I've already told you that I think "debating" here is pointless. No problem is going to be solved, no groundwork is going to be laid, no plan is going to be put into effect. That's for real life, and I'm definitely involved there.Yikes. Well, we disagree there, too. Without communication, little lasting progress can be made.Is this a riddle?What category of person, can't you talk to?
YOu can talk to friends. You can talk to acquaintances. YOu can talk to strangers.
Who can't you talk to?
Animals?
.
You can't talk to enemies.
When you stop talking to someone, and you have conflicts of interests, the only option is to destroy them.
Because you can't compromise, or work with someone you can't talk to.
For example, I agree with talking with adversarial foreign leaders. At every opportunity.
Being unwilling to talk to adversaries only leads to shallow tribalism. As we're seeing.
.
You are refusing to talk. You. Not me. Not us.
So far, the sum total of our conversations has been me trying to explain the other side to you, and you rejecting all of it out of hand. We have long since reached "beating a dead horse" territory. I tagged you a couple of times yesterday in a vain hope that you might at least acknowledge that a problem does exist on the Right, but I appear to have failed there, again.
What else is there to talk about that we haven't yet covered? Do you have something new?
.
I don't see much attempts at discussion in real life from the libs.