“Confiscation could be an option”

Doc91678

Rookie
Nov 13, 2012
753
99
0
Binghamton
December 22, 2012
by Jazz Shaw

In a radio interview on Thursday with Albany’s WGDJ-AM, New York governor Andrew Cuomo said that he plans to work with state legislators next month to submit a proposal for new gun-control laws; in particular, Cuomo said, “our focus is assault weapons,” because current state laws regulating the weapons “have more holes that Swiss cheese.”

“I don’t think legitimate sportsmen are going to say, ‘I need an assault weapon to go hunting,’” he said.

Cuomo continued, “Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”

Read more at:
“Confiscation could be an option” « Hot Air

I suggest that before Gov. Cuomo call upon the citizens of NY state to control firearms more, or confiscate them,. He and his political cronies representing the the people of NY, in both Cities, State and Federal government surrender their weapons first. (emphasis mine)
 
Cuomo said, “our focus is assault weapons,” because current state laws regulating the weapons “have more holes that Swiss cheese.”

Kinda like your brain, you liberal hack.
 
If you aren't in a militia, what right do you have to keep and bear arms?

Guess it brings up the question what is militia? In the Revolutionary War, the militia was simple farmers and towns folks picking up their hunting guns, and fighting alongside the "regulars" of the Army

The military and police are not militia.
 
If you aren't in a militia, what right do you have to keep and bear arms?

Guess it brings up the question what is militia? In the Revolutionary War, the militia was simple farmers and towns folks picking up their hunting guns, and fighting alongside the "regulars" of the Army

The military and police are not militia.

Correct, this is just more rightwing demagoguery.
 
I think that Governor Cuomo, as well as any other Governors thinking the same thing, might want to consider the resulting blood-bath that would occur in the attempt to take the away assault away from the gun owners. The gun owners may fail, but how many law enforcement officers or national guard would have to be sacrificed in the attempt.
They're getting mine only after I've taken some of them with me.
 
If you aren't in a militia, what right do you have to keep and bear arms?

The 2nd amendment gives us this right .. Next

Duh, only if you're in a militia... Are you in a militia...? Actually, no one is - because we have a standing socialist army.

No militia - no guns!

That's not true. From the Supreme Court ruling:

1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.


DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER
 
The 2nd amendment gives us this right .. Next

Duh, only if you're in a militia... Are you in a militia...? Actually, no one is - because we have a standing socialist army.

No militia - no guns!

That's not true. From the Supreme Court ruling:

1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.


DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

Heller was a shitty ruling, in future court cases it could be interpreted that you can only have a firearm in your home, it said nothing about outside your home.
 
382075_466796846691796_281778117_n_zps221135f7.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top