CNN Anchor Tells Nancy Pelosi That Trump Was Acquitted — She Interrupts, Claims He Wasn’t

[Weatherman2020]

Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.



Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

In a REAL trail with real juries the outcome would have been a hung jury. No acquittal, no conviction, no exoneration.

This was impeachment, not a court trial, so your post is irrelevant.

Duh.

Not in the Public Domain, thinking, not biased and educated voters, watched the circus put on by Moscow Mitch, and how trump reacted when he was not removed from office:

• Megalomania and vindictive actions to destroy those who testified against him while under oath (the dirt bag even fired the twin brother who had done nothing wrong)
• Let's wait and see how the election plays out. My sense is the Senate will turn blue, and Speaker Pelosi will remain the leader in the H. or Rep.
• Moscow Mitch will loss his seat and no longer be able to use his misfeasance, nonfeasance and malfeasance
• And, even if trump wins, he will be the longest running lame duck in history.

And, when he has a complete mental breakdown, he will be removed from office when the 25th Amendment is invoked.

Please offer up odds on each of your prognostications.

I'd be curious if you are really stupid enough to bet on them happening.

I don't bet on wishful thinking. Especially when reading posts by people like you, those who continue to support a megalomaniac; by 2024 we will be very lucky if we as a nation survive four more years of Trumpism.

Trump has not created the economic recovery which began six months into the first Obama Administration. This is one more of many of trumps BIG LIES.

Mexico has not paid for the Wall at our Southern Border. We, the American Taxpayers have paid to repair and replace an already existing wall (one of his new replacement walls fell in a wind storm, BTW); let us not also forget that the billions of money appropriated to improve military bases was taken by trump to try and build more sections of the wall.

He has alienated our allies in NATO, in Ukraine, our NATO Allies were left by him for their military to be attacked by the Russian Bear; in Syria he ordered out forces to fall back and protect an oil field, which left their base to Russian Forces and left the hegemony in the Middle East to Putin.

He failed miserably his promise to repeal and replace Obamacare on day one, and has not done anything but repeal a few parts of Obamacare which only served to deny needy citizens health care they cannot afford.

He has promised, since the tax fraud he signed has come into the light, that he will provide the middle class with a tax cut. What he says can never be believed, it has been reported that he has lied and mislead the public over 15,000 times since his inauguration.

He promised to cut the national debt, and during the last fiscal year he oversaw the deficit balloon to over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS.

I hope that this complete failure as president leads to a massive lose on Nov 3rd next. and hope to see the good people in Kentucky send McConnell home for good.

Obamacare website cost more than the wall will when completed.

 

[Care4all]

NONE of your concerns take his guilt away.

NONE of the would have, could have or should haves of what went on in the House prevented the Senate From accepting evidence and hearing witnesses.

I find it hard to even understand why anyone would not want to have justice served?

You still are to stupid to breed, it is not NOW and never has been the JOB of the senate to investigate the charges, they simply review the charges and evidence presented and rebutted by the House managers and the defense. Since the House does not call defense witnesses the Senate will usually allow the defense to call them but all it does for the prosecution is call witnesses already interviewed by the House for clarification. IT IS THE JOB OF THE HOUSE TO CALL WITNESSES AND GATHER EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CHARGES THEY LEVEL against the President.

Hearing witnesses and evaluating evidence submitted in the trial IS THE JURY'S duty.

That is not investigating....that's what is expected in a trial.

LOL you damn retard. It is not the JOB of the JURY to call witnesses that is the defense and prosecutors job, you know the House and the defense lawyers. God you get stupider with every post.

you are partly mistaken....

yes the prosecution and defense request witnesses in an impeachment,

HOWEVER, Mitch's trial rules state that the Senators get to vote on if they will allow any witnesses at all, and if yes, then the senators get to vote on each and every witness called and whether to allow them to testify, and the rules did not permit any of the witnesses that testified during the house inquiry, to testify live, allowing the president's team to cross examine them....

The Trial was a complete SHAM, rgs, there's no way around it....

And yes, it is what it is.... he got his acquittal, come hell or high water.... and ya'll Cheer!!!
Winner, at all costs!!!

No matter the destruction of the rule of law, the destruction of our constitution, the destruction of equal branches of governmnt, with the destruction of the power of the House, the ONLY REPRESENTATION, ''We the People'' have in our govt.... which ultimately means... the destruction of all the founders believed in.... ''We are a Nation of Laws, not men...'' you all have seemed to have chosen the opposite of what they believed in,
and what we used to stand for...

This whole event, just gets added to the complete lawlessness and every day occurrences of the past 3 years, the whole thing is disheartening, and makes me realize, the USA really is not, what I imagined it was.... my entire life...

Look you RAGING LOON Take Clinton's Impeachment, 3 witnesses were called by the Senate, 3 . Why, because the Senators had questions about their testimony to the House. Be specific now and cite for me when all the witnesses were called by Clinton's defense team and all the prosecution witness by the House in the Clinton Impeachment.... I am about feed up with your abject IGNORANCE and LYING. The Senate does NOT TRY THE CASE they simply listen to the evidence presented by the House and the defense and render a verdict. GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLUELESS it hurts.

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

 

[Rye Catcher]

In a REAL trail with real juries the outcome would have been a hung jury. No acquittal, no conviction, no exoneration.

This was impeachment, not a court trial, so your post is irrelevant.

Duh.

Not in the Public Domain, thinking, not biased and educated voters, watched the circus put on by Moscow Mitch, and how trump reacted when he was not removed from office:

• Megalomania and vindictive actions to destroy those who testified against him while under oath (the dirt bag even fired the twin brother who had done nothing wrong)
• Let's wait and see how the election plays out. My sense is the Senate will turn blue, and Speaker Pelosi will remain the leader in the H. or Rep.
• Moscow Mitch will loss his seat and no longer be able to use his misfeasance, nonfeasance and malfeasance
• And, even if trump wins, he will be the longest running lame duck in history.

And, when he has a complete mental breakdown, he will be removed from office when the 25th Amendment is invoked.

Please offer up odds on each of your prognostications.

I'd be curious if you are really stupid enough to bet on them happening.

I don't bet on wishful thinking. Especially when reading posts by people like you, those who continue to support a megalomaniac; by 2024 we will be very lucky if we as a nation survive four more years of Trumpism.

Trump has not created the economic recovery which began six months into the first Obama Administration. This is one more of many of trumps BIG LIES.

Mexico has not paid for the Wall at our Southern Border. We, the American Taxpayers have paid to repair and replace an already existing wall (one of his new replacement walls fell in a wind storm, BTW); let us not also forget that the billions of money appropriated to improve military bases was taken by trump to try and build more sections of the wall.

He has alienated our allies in NATO, in Ukraine, our NATO Allies were left by him for their military to be attacked by the Russian Bear; in Syria he ordered out forces to fall back and protect an oil field, which left their base to Russian Forces and left the hegemony in the Middle East to Putin.

He failed miserably his promise to repeal and replace Obamacare on day one, and has not done anything but repeal a few parts of Obamacare which only served to deny needy citizens health care they cannot afford.

He has promised, since the tax fraud he signed has come into the light, that he will provide the middle class with a tax cut. What he says can never be believed, it has been reported that he has lied and mislead the public over 15,000 times since his inauguration.

He promised to cut the national debt, and during the last fiscal year he oversaw the deficit balloon to over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS.

I hope that this complete failure as president leads to a massive lose on Nov 3rd next. and hope to see the good people in Kentucky send McConnell home for good.

Obamacare website cost more than the wall will when completed.

No link, no data, no substance ^^^.

Well, if the wind can knock down sections of the wall, it might be years before the wall can be completed. And, of course, given that private property reaches to the border, some owners will file suit to prevent government agents from intruding on their property.

Does the Liberty on property rights offend you?

 

[Nostra]

You still are to stupid to breed, it is not NOW and never has been the JOB of the senate to investigate the charges, they simply review the charges and evidence presented and rebutted by the House managers and the defense. Since the House does not call defense witnesses the Senate will usually allow the defense to call them but all it does for the prosecution is call witnesses already interviewed by the House for clarification. IT IS THE JOB OF THE HOUSE TO CALL WITNESSES AND GATHER EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CHARGES THEY LEVEL against the President.

Hearing witnesses and evaluating evidence submitted in the trial IS THE JURY'S duty.

That is not investigating....that's what is expected in a trial.

LOL you damn retard. It is not the JOB of the JURY to call witnesses that is the defense and prosecutors job, you know the House and the defense lawyers. God you get stupider with every post.

you are partly mistaken....

yes the prosecution and defense request witnesses in an impeachment,

HOWEVER, Mitch's trial rules state that the Senators get to vote on if they will allow any witnesses at all, and if yes, then the senators get to vote on each and every witness called and whether to allow them to testify, and the rules did not permit any of the witnesses that testified during the house inquiry, to testify live, allowing the president's team to cross examine them....

The Trial was a complete SHAM, rgs, there's no way around it....

And yes, it is what it is.... he got his acquittal, come hell or high water.... and ya'll Cheer!!!
Winner, at all costs!!!

No matter the destruction of the rule of law, the destruction of our constitution, the destruction of equal branches of governmnt, with the destruction of the power of the House, the ONLY REPRESENTATION, ''We the People'' have in our govt.... which ultimately means... the destruction of all the founders believed in.... ''We are a Nation of Laws, not men...'' you all have seemed to have chosen the opposite of what they believed in,
and what we used to stand for...

This whole event, just gets added to the complete lawlessness and every day occurrences of the past 3 years, the whole thing is disheartening, and makes me realize, the USA really is not, what I imagined it was.... my entire life...

Look you RAGING LOON Take Clinton's Impeachment, 3 witnesses were called by the Senate, 3 . Why, because the Senators had questions about their testimony to the House. Be specific now and cite for me when all the witnesses were called by Clinton's defense team and all the prosecution witness by the House in the Clinton Impeachment.... I am about feed up with your abject IGNORANCE and LYING. The Senate does NOT TRY THE CASE they simply listen to the evidence presented by the House and the defense and render a verdict. GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLUELESS it hurts.

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

None of that excuses the House for not doing their job. The Constitution says the House investigates impeachment, not the Senate.

13 witnesses and over 2800 documents submitted. You keep lying about no witnesses or evidence. It isn't working.

That lie won't fly, get a new one.

 

[Rye Catcher]

In a REAL trail with real juries the outcome would have been a hung jury. No acquittal, no conviction, no exoneration.

This was impeachment, not a court trial, so your post is irrelevant.

Duh.

Not in the Public Domain, thinking, not biased and educated voters, watched the circus put on by Moscow Mitch, and how trump reacted when he was not removed from office:

• Megalomania and vindictive actions to destroy those who testified against him while under oath (the dirt bag even fired the twin brother who had done nothing wrong)
• Let's wait and see how the election plays out. My sense is the Senate will turn blue, and Speaker Pelosi will remain the leader in the H. or Rep.
• Moscow Mitch will loss his seat and no longer be able to use his misfeasance, nonfeasance and malfeasance
• And, even if trump wins, he will be the longest running lame duck in history.

And, when he has a complete mental breakdown, he will be removed from office when the 25th Amendment is invoked.

Please offer up odds on each of your prognostications.

I'd be curious if you are really stupid enough to bet on them happening.

I don't bet on wishful thinking. Especially when reading posts by people like you, those who continue to support a megalomaniac; by 2024 we will be very lucky if we as a nation survive four more years of Trumpism.

Trump has not created the economic recovery which began six months into the first Obama Administration. This is one more of many of trumps BIG LIES.

Mexico has not paid for the Wall at our Southern Border. We, the American Taxpayers have paid to repair and replace an already existing wall (one of his new replacement walls fell in a wind storm, BTW); let us not also forget that the billions of money appropriated to improve military bases was taken by trump to try and build more sections of the wall.

He has alienated our allies in NATO, in Ukraine, our NATO Allies were left by him for their military to be attacked by the Russian Bear; in Syria he ordered out forces to fall back and protect an oil field, which left their base to Russian Forces and left the hegemony in the Middle East to Putin.

He failed miserably his promise to repeal and replace Obamacare on day one, and has not done anything but repeal a few parts of Obamacare which only served to deny needy citizens health care they cannot afford.

He has promised, since the tax fraud he signed has come into the light, that he will provide the middle class with a tax cut. What he says can never be believed, it has been reported that he has lied and mislead the public over 15,000 times since his inauguration.

He promised to cut the national debt, and during the last fiscal year he oversaw the deficit balloon to over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS.

I hope that this complete failure as president leads to a massive lose on Nov 3rd next. and hope to see the good people in Kentucky send McConnell home for good.

Hey, who ever said that cleaning up the mess sick politicians had made for the last 30+ years would be purdy ??

All I can say is that there is a new Sheriff in town, and his name is Trump.. MAGA.

Your sheriff is all for Law and Order, yet justice seems not to be on his agenda. Leading his biddable fools at rallies, all yelling, "lock her up" goes well beyond our system of jurisprudence, but I guess you don't care. Do you also salute your sheriff with a stiff right arm at 45 degrees and the palm of the right hand down? Seems so, metaphorically.

 

[Rye Catcher]

In a REAL trail with real juries the outcome would have been a hung jury. No acquittal, no conviction, no exoneration.

This was impeachment, not a court trial, so your post is irrelevant.

Duh.

Not in the Public Domain, thinking, not biased and educated voters, watched the circus put on by Moscow Mitch, and how trump reacted when he was not removed from office:

• Megalomania and vindictive actions to destroy those who testified against him while under oath (the dirt bag even fired the twin brother who had done nothing wrong)
• Let's wait and see how the election plays out. My sense is the Senate will turn blue, and Speaker Pelosi will remain the leader in the H. or Rep.
• Moscow Mitch will loss his seat and no longer be able to use his misfeasance, nonfeasance and malfeasance
• And, even if trump wins, he will be the longest running lame duck in history.

And, when he has a complete mental breakdown, he will be removed from office when the 25th Amendment is invoked.

Please offer up odds on each of your prognostications.

I'd be curious if you are really stupid enough to bet on them happening.

I don't bet on wishful thinking. Especially when reading posts by people like you, those who continue to support a megalomaniac; by 2024 we will be very lucky if we as a nation survive four more years of Trumpism.

Trump has not created the economic recovery which began six months into the first Obama Administration. This is one more of many of trumps BIG LIES.

Mexico has not paid for the Wall at our Southern Border. We, the American Taxpayers have paid to repair and replace an already existing wall (one of his new replacement walls fell in a wind storm, BTW); let us not also forget that the billions of money appropriated to improve military bases was taken by trump to try and build more sections of the wall.

He has alienated our allies in NATO, in Ukraine, our NATO Allies were left by him for their military to be attacked by the Russian Bear; in Syria he ordered out forces to fall back and protect an oil field, which left their base to Russian Forces and left the hegemony in the Middle East to Putin.

He failed miserably his promise to repeal and replace Obamacare on day one, and has not done anything but repeal a few parts of Obamacare which only served to deny needy citizens health care they cannot afford.

He has promised, since the tax fraud he signed has come into the light, that he will provide the middle class with a tax cut. What he says can never be believed, it has been reported that he has lied and mislead the public over 15,000 times since his inauguration.

He promised to cut the national debt, and during the last fiscal year he oversaw the deficit balloon to over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS.

I hope that this complete failure as president leads to a massive lose on Nov 3rd next. and hope to see the good people in Kentucky send McConnell home for good.

Liar^^^^

Idiot-gram ^^^; Source, stupid and biddable fool.

 

[hadit]

You still are to stupid to breed, it is not NOW and never has been the JOB of the senate to investigate the charges, they simply review the charges and evidence presented and rebutted by the House managers and the defense. Since the House does not call defense witnesses the Senate will usually allow the defense to call them but all it does for the prosecution is call witnesses already interviewed by the House for clarification. IT IS THE JOB OF THE HOUSE TO CALL WITNESSES AND GATHER EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CHARGES THEY LEVEL against the President.

Hearing witnesses and evaluating evidence submitted in the trial IS THE JURY'S duty.

That is not investigating....that's what is expected in a trial.

LOL you damn retard. It is not the JOB of the JURY to call witnesses that is the defense and prosecutors job, you know the House and the defense lawyers. God you get stupider with every post.

you are partly mistaken....

yes the prosecution and defense request witnesses in an impeachment,

HOWEVER, Mitch's trial rules state that the Senators get to vote on if they will allow any witnesses at all, and if yes, then the senators get to vote on each and every witness called and whether to allow them to testify, and the rules did not permit any of the witnesses that testified during the house inquiry, to testify live, allowing the president's team to cross examine them....

The Trial was a complete SHAM, rgs, there's no way around it....

And yes, it is what it is.... he got his acquittal, come hell or high water.... and ya'll Cheer!!!
Winner, at all costs!!!

No matter the destruction of the rule of law, the destruction of our constitution, the destruction of equal branches of governmnt, with the destruction of the power of the House, the ONLY REPRESENTATION, ''We the People'' have in our govt.... which ultimately means... the destruction of all the founders believed in.... ''We are a Nation of Laws, not men...'' you all have seemed to have chosen the opposite of what they believed in,
and what we used to stand for...

This whole event, just gets added to the complete lawlessness and every day occurrences of the past 3 years, the whole thing is disheartening, and makes me realize, the USA really is not, what I imagined it was.... my entire life...

Look you RAGING LOON Take Clinton's Impeachment, 3 witnesses were called by the Senate, 3 . Why, because the Senators had questions about their testimony to the House. Be specific now and cite for me when all the witnesses were called by Clinton's defense team and all the prosecution witness by the House in the Clinton Impeachment.... I am about feed up with your abject IGNORANCE and LYING. The Senate does NOT TRY THE CASE they simply listen to the evidence presented by the House and the defense and render a verdict. GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLUELESS it hurts.

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

Are you saying that the House investigation was incomplete? Had the Senate called all the witnesses who testified to the House, asked them questions, then voted to acquit, would you have accepted the outcome, or are you in actuality demanding NEW witnesses?

Had the Senate called only new witnesses that put Joe Biden in a bad light, would you have accepted it, or are you in actuality demanding that only witnesses YOU approve of be called?

 

[Rye Catcher]

Hearing witnesses and evaluating evidence submitted in the trial IS THE JURY'S duty.

That is not investigating....that's what is expected in a trial.

LOL you damn retard. It is not the JOB of the JURY to call witnesses that is the defense and prosecutors job, you know the House and the defense lawyers. God you get stupider with every post.

you are partly mistaken....

yes the prosecution and defense request witnesses in an impeachment,

HOWEVER, Mitch's trial rules state that the Senators get to vote on if they will allow any witnesses at all, and if yes, then the senators get to vote on each and every witness called and whether to allow them to testify, and the rules did not permit any of the witnesses that testified during the house inquiry, to testify live, allowing the president's team to cross examine them....

The Trial was a complete SHAM, rgs, there's no way around it....

And yes, it is what it is.... he got his acquittal, come hell or high water.... and ya'll Cheer!!!
Winner, at all costs!!!

No matter the destruction of the rule of law, the destruction of our constitution, the destruction of equal branches of governmnt, with the destruction of the power of the House, the ONLY REPRESENTATION, ''We the People'' have in our govt.... which ultimately means... the destruction of all the founders believed in.... ''We are a Nation of Laws, not men...'' you all have seemed to have chosen the opposite of what they believed in,
and what we used to stand for...

This whole event, just gets added to the complete lawlessness and every day occurrences of the past 3 years, the whole thing is disheartening, and makes me realize, the USA really is not, what I imagined it was.... my entire life...

Look you RAGING LOON Take Clinton's Impeachment, 3 witnesses were called by the Senate, 3 . Why, because the Senators had questions about their testimony to the House. Be specific now and cite for me when all the witnesses were called by Clinton's defense team and all the prosecution witness by the House in the Clinton Impeachment.... I am about feed up with your abject IGNORANCE and LYING. The Senate does NOT TRY THE CASE they simply listen to the evidence presented by the House and the defense and render a verdict. GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLUELESS it hurts.

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

None of that excuses the House for not doing their job. The Constitution says the House investigates impeachment, not the Senate.

13 witnesses and over 2800 documents submitted. You keep lying about no witnesses or evidence. It isn't working.

That lie won't fly, get a new one.

I can't decide if you are really as stupid as your many posts suggest, or that you are an agitator in training and still can't pass muster as a successful one. Of course I might be correct on both counts.

Committee hearings are not trials. Anyone who is not stupid or willingly obtuse knows this. And, BTW, your comment is nothing more than an echo of so many others, please don't pretend you had an original thought. I know you don't have that ability.

 

[hadit]

Hearing witnesses and evaluating evidence submitted in the trial IS THE JURY'S duty.

That is not investigating....that's what is expected in a trial.

LOL you damn retard. It is not the JOB of the JURY to call witnesses that is the defense and prosecutors job, you know the House and the defense lawyers. God you get stupider with every post.

you are partly mistaken....

yes the prosecution and defense request witnesses in an impeachment,

HOWEVER, Mitch's trial rules state that the Senators get to vote on if they will allow any witnesses at all, and if yes, then the senators get to vote on each and every witness called and whether to allow them to testify, and the rules did not permit any of the witnesses that testified during the house inquiry, to testify live, allowing the president's team to cross examine them....

The Trial was a complete SHAM, rgs, there's no way around it....

And yes, it is what it is.... he got his acquittal, come hell or high water.... and ya'll Cheer!!!
Winner, at all costs!!!

No matter the destruction of the rule of law, the destruction of our constitution, the destruction of equal branches of governmnt, with the destruction of the power of the House, the ONLY REPRESENTATION, ''We the People'' have in our govt.... which ultimately means... the destruction of all the founders believed in.... ''We are a Nation of Laws, not men...'' you all have seemed to have chosen the opposite of what they believed in,
and what we used to stand for...

This whole event, just gets added to the complete lawlessness and every day occurrences of the past 3 years, the whole thing is disheartening, and makes me realize, the USA really is not, what I imagined it was.... my entire life...

Look you RAGING LOON Take Clinton's Impeachment, 3 witnesses were called by the Senate, 3 . Why, because the Senators had questions about their testimony to the House. Be specific now and cite for me when all the witnesses were called by Clinton's defense team and all the prosecution witness by the House in the Clinton Impeachment.... I am about feed up with your abject IGNORANCE and LYING. The Senate does NOT TRY THE CASE they simply listen to the evidence presented by the House and the defense and render a verdict. GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLUELESS it hurts.

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

Are you saying that the House investigation was incomplete? Had the Senate called all the witnesses who testified to the House, asked them questions, then voted to acquit, would you have accepted the outcome, or are you in actuality demanding NEW witnesses?

Had the Senate called only new witnesses that put Joe Biden in a bad light, would you have accepted it, or are you in actuality demanding that only witnesses YOU approve of be called?

IOW, is it a sham only because you don't like the outcome? Final question, would you be complaining about the lack of witnesses had the Senate voted to convict? I predict you would have had absolutely no issue with that at all.

 

[Care4all]

Hearing witnesses and evaluating evidence submitted in the trial IS THE JURY'S duty.

That is not investigating....that's what is expected in a trial.

LOL you damn retard. It is not the JOB of the JURY to call witnesses that is the defense and prosecutors job, you know the House and the defense lawyers. God you get stupider with every post.

you are partly mistaken....

yes the prosecution and defense request witnesses in an impeachment,

HOWEVER, Mitch's trial rules state that the Senators get to vote on if they will allow any witnesses at all, and if yes, then the senators get to vote on each and every witness called and whether to allow them to testify, and the rules did not permit any of the witnesses that testified during the house inquiry, to testify live, allowing the president's team to cross examine them....

The Trial was a complete SHAM, rgs, there's no way around it....

And yes, it is what it is.... he got his acquittal, come hell or high water.... and ya'll Cheer!!!
Winner, at all costs!!!

No matter the destruction of the rule of law, the destruction of our constitution, the destruction of equal branches of governmnt, with the destruction of the power of the House, the ONLY REPRESENTATION, ''We the People'' have in our govt.... which ultimately means... the destruction of all the founders believed in.... ''We are a Nation of Laws, not men...'' you all have seemed to have chosen the opposite of what they believed in,
and what we used to stand for...

This whole event, just gets added to the complete lawlessness and every day occurrences of the past 3 years, the whole thing is disheartening, and makes me realize, the USA really is not, what I imagined it was.... my entire life...

Look you RAGING LOON Take Clinton's Impeachment, 3 witnesses were called by the Senate, 3 . Why, because the Senators had questions about their testimony to the House. Be specific now and cite for me when all the witnesses were called by Clinton's defense team and all the prosecution witness by the House in the Clinton Impeachment.... I am about feed up with your abject IGNORANCE and LYING. The Senate does NOT TRY THE CASE they simply listen to the evidence presented by the House and the defense and render a verdict. GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLUELESS it hurts.

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

None of that excuses the House for not doing their job. The Constitution says the House investigates impeachment, not the Senate.

13 witnesses and over 2800 documents submitted. You keep lying about no witnesses or evidence. It isn't working.

That lie won't fly, get a new one.

The trial allowed no LIVE witnesses that did testify before the House, their depositions/evidence were allowed on tape.

And the Trial allowed no new witnesses that came forth after the Impeachment, and no new evidence that came out after the impeachment, in to the trial.

And this is my major complaint.

Because in a criminal and civic trial, a prosecutor is not prevented from calling witnesses and presenting evidence, that were acquired AFTER the prosecutors charged the defendant.

In a regular trial, as long as the witness is material to a case, they can be called to testify....no matter when the witness showed up on the scene.... as long as they are pertinent to making their case in the trial.

What you and the silly republicans are trying to claim, is that if a person was on trial for murder and the prosecutors charged him, and a new witness or 2 showed up, after the indictment for murder was already filed, if these eye witness or two, to the murder, presented themselves after the indictment was filed, YOU WOULD NOT ALLOW this testimony in a trial because the charges were filed already and they never deposed the witness before the indictment....

that is utter NONSENSE!

 

[berg80]

Obamacare website cost more than the wall will when completed.

Because Mexico will pay for the wall as promised?

 

[beagle9]

This was impeachment, not a court trial, so your post is irrelevant.

Duh.

Not in the Public Domain, thinking, not biased and educated voters, watched the circus put on by Moscow Mitch, and how trump reacted when he was not removed from office:

• Megalomania and vindictive actions to destroy those who testified against him while under oath (the dirt bag even fired the twin brother who had done nothing wrong)
• Let's wait and see how the election plays out. My sense is the Senate will turn blue, and Speaker Pelosi will remain the leader in the H. or Rep.
• Moscow Mitch will loss his seat and no longer be able to use his misfeasance, nonfeasance and malfeasance
• And, even if trump wins, he will be the longest running lame duck in history.

And, when he has a complete mental breakdown, he will be removed from office when the 25th Amendment is invoked.

Please offer up odds on each of your prognostications.

I'd be curious if you are really stupid enough to bet on them happening.

I don't bet on wishful thinking. Especially when reading posts by people like you, those who continue to support a megalomaniac; by 2024 we will be very lucky if we as a nation survive four more years of Trumpism.

Trump has not created the economic recovery which began six months into the first Obama Administration. This is one more of many of trumps BIG LIES.

Mexico has not paid for the Wall at our Southern Border. We, the American Taxpayers have paid to repair and replace an already existing wall (one of his new replacement walls fell in a wind storm, BTW); let us not also forget that the billions of money appropriated to improve military bases was taken by trump to try and build more sections of the wall.

He has alienated our allies in NATO, in Ukraine, our NATO Allies were left by him for their military to be attacked by the Russian Bear; in Syria he ordered out forces to fall back and protect an oil field, which left their base to Russian Forces and left the hegemony in the Middle East to Putin.

He failed miserably his promise to repeal and replace Obamacare on day one, and has not done anything but repeal a few parts of Obamacare which only served to deny needy citizens health care they cannot afford.

He has promised, since the tax fraud he signed has come into the light, that he will provide the middle class with a tax cut. What he says can never be believed, it has been reported that he has lied and mislead the public over 15,000 times since his inauguration.

He promised to cut the national debt, and during the last fiscal year he oversaw the deficit balloon to over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS.

I hope that this complete failure as president leads to a massive lose on Nov 3rd next. and hope to see the good people in Kentucky send McConnell home for good.

Hey, who ever said that cleaning up the mess sick politicians had made for the last 30+ years would be purdy ??

All I can say is that there is a new Sheriff in town, and his name is Trump.. MAGA.

Your sheriff is all for Law and Order, yet justice seems not to be on his agenda. Leading his biddable fools at rallies, all yelling, "lock her up" goes well beyond our system of jurisprudence, but I guess you don't care. Do you also salute your sheriff with a stiff right arm at 45 degrees and the palm of the right hand down? Seems so, metaphorically.

You got nothing but babbel in your rebuttal....What did somebody strike a nerve ? LOL.

We know who the anti-Americans are in this country, and it definitely ain't the Trump supporters.

 

[berg80]

IOW, is it a sham only because you don't like the outcome?

It was a sham proceeding and an embarrassment for any country claiming to be governed by the rule of law. Full stop.

 

[beagle9]

Obamacare website cost more than the wall will when completed.

Because Mexico will pay for the wall as promised?

Who cares who pays for it, just as long as it works when finished. Can't say that about Obama care though, because it still don't work after many so called finishes.

 

[beagle9]

IOW, is it a sham only because you don't like the outcome?

It was a sham proceeding and an embarrassment for any country claiming to be governed by the rule of law. Full stop.

Yes the house impeachement was. Thanks

 

[berg80]

We know who the anti-Americans are in this country, and it definitely ain't the Trump supporters.

It's "anti-American" for the prez to purge anyone from the government who tells the truth about him, investigated him, or reports to Congress that Putin is once again working to elect him.

 

[Weatherman2020]

We know who the anti-Americans are in this country, and it definitely ain't the Trump supporters.

It's "anti-American" for the prez to purge anyone from the government who tells the truth about him, investigated him, or reports to Congress that Putin is once again working to elect him.

Hilarious. Flee Amerikkka while you still can.

 

[berg80]

Obamacare website cost more than the wall will when completed.

Because Mexico will pay for the wall as promised?

Who cares who pays for it, just as long as it works when finished. Can't say that about Obama care though, because it still don't work after many so called finishes.

There is absolutely no evidence the wall will work, quite to the contrary. Don't you get it's just a physical embodiment of Trump's bigotry and a monument to his ignorance?
As for the ACA, we'll never know if it could have worked better than it already has given the GOP, now POT, sabotage of the bill since its inception.

Solid Majority Still Opposes New Construction on Border Wall
Solid Majority Still Opposes New Construction on Border Wall

Despite Republican efforts, ACA popularity reaches new high
Despite Republican efforts, ACA popularity reaches new high

 

[beagle9]

We know who the anti-Americans are in this country, and it definitely ain't the Trump supporters.

It's "anti-American" for the prez to purge anyone from the government who tells the truth about him, investigated him, or reports to Congress that Putin is once again working to elect him.

LOL... Well then lock him up.. Oh wait you don't have a crime just like you didn't with the house impeachement bullcrap. LOL

 

[beagle9]

Obamacare website cost more than the wall will when completed.

Because Mexico will pay for the wall as promised?

Who cares who pays for it, just as long as it works when finished. Can't say that about Obama care though, because it still don't work after many so called finishes.

There is absolutely no evidence the wall will work, quite to the contrary. Don't you get it's just a physical embodiment of Trump's bigotry and a monument to his ignorance?
As for the ACA, we'll never know if it could have worked better than it already has given the GOP, now POT, sabotage of the bill since its inception.

The only way to not support something, is when the people in mass don't support it. We do have a representative government you know ? Try again, the people hated it, and therefore it would not work.