OohPooPahDoo
Gold Member
Can you speak in complete, coherent thoughts?ladies and gentlemen, i give you the state of climate alarmism. Scientists who knowingly pass off bad information are the norm for you guys. Congrats. In two years your masters will have completely discredited science as a whole. All for a few million in their pockets.
And that is criminal.
To: Gabi hegerl; klaus hasselmann
cc: Prof.dr. Hans von storch; myles allen; francis; reiner schnur; phil jones; tom crowley; nathan gillett; david karoly; jesse kenyon; [email protected]; pennell, william t; tett, simon; ben santer; karl taylor; stott, peter; bamzai, anjuli
subject: Re: Spring meeting
not to be a trouble maker but if we are going to really get into the paleo stuff, maybe someone(s) ought to have another look at manns paper. His statistics were suspect as i remember. For instance, i seem to remember he used, say, 4 eofs as predictors. But he prescreened them and threw one away because it was not useful. Then made a model with the remaining three, ignoring the fact he had originally considered 4 predictors. He never added an artifical skill measure to account for this but based significance on 3 predictors. Might not make any difference. My memory is probably faulty on these issues, but to be completely even handed we ought to be sure we agree with his procedures. Best, tim
and
? Who the fuck is Tim and why should we care?
Yup, that's scientific integrity, right?