dishonesty, fraud, and deceit to impair, obstruct, and defeat the lawful federal government function by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted, and certified by the federal government, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371;

b. A conspiracy to corruptly obstruct and impede the January 6 congressional proceeding at which the collected results of the presidential election are counted and certified ("the certification proceeding"), in violation of 18U.S.C. § 1512(k);

c. A conspiracy against the right to vote and to have one's vote counted, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241.

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[BlindBoo]

Everyone saw your post.

Then you shouldn't have difficulty in finding it.

 

[Rogue AI]

The majority vote of the House was a finding of fact. The vote in the Senate was a majority. Not the 2/3rds required to convict, but more than enough to meet the requirements of Article 14/3 Read the article for god's sake.

Hardly, this silly notion just ignores the fact Trump was not convicted. Such fantasies have no place in reality.

 

[Rawley]

Here's one of Benedict Donald's indictments.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

4. Shortly after election day, the Defendant also pursued unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results. In so doing, the Defendant perpetrated three criminal conspiracies:

a. A conspiracy to defraud the United States by using dishonesty, fraud, and deceit to impair, obstruct, and defeat the lawful federal government function by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted, and certified by the federal government, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371;

b. A conspiracy to corruptly obstruct and impede the January 6 congressional proceeding at which the collected results of the presidential election are counted and certified ("the certification proceeding"), in violation of 18U.S.C. § 1512(k);

c. A conspiracy against the right to vote and to have one's vote counted, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241.

Funny that. Nothing about insurrection.

 

[BlindBoo]

Funny that. Nothing about insurrection.

Show me where I said one of the crimes he was charged with for Jan 6th by Jack Smith included insurrection.

 

[Rogue AI]

The Senate is a political body and not part of the Justice System. It doesn't have the authority to absolve him of his crimes.

He was found not guilty, the charges are no longer valid. You are promoting double jeopardy. Sad.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

An excellent opinion piece from Tristan Snell on CNN explains that in the course of Trump's second impeachment, a majority of the House and of the Senate voted that the events of January 6 were an insurrection and that Trump incited it. If the Supreme Court does not obey the clear text of our Constitution, this democracy is at an end.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions/trump-supreme-court-oral-arguments-election-snell/index.html

But he was not convicted. Conviction by impeachment is by 2/3ds not majority.