Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, here is my instruction (English) on how to install Red Star OS 2.0 (Korean):That statement alone shows how much you do not know about operating systems, or what an operating system even is. Nice Googling.
Well, here is my instruction (English) on how to install Red Star OS 2.0 (Korean):That statement alone shows how much you do not know about operating systems, or what an operating system even is. Nice Googling.
Linux......
So, I am a Mac user who , due to Corporate Standards, uses a PC at work. Last Thursday, I had to do "8 Urgent Updates". And today I had to do "4 Urgent Updates".
Why do PCs need so many Frelling Urgent Updates. Many of these Every Frelling Week.
What is wrong with Windows that this obscenely time-wasting amount of updating is necessary?
There's no shortage of security researchers who criticise Apple's response to the recent Flashback trojan malware outbreak.
Flashback's success, compared with previous Mac malware, happened in part because it exploited a flaw in Oracle's Java software, allowing it to silently install on the victim's system.
It was a mass, automated attack of the kind that has threatened Windows users for years: a drive-by download where infections occur merely by visiting an infected website.
Flashback netted some 700,000 Macs worldwide, according to several security companies monitoring infections.
Other reasons for the unprecedented infection is that Apple has wrongly convinced people Macs don't need antivirus, and its Java security update came 50 days after Oracle had fixed it.
This is why I wrote (what was clear). My point is to illustrate, that it is not an advantage to start at zero.And...?
Your statement "it didn't run my programs" is Mr. Obvious for someone who knows nothing about an operating system. Of course Linux doesn't natively run windows programs because..well gosh...it isn't windows.
I dislike Linux mostly because of some of its users. They say, Windows is dirt and for noobs and worship their Ubuntu, which really is for noobs and does not provide any advantage compared to Windows.Yes, we all know, Linux is so much better. This is also why almost everyone uses Windows, though Linux is free.
Almost everyone uses Windows because of Microsoft's early marketing strategy and consumers who know nothing else and/or want to know nothing else. Such is the fact of consumerism and successful marketing.
Not saying Windows doesn't have it pluses or that Linux doesn't have it's negatives, I use both for different reasons.
Of course. For fun I installed some editions. Ubuntu, Red Star OS, Puppy Linux, but neither did my programs and games run with Ubuntu (what was clear) nor my UMTS device. I am not able to get online with Linux, Windows and MAC OS are supported.
Linux......
Near daily updates too.
Linux......
Near daily updates too.
Linux......
Near daily updates too.
Yes but they don't take over your system while doing so and reboot your computer afterwords.
Near daily updates too.
Yes but they don't take over your system while doing so and reboot your computer afterwords.
One of the many reasons unix is superior. I have a leased server that's been running for 5 years straight.
The frequency of attacks is not the only factor. Microsoft is always busy to fix any security risks.So, I am a Mac user who , due to Corporate Standards, uses a PC at work. Last Thursday, I had to do "8 Urgent Updates". And today I had to do "4 Urgent Updates".
Why do PCs need so many Frelling Urgent Updates. Many of these Every Frelling Week.
What is wrong with Windows that this obscenely time-wasting amount of updating is necessary?
As others have said, it's due to the constant attacks by hackers because of the overwhelming market share of Windows.
Here's a good article on the subject.
In their words: Experts weigh in on Mac vs. PC security | InSecurity Complex - CNET News
Mint is very popular nowadays. But I fear, Linux will never be a gaming platform. I don´t know, how serious Valve was, when they talked about a Linux-based Steam variant (they were angry over Microsoft´s integrated market in Win8), but it is clear that the gaming industry would have to push Linux. Its current market share does not justify the extra work to port games to the Linux platform.I prefer Mint, no Unity interface. As more programs/games are being written for Linux the closer I get to dropping Windows altogether but that's just me, I'm not your typical consumer.
So, I am a Mac user who , due to Corporate Standards, uses a PC at work. Last Thursday, I had to do "8 Urgent Updates". And today I had to do "4 Urgent Updates".
Why do PCs need so many Frelling Urgent Updates. Many of these Every Frelling Week.
What is wrong with Windows that this obscenely time-wasting amount of updating is necessary?
Mint is very popular nowadays. But I fear, Linux will never be a gaming platform. I don´t know, how serious Valve was, when they talked about a Linux-based Steam variant (they were angry over Microsoft´s integrated market in Win8), but it is clear that the gaming industry would have to push Linux. Its current market share does not justify the extra work to port games to the Linux platform.I prefer Mint, no Unity interface. As more programs/games are being written for Linux the closer I get to dropping Windows altogether but that's just me, I'm not your typical consumer.
But there are good news for the Personal Computer.
And hey, did you now the age of the average gamer is 37?
PC gaming vs. consoles, the infographic | ExtremeTech
Good post!Linux vs. Windows....in my opinion.
Gaming....not even a discussion, Windows is by far the choice of OS if gaming is a part of your PC usage.
Serfing the net....Linux. Why? Security and impervious to nearly all viruses and spyware. Surfing the net is relatively risk-free on Linux while almost every Windows PC in America is infected with multiple spyware applications.
Business use.....still Windows, but to a lesser degree each year as many business systems are now browser based and works on any OS platform. I will say within 5 years there will be little advantage in having Windows in a business setting unless your company runs a MS platform.
Video viewing/manipulation/producing.....Linux by faaaaar. There is a reason that all of the major CGI production companies use Linux cluster servers and Linux programs for making video. The cost of using MS is 10 times that of Linux and the superior stability of custom Linux OS's eliminates the nightmare of a system crashing under heavy load in the middle of making the film.
Website hosting/application hosting....not even a discussion, Linux. Security/Apache/free software makes Linux the overwhelming choice of internet websites. (inlcuding USMB)
We have that with Windows, too. Steam, like Origin, is not a good copy protection. Like in the old days, you copy and paste the crack and you can run the game - and that portable.The issue with game producers and Linux is the open source platform, the computer game industry wants to protect it's product, for obvious reasons. The Linux fanatics want everything on Linux to be open source and will crack the games and make them freely available if they can.
Steam for Linux is already available so it's a viable workaround for Linux users and as Linux becomes ever more increasingly user friendly more average consumers will start using it and the fanatics will ultimately become the minority.
Don't really know how Steam works but pretty sure most, if not all of the primary distros will work...... they have the same kernel.We have that with Windows, too. Steam, like Origin, is not a good copy protection. Like in the old days, you copy and paste the crack and you can run the game - and that portable.The issue with game producers and Linux is the open source platform, the computer game industry wants to protect it's product, for obvious reasons. The Linux fanatics want everything on Linux to be open source and will crack the games and make them freely available if they can.
Steam for Linux is already available so it's a viable workaround for Linux users and as Linux becomes ever more increasingly user friendly more average consumers will start using it and the fanatics will ultimately become the minority.
Linux has to many distributions, can you run Steam and the games offered by this version on any distribution? I don´t think so. In my opinion, it´s good that the PC has a universal platform (Windows). Otherwise we probably would need several devices and operating systems to get the functionality of the PC we have now.
