Common Core Is A United Nations Program

[Flanders]

If you pay attention to the growing resistance to Common Core —— FINALLY —— being reported on television you will never hear a word about the United Nations. George Will came close to committing the unpardonable sin when he used the phrase “continental solutions” in this video. Move the cursor to 3:35 to hear Will’s crystal clear analysis:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=2bXUIZ78Tt8]Common Core Controversy - Special Report All Star Panel - YouTube[/ame]​

For the billionth time I will post the reason the United Nations is never challenged by the press:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years."

He went on to explain:

"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."

-- David Rockefeller, Speaking at the June, 1991 Bilderberger meeting in Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton and by Dan Quayle

David Rockefeller's 1991 Bilderberg Quote...Ten Years Later​

Rockefeller’s world government will be administered by the United Nations. Proof: There is no other institutional framework setup for such an undertaking. Put it this way: Rockefeller would sound like a kook if the United Nations did not exist. Better still, how would he sound if the US was not a member of the UN?

In addition to the bankers, and the Council on Foreign Relations, the list of Common Core supporters reads like an endorsement for world government.

A media blackout has been protecting the New World Order’s one government world agenda since the early 1950s. Common Core has no such protection now that Americans are getting a taste of world government programs; nevertheless, an informal blackout has been effective until recently.

Here’s how the blackout works for UN-loving Democrats.

No reporter will ever challenge clowns like Al Gore, or John Kerry, or a president, when they lie about the environment. For all political purposes the EPA is a United Nations agency enforcing the Clean Air Act for the United Nations; so Podesta is actually saying that Congress cannot stop the United Nations.

Podesta: Congress Can’t Stop Obama On Global Warming
4:24 PM 05/05/2014
Michael Bastasch

Podesta: Congress Can't Stop Obama On Global Warming | The Daily Caller

In the same vein, no matter how far up the larceny food chain a scam goes —— the media will never go all the way to the United Nations:

. . . Soylandra has become the focus of competing political philosophies, along with a criminal probe that may extend far up the Obama administration’s food chain.

Monday, September 12, 2011
Obama’s Bankrupt Green Ideology - The investigation into the implosion of Soylandra turns criminal

front lines: Obama?s Bankrupt Green Ideology - The investigation into the implosion of Soylandra turns criminal​

If you doubt me ask yourself how many times you heard anybody on a panel connect the United Nations to a specific environmental scam like Soylandra? I can answer for you: NONE. The same is true of every issue that originates in the United Nations. Common Core is no exception. That’s why George Will’s reference to “continental solutions” is memorable in a discussion about a United Nations program.

Here’s how the blackout works in panel discussions.

Those who speak for the UN can say anything they want to say knowing their opposites are prohibited from hitting back with the United Nations’ agenda; ergo, UN stooges can lie, make ridiculous statements, and totally misrepresent any topic.

Parenthetically, liberals are famous for the smug arrogance common among true believers. The only proof they need to support their particular universal truth is the stupidity of everybody who dares disagree. You can see the same smug arrogance on the faces of liberals when they preach the glory of Common Core to poor misguided children. After all, how can they not be idiots when so many wealthy elitists believe in Common Core.

Indeed, connecting Common Core to the United Nations is rare among the best of conservatives on the Internet. Phyllis Schlafly and Canada Free Press’ Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh are exceptions.

Double-speaking Common Core

Democrats play their usual doublespeak games with Common Core. A few even claim they oppose it. Sincere or not you’ll never hear a one of them say they oppose US membership in the United Nations. Why is that important? Answer: Should a majority of states abandon Common Core it won’t be long before the UN comes up with a replacement program.

This article offers a foundation for understanding how far Common Core has come. Notice that two presidential wannabes, Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton, are Common Core advocates:

In fact, just this week, an invitation-only conference hosted by former Florida Governor and pro-Common Core ringleader Jeb Bush entitled “Globalization of Higher Education” took place in Texas. Among the attendees: Hillary Clinton, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan, former World Bank President Robert Zoellick, UNESCO officials, university presidents, and more. While higher education appears to be the next target of reformers, the globalization of K-12 schooling is on the verge of completion — at least if the American people do not rise up and stop it.

Wednesday, 26 March 2014 19:30
UN, Obama, and Gates Are Globalizing Education Via Common Core
Written by Alex Newman

UN, Obama, and Gates Are Globalizing Education Via Common Core​

Finally, I doubt if Common Core will become a major issue in this year’s midterms. There is no doubt that it could be a priority for voters in 2016 if parents and groups actively opposing Common Core began tying educators and legislators to the United Nations.

 

[regent]

So have Republicans as yet declared common core to be a communist plan to take over American education? Seems America is always headed for a communist takeover when Republicans don't like a plan, So will those 45 or so states that voted to implement common core be declared communistic, or simply misguided communist dupes? I say dupes for now but stand by it could be soon discovered that all 45 states have gone communistic. Poor dupes.

 

[Flanders]

So have Republicans as yet declared common core to be a communist plan to take over American education?

To regent: You tell me:

Common Core Dates Back to the Marxist-Socialist Paradigm of UN Charter
by Nancy Thorner
April 7, 2014

Common Core Dates Back to the Marxist-Socialist Paradigm of UN Charter | Somewhat Reasonable

The topic of this thread includes school children in Austin, Texas being forced to draw a Socialist flag.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/religion-and-ethics/277950-secretary-of-god.html

Seems America is always headed for a communist takeover when Republicans don't like a plan, So will those 45 or so states that voted to implement common core be declared communistic, or simply misguided communist dupes? I say dupes for now but stand by it could be soon discovered that all 45 states have gone communistic. Poor dupes.

To regent: Those 45 states are not locked in to Common Core. Go back to the OP and listen to George Will.

This video is for anyone who is not familiar with what has been happening for decades in the government’s education system:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=LNeimlu9jxk]Common Core: Based on UN Agenda 21, UNESCO Standards - YouTube[/ame]​

 

[regent]

So have Republicans as yet declared common core to be a communist plan to take over American education?

To regent: You tell me:

Common Core Dates Back to the Marxist-Socialist Paradigm of UN Charter
by Nancy Thorner
April 7, 2014

Common Core Dates Back to the Marxist-Socialist Paradigm of UN Charter | Somewhat Reasonable

The topic of this thread includes school children in Austin, Texas being forced to draw a Socialist flag.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/religion-and-ethics/277950-secretary-of-god.html

Seems America is always headed for a communist takeover when Republicans don't like a plan, So will those 45 or so states that voted to implement common core be declared communistic, or simply misguided communist dupes? I say dupes for now but stand by it could be soon discovered that all 45 states have gone communistic. Poor dupes.

To regent: Those 45 states are not locked in to Common Core. Go back to the OP and listen to George Will.

This video is for anyone who is not familiar with what has been happening for decades in the government’s education system:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=LNeimlu9jxk]Common Core: Based on UN Agenda 21, UNESCO Standards - YouTube[/ame]​

I don't trust George Will, I heard one time that he drank fluoridated water and we all know that fluoridated water has turned many Americans, even former patriots into communists.
That fluoridated water softens the brain and one can become a communist almost overnight. Come to think of it why do communists go to all that trouble of trying to put common core into schools when bingo they only need to put fluoridated water into the schools water supply?

 

[Flanders]

Learning that the EPA is staffed by crooks and perverts is no surprise:

The shadowy world of the Environmental Protection Agency
By John Hayward
5/8/2014 03:30 PM

The shadowy world of the Environmental Protection Agency | Human Events

 

[Flanders]

An article by Leo Hohmann is so full of information it is a must-read even if you do not have children or grandchildren in the public schools. The few excerpts I selected barely scratch the surface of what Common Core is aiming for.

First, I’ll wager that many parents believe that their children must take every test the school orders. Not so.

The “opt out” movement in which parents opt their children out of the standardized tests has spread in recent weeks from New York to Georgia to Alabama.

XXXXX​

Meg Norris was forced out of her job as a Hall County, Ga., teacher last year after she ran afoul of mandatory testing for Common Core.

XXXXX​

One day a student came up to Norris and asked, “Do we have to take the test?”

“No, you don’t have to do anything your parents don’t want you to do,” Norris responded.

That was when the school district opened a secretive internal investigation on its wayward teacher and she resigned.

Once again tax dollars are being used to implement an ideology most Americans disagree with:

The Obama administration also required all states receiving federal Race to the Top funds to put in place longitudinal databases capable of tracking students’ progress over time. These databases are designed to be “interoperable,” essentially creating a uniform data chain across the 50 states.

XXXXX​

Testing for “attitudes and values” is something many parents are not even aware is going on in their schools.

Let corporations pay for their own training programs without passing the cost along to taxpayers:

“As evil as Common Core is, it’s a diversion,” said Iserbyt, author of several books including “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America” and “Back to Basics Reform.”

The real genie in the bottle, she says, is the takeover of education by corporations pushing “school choice,” a very seductive concept to conservatives who have soured on traditional public education. But the schools would still be funded by tax dollars. The main difference, she said, would be that locally elected school boards would be shut down or stripped of any meaningful authority.

Iserbyt believes the burgeoning charter-school movement is being readied to create a pipeline of “school-to-work” graduates that fulfills the needs of corporations but does little to encourage real education.

XXXXX​

It was called “mastery learning” in the 1960s and 70s and that morphed into “outcome-based education” in the 1980s and 90s with assessments to measure the outcomes.

Now the final building block has been introduced – Common Core.

And here comes the United Nations:

The Soviet and Chinese systems use the same model, Iserbyt said. The vast majority of children get “trained” for specific “outcomes” while traditional education is reserved for the top 10 percent of elite students. The global drive toward school-to-work, outcome-based training comes packaged with the full backing of the United Nations Educational and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and tax-exempt foundations funded by the Carnegie, Gates and Rockefeller families.

Education? No, it’s about data-mining
‘Opt out’ movement surges in response to Common Core
Published: 9 hours ago
By Leo Hohmann

Education? No, it?s about data-mining​

Three cures:

1. Limit tax dollar funded education to teaching the three R’s at the elementary level only.

2. Shut down the Department of Education.

3. Withdraw from the United Nations.

 

[regent]

So what parts of common core bothers conservatives? Originally I thought it was the "thinking part" that bothered them, but maybe it's not the thinking part but just not enough memorization? So again what part or parts of common core bothers conservatives?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Common Core Is A United Nations Program

No, it isn't.

Next!

 

[Flanders]

So again what part or parts of common core bothers conservatives?

To regent: Better you should ask which parts DO NOT bother conservatives. I cannot address the specific parts each opponent of Common Core dislikes the most, but the United Nations controlling America’s children is at the top of my list —— with tax-exempt foundations funded by the Carnegie, Gates and Rockefeller families coming in second.

Judi McLeod over at Canada Free Press addresses controlling America’s children from a different perspective although I have no trouble connecting it to the United Nations:

Control of children from pre-kindergarten age is how President Barack Obama is making the Fundamental Transformation of America a fait accompli.

Depressing and demoralizing to know that today’s children are growing up under Marxist rule and that Marxism has been in the classroom for decades.

Judi begins and ends her very informative piece with a profound suggestion:

Before you take your country back, you’ve got to take your children back first.

Taking the Country Back starts with Taking the Children Back
By Judi McLeod Monday, May 12, 2014

Taking the Country Back starts with Taking the Children Back​

 

[regent]

So again what part or parts of common core bothers conservatives?

To regent: Better you should ask which parts DO NOT bother conservatives. I cannot address the specific parts each opponent of Common Core dislikes the most, but the United Nations controlling America’s children is at the top of my list —— with tax-exempt foundations funded by the Carnegie, Gates and Rockefeller families coming in second.

Judi McLeod over at Canada Free Press addresses controlling America’s children from a different perspective although I have no trouble connecting it to the United Nations:

Control of children from pre-kindergarten age is how President Barack Obama is making the Fundamental Transformation of America a fait accompli.

Depressing and demoralizing to know that today’s children are growing up under Marxist rule and that Marxism has been in the classroom for decades.

Judi begins and ends her very informative piece with a profound suggestion:

Before you take your country back, you’ve got to take your children back first.

Taking the Country Back starts with Taking the Children Back
By Judi McLeod Monday, May 12, 2014

Taking the Country Back starts with Taking the Children Back​

This is exactly why states should not be allowed to create their own programs, and only the federal government make decisions about education. Unlike Bush and his NCLB, states are too easily duped .

 

[jasonnfree]

So again what part or parts of common core bothers conservatives?

To regent: Better you should ask which parts DO NOT bother conservatives. I cannot address the specific parts each opponent of Common Core dislikes the most, but the United Nations controlling America’s children is at the top of my list —— with tax-exempt foundations funded by the Carnegie, Gates and Rockefeller families coming in second.

Judi McLeod over at Canada Free Press addresses controlling America’s children from a different perspective although I have no trouble connecting it to the United Nations:

Control of children from pre-kindergarten age is how President Barack Obama is making the Fundamental Transformation of America a fait accompli.

Depressing and demoralizing to know that today’s children are growing up under Marxist rule and that Marxism has been in the classroom for decades.

Judi begins and ends her very informative piece with a profound suggestion:

Before you take your country back, you’ve got to take your children back first.

Taking the Country Back starts with Taking the Children Back
By Judi McLeod Monday, May 12, 2014

Taking the Country Back starts with Taking the Children Back​

So in your own words, what parts of the common core curriculum don't you like? Are the students better off or worse off because of it? So far, you've just quoted conspiracy stuff.

 

[Flanders]

This is exactly why states should not be allowed to create their own programs, and only the federal government make decisions about education. Unlike Bush and his NCLB, states are too easily duped .

To regent: All fifty states are duped by the federal government with one stroke of the pen, and it’s done with tax dollars; Common Core is one example. Then the states have to get out from under the federal government one state at a time. Case in point:

At stake for Hoosiers is $200 million in federal education funds. The Obama Administration is using “No Child Left Behind” waivers to warn Indiana officials of the penalties they face for non-compliance with Common Core. In a political scheme that could only be hatched in Washington, one federal program enacted under George W. Bush and widely derided for undermining local school authority, is pitted against another federal program even more derided for the same reasons.

Dept. of Education erects obstacles to keep states in Common Core
By: David Craig
5/12/2014 08:26 AM

Dept. of Education erects obstacles to keep states in Common Core | Human Events​

 

[Flanders]

Common Core Is A United Nations Program

No, it isn't.

Next!

To Dont Taz Me Bro: Would you believe it’s a Bill Gates program?

Parents are also suspicious of the gigantic amount of money that is being spent to promote the use of Common Core-aligned books and teacher training. Emeritus professor Jack Hassard of Georgia State University estimates that billionaire Bill Gates has spent $2.3 billion on Common Core.

Some say Gates is a promoter of “global sameness of education as defined by UNESCO and the United Nations.” Gates has expressed agreement with U.N. policies that many Americans oppose such as Agenda 21, which promotes global governance at the expense of private property and national sovereignty.

My child is not common!
Phyllis Schlafly: Latest top-down education scheme more hated than all its predecessors
Published: 16 hours ago
PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY

My child is not common!​

Incidentally, does Gates get a tax deduction for whatever he gives to the United Nations/Common Core?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Common Core Is Not A United Nations Program. It began in Texas under Governor Bush.

 

[Flanders]

Common Core Is Not A United Nations Program.

To JakeStarkey: It pains me to see you always making a fool of yourself in my threads. Go to this link for articles about Common Core/Agenda 21.

AOL Search

It began in Texas under Governor Bush.

To JakeStarkey: Source please.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Calling Common Core a "UN Program" shows that you have absolutely no concept of what Common Core actually is.

 

[Flanders]

Calling Common Core a "UN Program" shows that you have absolutely no concept of what Common Core actually is.

To theDoctorisIn: I wonder if my threads qualify for an asshole magnet patent? They are certainly attracted to my messages.

 

[regent]

Calling Common Core a "UN Program" shows that you have absolutely no concept of what Common Core actually is.

To theDoctorisIn: I wonder if my threads qualify for an asshole magnet patent? They are certainly attracted to my messages.

If you did not expect to get responses to your post why did you put it on the boards? Apparently people want a clue as to your evidence that common core is connected to the UN. Do you have any evidence?

 

[Flanders]

If you did not expect to get responses to your post why did you put it on the boards?

To regent: This is a message board not a debate board. I do not post messages to solicit responses from liberals. You have read enough of my posts to know that I prefer that my opposites do not read my messages. I post messages in the hope a conservative will get something from my thoughts and interpretations.

Apparently people want a clue as to your evidence that common core is connected to the UN. Do you have any evidence?

To regent: There is a helluva lot more evidence available than environmental whackos offer in support of global warming. There is so much evidence connecting the UN to Common Core that calling doubters ‘United Nations/Common Core deniers’ is more accurate than ‘Holocaust deniers’ or ‘global warming deniers.’

Irrespective of an individual’s views on God and organized religion one thing is certain, the deniers will always deny facts should one penetrate their mindless defenses:

A ‘core’ tenant of U. N. Agenda 21 is massive depopulation in the name of ‘sustainability’. As students are stripped of their spirit and the possible religious influence of their parents, the concepts of abortion, eugenics and euthanasia will be surreptitiously embedded within the Common Core curriculum to coerce students into accepting these concepts as needed actions to achieve the ultimate goal of sustainability over their God-given and constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms. Common Core is about changing children’s attitudes, values and behaviors, advancing a Godless agenda, lacking morals, ethics and principles. There are designs replace churches and synagogues with schools as the focal point of every community. As a result, Common Core, and the entire UNA21, is anti-God, inhumane and anti-human.

A U. S. Citizen Cannot be Pro-Life &/or a Patriot and be Pro-Common Core!
By A.J. Cameron Wednesday, May 14, 2014

A U. S. Citizen Cannot be Pro-Life &/or a Patriot and be Pro-Common Core!​

 

[regent]

If you did not expect to get responses to your post why did you put it on the boards?

To regent: This is a message board not a debate board. I do not post messages to solicit responses from liberals. You have read enough of my posts to know that I prefer that my opposites do not read my messages. I post messages in the hope a conservative will get something from my thoughts and interpretations.

Apparently people want a clue as to your evidence that common core is connected to the UN. Do you have any evidence?

To regent: There is a helluva lot more evidence available than environmental whackos offer in support of global warming. There is so much evidence connecting the UN to Common Core that calling doubters ‘United Nations/Common Core deniers’ is more accurate than ‘Holocaust deniers’ or ‘global warming deniers.’

Irrespective of an individual’s views on God and organized religion one thing is certain, the deniers will always deny facts should one penetrate their mindless defenses:

A ‘core’ tenant of U. N. Agenda 21 is massive depopulation in the name of ‘sustainability’. As students are stripped of their spirit and the possible religious influence of their parents, the concepts of abortion, eugenics and euthanasia will be surreptitiously embedded within the Common Core curriculum to coerce students into accepting these concepts as needed actions to achieve the ultimate goal of sustainability over their God-given and constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms. Common Core is about changing children’s attitudes, values and behaviors, advancing a Godless agenda, lacking morals, ethics and principles. There are designs replace churches and synagogues with schools as the focal point of every community. As a result, Common Core, and the entire UNA21, is anti-God, inhumane and anti-human.

A U. S. Citizen Cannot be Pro-Life &/or a Patriot and be Pro-Common Core!
By A.J. Cameron Wednesday, May 14, 2014

A U. S. Citizen Cannot be Pro-Life &/or a Patriot and be Pro-Common Core!​

That's not evidence. Those are simply more accusations.