Climate "Science" Question

Discussion in 'Environment' started by CrusaderFrank, Feb 16, 2012.

  1. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,228
    Thanks Received:
    14,913
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,015
    How does global warming both cause CO2 to leech out of the oceans in a "Feedback loop", but simultaneously make the oceans absorb more CO2, turning them acidic?

    "Warmer oceans release CO2 faster than thought"

    Warmer oceans release CO2 faster than thought - environment - 25 April 2011 - New Scientist

    "Carbon emissions creating acidic oceans not seen since dinosaurs"

    Carbon emissions creating acidic oceans not seen since dinosaurs | Environment | guardian.co.uk

    "A lie ain't a side of a story. It's just a lie."
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2012
  2. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,474
    Thanks Received:
    5,416
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,318
  3. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    31,748
    Thanks Received:
    4,242
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +8,156
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2012
  4. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,564
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,673
    When I run the bathwater too long, the tub overflows and I lose water, but there's still enough there to get wet.
     
  5. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,228
    Thanks Received:
    14,913
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,015
    I asked about CO2 and the article you didn't read, yet posted anyway, talked about Carbon.

    You know that C and CO2 are different, right?

    Also, it had no answer to the OP.

    Skookerasbill will give you your report card for your answer when he's on
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2012
  6. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,228
    Thanks Received:
    14,913
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,015
    Unlike your fellow Warmers who linked articles they didn't read that don't address the OP, you just needed to make a glib statement that also fails to address the OP.
     
  7. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,228
    Thanks Received:
    14,913
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,015
    From one of your linked to and obviously unread articles, "How much will global atmospheric temperatures change over the next century? Two kinds of problems make this an exceptionally difficult question to answer. (See “Sample Forecasts of Future Temperature Change” on this site for some possible answers.) First, the enormous complexity of the earth’s dynamic climate system—including the interacting air masses, winds and, ocean currents, and patterns of evaporation and precipitation—makes long-term climate prediction extremely problematic."

    "The oceans play a key role in regulating the earth’s climate—and yet they remain mysterious, because so many of the basic processes underlying ocean dynamics are still poorly understood. "

    "Increases in the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could promote plant growth. If the planet’s vegetation grows stronger and more widespread, it could take in more of the atmospheric carbon dioxide"

    They admit there's too many variables. It's refreshing when you get a grain of truth.

    You read the articles before you posted them, right? You can't possibly be THAT fucking stupid can you?
     
  8. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,228
    Thanks Received:
    14,913
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,015
    Oops, did none of you read the articles you linked to?
     
  9. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,217
    Thanks Received:
    2,913
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,221

    [​IMG]


    Frank......they dont even bother to read this stuff. They reject information. It is the way of the far left. If it doesnt fit their ideology, no matter how applicable, new information becomes a target.......to be decimated any way possible. These are the same people who loath the 1st ammendment and do anything they can to shut the free exchange of imformation.

    Frank........these people who coordinate these global climate summits? If you show up with research that counters in any way, the annointed view, you are prohibited from participation. And these people call themselves "scientists". Its beyond laughable.

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/27/warmists-deny-copenhagen-access-to-polar-bear-scientist/
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2012
  10. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,228
    Thanks Received:
    14,913
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,015
    OK! You have to fucking warn me before you do that again...that was hysterical!!!
     

Share This Page