Climate Sensitivity per the IPCC

[EMH]

Yeah, just weather in San Fran…nothing to see here.

Scientists detect sign that a crucial ocean current is near collapse — The Washington Post

Ocean currents and wind patterns are weather, not climate, and it takes an IQ over 5 to understand that, which is what is lacking in you...

 

[EMH]

the corrected data

In other words, the data from the instruments does not matter, because if it refutes the Co2 fraud, just fudge it, and otto's beaked birdbrain will be certain it is correct...

LOL!!!!

 

[otto105]

In other words, the data from the instruments does not matter, because if it refutes the Co2 fraud, just fudge it, and otto's beaked birdbrain will be certain it is correct...

LOL!!!!

Hilarious


Fuckup

 

[otto105]

Ocean currents and wind patterns are weather, not climate, and it takes an IQ over 5 to understand that, which is what is lacking in you...

Hilariously wrong fuckup.

The ocean influences weather and climate by storing solar radiation, distributing heat and moisture around the globe, and driving weather systems.​

Don’t you tire of being stupid.

 

[otto105]

In other words, the data from the instruments does not matter, because if it refutes the Co2 fraud, just fudge it, and otto's beaked birdbrain will be certain it is correct...

LOL!!!!

Absolutely not fuckup.

The data clearly showed warming and at a higher level than when it was not being correctly read.

 

[ding]

Absolutely not fuckup.

The data clearly showed warming and at a higher level than when it was not being correctly read.

That's what happens in an interglacial period, dummy.

 

[EMH]

Hilariously wrong fuckup.

The ocean influences weather and climate by storing solar radiation, distributing heat and moisture around the globe, and driving weather systems.​

Don’t you tire of being stupid.

LOL!!!

So if the oceans are "warming" and have been for a hundred plus years....

WHY IS THE STRONGEST DECADE FOR CANES STILL THE 1940s?

LOL!!!!

SOMETHING IS WRONG, AND IT IS NOT THE CANE DATA.... IT IS THE LACK OF ANY OCEAN WARMING AT ALL....

 

[EMH]

data clearly showed warming

LIAR

The highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING despite rising Co2.

The FUDGE JOB was absolutely laughable. Your side has NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2

 

[otto105]

That's what happens in an interglacial period, dummy.

Your denial ignorance has already been noted.

 

[otto105]

LOL!!!

So if the oceans are "warming" and have been for a hundred plus years....

WHY IS THE STRONGEST DECADE FOR CANES STILL THE 1940s?

LOL!!!!

SOMETHING IS WRONG, AND IT IS NOT THE CANE DATA.... IT IS THE LACK OF ANY OCEAN WARMING AT ALL....

Still in denial of basic climate science eh fuckup.

 

[otto105]

LIAR

The highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING despite rising Co2.

The FUDGE JOB was absolutely laughable. Your side has NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2

Post your article from 2006 and read it very slowly this time fuckup.

 

[ding]

Your denial ignorance has already been noted.

The present temperature is 2C cooler with 120 ppm more atmospheric CO2 than the previous interglacial.

 

[otto105]

The present temperature is 2C cooler than the previous interglacial period with 120 ppm more atmospheric CO2.

Hilarious.

So, according to you. The last interglacial period was 3 million years ago. 3 million years ago was the last time CO2 was 420ppm.


Fucking idiot.

 

[ding]

Hilarious.

So, according to you. The last interglacial period was 3 million years ago. 3 million years ago was the last time CO2 was 420ppm.


Fucking idiot.

 

[otto105]

View attachment 808282

Sure, right back to catalyst drivers such as volanic activity.

A Graphical History of Atmospheric CO2 Levels Over Time | Earth.Org

Again, try to use science fuckup.

 

[otto105]

View attachment 808282

Also, according to this graph there is a serious correlation between rising CO2 and temperature.

Just where do you think that red line is headed.

 

[otto105]

We are watching the brutal reality of what climate scientists told us would happen. How will we respond? — Guardian US

 

[ding]

We are watching the brutal reality of what climate scientists told us would happen. How will we respond? — Guardian US

Tell me how bad it will get.

 

[ding]

Sure, right back to catalyst drivers such as volanic activity.

A Graphical History of Atmospheric CO2 Levels Over Time | Earth.Org

Again, try to use science fuckup.

Will there be supercanes?

 

[ding]

Also, according to this graph there is a serious correlation between rising CO2 and temperature.

Just where do you think that red line is headed.

Will it get so hot that your bung hole will invert?