OldLady
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 69,568
- 19,601
- 2,220
It's got to be Newsmax and OAN taking the viewers, don't you think? Of course, being the day after the Trump Insurrection, it's possible people tuned in CNN because they do the Big Disasters better than anyone. I doubt if regular Fox viewers are going to switch to CNN. There's just too much daylight between those two.Check out these numbers. Almost unbelievable unless newsmax and other networks have taken most of Fox viewers. There is no way other than the Weasel Wallace viewers that Fox News viewers are switching to CNN.
This is a collapse of mammoth proportions. Maybe worse than what twitter is about to experience.
Man, when Americans get pissed and feel betrayed, they really let it be known.
Thursday, Jan. 7 Scoreboard: CNN Is the No. 1 Network, Led by Anderson Cooper
Cooper delivered 5.8 million viewers in the 8 p.m. hour, No. 1 on all of cable news. MSNBC ranked No. 2 across the board, both in total day and prime time among total viewers and adults 25-54.www.adweek.com
Thursday, Jan. 7 Scoreboard: CNN Is the No. 1 Network, Led by Anderson Cooper
By A.J. Katz on Jan. 8, 2021 - 5:22 PMComment
25-54 Demographic (Live+SD x 1,000)
Total Day: FNC: 384 | CNN: 1.193 | MSNBC: 653
Prime: FNC: 521 | CNN: 1.630 | MSNBC: 907
Total Viewers (Live+SD x 1,000)
FNC: CNN: MSNBC: 4PM Cavuto:
388Tapper:
1.548Wallace:
7565PM Five:
628Blitzer:
1.581Wallace:
—6PM Baier:
491Blitzer:
1.504Melber:
6937PM MacCallum:
509Burnett:
1.698Reid:
7488PM Carlson:
665Cooper:
1.830Hayes:
7559PM Hannity:
496Cuomo:
1.690Maddow:
1.13010PM Ingraham:
401Lemon:
1.371O’Donnell:
83611PM Bream:
301Lemon:
997Williams:
722
Total Day: FNC: 1.935 | CNN: 3.854 | MSNBC: 3.321
Prime: FNC: 2.965 | CNN: 5.049 | MSNBC: 4.543
FNC CNN MSNBC: 4PM Cavuto:
1.950Tapper:
5.316Wallace:
4.1665PM Five:
3.602Blitzer:
5.116Wallace:
—-6PM Baier:
2.393Blitzer:
4.540Melber:
3.5357PM MacCallum:
2.186Burnett:
4.875Reid:
3.4668PM Carlson:
3.582Cooper:
5.766Hayes:
3.6239PM Hannity:
3.000Cuomo:
5.209Maddow:
5.39810PM Ingraham:
2.315Lemon:
4.172O’Donnell:
4.60811PM Bream:
1.427Lemon:
2.915Williams:
3.797
It's hard to beleve how fucking DENSE you are AFTER being schooled on this.
Broadcast "ratings" have ONE PURPOSE AND ONE PURPOSE ONLY, and that is to set advertising rates.
They show ONE THING AND ONE THING ONLY and that is how many of what kind of people are watching/listening/reading.
THAT'S IT. FULL STOP.
THEY DO NOT, AND CAN NOT, MEASURE ANYTHING REMOTELY RELATED TO ANY KIND OF "FEEWINGS". UNDERSTAND? THEY MEASURE ATTENTION, NOT "ASSENT'. THEY ARE NOT "VOTES" ON CONTENT. NEVER HAVE BEEN, NEVER WILL BE, NEVER CAN BE.
What does that mean for you and your pretentiously pathetic thread here Twinkles? It means that unless you're in the business of either buying or selling TV commercials, WHAT YOU HAVE HERE MEANS ABSOLUTE SQUAT.
FOR FUCK's SAKE YOUR OWN LINK COMES FROM AdWeek. What did that tell you??
It is giving us the ratings of people who watch the shows. Who cares about the purpose, the viewers aren't saying "hey man, I really want to increase CNNs ad revenue so maybe I will watch them now, and make them some more money!".
You suggesting that actual ratings of sports, news, TV Shows are not valid in understanding who is watching what? That's asinine.
I'm not concerned with the impact on rates they charge advertisers, I'm interested in the sets of eyes watching TV shows. They show what people are interested in, even where their ideology is leaning. You don't go from a couple of millions ahead of your closest rival to 3rd place and millions behind, without a good reason.
Tucker said CNN is trying to sink Fox News, and they may just succeed. I live in the world of data of numbers, not "agreement or disagreement".